title: Rumen Bacterial Community Composition in Holstein and Jersey Cows Is Different under Same Dietary Condition and Is Not Affected by Sampling Method.
abstract: The rumen microbial community in dairy cows plays a critical role in efficient milk production. However, there is a lack of data comparing the composition of the rumen bacterial community of the main dairy breeds. This study utilizes 16S rRNA gene sequencing to describe the rumen bacterial community composition in Holstein and Jersey cows fed the same diet by sampling the rumen microbiota via the rumen cannula (Holstein cows) or esophageal tubing (both Holstein and Jersey cows). After collection of the rumen sample via esophageal tubing, particles attached to the strainer were added to the sample to ensure representative sampling of both the liquid and solid fraction of the rumen contents. Alpha diversity metrics, Chao1 and observed OTUs estimates, displayed higher (P = 0.02) bacterial richness in Holstein compared to Jersey cows and no difference (P > 0.70) in bacterial community richness due to sampling method. The principal coordinate analysis displayed distinct clustering of bacterial communities by breed suggesting that Holstein and Jersey cows harbor different rumen bacterial communities. Family level classification of most abundant (>1%) differential OTUs displayed that OTUs from the bacterial families Lachnospiraceae and p-2534-18B5 to be predominant in Holstein cows compared to Jersey cows. Additionally, OTUs belonging to family Prevotellaceae were differentially abundant in the two breeds. Overall, the results from this study suggest that the bacterial community between Holstein and Jersey cows differ and that esophageal tubing with collection of feed particles associated with the strainer provides a representative rumen sample similar to a sample collected via the rumen cannula. Thus, in future studies esophageal tubing with addition of retained particles can be used to collect rumen samples reducing the cost of cannulation and increasing the number of animals used in microbiome investigations, thus increasing the statistical power of rumen microbial community evaluations.
authors.affiliation: Department of Animal Science, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln NE, USA.
authors.forename: Henry A
authors.initials: HA
authors.lastname: Paz
authors.affiliation: Department of Animal Science, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, LincolnNE, USA; School of Biological Sciences, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, LincolnNE, USA.
authors.forename: Christopher L
authors.initials: CL
authors.lastname: Anderson
authors.affiliation: Department of Animal Science, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln NE, USA.
authors.forename: Makala J
authors.initials: MJ
authors.lastname: Muller
authors.affiliation: Department of Animal Science, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln NE, USA.
authors.forename: Paul J
authors.initials: PJ
authors.lastname: Kononoff
authors.affiliation: Department of Animal Science, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, LincolnNE, USA; School of Biological Sciences, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, LincolnNE, USA; Department of Food Science and Technology, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, LincolnNE, USA.
authors.forename: Samodha C
authors.initials: SC
authors.lastname: Fernando
keywords: Holstein cow; Jersey cow; esophageal tubing; rumen bacterial community; rumen cannula; rumen sample