The role of outpatient visit after operative treatment of ankle fractures.
It is a common practice that patients have a scheduled follow-up visit with radiographs following ankle fracture surgery. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether an early outpatient visit (<3 weeks) after ankle fracture surgery resulted in a change in patient management. For this study, 878 consecutive operatively treated ankle fracture patients with an early outpatient clinical-radiological visit were reviewed. The outcome measure was a change in treatment plan defined as any procedure, medication, or surgical intervention that is not typically implemented during the uncomplicated healing process of an acute fracture. A change in treatment plan was observed in 9.8% of operatively treated ankle fracture patients. The mean age of the patients was 48 years and the mean follow-up time was 64 months. Of the changes in treatment plan, 91% were exclusively due to clinical findings such as infection. Only three of 878 patients required a change in their treatment plan based merely on the findings of the radiographs taken at the outpatient visit. Only 37% of the patients requiring a change in their postoperative management had solicited an unanticipated visit before the scheduled outpatient visit due to clinical problems such as infection or a cast-related issue. Our study showed that every tenth operatively treated ankle fracture patient requires a change in their treatment plan due to a clinical problem such as infection or a cast-related issue. Although at hospital discharge all patients are provided with written instructions on where to contact if problems related to the operated ankle emerge, only one third of the patients are aware of the clinically alarming symptoms and seek care when problems present. Our findings do not support obtaining routine radiographs at the early outpatient visit in an ankle fracture patient without clinical signs of a complication.
Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland. Electronic address: mikko.ovaska@hus.fi.
Mikko T
MT
Ovaska
Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.
Timo
T
Nuutinen
Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.
Rami
R
Madanat
Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.
Tatu J
TJ
Mäkinen
Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.
Tim
T
Söderlund
D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D000369:Aged, 80 and over; D064386:Ankle Fractures / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging / Q000503:physiopathology / Q000601:surgery*; D002370:Casts, Surgical; D005260:Female; D005387:Finland / Q000453:epidemiology; D005500:Follow-Up Studies; D005593:Fracture Fixation, Internal / Q000534:rehabilitation*; D017102:Fracture Healing; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D009819:Office Visits; D010045:Outpatients; D011182:Postoperative Care / Q000379:methods; D011183:Postoperative Complications / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging*; D011859:Radiography / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D016059:Range of Motion, Articular; D013530:Surgical Wound Infection / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging* / Q000517:prevention & control; D016896:Treatment Outcome; D055815:Young Adult
Ankle fracture; Complication; Control visit; Infection; Radiograph