Lasers for caries removal in deciduous and permanent teeth.
BACKGROUND
Despite considerable improvements in oral health, dental caries continue to be a public health issue. The most frequently used, and universally accepted technique, to remove caries is through mechanical ablation of decayed tissues by means of rotating drills (diamond or tungsten carbide, or both). In the past few decades, the introduction of adhesive filling materials (resin composites) has affected cavity filling procedures by reducing its retention needs, with advantages for dental tissue conservation. Consequently, new minimally invasive strategies were introduced into dental practice, such as the use of lasers to perform highly controlled tissue ablation. Laser use has also raised expectations of limiting pain and discomfort compared to using drills, as well as overcoming drill phobia.


OBJECTIVE
The main objective of the review was to compare the effects of laser-based methods to conventional mechanical methods for removing dental caries in deciduous and permanent teeth.


METHODS
We searched the following electronic databases: Cochrane Oral Health's Trials Register (searched 22 June 2016), Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL; 2016, Issue 5) in the Cochrane Library (searched 22 June 2016), MEDLINE Ovid (1946 to 22 June 2016), Embase Ovid (1980 to 22 June 2016), ProQuest Dissertations and Theses (1980 to 22 June 2016), Zetoc (limited to conference proceedings) (1993 to 22 June 2016), and ISI Web of Knowledge (limited to conference proceedings) (1990 to 22 June 2016). We checked the reference lists of relevant articles to identify additional studies. We searched the US National Institutes of Health Ongoing Trials Register ClinicalTrials.gov and the World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform for ongoing trials.


METHODS
We included randomised controlled trials, split-mouth trials and cluster-randomised trials (irrespective of their language) comparing laser therapy to drill ablation of caries. We included participants of any age (children, adolescents and adults).


METHODS
Two review authors independently screened titles and abstracts of citations identified by the review search strategy. Two review authors independently evaluated the full text of relevant primary studies, assessed risk of bias and extracted data. We used standard methodological procedures expected by Cochrane.


RESULTS
We included nine randomised trials, published between 1998 and 2014, involving 662 participants. The population consisted of both children and adolescents in four trials, only adults in four trials, and both children/adolescents and adults in one trial. Four studies examined only permanent teeth, and five studies evaluated both deciduous and permanent teeth. Six trials used Er:YAG (erbium-doped yttrium aluminium garnet) lasers, two trials employed Er,Cr:YSGG (erbium, chromium: yttrium-scandium-gallium-garnet) lasers, and one trial used Nd:YAG (neodymium-doped yttrium aluminium garnet) laser.Overall, the trials had small sample sizes, and the majority were at unclear or high risk of bias. The primary outcomes were evaluated in a limited number of trials (removal of caries (four trials (but only two reported quantitative data)); episodes of pain (five studies)). There was insufficient evidence to suggest that either lasers or drill were better at caries removal (risk ratio (RR) 1.00, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.99 to 1.01; 2 studies; 256 treated caries; P = 0.75; I2= 0%; low-quality evidence).The incidence of moderate or high pain was greater in the drill group compared to the laser group (RR 0.40, 95% CI 0.28 to 0.57; 2 studies; 143 participants; P < 0.001; I2= 50%). Similarly, the need for anaesthesia was significantly higher in the drill group than in the laser group (RR 0.25, 95% CI 0.10 to 0.65; 3 studies; 217 children/adolescents; P = 0.004; I2= 0%).In terms of marginal integrity of restoration, there was no evidence of a difference between laser and drill comparisons evaluated at 6 months (RR 1.00, 95% CI 0.21 to 4.78; 3 studies), 1 year (RR 1.59, 95% CI 0.34 to 7.38; 2 studies), or 2 years (RR 1.00, 95% CI 0.21 to 4.74; 1 study).There was no evidence of a difference for durability of restoration between laser therapy or drill at 6 months' follow-up (RR 2.40, 95% CI 0.65 to 8.77; 4 studies), at 1 year (RR 1.40, 95% CI 0.29 to 6.78; 2 studies) or at 2 years' follow-up (RR 0.50, 95% CI 0.02 to 14.60; 1 study).Only two trials investigated the recurrence of caries, but no events occurred during 6 months' follow-up.There was insufficient evidence of a difference between laser or drill in terms of pulpal inflammation or necrosis at 1 week (RR 1.51, 95% CI 0.26 to 8.75; 3 studies) and at 6 months (RR 0.99, 95% CI 0.10 to 9.41; 2 studies).


