title: Invited Commentary: Beware the Test-Negative Design.
abstract: In this issue of the Journal, Sullivan et al. (Am J Epidemiol. 2016;184(5):345-353) carefully examine the theoretical justification for use of the test-negative design, a common observational study design, in assessing the effectiveness of influenza vaccination. Using modern causal inference methods (in particular, directed acyclic graphs), they describe different threats to the validity of inferences drawn about the effect of vaccination from test-negative design studies. These threats include confounding, selection bias, and measurement error in either the exposure or the outcome. While confounding and measurement error are common in observational studies, the potential for selection bias inherent in the test-negative design brings into question the validity of inferences drawn from such studies.
authors: Daniel
authors: D
authors: Westreich
authors: Michael G
authors: MG
authors: Hudgens
mesh_terms: D006801:Humans; D012107:Research Design; D015983:Selection Bias
keywords: confounding; epidemiologic methods; influenza vaccine; selection bias; test-negative study design