How reliably can northeast Atlantic sand lances of the genera Ammodytes and Hyperoplus be distinguished? A comparative application of morphological and molecular methods.
Accurate stock assessments for each of the dominant species of sand lances in the northeast Atlantic Ocean and adjacent areas are not available due to the lack of a reliable identification procedure; therefore, appropriate measures of fisheries management or conservation of sand lances cannot be implemented. In this study, detailed morphological and molecular features are assessed to discriminate between four species of sand lances belonging to the genera Ammodytes and Hyperoplus. Morphological characters described by earlier authors as useful for identification of the genera are confirmed, and two additional distinguishing characters are added. A combination of the following morphological characters is recommended to distinguish between the genera Hyperoplus and Ammodytes: the protrusibility of the premaxillae, the presence of hooked ends of the prevomer, the number of dermal plicae, and the pectoral-fin length as a percentage of the standard length. The discriminant function analysis revealed that morphometric data are not very useful to distinguish the species of each of the two genera. The following meristic characters improve the separation of Hyperoplus lanceolatus from Hyperoplus immaculatus: the number of lower arch gill rakers, total number of gill rakers, numbers of caudal vertebrae and total vertebrae, and numbers of dorsal-fin and anal-fin rays. It is confirmed that Ammodytes tobianus differs from Ammodytes marinus by its belly scales that are organised in tight chevrons, scales which are present over the musculature at the base of the caudal fin, as well as by the lower numbers of dermal plicae, dorsal-fin rays, and total vertebrae. In contrast to the morphological data, mitochondrial COI sequences (DNA barcodes) failed to separate unambiguously the four investigated species. Ammodytes tobianus and Hyperoplus lanceolatus showed an overlap between intraspecific and interspecific K2P genetic distances and cannot be reliably distinguished using the common DNA barcoding approach. Ammodytes marinus and Hyperoplus immaculatus exhibited gaps between intraspecific and interspecific K2P distances of 2.73 and 3.34% respectively, indicating that their DNA barcodes can be used for species identification. As an alternative, short nuclear Rhodopsin sequences were analysed and one diagnostic character was found for each of the species Ammodytes marinus, Hyperoplus lanceolatus, and Hyperoplus immaculatus. Ammodytes tobianus can be characterised by the lack of species-specific mutations when compared to the other three species. In contrast to COI, the short nuclear sequences represent a useful alternative for rapid species identification whenever an examination of morphological characters is not available.
University of Hamburg, Center of Natural History, Zoological Museum, 20146 Hamburg, Germany.
Ralf
R
Thiel
Senckenberg am Meer, German Centre for Marine Biodiversity Research (DZMB), 26382 Wilhelmshaven, Germany.
Thomas
T
Knebelsberger
Ammodytes; COI; DNA barcoding; Hyperoplus; Rhodopsin; Sand lances; meristic characters; mitochondrial DNA; morphology; morphometrics; northeast Atlantic; nuclear gene; species identification
Proc Biol Sci. 2003 Feb 7;270(1512):313-21
12614582
Nucleic Acids Res. 2004 Mar 19;32(5):1792-7
15034147
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2005 Oct 29;360(1462):1847-57
16214743
PLoS Biol. 2005 Dec;3(12):e422
16336051
Mol Ecol Notes. 2007 May 1;7(3):355-364
18784790
Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2010 Jun;55(3):1195-203
20188843
Mol Ecol Resour. 2009 May;9 Suppl s1:237-42
21564983
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 Jun 28;108(26):10602-7
21670289
Mitochondrial DNA. 2011 Oct;22 Suppl 1:27-36
21980985
PLoS One. 2011;6(12):e28655
22174860
PLoS One. 2012;7(1):e28381
22276096
PLoS One. 2012;7(2):e30621
22363454
PLoS One. 2008;3(6):e2490
22423312
PLoS One. 2012;7(4):e35858
22558244
Methods Mol Biol. 2012;858:311-38
22684962
Mol Ecol Resour. 2013 Jan;13(1):32-42
23006488
Mol Ecol Resour. 2013 Mar;13(2):177-88
23253798
Mol Ecol Resour. 2013 Sep;13(5):788-97
23668535
PLoS One. 2013 Jul 08;8(7):e66213
23861743
Mol Biol Evol. 2013 Dec;30(12):2725-9
24132122
Mol Ecol Resour. 2014 Sep;14(5):1060-71
24618145
Mol Ecol Resour. 2014 Nov;14(6):1210-21
24690331
Mol Ecol Resour. 2015 May;15(3):562-72
25186809
Evolution. 1985 Jul;39(4):783-791
28561359
Mol Biol Evol. 1987 Jul;4(4):406-25
3447015