Is Handwriting Performance Affected by the Writing Surface? Comparing Preschoolers', Second Graders', and Adults' Writing Performance on a Tablet vs. Paper.
Due to their multifunctionality, tablets offer tremendous advantages for research on handwriting dynamics or for interactive use of learning apps in schools. Further, the widespread use of tablet computers has had a great impact on handwriting in the current generation. But, is it advisable to teach how to write and to assess handwriting in pre- and primary schoolchildren on tablets rather than on paper? Since handwriting is not automatized before the age of 10 years, children's handwriting movements require graphomotor and visual feedback as well as permanent control of movement execution during handwriting. Modifications in writing conditions, for instance the smoother writing surface of a tablet, might influence handwriting performance in general and in particular those of non-automatized beginning writers. In order to investigate how handwriting performance is affected by a difference in friction of the writing surface, we recruited three groups with varying levels of handwriting automaticity: 25 preschoolers, 27 second graders, and 25 adults. We administered three tasks measuring graphomotor abilities, visuomotor abilities, and handwriting performance (only second graders and adults). We evaluated two aspects of handwriting performance: the handwriting quality with a visual score and the handwriting dynamics using online handwriting measures [e.g., writing duration, writing velocity, strokes and number of inversions in velocity (NIV)]. In particular, NIVs which describe the number of velocity peaks during handwriting are directly related to the level of handwriting automaticity. In general, we found differences between writing on paper compared to the tablet. These differences were partly task-dependent. The comparison between tablet and paper revealed a faster writing velocity for all groups and all tasks on the tablet which indicates that all participants-even the experienced writers-were influenced by the lower friction of the tablet surface. Our results for the group-comparison show advancing levels in handwriting automaticity from preschoolers to second graders to adults, which confirms that our method depicts handwriting performance in groups with varying degrees of handwriting automaticity. We conclude that the smoother tablet surface requires additional control of handwriting movements and therefore might present an additional challenge for learners of handwriting.
Research Group: Diversity and Inclusion, Human Sciences Faculty, University of Potsdam Potsdam, Germany.
Sabrina
S
Gerth
Research Group: Diversity and Inclusion, Human Sciences Faculty, University of Potsdam Potsdam, Germany.
Annegret
A
Klassert
Department of Psychology, University of Regensburg Regensburg, Germany.
Thomas
T
Dolk
Research Group: Diversity and Inclusion, Human Sciences Faculty, University of Potsdam Potsdam, Germany.
Michael
M
Fliesser
Cognitive Sciences, University of Potsdam Potsdam, Germany.
Martin H
MH
Fischer
Primary School Education/German, Human Sciences Faculty, University of Potsdam Potsdam, Germany.
Guido
G
Nottbusch
Research Group: Diversity and Inclusion, Human Sciences Faculty, University of Potsdam Potsdam, Germany.
Julia
J
Festman
children; graphomotor control; handwriting; movement kinematics; tablet; writing acquisition
Am J Occup Ther. 2000 Jan-Feb;54(1):83-8
10686631
Dev Psychol. 2001 Jan;37(1):101-14
11206425
Am J Occup Ther. 2003 Jul-Aug;57(4):459-62
12911088
J Learn Disabil. 2002 Jan-Feb;35(1):39-56
15490899
J Atten Disord. 2005 Aug;9(1):323-32
16371678
Am J Occup Ther. 2006 Jul-Aug;60(4):451-60
16915876
Hum Mov Sci. 2006 Oct;25(4-5):608-21
17011656
Dev Med Child Neurol. 2007 Apr;49(4):312-7
17376144
Hum Mov Sci. 2013 Oct;32(5):999-1009
24128883
Front Psychol. 2013 Nov 05;4:818
24204357
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2014 Sep;40(5):1441-7
24548322
Cognition. 2015 Mar;136:325-36
25525970
Front Psychol. 2015 Mar 05;6:225
25798120
Dev Psychol. 2015 Jul;51(7):879-88
26029821
Hum Mov Sci. 2015 Dec;44:32-41
26298215
Hum Mov Sci. 2016 Aug;48:62-73
27132154
Am J Occup Ther. 1994 Nov-Dec;48(11):982-8
7840134
J Neurosci Methods. 1994 Apr;52(1):39-45
8090015
J Learn Disabil. 1993 Dec;26(10):689-99
8151209
Am J Occup Ther. 1996 Oct;50(9):732-9
8886192
Percept Mot Skills. 1998 Jun;86(3 Pt 2):1299-310
9700806