Preferred Compression Speed for Speech and Music and Its Relationship to Sensitivity to Temporal Fine Structure.
Multichannel amplitude compression is widely used in hearing aids. The preferred compression speed varies across individuals. Moore (2008) suggested that reduced sensitivity to temporal fine structure (TFS) may be associated with preference for slow compression. This idea was tested using a simulated hearing aid. It was also assessed whether preferences for compression speed depend on the type of stimulus: speech or music. Twenty-two hearing-impaired subjects were tested, and the stimulated hearing aid was fitted individually using the CAM2A method. On each trial, a given segment of speech or music was presented twice. One segment was processed with fast compression and the other with slow compression, and the order was balanced across trials. The subject indicated which segment was preferred and by how much. On average, slow compression was preferred over fast compression, more so for music, but there were distinct individual differences, which were highly correlated for speech and music. Sensitivity to TFS was assessed using the difference limen for frequency at 2000 Hz and by two measures of sensitivity to interaural phase at low frequencies. The results for the difference limens for frequency, but not the measures of sensitivity to interaural phase, supported the suggestion that preference for compression speed is affected by sensitivity to TFS.
Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Cambridge, UK bcjm@cam.ac.uk.
Brian C J
BC
Moore
Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Cambridge, UK Institute of Acoustics, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznan, Poland.
Aleksander
A
Sęk
D000161:Acoustic Stimulation; D006310:Hearing Aids; D006319:Hearing Loss, Sensorineural; D006801:Humans; D009146:Music; D013060:Speech; D013067:Speech Perception
compression speed; hearing aids; temporal fine structure