Trait coordination, mechanical behaviour and growth form plasticity of Amborella trichopoda under variation in canopy openness.
Understanding the distribution of traits across the angiosperm phylogeny helps map the nested hierarchy of features that characterize key nodes. Finding that Amborella is sister to the rest of the angiosperms has raised the question of whether it shares certain key functional trait characteristics, and plastic responses apparently widespread within the angiosperms at large. With this in mind, we test the hypothesis that local canopy openness induces plastic responses. We used this variation in morphological and functional traits to estimate the pervasiveness of trait scaling and leaf and stem economics. We studied the architecture of Amborella and how it varies under different degrees of canopy openness. We analyzed the coordination of 12 leaf and stem structural and functional traits, and the association of this covariation with differing morphologies. The Amborella habit is made up of a series of sympodial modules that vary in size and branching pattern under different canopy openness. Amborella stems vary from self-supporting to semi-scandent. Changes in stem elongation and leaf size in Amborella produce distinct morphologies under different light environments. Correlations were found between most leaf and stem functional traits. Stem tissue rigidity decreased with increasing canopy openness. Despite substantial modulation of leaf size and leaf mass per area by light availability, branches in different light environments had similar leaf area-stem size scaling. The sympodial growth observed in Amborella could point to an angiosperm synapomorphy. Our study provides evidence of intraspecific coordination between leaf and stem economic spectra. Trait variation along these spectra is likely adaptive under different light environments and is consistent with these plastic responses having been present in the angiosperm common ancestor.
IRD, UMR AMAP, Laboratoire de Botanique et d'Écologie Végétale Appliquées, Noumea, BPA5, 98800, New Caledonia strueba@gmail.com.
Santiago
S
Trueba
IRD, UMR AMAP, Laboratoire de Botanique et d'Écologie Végétale Appliquées, Noumea, BPA5, 98800, New Caledonia.
Sandrine
S
Isnard
CIRAD, BIOS Direction, and INRA, UMR AMAP, F-34398 Montpellier, France.
Daniel
D
Barthélémy
Instituto de Biología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Tercer Circuito s/n de Ciudad Universitaria México, México DF 04510, México.
Mark E
ME
Olson
Adaptation; allometry; biomechanics; leaf mass per area; light environment; modulus of elasticity; phenotypic plasticity; plant architecture
Am J Bot. 2002 May;89(5):812-9
21665681
Oecologia. 2004 Aug;140(4):543-50
15232729
Nature. 2004 Apr 22;428(6985):851-4
15103376
New Phytol. 2011 Sep;191(4):1141-1149
21585390
J Exp Bot. 2006;57(2):355-71
16303828
Oecologia. 1999 Feb;118(2):248-255
28307701
New Phytol. 2014 Jan;201(2):378-382
24117716
New Phytol. 2007;174(4):787-798
17504462
Trends Plant Sci. 2000 Dec;5(12):537-42
11120476
Am J Bot. 2008 Apr;95(4):516-9
21632377
New Phytol. 2014 Jan;201(1):193-204
24033342
Mol Ecol. 2013 Dec;22(24):6163-78
24118476
Science. 2013 Dec 20;342(6165):1241089
24357323
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2010 Feb 27;365(1540):547-56
20083631
Ann Bot. 2007 Jan;99(1):121-30
17085473
New Phytol. 1997 Nov;137(3):463-472
33863072
Science. 1999 Oct 29;286(5441):947-50
10542147
Oecologia. 2003 May;135(4):621-8
16228258
New Phytol. 2005 May;166(2):383-408
15819904
Ann Bot. 2010 Feb;105(2):205-20
19900945
New Phytol. 2012 Jan;193(1):30-50
22085245
Oecologia. 1999 Aug;120(2):183-192
28308078
Ann Bot. 2014 Jul;114(1):179-90
24879768
J Exp Biol. 2006 Jun;209(Pt 12):2362-7
16731812
Ecology. 2012 Nov;93(11):2397-406
23236911
Am J Bot. 2005 Aug;92(8):1381-96
21646158
Int J Plant Sci. 1999 Sep;160(5):837-848
10506464
Integr Comp Biol. 2003 Jul;43(3):459-69
21680454
Evol Dev. 2011 Mar-Apr;13(2):214-27
21410877
New Phytol. 2010 Jan;185(2):493-501
19925557
Ann Bot. 2007 May;99(5):1003-15
16595553
Am Nat. 1998 Dec;152(6):767-91
18811427
Nature. 2016 Jan 14;529(7585):167-71
26700811
Tree Physiol. 2002 Nov;22(15-16):1045-64
12414366
Am Nat. 2005 Dec;166(6):650-60
16475082
Ann Bot. 2007 Mar;99(3):375-407
17218346
Oecologia. 1991 Jul;87(2):180-189
28313834
Ann Bot. 2006 Jan;97(1):97-107
16254019
Am J Phys Anthropol. 2009 Nov;140(3):476-86
19425097
Plant Cell Environ. 2013 Feb;36(2):405-18
22812458
Oecologia. 2000 Sep;124(4):476-486
28308386
Nature. 1999 Nov 25;402(6760):402-4
10586878
Trends Ecol Evol. 2008 Jun;23(6):299-303
18439708
New Phytol. 2010 Jan;185(2):481-92
19925555
Plant Cell Environ. 2007 Mar;30(3):291-309
17263775
Trends Ecol Evol. 2005 Mar;20(3):122-8
16701355
Nature. 2004 Apr 22;428(6985):821-7
15103368
Evolution. 2011 Jul;65(7):1827-40
21729041
Am J Bot. 2003 Aug;90(8):1253-6
21659225
Trends Ecol Evol. 2006 May;21(5):261-8
16697912
Evol Dev. 2012 Sep-Oct;14(5):437-49
22947317
Trends Ecol Evol. 2001 Jan 1;16(1):45-51
11146144
New Phytol. 2009;182(3):565-588
19434804
New Phytol. 2005 Apr;166(1):61-72
15760351
Am J Bot. 2013 Oct;100(10):1969-80
24107583
Front Plant Sci. 2015 Apr 22;6:266
25954292
Ecol Lett. 2009 Mar;12(3):210-9
19141123