title: Resuming the discussion of AMSTAR: What can (should) be made better?
abstract: Evidence syntheses, and in particular systematic reviews (SRs), have become one of the cornerstones of evidence-based health care. The Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews (AMSTAR) tool has become the most widely used tool for investigating the methodological quality of SRs and is currently undergoing revision. The objective of this paper is to present insights, challenges and potential solutions from the point of view of a group of assessors, while referring to earlier methodological discussions and debates with respect to AMSTAR.
  
  
  
  One major drawback of AMSTAR is that it relies heavily on reporting quality rather than on methodological quality. This can be found in several items. Furthermore, it should be acknowledged that there are now new methods and procedures that did not exist when AMSTAR was developed. For example, the note to item 1 should now refer to the International Prospective Register of Ongoing Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO). Furthermore, item 3 should consider the definition of hand-searching, as the process of reviewing conference proceedings using the search function (e.g. in Microsoft Word or in a PDF file) does not meet the definition set out by the Cochrane Collaboration. Moreover, methods for assessing the quality of the body of evidence have evolved since AMSTAR was developed and should be incorporated into a revised AMSTAR tool. Potential solutions are presented for each AMSTAR item with the aim of allowing a more thorough assessment of SRs. As the AMSTAR tool is currently undergoing further development, our paper hopes to add to preceding discussions and papers regarding this tool and stimulate further discussion.
authors: Federal Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (BAuA), Nöldnerstr. 40-42, 10317, Berlin, Germany.
authors: Uta
authors: U
authors: Wegewitz
authors: Federal Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (BAuA), Nöldnerstr. 40-42, 10317, Berlin, Germany.
authors: Beate
authors: B
authors: Weikert
authors: Federal Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (BAuA), Nöldnerstr. 40-42, 10317, Berlin, Germany.
authors: Alba
authors: A
authors: Fishta
authors: The Federal Joint Committee (G-BA), Wegelystr. 8, 10623, Berlin, Germany.
authors: Anja
authors: A
authors: Jacobs
authors: Institute for Research in Operative Medicine, Witten/Herdecke University, Ostmerheimer Str. 200 (Building 38), 51109, Cologne, Germany. dawid.pieper@uni-wh.de.
authors: Dawid
authors: D
authors: Pieper
mesh_terms: D035843:Biomedical Research; D006801:Humans; D017594:Publication Bias; D058996:Quality Improvement; D012196:Review Literature as Topic
keywords: Decision making; Evidence-Based Medicine; Methods; Systematic review