Neurite outgrowth is driven by actin polymerization even in the presence of actin polymerization inhibitors.
Actin polymerization is a universal mechanism to drive plasma membrane protrusion in motile cells. One apparent exception to this rule is continuing, or even accelerated outgrowth of neuronal processes in the presence of actin polymerization inhibitors. This fact together with a key role of microtubule dynamics in neurite outgrowth led to the concept that microtubules directly drive plasma membrane protrusion, either in the course of polymerization or motor-driven sliding. Surprisingly, a possibility that unextinguished actin polymerization drives neurite outgrowth in the presence of actin drugs was not explored. We show that cultured hippocampal neurons treated with cytochalasin D or latrunculin B contained dense accumulations of branched actin filaments at ∼50% of neurite tips at all tested drug concentrations (1-10 μM). Actin polymerization was required for neurite outgrowth, because only low concentrations of either inhibitor increased the length and/or a number of neurites, whereas high concentrations inhibited neurite outgrowth. Importantly, neurites undergoing active elongation invariably contained a bright F-actin patch at the tip, whereas actin-depleted neurites never elongated, even though they still contained dynamic microtubules. Stabilization of microtubules by taxol treatment did not stop elongation of cytochalasin d-treated neurites. We conclude that actin polymerization is indispensable for neurite elongation.
Department of Biology, University of Pennsylvania, 433 S. University Avenue, Philadelphia, PA 19104.
Jonathan X
JX
Chia
Department of Biology, University of Pennsylvania, 433 S. University Avenue, Philadelphia, PA 19104.
Nadia
N
Efimova
Department of Biology, University of Pennsylvania, 433 S. University Avenue, Philadelphia, PA 19104 svitkina@sas.upenn.edu.
Tatyana M
TM
Svitkina
J Cell Biol. 1988 Oct;107(4):1505-16
3170637
Science. 1999 Mar 19;283(5409):1931-4
10082468
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1970 Aug;66(4):1206-12
5273449
Methods Cell Biol. 2007;79:295-319
17327162
Cell Motil Cytoskeleton. 1987;8(3):193-209
2891448
J Neurosci. 2002 Nov 1;22(21):9358-67
12417661
Curr Biol. 2013 Jun 3;23 (11):1018-23
23707427
Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2011 Mar 01;3(3):null
21106647
J Neurosci. 2001 Dec 15;21(24):9757-69
11739584
Mol Biol Cell. 2008 Apr;19(4):1561-74
18256280
Neuron. 2012 Dec 20;76(6):1091-107
23259946
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1988 Aug;85(16):5946-50
3413068
J Cell Biol. 1986 Jan;102(1):282-8
3941155
J Cell Sci. 2006 May 1;119(Pt 9):1736-45
16595545
Nat Cell Biol. 2016 Jun;18(6):676-83
27159499
Science. 2015 Apr 17;348(6232):347-52
25765066
Synapse. 1994 Oct;18(2):128-51
7839312
J Cell Biol. 1995 Jan;128(1-2):139-55
7822411
Nat Cell Biol. 2002 Apr;4(4):294-301
11912491
J Cell Biol. 1986 Apr;102(4):1510-21
3514635
J Cell Biol. 1997 Oct 20;139(2):397-415
9334344
Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 2002 Jul;34(7):746-61
11950592
J Neurosci. 2000 Mar 15;20(6):2266-74
10704502
Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2013 Oct;25(5):574-81
23639311
Nat Methods. 2008 Jul;5(7):605-7
18536722
Methods Mol Biol. 2009;586:187-206
19768431
Nat Cell Biol. 1999 May;1(1):45-50
10559863
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2012 Feb 15;13(3):183-93
22334213
J Embryol Exp Morphol. 1970 Nov;24(3):625-40
4923996
Brain Res. 1977 May 13;126(3):397-42
861729
J Cell Biol. 1999 May 31;145(5):1009-26
10352018
Cell. 2016 Apr 7;165(2):434-48
26997484
Brain. 2013 Oct;136(Pt 10):2937-51
23811322
Curr Biol. 2011 Jul 26;21(14):1167-75
21723126
J Mol Biol. 2001 Sep 28;312(4):721-30
11575927
Mol Biol Cell. 2009 Dec;20(24):5166-80
19846664
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998 May 26;95(11):6181-6
9600938
Int Rev Cell Mol Biol. 2013;301:95-156
23317818
Genes Dev. 2007 Mar 1;21(5):483-96
17344411
Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2013 Oct;25(5):582-90
23786923
J Cell Biol. 2008 Feb 11;180(3):619-32
18268107
Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 2013;29:471-99
23875648