How Is RAN Related to Reading Fluency? A Comprehensive Examination of the Prominent Theoretical Accounts.
We examined the prominent theoretical explanations of the RAN-reading relationship in a relatively transparent language (Greek) in a sample of children (n = 286) followed from Grade 1 to Grade 2. Specifically, we tested the fit of eight different models, as defined by the type of reading performance predicted (oral vs. silent word reading fluency), the type of RAN tasks (non-alphanumeric vs. alphanumeric), and the RAN effects (direct vs. indirect). Working memory, attention, processing speed, and motor skills were used as "common cause" variables predicting both RAN and reading fluency and phonological awareness and orthographic processing were used as mediators of RAN's effects on reading fluency. The findings of both concurrent and longitudinal analyses indicated that RAN is a unique predictor of oral reading fluency, but not silent reading fluency. Using alphanumeric or non-alphanumeric RAN did not particularly affect the RAN-reading relationship. Both phonological awareness and orthographic processing partly mediated RAN's effects on reading fluency. Theoretical implications of these findings are discussed.
Psychology, Center for Applied Neuroscience, University of Cyprus Nicosia, Cyprus.
Timothy C
TC
Papadopoulos
Psychology, Center for Applied Neuroscience, University of Cyprus Nicosia, Cyprus.
George C
GC
Spanoudis
Educational Psychology, J. P. DAS Developmental Disabilities Centre, University of Alberta Edmonton, AB, Canada.
George K
GK
Georgiou
Greek; longitudinal; rapid automatized naming; reading fluency