Social observation enhances cross-environment activation of hippocampal place cell patterns.
Humans and animals frequently learn through observing or interacting with others. The local enhancement theory proposes that presence of social subjects in an environment facilitates other subjects' understanding of the environment. To explore the neural basis of this theory, we examined hippocampal place cells, which represent spatial information, in rats as they stayed in a small box while a demonstrator rat running on a separate, nearby linear track, and as they ran on the same track themselves. We found that place cell firing sequences during self-running on the track also appeared in the box. This cross-environment activation occurred even prior to any self-running experience on the track and was absent without a demonstrator. Our data thus suggest that social observation can facilitate the observer's spatial representation of an environment without actual self-exploration. This finding may contribute to neural mechanisms of local enhancement.
Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, United States.
Xiang
0000-0002-8579-7316
X
Mou
Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, United States.|Department of Neuroscience, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, United States.
Daoyun
0000-0003-4115-5888
D
Ji
D000200:Action Potentials; D000818:Animals; D019370:Observation; D000071037:Place Cells / Q000502:physiology*; D051381:Rats; D000067570:Social Learning
cross-activation; hippocampus; neuroscience; place cells; rat; social learning; spatiial memory
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000 Feb 29;97(5):2320-5
10681456
Neuroscience. 2000;100(1):11-9
10996454
Neuron. 2002 Jan 31;33(3):325-40
11832222
Neuron. 2002 Dec 19;36(6):1183-94
12495631
Science. 1965 Jul 16;149(3681):269-74
14300526
Trends Cogn Sci. 2003 Dec;7(12):517-9
14643363
J Neurosci. 2004 Sep 1;24(35):7681-9
15342735
Science. 1992 May 15;256(5059):1025-7
1589772
Science. 2005 Jul 22;309(5734):619-23
16040709
Nature. 2006 Mar 30;440(7084):680-3
16474382
Anim Cogn. 2006 Oct;9(4):335-53
17024510
Nat Neurosci. 2007 Jan;10(1):100-7
17173043
Science. 1972 Dec 15;178(4066):1220-1
17748985
Nat Neurosci. 2007 Oct;10(10):1241-2
17828259
Trends Neurosci. 2008 Sep;31(9):469-77
18687478
Science. 2008 Sep 5;321(5894):1322-7
18772431
Nat Neurosci. 2009 Jul;12(7):913-8
19525943
Science. 2009 Jul 17;325(5938):284-8
19608908
Nat Neurosci. 2010 Apr;13(4):482-8
20190743
Nature. 2011 Jan 20;469(7330):397-401
21179088
Neuron. 2011 Aug 25;71(4):737-49
21867888
J Neurosci. 2012 Feb 8;32(6):2129-41
22323725
Science. 2013 Jun 14;340(6138):1342-1346
23641063
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 May 28;110(22):9100-5
23671088
Elife. 2013 Jun 25;2:e00647
23805379
J Neurosci. 2013 Sep 4;33(36):14607-16
24005311
Elife. 2014 Aug 20;3:e03476
25141375
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014 Dec 30;111(52):18428-35
25489089
Nat Neurosci. 2015 Feb;18(2):282-8
25531571
Elife. 2015 Sep 08;4:null
26349031
Nat Neurosci. 2015 Dec;18(12):1772-9
26502260
Nat Commun. 2016 Jan 25;7:10300
26806606
Bio Protoc. 2017 Jul 5;7(13):null
28804738
Brain Res. 1971 Nov;34(1):171-5
5124915
Science. 1993 Aug 20;261(5124):1055-8
8351520
Nature. 1996 May 30;381(6581):425-8
8632799
J Neurosci. 1996 Dec 15;16(24):8027-40
8987829