Successful population establishment from small introductions appears to be less common than believed.
Although small populations are at high risk of extinction, there are regular reports in the scientific literature of purported small, isolated, persistent populations. One source of evidence of the viability of small populations comes from the alleged successful introduction of species to areas outside their original range from introductions of few individuals. We reviewed the examples from introduction compendia on deliberate translocations of birds, and the original sources, to identify and evaluate purported examples of successful establishments from small introductions. We found 23 purportedly successful introductions from few (<30) individuals. After assessing original sources, we found that two of the claims were substantiated; the rest were ambiguous or could be rejected as examples, primarily due to a lack of evidence in original sources of the number of birds released and because of supplemental individuals from other releases, releases in nearby regions, and the possibility of natural invasion. Our results suggest that reports of successful establishment of birds from introductions of few individuals have been overstated. These results strengthen the relationship previously reported between propagule pressure and likelihood of establishment, and support the lack of viability of small populations presumed by population theory. We suggest that analyses of introduction failure and success would benefit from excluding studies where introduction effort is unknown or unreliably documented.
Department of Biology, Tufts University, Medford, MA, USA; Current affiliation: The School for Field Studies, Beverly, MA, USA.
Alyssa
A
Corbett King
Department of Biology, Tufts University , Medford , MA , USA.
J Michael
JM
Reed
Allee effect; Introduction success; Invasive species; Population viability; Propagule pressure; Small population paradigm; Translocation
Trends Ecol Evol. 2005 May;20(5):223-8
16701373
Proc Biol Sci. 2014 Nov 7;281(1794):20141648
25232135
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1993 Nov 15;90(22):10871-5
11607439
Proc Biol Sci. 2016 Jan 27;283(1823):
26817777
Am Nat. 1997 May;149(5):903-15
18811254
Science. 1989 Aug 4;245(4917):477-80
17750257
Science. 2005 Jun 3;308(5727):1460-2
15860589
Trends Ecol Evol. 2008 Aug;23(8):453-60
18582986
Mol Ecol. 2016 Aug;25(16):3962-73
27314880
Science. 2006 Mar 17;311(5767):1555; author reply 1555
16543443
Proc Biol Sci. 2014 Oct 7;281(1792):null
25143033
J Evol Biol. 2013 Aug;26(8):1691-9
23724778
Ecol Lett. 2006 Jan;9(1):51-60
16958868