title: Validation of a multi-criteria evaluation model for animal welfare.
abstract: The aim of this paper was to validate an alternative multi-criteria evaluation system to assess animal welfare on farms based on the Welfare Quality® (WQ) project, using an example of welfare assessment of growing pigs. This alternative methodology aimed to be more transparent for stakeholders and more flexible than the methodology proposed by WQ. The WQ assessment protocol for growing pigs was implemented to collect data in different farms in Schleswig-Holstein, Germany. In total, 44 observations were carried out. The aggregation system proposed in the WQ protocol follows a three-step aggregation process. Measures are aggregated into criteria, criteria into principles and principles into an overall assessment. This study focussed on the first two steps of the aggregation. Multi-attribute utility theory (MAUT) was used to produce a value of welfare for each criterion and principle. The utility functions and the aggregation function were constructed in two separated steps. The MACBETH (Measuring Attractiveness by a Categorical-Based Evaluation Technique) method was used for utility function determination and the Choquet integral (CI) was used as an aggregation operator. The WQ decision-makers' preferences were fitted in order to construct the utility functions and to determine the CI parameters. The validation of the MAUT model was divided into two steps, first, the results of the model were compared with the results of the WQ project at criteria and principle level, and second, a sensitivity analysis of our model was carried out to demonstrate the relative importance of welfare measures in the different steps of the multi-criteria aggregation process. Using the MAUT, similar results were obtained to those obtained when applying the WQ protocol aggregation methods, both at criteria and principle level. Thus, this model could be implemented to produce an overall assessment of animal welfare in the context of the WQ protocol for growing pigs. Furthermore, this methodology could also be used as a framework in order to produce an overall assessment of welfare for other livestock species. Two main findings are obtained from the sensitivity analysis, first, a limited number of measures had a strong influence on improving or worsening the level of welfare at criteria level and second, the MAUT model was not very sensitive to an improvement in or a worsening of single welfare measures at principle level. The use of weighted sums and the conversion of disease measures into ordinal scores should be reconsidered.
authors: 1Institut für Tierzucht und Tierhaltung,Christian-Albrechts-Universität,Olshausenstr. 40,24098 Kiel,Germany.
authors: P
authors: P
authors: Martín
authors: 1Institut für Tierzucht und Tierhaltung,Christian-Albrechts-Universität,Olshausenstr. 40,24098 Kiel,Germany.
authors: I
authors: I
authors: Czycholl
authors: 2Departmento de Producción Animal,ETSIA,Universidad Politécnica de Madrid,Ciudad Universitaria,s/n, 28040 Madrid,Spain.
authors: C
authors: C
authors: Buxadé
authors: 1Institut für Tierzucht und Tierhaltung,Christian-Albrechts-Universität,Olshausenstr. 40,24098 Kiel,Germany.
authors: J
authors: J
authors: Krieter
mesh_terms: D000827:Animal Welfare / Q000592:standards*; D000818:Animals; D005858:Germany; D058751:Livestock; D008962:Models, Theoretical; D013552:Swine / Q000502:physiology*
keywords: Welfare Quality®
              ; growing pigs; multi-criteria evaluation