Comparison of ALIF vs. XLIF for L4/5 interbody fusion: pros, cons, and literature review.
The incidence of lumbar fusion for the treatment of various degenerative lumbar spine diseases has increased dramatically over the last twenty years. Many lumbar fusion techniques have been developed and popularized, each with its own advantages and disadvantages. Anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) initially introduced in the 1930's, has become a common and widely accepted technique for lumbar fusions over the last decade offering several advantages over standard posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) or transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF). More recently, the lateral trans-psoas approach termed extreme, direct or lateral lumbar interbody fusion (XLIF, DLIF, LLIF) is gaining widespread popularity. The aim of this paper is to compare the approaches, advantages and disadvantages of ALIF and XLIF for L4/5 interbody fusion based on relevant literature.
St Vincent's Public and Private Hospitals, Sydney, Australia.
Mark J
MJ
Winder
St Vincent's Public and Private Hospitals, Sydney, Australia.
Shanu
S
Gambhir
Lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF); anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF); extreme lateral interbody fusion (XLIF); spine
Eur Spine J. 2015 Apr;24 Suppl 3:369-71
25893332
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000 Oct 15;25(20):2682-7
11034657
SAS J. 2010 Jun 01;4(2):63-6
25802651
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2004 Nov 1;29(21):2389-94
15507800
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1993 Nov;18(15):2227-30
8278837
Spine J. 2012 Oct;12(10):881-90
23098617
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2012 May 1;37(10):819-25
21971125
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1995 Jul 15;20(14):1592-9
7570174
J Spinal Disord Tech. 2012 Jul;25(5):285-91
21606855
J Neurosurg Spine. 2011 Jul;15(1):92-6
21476802
Eur Spine J. 2009 Jul;18 Suppl 2:228-31
19214598
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010 Dec 15;35(26 Suppl):S361-7
21160401
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2006 Apr;148(4):375-87
16322906
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005 Apr 18;(2):CD001352
15846617
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005 Feb 1;30(3):346-53
15682018
J Neurosurg Spine. 2011 Sep;15(3):311-9
21599444
Eur Spine J. 2015 May;24(5):1051-7
25676611
Neurosurgery. 2002 Jul;51(1):97-103; discussion 103-5
12182440
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009 Aug 1;34(17):1828-33
19644334
Spine J. 2005 Mar-Apr;5(2):155-60
15749615
J Neurosurg Spine. 2007 Oct;7(4):379-86
17933310
J Clin Neurosci. 2013 Nov;20(11):1558-63
23906522
J Spinal Disord Tech. 2009 Feb;22(1):34-7
19190432
Eur Spine J. 2004 Aug;13(5):425-31
15138863
SAS J. 2010 Jun 01;4(2):41-6
25802648
J Spinal Disord Tech. 2014 Jul;27(5):253-6
23511641
Acta Orthop Scand Suppl. 1993;251:120-2
8451967
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2003 May 15;28(10):1023-6
12768143
Neurosurg Focus. 2010 Mar;28(3):E8
20192668
Eur Spine J. 2012 Jun;21(6):1192-9
22130617
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2011 Jan 1;36(1):26-32
21192221
Spine J. 2002 May-Jun;2(3):216-23
14589496
Eur Spine J. 2000 Feb;9 Suppl 1:S95-101
10766064
Eur Spine J. 2015 Apr;24 Suppl 3:420-6
25772093
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005 Dec 1;30(23):2631-6
16319749
Global Spine J. 2016 Aug;6(5):472-81
27433432
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010 Dec 15;35(26 Suppl):S331-7
21160397
J Spinal Disord Tech. 2014 Feb;27(1):29-39
23429305
Neurosurg Focus. 2010 Mar;28(3):E7
20192667
Eur Spine J. 2015 Apr;24 Suppl 3:372-7
25874742
Neurosurgery. 2015 Jan;76(1):7-23; discussion 23-4
25255259
Am J Surg. 1987 Dec;154(6):700-4
3425822
ScientificWorldJournal. 2012;2012:789698
23304089
J Clin Neurosci. 2015 Nov;22(11):1714-21
26190218
J Spinal Disord Tech. 2011 Jun;24(4):242-50
20844451
J Neurosurg Spine. 2014 Jun;20(6):623-35
24702513
Neurosurgery. 2004 Mar;54(3):636-43; discussion 643-4
15028138
Biomed Pap Med Fac Univ Palacky Olomouc Czech Repub. 2014;158(1):127-32
23073535
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006 Apr 1;31(7):762-8
16582849
J Spinal Disord Tech. 2002 Oct;15(5):355-61
12394658
Spine J. 2006 Jul-Aug;6(4):435-43
16825052