The role of scientists in statutory interpretation of the U.S. Endangered Species Act.
Like many federal statutes, the U.S. Endangered Species Act (ESA) contains vague or ambiguous language. The meaning imparted to the ESA's unclear language can profoundly impact the fates of endangered and threatened species. Hence, conservation scientists should contribute to the interpretation of the ESA when vague or ambiguous language contains scientific words or refers to scientific concepts. Scientists need to know at least these 2 facts about statutory interpretation: statutory interpretation is subjective and the potential influence of normative values results in different expectations for the parties involved. With the possible exception of judges, all conventional participants in statutory interpretation are serving their own interests, advocating for their preferred policies, or biased. Hence, scientists can play a unique role by informing the interpretative process with objective, policy-neutral information. Conversely, scientists may act as advocates for their preferred interpretation of unclear statutory language. The different roles scientists might play in statutory interpretation raise the issues of advocacy and competency. Advocating for a preferred statutory interpretation is legitimate political behavior by scientists, but statutory interpretation can be strongly influenced by normative values. Therefore, scientists must be careful not to commit stealth policy advocacy. Most conservation scientists lack demonstrable competence in statutory interpretation and therefore should consult or collaborate with lawyers when interpreting statutes. Professional scientific societies are widely perceived by the public as unbiased sources of objective information. Therefore, professional scientific societies should remain policy neutral and present all interpretations of unclear statutory language; explain the semantics and science both supporting and contradicting each interpretation; and describe the potential consequences of implementing each interpretation. A review of scientists' interpretations of the phrase "significant portion of its range" in the ESA is used to critique the role of scientists and professional societies in statutory interpretation.
Habitat Program, Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife, 600 Capitol Way North, Olympia, WA, 98501, U.S.A.
George F
GF
Wilhere
D000818:Animals; D003247:Conservation of Natural Resources / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence*; D056727:Endangered Species; D006801:Humans; D057766:Policy; D024382:Professional Role; D012586:Science; D012958:Societies, Scientific
Abogacía politica; Acta de Especies en Peligro de Extinción; Endangered Species Act; SPOIR; environmental law; interpretación de la ley; ley del medio ambiente; policy advocacy; porción significativa de su extensión; significant portion of its range; statutory interpretation