The evolution of monogamy in response to partner scarcity.
The evolution of monogamy and paternal care in humans is often argued to have resulted from the needs of our expensive offspring. Recent research challenges this claim, however, contending that promiscuous male competitors and the risk of cuckoldry limit the scope for the evolution of male investment. So how did monogamy first evolve? Links between mating strategies and partner availability may offer resolution. While studies of sex roles commonly assume that optimal mating rates for males are higher, fitness payoffs to monogamy and the maintenance of a single partner can be greater when partners are rare. Thus, partner availability is increasingly recognized as a key variable structuring mating behavior. To apply these recent insights to human evolution, we model three male strategies - multiple mating, mate guarding and paternal care - in response to partner availability. Under assumed ancestral human conditions, we find that male mate guarding, rather than paternal care, drives the evolution of monogamy, as it secures a partner and ensures paternity certainty in the face of more promiscuous competitors. Accordingly, we argue that while paternal investment may be common across human societies, current patterns should not be confused with the reason pairing first evolved.
Department of Anthropology, University of Utah 270S 1400 E, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA.
Ryan
R
Schacht
Department of Anthropology, University of Utah 270S 1400 E, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA.
Adrian V
AV
Bell
D000818:Animals; D005075:Biological Evolution; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D012098:Reproduction / Q000502:physiology; D043762:Reproductive Behavior / Q000502:physiology*; D012725:Sexual Behavior / Q000502:physiology*; D012726:Sexual Behavior, Animal / Q000502:physiology*; D012747:Sexual Partners