CONCLUSIONS
Given the low quality of the body of evidence, we concluded that evidence was insufficient to support the use of laser as an alternative to traditional drill therapy for caries removal. We found some evidence in favour of laser therapy for pain control, need of anaesthesia and patient discomfort, but, again, the body of evidence was of low quality. Additional well-designed, randomised trials investigating the most relevant outcomes are needed.
Health Planning Service, Regional Health Authority of Umbria, Via Mario Angeloni 61, Perugia, Umbria, Italy, 06124.
Alessandro
A
Montedori
Iosief
I
Abraha
Massimiliano
M
Orso
Potito Giuseppe
PG
D'Errico
Stefano
S
Pagano
Guido
G
Lombardo
Noise Health. 2013 May-Jun;15(64):190-3
23689302
J Am Dent Assoc. 1997 Aug;128(8):1080-7
9260417
J Biomed Opt. 2005 Jan-Feb;10(1):14001
15847582
J Am Dent Assoc. 1984 Aug;109(2):247-51
6590605
Br Dent J. 1996 Apr 20;180(8):287-91
8639369
J Am Dent Assoc. 1993 Feb;124(2):49-54
8429184
J Biomed Opt. 1996 Oct;1(4):455-65
23014790
J Dent. 2012 Oct;40(10):793-801
22687577
Lasers Surg Med. 1999;25(4):335-47
10534750
Dent Clin North Am. 2000 Oct;44(4):955-69, ix
11048282
Bull World Health Organ. 2005 Sep;83(9):661-9
16211157
Lasers Surg Med. 1986;6(4):396-8
3093791
J Clin Laser Med Surg. 1997;15(3):109-15
9612157
Lasers Surg Med. 2011 Sep;43(8):824-32
21956630
Laser Ther. 2015 Oct 2;24(3):189-93
26557733
Lasers Surg Med. 2003;32(1):25-31
12516067
J Dent Res. 2004;83 Spec No C:C39-42
15286120
J Dent. 2011 Feb;39(2):154-62
21111770
Acta Odontol Scand. 2011 Mar;69(2):65-74
21319941
Int J Paediatr Dent. 1992 Apr;2(1):17-24
1525127
J Biomed Opt. 2001 Apr;6(2):231-8
11375734
Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2013 Feb 18;45(1):87-91
23411526
Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 1992 Dec;20(6):368-71
1464234
Lasers Surg Med. 1992;12(6):625-30
1453865
Caries Res. 2004 May-Jun;38(3):305-13
15153704
J Am Dent Assoc. 2003 Aug;134(8):1101-8
12956352
Gen Dent. 2008 Nov-Dec;56(7):653-9; quiz 660-1, 767
19014025
J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2004 Dec;15(12):1323-31
15747185
J Dent Educ. 2001 Oct;65(10):960-8
11699997
BMJ. 2015 May 27;350:h2445
26016488
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2012 Jan 01;13(1):40-7
22430692
Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2005 Jun;33(3):196-204
15853842
Lasers Surg Med. 1989;9(4):338-44
2761329
Lasers Surg Med. 1995;16(2):103-33
7769957
J Dent Educ. 2001 Oct;65(10):1114-20
11699987
J Am Dent Assoc. 1965 Mar;70:601-6
14245324
Intern Emerg Med. 2010 Apr;5(2):151-5
20300879
Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 1998 Oct;26(5):340-3
9792126
J Dent. 1998 Nov;26(8):649-56
9793286
BMJ. 1997 Sep 13;315(7109):629-34
9310563
Int J Epidemiol. 2002 Feb;31(1):140-9
11914310
Photonics Lasers Med. 2014 Feb 1;3(1):37-45
24707453
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Mar 28;(3):CD003808
23543523
Br Dent J. 2000 Jun 24;188(12):677-9
11022383
Minerva Stomatol. 2012 Mar;61(3):83-9
22402299
Dent Update. 2014 Apr;41(3):218-20, 222-4
24839709
Caries Res. 2006;40(2):117-23
16508268
Photomed Laser Surg. 2006 Aug;24(4):489-93
16942429
J Am Dent Assoc. 2000 Jun;131(6):777-85
10860330
Health Technol Assess. 2012 Sep;16(35):1-82
22989478
Lasers Surg Med. 1984;4(4):311-21
6441093
Oper Dent. 2010 Sep-Oct;35(5):500-7
20945740
Int J Paediatr Dent. 1993 Dec;3(4):193-8
8142322
Eur J Oral Sci. 2008 Apr;116(2):170-6
18353012
Br Dent J. 2000 May 13;188(9):476-82
10859846
BMJ. 2008 Mar 15;336(7644):601-5
18316340
Lasers Surg Med. 2008 Nov;40(9):634-43
18951420
J Oral Rehabil. 2012 Apr;39(4):301-18
22066463
Eur J Oral Sci. 1997 Apr;105(2):117-22
9151063
Stomatologija. 2013;15(1):26-31
23732827
Int J Paediatr Dent. 2007 Nov;17(6):391-406
17935593
JAMA. 2004 May 26;291(20):2457-65
15161896
Lasers Surg Med. 2002;30(5):342-50
12116326
Med Princ Pract. 2016;25(3):201-11
26642047
Br Dent J. 2007 May 12;202(9):523-32
17496861