title: Reporting provider performance: what can be learned from the experience of multi-stakeholder community coalitions?
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  This analysis assessed the evolution of public reporting of provider performance in Aligning Forces for Quality (AF4Q) alliances, contrasted alliances that stopped reporting with those that plan to continue, and drew insights from alliance public reporting efforts for the national transparency movement.
  
  
  METHODS
  Combined with document review, qualitative research methods were used to analyze interview data collected, over a nearly 10-year period, from the 16 participating alliances.
  
  
  RESULTS
  AF4Q alliances made their greatest contributions to provider transparency in reporting ambulatory quality and patient experience measures. However, reporting ambulatory cost/efficiency/utilization measures was more challenging for alliances. Alliances contributed the least with respect to measures of inpatient performance. Six alliances ceased reporting at the end of the AF4Q program because of their inability to develop stable funding sources and overcome stakeholder skepticism about the value of public reporting. Insights provided by alliance leaders included the need to: focus on provider, rather than consumer, responses to public reports as the most likely avenue for improving quality; address the challenge of funding the reporting infrastructure from the beginning; explore collaborations with other entities to increase public reporting efficiency; and develop a strategy for responding to efforts at the national level to increase the availability of information on provider performance.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  The AF4Q initiative demonstrated that a wide variety of voluntary stakeholder coalitions could develop public reports with financial and technical support. However, the contents of these reports varied considerably, reflecting differences in local environments and alliance strategies. The challenges faced by alliances to maintain their reporting efforts were substantial, and not all alliances chose to report. Nevertheless, there are potential roles for alliances going forward in contributing to the national transparency movement.
authors: chris001@umn.edu.
authors: Jon B
authors: JB
authors: Christianson
authors: Bethany W
authors: BW
authors: Shaw
authors: Jessica
authors: J
authors: Greene
authors: Dennis P
authors: DP
authors: Scanlon
mesh_terms: D003153:Community Health Services / Q000592:standards* / Q000706:statistics & numerical data / Q000639:trends; D003256:Community Participation; D005544:Forecasting; D006801:Humans; D000070516:Intersectoral Collaboration; D058996:Quality Improvement / Q000592:standards* / Q000706:statistics & numerical data / Q000639:trends*; D014481:United States