Bessel-beam illumination in dual-axis confocal microscopy mitigates resolution degradation caused by refractive heterogeneities.
One of the main challenges for laser-scanning microscopy of biological tissues with refractive heterogeneities is the degradation in spatial resolution that occurs as a result of beam steering and distortion. This challenge is particularly significant for dual-axis confocal (DAC) microscopy, which achieves improved spatial-filtering and optical-sectioning performance over traditional confocal microscopy through off-axis illumination and collection of light with low-numerical aperture (NA) beams that must intersect precisely at their foci within tissues. DAC microscope image quality is sensitive to positional changes and distortions of these illumination- and collection-beam foci. Previous studies have shown that Bessel beams display improved positional stability and beam quality than Gaussian beams when propagating through tissues with refractive heterogeneities, which suggests that Bessel-beam illumination may enhance DAC microscopy of such tissues. Here, we utilize both Gaussian and Bessel illumination in a point-scanned DAC microscope and quantify the resultant degradation in resolution when imaging within heterogeneous optical phantoms and fresh tissues. Results indicate that DAC microscopy with Bessel illumination exhibits reduced resolution degradation from microscopic tissue heterogeneities compared to DAC microscopy with conventional Gaussian illumination.
Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA.
Ye
Y
Chen
Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA.
Adam
A
Glaser
Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA.
Jonathan T C
JT
Liu
D008027:Light; D018613:Microscopy, Confocal / Q000379:methods*; D016011:Normal Distribution; D019047:Phantoms, Imaging
Bessel beams; beam-steering and distortion; confocal microscopy; resolution degradation
Biomed Opt Express. 2014 Mar 31;5(5):1296-308
24876996
Opt Lett. 1988 Feb 1;13(2):79
19741986
Nat Protoc. 2014 May;9(5):1083-101
24722406
Biomed Opt Express. 2014 Oct 01;5(11):3781-91
25426310
Appl Opt. 1992 May 20;31(15):2708-13
20725197
Opt Lett. 2013 Dec 15;38(24):5280-3
24322237
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015 Jul 28;112(30):9236-41
26170286
Biomed Opt Express. 2016 Jan 05;7(2):251-63
26977337
Opt Lett. 2012 Jun 15;37(12):2430-2
22739931
Nat Methods. 2011 May;8(5):417-23
21378978
Proc Am Thorac Soc. 2009 Aug 15;6(5):444-9
19687217
J Microsc. 2002 Aug;207(Pt 2):137-45
12180959
Biomed Opt Express. 2011 Aug 1;2(8):2231-42
21833360
J Biomed Opt. 2015 Jun;20(6):61103
25706821
Biomed Opt Express. 2014 Apr 30;5(6):1709-20
24940534
J Biomed Opt. 2008 Jan-Feb;13(1):010501
18315346
Opt Express. 2013 Jun 3;21(11):13824-39
23736637
Opt Lett. 2014 Feb 1;39(3):548-51
24487862
Opt Express. 2010 Nov 8;18(23):24229-44
21164769
Opt Lett. 2012 Nov 1;37(21):4495-7
23114341
Appl Opt. 1999 Dec 1;38(34):7133-44
18324260
J Biomed Opt. 2010 Mar-Apr;15(2):026029
20459274
Gastroenterology. 2004 Sep;127(3):706-13
15362025
Sci Rep. 2016 Mar 24;6:23483
27009371
Phys Rev Lett. 1987 Nov 30;59(22):2612
10035598
Opt Lett. 2006 Apr 1;31(7):942-4
16599219
Biomed Opt Express. 2015 Mar 17;6(4):1318-30
25909015
Gastroenterology. 2014 Mar;146(3):615-7
24440675
Opt Express. 2013 May 6;21(9):11425-40
23669999
Opt Lett. 2016 Jan 1;41(1):21-4
26696148
Appl Opt. 1999 Aug 1;38(22):4870-5
18323977
Opt Lett. 2008 May 1;33(9):929-31
18451942
Optica. 2016;3(8):861-869
28983499
Appl Opt. 2013 Aug 10;52(23):5835-42
23938439
J Biomed Opt. 2008 May-Jun;13(3):034020
18601565
Nat Commun. 2015 Jun 15;6:7276
26073070
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2007 Nov;5(11):1300-5
17936692
J Biomed Opt. 2006 Sep-Oct;11(5):054019
17092168
J Biomed Opt. 2013 Jun;18(6):066006
23733022
Opt Lett. 2003 Mar 15;28(6):414-6
12659264
Appl Opt. 1992 Nov 1;31(31):6653-7
20733892
Biomed Opt Express. 2012 Dec 1;3(12):3153-60
23243566
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014 Oct 28;111(43):15304-9
25313045
Appl Opt. 1999 Apr 1;38(10):2105-15
18319771
Nat Commun. 2012 Jan 17;3:632
22252556