title: Bacterial Quorum Sensing Stabilizes Cooperation by Optimizing Growth Strategies.
abstract: Communication has been suggested as a mechanism to stabilize cooperation. In bacteria, chemical communication, termed quorum sensing (QS), has been hypothesized to fill this role, and extracellular public goods are often induced by QS at high cell densities. Here we show, with the bacterium Vibrio harveyi, that QS provides strong resistance against invasion of a QS defector strain by maximizing the cellular growth rate at low cell densities while achieving maximum productivity through protease upregulation at high cell densities. In contrast, QS mutants that act as defectors or unconditional cooperators maximize either the growth rate or the growth yield, respectively, and thus are less fit than the wild-type QS strain. Our findings provide experimental evidence that regulation mediated by microbial communication can optimize growth strategies and stabilize cooperative phenotypes by preventing defector invasion, even under well-mixed conditions. This effect is due to a combination of responsiveness to environmental conditions provided by QS, lowering of competitive costs when QS is not induced, and pleiotropic constraints imposed on defectors that do not perform QS.
  
  
  
  Cooperation is a fundamental problem for evolutionary biology to explain. Conditional participation through phenotypic plasticity driven by communication is a potential solution to this dilemma. Thus, among bacteria, QS has been proposed to be a proximate stabilizing mechanism for cooperative behaviors. Here, we empirically demonstrate that QS in V. harveyi prevents cheating and subsequent invasion by nonproducing defectors by maximizing the growth rate at low cell densities and the growth yield at high cell densities, whereas an unconditional cooperator is rapidly driven to extinction by defectors. Our findings provide experimental evidence that QS regulation prevents the invasion of cooperative populations by QS defectors even under unstructured conditions, and they strongly support the role of communication in bacteria as a mechanism that stabilizes cooperative traits.
authors: Department of Microbiology and Molecular Genetics, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, USA BEACON Center for the Study of Evolution in Action, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, USA.
authors: Eric L
authors: EL
authors: Bruger
authors: Department of Microbiology and Molecular Genetics, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, USA BEACON Center for the Study of Evolution in Action, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, USA watersc3@msu.edu.
authors: Christopher M
authors: CM
authors: Waters
mesh_terms: D015964:Gene Expression Regulation, Bacterial; D056084:Genetic Fitness; D005838:Genotype; D009154:Mutation; D010447:Peptide Hydrolases / Q000235:genetics / Q000378:metabolism; D010641:Phenotype; D053038:Quorum Sensing; D014733:Vibrio / Q000235:genetics / Q000254:growth & development* / Q000502:physiology*
chemical_list: D010447:Peptide Hydrolases