title: [Navigation in implantology: Accuracy assessment regarding the literature].
abstract: Our objective was to assess the literature regarding the accuracy of the different static guided systems. After applying electronic literature search we found 661 articles. After reviewing 139 articles, the authors chose 52 articles for full-text evaluation. 24 studies involved accuracy measurements. Fourteen of our selected references were clinical and ten of them were in vitro (modell or cadaver). Variance-analysis (Tukey's post-hoc test; p < 0.05) was conducted to summarize the selected publications. Regarding 2819 results the average mean error at the entry point was 0.98 mm. At the level of the apex the average deviation was 1.29 mm while the mean of the angular deviation was 3,96 degrees. Significant difference could be observed between the two methods of implant placement (partially and fully guided sequence) in terms of deviation at the entry point, apex and angular deviation. Different levels of quality and quantity of evidence were available for assessing the accuracy of the different computer-assisted implant placement. The rapidly evolving field of digital dentistry and the new developments will further improve the accuracy of guided implant placement. In the interest of being able to draw dependable conclusions and for the further evaluation of the parameters used for accuracy measurements, randomized, controlled single or multi-centered clinical trials are necessary.
authors.forename: Ibrahim Ádám
authors.initials: IÁ
authors.lastname: Barrak
authors.forename: Endre
authors.initials: E
authors.lastname: Varga
authors.forename: József
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Piffko
mesh_terms: D003758:Dental Implantation, Endosseous / Q000379:methods; D015921:Dental Implants; D003813:Dentistry / Q000379:methods / Q000639:trends*; D006801:Humans; D021621:Imaging, Three-Dimensional
chemical_list: D015921:Dental Implants