IVF, same-sex couples and the value of biological ties.
Ought parents, in general, to value being biologically tied to their children? Is it important, in particular, that both parents be biologically tied to their children? I will address these fundamental questions by looking at a fairly new practice within IVF treatments, so-called IVF-with-ROPA (Reception of Oocytes from Partner), which allows lesbian couples to 'share motherhood', with one partner providing the eggs while the other becomes pregnant. I believe that IVF-with-ROPA is, just like other IVF treatments, morally permissible, but here I argue that the increased biological ties which IVF-with-ROPA allows for do not have any particular value beside the satisfaction of a legitimate wish, because there is no intrinsic value in a biological tie between parents and children; further, I argue that equality within parental projects cannot be achieved by redistributing biological ties.
Ezio
E
Di Nucci
D001695:Biology; D002648:Child; D033001:Directed Tissue Donation; D005190:Family; D005260:Female; D005307:Fertilization in Vitro / Q000379:methods*; D018452:Homosexuality, Female; D006801:Humans; D009035:Mothers; D009865:Oocytes; D010290:Parents; D011247:Pregnancy; D012098:Reproduction; D012747:Sexual Partners; D012945:Social Values; D014019:Tissue Donors
Reproductive Medicine