A bias in the "mass-normalized" DTT response - an effect of non-linear concentration-response curves for copper and manganese.
The dithiothreitol (DTT) assay is widely used to measure the oxidative potential of particulate matter. Results are typically presented in mass-normalized units (e.g., pmols DTT lost per minute per microgram PM) to allow for comparison among samples. Use of this unit assumes that the mass-normalized DTT response is constant and independent of the mass concentration of PM added to the DTT assay. However, based on previous work that identified non-linear DTT responses for copper and manganese, this basic assumption (that the mass-normalized DTT response is independent of the concentration of PM added to the assay) should not be true for samples where Cu and Mn contribute significantly to the DTT signal. To test this we measured the DTT response at multiple PM concentrations for eight ambient particulate samples collected at two locations in California. The results confirm that for samples with significant contributions from Cu and Mn, the mass-normalized DTT response can strongly depend on the concentration of PM added to the assay, varying by up to an order of magnitude for PM concentrations between 2 and 34 μg mL-1. This mass dependence confounds useful interpretation of DTT assay data in samples with significant contributions from Cu and Mn, requiring additional quality control steps to check for this bias. To minimize this problem, we discuss two methods to correct the mass-normalized DTT result and we apply those methods to our samples. We find that it is possible to correct the mass-normalized DTT result, although the correction methods have some drawbacks and add uncertainty to DTT analyses. More broadly, other DTT-active species might also have non-linear concentration-responses in the assay and cause a bias. In addition, the same problem of Cu- and Mn-mediated bias in mass-normalized DTT results might affect other measures of acellular redox activity in PM and needs to be addressed.
Department of Land, Air, and Water Resources, University of California, Davis.
Jessica G
JG
Charrier
Department of Land, Air, and Water Resources, University of California, Davis.
Alexander S
AS
McFall
Department of Chemistry, California State University, Fresno.
Kennedy K-T
KK
Vu
Department of Chemistry, California State University, Fresno.
James
J
Baroi
Department of Chemistry, California State University, Fresno.
Catalina
C
Olea
Department of Chemistry, California State University, Fresno.
Alam
A
Hasson
Department of Land, Air, and Water Resources, University of California, Davis.
Cort
C
Anastasio
Dithiothreitol; copper; manganese; oxidative potential; particulate matter; quinones
J Am Chem Soc. 2012 Jun 27;134(25):10562-8
22651886
Part Fibre Toxicol. 2011 Sep 02;8:26
21888644
Environ Sci Technol. 2014 Jun 17;48(12):7010-7
24857372
Inhal Toxicol. 2010 Dec;22 Suppl 2:37-47
21142797
J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol. 2013 Sep-Oct;23(5):466-73
23673461
Atmos Chem Phys. 2012 May 3;12(5):11317-11350
23393494
Environ Sci Technol. 2013 Jan 15;47(2):932-40
23227907
Environ Sci Technol. 2009 May 15;43(10):3905-12
19544906
Atmos Environ (1994). 2011 Nov;45(40):7555-7562
22125412
Environ Sci Technol. 2015 Apr 7;49(7):4646-56
25748105
Environ Sci Technol. 2013 Apr 2;47(7):3362-9
23470039
Atmos Chem Phys. 2011 Sep 16;11(18):9671-9682
22121357
J Appl Toxicol. 2009 Jan;29(1):69-78
18756589
Environ Sci Technol. 2012 Oct 16;46(20):11384-92
22974103
Environ Sci Technol. 2009 Feb 1;43(3):954-60
19245042
Environ Sci Technol. 2015 Aug 4;49(15):9317-25
26153923
Environ Sci Technol. 2006 Aug 15;40(16):4880-6
16955881
Environ Sci Technol. 2011 Dec 15;45(24):10362-8
22044074
Atmos Environ (1994). 2008;42(18):4369-4379
19148304
Inhal Toxicol. 2009 Aug;21(9):731-8
19242849
Aerosol Sci Technol. 2014 May 1;48(5):489-497
24711675
Atmos Environ (1994). 2012 Jan 1;46:665-668
22267949
Environ Health Perspect. 2015 Nov;123(11):1187-92
25840153
J Environ Sci Health A Tox Hazard Subst Environ Eng. 2014;49(4):441-51
24345242
Environ Sci Technol. 2009 Feb 1;43(3):922-7
19245037
Environ Res. 2005 Sep;99(1):40-7
16053926