Pesticide Residues on Three Cut Flower Species and Potential Exposure of Florists in Belgium.
In order to assess the prevalence of pesticide contamination and the risk of florists' exposure when handling cut flowers, sampling and analysis of 90 bouquets of the most commonly sold cut flowers in Belgium (50 bouquets of roses; 20 of gerberas, and 20 of chrysanthemums) were carried out. The bouquets were collected from 50 florists located in the seven largest cities of Belgium (Antwerp, Brussels, Charleroi, Ghent, Leuven, Liege, and Namur) and from five supermarkets located in the different regions. To have a better understanding of the route of exposure and professional practices a questionnaire was also addressed to a group of 25 florists who volunteered to take part in the survey. All florists were interviewed individually when collecting the questionnaire. The residual pesticide deposit values on cut flowers were determined in an accredited laboratory using a multi-residue (QuEChERS Quick Easy Cheap Effective Rugged Safe) method and a combination of gas chromatography (GC) and liquid chormatograhphy (LC) analysis. A total of 107 active substances were detected from all samples; i.e., an average of about 10 active substances per bouquet. The most severely contaminated bouquet accumulated a total concentration of residues up to 97 mg/kg. Results show that roses are the most contaminated cut flowers; with an average of 14 substances detected per sample and a total concentration per rose sample of 26 mg/kg. Some active substances present an acute toxicity (acephate, methiocarb, monocrotophos, methomyl, deltamethrin, etc.) and exposure can generate a direct effect on the nervous system of florists. Nevertheless, fungicides (dodemorph, propamocarb, and procymidone) were the most frequently detected in samples and had the highest maximum concentrations out of all the active substances analysed. Dodemorph was the most frequently detected substance with the highest maximum concentration (41.9 mg/kg) measured in the rose samples. It appears from the survey that, despite being exposed to high deposits of residues, florists usually do not protect themselves from contact with residues even if they spend several hours handling cut flowers and preparing bouquets (from 2 to 6 h/day, depending on the time of year and/or selling periods) daily. Bad habits (eating, drinking, or smoking at work) and absence of personal protective equipment of most florists also increase the risk of contact with pesticide residues.
Gembloux Agro-Bio Tech/ULg-Laboratoire de Phytopharmacie, Passage des Déportés 2, Gembloux 5030, Belgium. khaoula.toumi@doct.ulg.ac.be.
Khaoula
K
Toumi
Institut Scientifique de Santé Publique, OD Food, Medecines and Consumer Safety, Rue Juliette Wytsman 14, Brussels 1050, Belgium. Christiane.Vleminckx@wiv-isp.be.
Christiane
C
Vleminckx
Institut Scientifique de Santé Publique, OD Food, Medecines and Consumer Safety, Rue Juliette Wytsman 14, Brussels 1050, Belgium. Joris.vanloco@wiv-isp.Be.
Joris
J
van Loco
Gembloux Agro-Bio Tech/ULg-Laboratoire de Phytopharmacie, Passage des Déportés 2, Gembloux 5030, Belgium. bruno.schiffers@ulg.ac.be.
Bruno
B
Schiffers
D000328:Adult; D001530:Belgium; D002849:Chromatography, Gas; D003132:Commerce; D005260:Female; D035264:Flowers; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D016273:Occupational Exposure / Q000032:analysis*; D010573:Pesticide Residues / Q000032:analysis*; D011795:Surveys and Questionnaires; D055815:Young Adult
D010573:Pesticide Residues
cut flowers; exposure risk evaluation; florists; pesticide residues; roses
Int J Environ Health Res. 2005 Jun;15(3):161-9
16134479
Annu Rev Public Health. 2004;25:155-97
15015917
Int J Occup Med Environ Health. 2004;17(2):223-43
15387079
Scand J Work Environ Health. 1990 Aug;16(4):232-8
2389129
Int J Occup Environ Health. 2005 Apr-Jun;11(2):144-9
15875890
J AOAC Int. 2003 Mar-Apr;86(2):412-31
12723926
Int J Occup Environ Health. 2001 Oct-Dec;7(4):303-12
11783860
Occup Environ Med. 2003 Apr;60(4):279-86
12660376
Occup Med (Lond). 1997 Jul;47(5):281-93
9302811
Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 2010 Feb 15;243(1):19-26
19914268
Can Fam Physician. 2007 Oct;53(10):1704-11
17934034
Am J Epidemiol. 2003 May 1;157(9):800-14
12727674
Dermatitis. 2004 Sep;15(3):137-45
15724348
EFSA J. 2022 Jan 18;20(1):e07032
35079284
J Occup Med Toxicol. 2007 Sep 18;2:9
17877808
Am J Public Health. 1979 Jan;69(1):53-6
420356
Scand J Work Environ Health. 2000 Dec;26(6):492-500
11201396
Occup Environ Med. 2010 Nov;67(11):778-84
20798019
Scand J Work Environ Health. 1990 Aug;16(4):239-46
2389130
Occup Environ Med. 2011 Feb;68(2):108-15
21097948
Mutat Res. 2000 Mar 3;466(1):117-24
10751733