Rapid Motion Adaptation Reveals the Temporal Dynamics of Spatiotemporal Correlation between ON and OFF Pathways.
At the early stages of visual processing, information is processed by two major thalamic pathways encoding brightness increments (ON) and decrements (OFF). Accumulating evidence suggests that these pathways interact and merge as early as in primary visual cortex. Using regular and reverse-phi motion in a rapid adaptation paradigm, we investigated the temporal dynamics of within and across pathway mechanisms for motion processing. When the adaptation duration was short (188 ms), reverse-phi and regular motion led to similar adaptation effects, suggesting that the information from the two pathways are combined efficiently at early-stages of motion processing. However, as the adaption duration was increased to 752 ms, reverse-phi and regular motion showed distinct adaptation effects depending on the test pattern used, either engaging spatiotemporal correlation between the same or opposite contrast polarities. Overall, these findings indicate that spatiotemporal correlation within and across ON-OFF pathways for motion processing can be selectively adapted, and support those models that integrate within and across pathway mechanisms for motion processing.
National Magnetic Resonance Research Center (UMRAM), Bilkent University, Ankara, Turkey.|Department of Psychology, Bilkent University, Ankara, Turkey.
Can
C
Oluk
University of Lincoln, School of Psychology, Brayford Pool, Lincoln, LN6 7TS, UK.
Andrea
A
Pavan
National Magnetic Resonance Research Center (UMRAM), Bilkent University, Ankara, Turkey.|Interdisciplinary Neuroscience Program, Bilkent University, Ankara, Turkey.
Hulusi
H
Kafaligonul
Vision Res. 2007 Sep;47(20):2675-83
17697690
Vision Res. 1994 Nov;34(21):2849-58
7975320
Vision Res. 2009 Jan;49(1):1-9
18848956
J Neurophysiol. 2006 Jun;95(6):3928-32
16709726
J Physiol. 1965 Jun;178(3):477-504
5827909
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 Jun 7;108(23):9685-90
21586635
Vision Res. 1992 Jan;32(1):47-59
1502811
Cereb Cortex. 2016 Dec;26(12):4602-4612
26433972
J Opt Soc Am A. 1985 Feb;2(2):300-21
3973763
J Vis. 2007 Aug 24;7(11):8.1-10
17997663
J Vis. 2009 Oct 28;9(11):27.1-16
20053090
Front Integr Neurosci. 2015 Mar 31;9:26
25873869
Vision Res. 1989;29(12):1749-58
2631396
J Opt Soc Am A. 1985 Feb;2(2):284-99
3973762
Vision Res. 1995 Oct;35(19):2697-722
7483311
Vision Res. 1997 Mar;37(5):541-52
9156198
Neural Comput. 2003 Apr;15(4):735-59
12689385
Nature. 1982 Jun 17;297(5867):580-3
7088141
Science. 1992 Sep 11;257(5076):1563-5
1523411
J Physiol. 1973 Jul;232(1):149-62
4733479
Vision Res. 1997 Jan;37(2):185-98
9068819
J Physiol. 1968 Mar;195(1):215-43
4966457
Trends Neurosci. 1992 Mar;15(3):86-92
1373923
J Neurosci. 1992 Jun;12(6):2247-50
1607939
Neuropsychologia. 2011 Aug;49(10):2929-34
21726570
J Vis. 2013 Jan 09;13(1):10
23302213
Spat Vis. 1997;10(4):437-42
9176953
J Vis. 2012 Oct 03;12(11):
23035130
Vision Res. 2006 Sep;46(18):2859-68
16684555
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 Jan 11;108(2):876-81
21187390
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2012 Jan;74(1):185-93
22033949
Vision Res. 1991;31(2):223-36
2017883
J Neurophysiol. 1987 Jul;58(1):33-65
3039079
Neuropsychologia. 2010 Aug;48(10):3069-79
20600191
J Vis. 2006 Sep 12;6(10):1018-25
17132074
J Vis. 2008 Feb 06;8(2):1.1-15
18318627
Spat Vis. 1997;10(4):433-6
9176952
Nature. 1986 Aug 28-Sep 3;322(6082):824-5
3748169
Vision Res. 2005 Nov;45(25-26):3109-16
16023173
J Neurophysiol. 2005 May;93(5):2908-21
15574800
Vision Res. 1984;24(12):1881-7
6534011
Vision Res. 1975 Aug-Sep;15:957-61
1166630
J Neurosci. 1990 Jul;10(7):2223-37
2198331
Vision Res. 1970 Dec;10(12):1411-30
5516541
Neuron. 2014 Apr 2;82(1):224-34
24698277
J Neurosci. 2002 Apr 1;22(7):2737-47
11923439
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 Nov 8;108(45):E1080-8
21709221