Experimental Horizontal Gene Transfer of Methylamine Dehydrogenase Mimics Prevalent Exchange in Nature and Overcomes the Methylamine Growth Constraints Posed by the Sub-Optimal N-Methylglutamate Pathway.
Methylamine plays an important role in the global carbon and nitrogen budget; microorganisms that grow on reduced single carbon compounds, methylotrophs, serve as a major biological sink for methylamine in aerobic environments. Two non-orthologous, functionally degenerate routes for methylamine oxidation have been studied in methylotrophic Proteobacteria: Methylamine dehydrogenase and the N-methylglutamate pathway. Recent work suggests the N-methylglutamate (NMG) pathway may be more common in nature than the well-studied methylamine dehydrogenase (MaDH, encoded by the mau gene cluster). However, the distribution of these pathways across methylotrophs has never been analyzed. Furthermore, even though horizontal gene transfer (HGT) is commonly invoked as a means to transfer these pathways between strains, the physiological barriers to doing so have not been investigated. We found that the NMG pathway is both more abundant and more universally distributed across methylotrophic Proteobacteria compared to MaDH, which displays a patchy distribution and has clearly been transmitted by HGT even amongst very closely related strains. This trend was especially prominent in well-characterized strains of the Methylobacterium extroquens species, which also display significant phenotypic variability during methylamine growth. Strains like Methylobacterium extorquens PA1 that only encode the NMG pathway grew on methylamine at least five-fold slower than strains like Methylobacterium extorquens AM1 that also possess the mau gene cluster. By mimicking a HGT event through the introduction of the M. extorquens AM1 mau gene cluster into the PA1 genome, the resulting strain instantaneously achieved a 4.5-fold increase in growth rate on methylamine and a 11-fold increase in fitness on methylamine, which even surpassed the fitness of M. extorquens AM1. In contrast, when three replicate populations of wild type M. extorquens PA1 were evolved on methylamine as the sole carbon and energy source for 150 generations neither fitness nor growth rate improved. These results suggest that the NMG pathway permits slow growth on methylamine and is widely distributed in methylotrophs; however, rapid growth on methylamine can be achieved quite readily through acquisition of the mau cluster by HGT.
Organismic and Evolutionary Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA. dipti.nayak@gmail.com.|Biological Sciences, University of Idaho, Moscow, ID 83844, USA. dipti.nayak@gmail.com.
Dipti D
DD
Nayak
Organismic and Evolutionary Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA. cmarx@uidaho.edu.|Biological Sciences, University of Idaho, Moscow, ID 83844, USA. cmarx@uidaho.edu.|Faculty of Arts and Sciences Center for Systems Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA. cmarx@uidaho.edu.|Institute for Bioinformatics and Evolutionary Studies, University of Idaho, Moscow, ID 83844, USA. cmarx@uidaho.edu.
Christopher J
CJ
Marx
Experimental Evolution; Horizontal Gene Transfer (HGT); Methylamine; Methylobacterium; Methylotrophy
Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2004 Jul;54(Pt 4):1191-6
15280290
Biochemistry. 1992 Jun 2;31(21):4959-64
1599920
Arch Biochem Biophys. 1972 Nov;153(1):368-74
4650618
Elife. 2014 Nov 24;3:null
25418043
ISME J. 2007 Oct;1(6):480-91
18043650
Appl Environ Microbiol. 1983 Apr;45(4):1310-5
16346271
Bioinformatics. 2012 Jun 15;28(12):1647-9
22543367
J Bacteriol. 2014 Dec;196(23):4130-9
25225269
PLoS One. 2009;4(5):e5584
19440302
PLoS One. 2013 Apr 30;8(4):e62957
23646164
ISME J. 2015 Jan;9(1):195-206
25050523
Evolution. 2009 Nov;63(11):2816-30
19545267
Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2006 May;56(Pt 5):983-9
16627642
J Mol Evol. 1985;22(2):160-74
3934395
Nature. 2012 Sep 27;489(7417):513-8
22992527
Mol Biol Evol. 2013 Mar;30(3):549-60
23223712
Anal Chim Acta. 2008 Aug 22;624(1):37-58
18706309
Biochem J. 1968 Jan;106(1):245-55
4388687
Cell Rep. 2012 Feb 23;1(2):133-40
22832162
Science. 1991 May 10;252(5007):817-24
2028257
Nucleic Acids Res. 2004 Mar 19;32(5):1792-7
15034147
PLoS One. 2014 Sep 18;9(9):e107887
25232997
Science. 2011 Jun 3;332(6034):1190-2
21636771
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008 Jun 10;105(23):7899-906
18524956
Microb Ecol. 2010 Aug;60(2):440-52
20700590
J Biol Chem. 1973 Oct 10;248(19):6724-33
4745441
J Lab Autom. 2013 Apr;18(2):171-7
23032169
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 Mar 24;106(12):4846-51
19261854
Annu Rev Microbiol. 2009;63:477-99
19514844
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2011 Jul;77(14):4705-11
21622781
Biochem J. 1961 Dec;81:465-9
14484877
Environ Microbiol. 2012 Sep;14(9):2308-22
22540311
J Bacteriol. 1987 Apr;169(4):1712-7
3558322
J Bacteriol. 2003 Dec;185(24):7169-75
14645277
Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek. 1990 Nov;58(4):291-8
2082817
J Bacteriol. 1994 Apr;176(7):1957-68
8144463
J Bacteriol. 2007 Dec;189(24):9076-81
17921299
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2014 Jun;80(11):3541-50
24682302
Biochem J. 1963 May;87(2):386-96
16749008
J Bacteriol. 2004 Jan;186(1):22-8
14679220
J Bacteriol. 2012 Sep;194(17):4746-8
22887658
Science. 2014 Jun 27;344(6191):1519-22
24970088
Environ Microbiol. 2011 Oct;13(10):2603-22
21443740
J Bacteriol. 2003 Dec;185(24):7160-8
14645276
Biochem J. 1977 Feb 1;161(2):357-70
15545
J Bacteriol. 1991 Sep;173(18):5901-8
1653226
J Bacteriol. 2014 Jun;196(11):2101-7
24682326
J Gen Microbiol. 1988 Apr;134(4):943-52
3141582
Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2001 Jan;51(Pt 1):119-22
11211248
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2010 Jul;76(13):4530-7
20472738
Mol Microbiol. 2010 Jan;75(2):426-39
19943898