Looking inward and back: Real-time monitoring of visual working memories.
Confidence in our memories is influenced by many factors, including beliefs about the perceptibility or memorability of certain kinds of objects and events, as well as knowledge about our skill sets, habits, and experiences. Notoriously, our knowledge and beliefs about memory can lead us astray, causing us to be overly confident in eyewitness testimony or to overestimate the frequency of recent experiences. Here, using visual working memory as a case study, we stripped away all these potentially misleading cues, requiring observers to make confidence judgments by directly assessing the quality of their memory representations. We show that individuals can monitor the status of information in working memory as it degrades over time. Our findings suggest that people have access to information reflecting the existence and quality of their working memories, and furthermore, that they can use this information to guide their behavior. (PsycINFO Database Record
Department of Psychology, Harvard University.
Jordan W
JW
Suchow
Department of Psychology, Harvard University.
Daryl
D
Fougnie
Department of Psychology, Harvard University.
George A
GA
Alvarez
D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D001288:Attention / Q000502:physiology*; D003463:Cues; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007439:Introversion, Psychological; D007600:Judgment / Q000502:physiology*; D008128:Logic; D008297:Male; D008570:Memory, Short-Term / Q000502:physiology*; D010775:Photic Stimulation; D014796:Visual Perception / Q000502:physiology*; D055815:Young Adult
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1986 Jul;12(3):452-60
2942629
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012 May 29;109(22):8780-5
22582168
J Opt Soc Am A. 1988 Apr;5(4):617-27
3404312
Nature. 2008 May 8;453(7192):233-5
18385672
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2016 Feb;42(2):169-85
26375783
Nature. 2008 Sep 11;455(7210):227-31
18690210
Spat Vis. 1997;10(4):433-6
9176952
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2012 Sep;38(5):1206-20
22409182
Psychol Sci. 2013 Jun;24(6):981-90
23630219
Psychon Bull Rev. 2013 Apr;20(2):348-55
23208769
Psychol Rev. 1964 Sep;71:392-407
14208857
Psychol Sci. 2009 Apr;20(4):423-8
19320861
Psychol Sci. 2007 Jul;18(7):622-8
17614871
Behav Brain Res. 2012 Aug 1;233(2):256-70
22640812
Cognition. 1997 Jan;62(1):75-97
8997171
J Vis. 2004 Dec 29;4(12):1120-35
15669916
Psychol Bull. 1991 Mar;109(2):204-23
2034750
PLoS One. 2014 Mar 24;9(3):e90808
24663094
Psychol Sci. 2004 Feb;15(2):106-11
14738517
Spat Vis. 1997;10(4):437-42
9176953
Mem Cognit. 2013 Aug;41(6):839-49
23400826
J Vis. 2013 Aug 20;13(10):null
23962734
Psychon Bull Rev. 1994 Sep;1(3):357-75
24203520
Annu Rev Neurosci. 2007;30:535-74
17600525
Neuropsychol Rev. 2005 Sep;15(3):105-30
16328731
J Vis. 2009 Sep 09;9(10):7.1-11
19810788
Nat Commun. 2012;3:1229
23187629
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010 Nov 30;107(48):20834-9
21076036
J Exp Psychol Gen. 1995 Dec;124(4):391-408
8530911
Psychol Sci. 2014 Apr;25(4):861-73
24549293
Front Psychol. 2013 Feb 14;4:62
23420570
Psychol Sci. 2005 Oct;16(10):769-74
16181438