Postoperative pain assessment in hospitalised patients: National survey and secondary data analysis.
BACKGROUND
Measuring pain is important for the adequate pain management of postoperative patients. The actual compliance with pain assessment in postoperative patients after implementation of a national safety program is unknown.


OBJECTIVE
The aim of this study is to examine the compliance with pain assessment in postoperative patients after implementation of a national safety program, according to the national quality indicators for pain assessment in postoperative patients. Furthermore, organisational factors associated with this compliance were determined.


METHODS
In this study, two data sources were used: 1) data from an evaluation study of the Dutch Hospital Patient Safety Program; and 2) data from a questionnaire survey.


METHODS
The compliance with two different pain process indicators was determined: 1) 3 pain measurements a day, all three full days after surgery; and 2) ≥1 pain measurement a day, all three full days after surgery. Multilevel logistic regression analysis was used to investigate the association between organisational factors in hospitals and compliance with pain process indicators.


RESULTS
Data of 3895 patient records from 16 hospitals was included in this study. In 12% of the postoperative patients, pain was measured 3 times a day, all three full days after surgery. In 53% of the postoperative patients, pain was measured ≥1 time a day, all three full days after surgery. Compliance was highest in general hospitals compared to tertiary teaching and academic hospitals, and was statistically significantly higher at the surgery and surgical oncology department compared to the other departments.


CONCLUSIONS
Low compliance was shown with pain assessment in postoperative patients, according to the process indicator pain after surgery in Dutch hospitals. This suggests that the implementation of measuring pain in hospitals is still insufficient.
NIVEL, Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research, PO Box 1568, 3500 BN Utrecht, The Netherlands. Electronic address: jannekeschilp@hotmail.com.
J
J
Hoogervorst-Schilp
Department of Anesthesiology Pain & Palliative Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, PO Box 9101, intern 549, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. Electronic address: rianne.vanboekel@radboudumc.nl.
R L M
RL
van Boekel
Department of Operations, Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Groningen, PO box 72, 9700 AB, Groningen, The Netherlands. Electronic address: c.de.blok@rug.nl.
C
C
de Blok
Department of Anesthesiology Pain & Palliative Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, PO Box 9101, intern 549, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. Electronic address: monique.steegers@radboudumc.nl.
M A H
MA
Steegers
NIVEL, Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research, PO Box 1568, 3500 BN Utrecht, The Netherlands. Electronic address: p.spreeuwenberg@nivel.nl.
P
P
Spreeuwenberg
NIVEL, Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research, PO Box 1568, 3500 BN Utrecht, The Netherlands. Electronic address: c.wagner@nivel.nl.
C
C
Wagner
D005260:Female; D006761:Hospitals; D006801:Humans; D007297:Inpatients; D016015:Logistic Models; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D010147:Pain Measurement; D010149:Postoperative Pain / Q000175:diagnosis*; D010349:Patient Compliance; D011184:Postoperative Period; D011795:Surveys and Questionnaires
Compliance; Health care; Hospitals; Pain; Pain measurement; Postoperative; Quality indicators