Differences between Practice Patterns of Conventional and Naturopathic GPs in Germany.
BACKGROUND
Limited evidence exists whether practice patterns of general practitioners (GPs) who have additionally completed training in naturopathy are different from those of conventional GPs. We aimed to assess and compare practice patterns of GPs in conventional and naturopathic GPs.


METHODS
Routine data from 41 GPs (31 with and 11 without additional qualification in NP, respectively) and 180,789 patients, drawn from the CONTinuous morbidity registration Epidemiologic NeTwork (CONTENT)-registry and collected between 2009 and 2014, were used. To assess practice patterns determinants of (non-)phytopharmaceutical prescriptions, referrals and hospitalizations were analyzed using mixed-effects Poisson regression models. As explanatory variables, the qualification of the GP in NM, the age group and sex of the patient, as well as bivariate interactions between these variables were considered.


RESULTS
GPs additionally qualified in naturopathy exhibited higher rates of phytopharmaceutical prescriptions (p<0.034; independent effect) compared to conventional GPs. This association was not observed with respect to non-phytopharmaceutical prescriptions. However, interaction effects between qualification and age group as well as sex were present with respect to both phytopharmaceutical and non-phytopharmaceutical prescriptions (all p<0.001). No further independent association existed between qualification and either referral rates or hospitalization rates, but again interactions between qualification and age group and sex (only referrals) were statistically significant (all p<0.0001).


CONCLUSIONS
The results show that the rate of phyto-pharmaceutical prescriptions are generally higher when the GP has an additional qualification in naturopathy. Further differences in practice patterns between conventional and naturopathy GPs could be subject to certain age groups and sex. However, the magnitude of these differences seem to be rather small.
University Hospital Heidelberg, Department of General Practice and Health Services Research, Heidelberg, Germany.
Gunter
G
Laux
University Hospital Heidelberg, Department of General Practice and Health Services Research, Heidelberg, Germany.
Berthold
B
Musselmann
University Hospital Heidelberg, Department of General Practice and Health Services Research, Heidelberg, Germany.
Marion
M
Kiel
University Hospital Heidelberg, Department of General Practice and Health Services Research, Heidelberg, Germany.
Joachim
J
Szecsenyi
University Hospital Heidelberg, Department of General Practice and Health Services Research, Heidelberg, Germany.
Stefanie
S
Joos
D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D011307:Drug Prescriptions; D005194:Family Practice / Q000193:education; D005260:Female; D058005:General Practitioners; D005858:Germany; D029001:Herbal Medicine; D006760:Hospitalization; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D009324:Naturopathy; D010818:Practice Patterns, Physicians'; D011320:Primary Health Care; D011787:Quality of Health Care; D011795:Surveys and Questionnaires
BMJ Open. 2014 Aug 27;4(8):e005332
25164536
Forsch Komplementmed. 2014;21(2):e1-16
24851850
Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2012;2012:294638
23346197
BMJ Open. 2012 Sep 03;2(5):null
22945962
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2010 Jul;65(7):1521-5
20494927
Patient Educ Couns. 2008 Mar;70(3):395-402
18201857
Prim Care. 2010 Mar;37(1):119-36
20189002
Gesundheitswesen. 2014 Nov;76(11):715-21
24566840
Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2011;2011:495813
19293252
Fam Pract. 2001 Apr;18(2):209-13
11264274
BMC Health Serv Res. 2008 Jan 18;8:14
18205916
Inform Prim Care. 2005;13(4):249-55
16510021
BMC Complement Altern Med. 2011 Dec 19;11:131
22182710
Forsch Komplementmed. 2012;19 Suppl 2:18-28
23883941
Eur J Health Econ. 2012 Dec;13(6):769-76
21695547
Forsch Komplementmed. 2011;18(6):315-20
22189362