title: After phrenology: Time for a paradigm shift in cognitive science.
abstract: Anderson (2014) uses an impressive, consolidating review of the literature to argue for major changes in cognitive science. Arguably, however, much of what he proposes is not particularly new. He also neglects important predictive coding approaches that call his perspective of the brain into question, and his misconstrual of evolutionary psychology devalues an influential paradigm that promises to complement his own.
authors: Melbourne School of Psychological Sciences,The University of Melbourne,Melbourne,Australia,3010.pbadcock@unimelb.edu.au.
authors: Paul Benjamin
authors: PB
authors: Badcock
authors: Department of Psychology,University of Amsterdam,1018 XA Amsterdam,The Netherlands.a.ploeger@uva.nlhttp://www.uva.nl/profiel/a.ploeger.
authors: Annemie
authors: A
authors: Ploeger
authors: Department of Psychology,University of Oregon,Eugene,OR 97403.nallen3@uoregon.eduhttp://psychology.uoregon.edu/profile/nallen3/
authors: Nicholas Brian
authors: NB
authors: Allen
mesh_terms: D019336:Cognitive Science / Q000639:trends*; D006801:Humans; D010792:Phrenology