Relationships between functional diversity and aboveground biomass production in the Northern Tibetan alpine grasslands.
Functional diversity, the extent of functional differences among species in a community, drives biodiversity-ecosystem function (BEF) relationships. Here, four species traits and aboveground biomass production (ABP) were considered. We used two community-wide measures of plant functional composition, (1) community weighted means of trait values (CWM) and (2) functional trait diversity based on Rao's quadratic diversity (FDQ) to evaluate the effects of functional diversity on the ABP in the Northern Tibetan alpine grasslands. Both species and functional diversity were positively related to the ABP. Functional trait composition had a larger predictive power for the ABP than species diversity and FDQ, indicating a primary dependence of ecosystem property on the identity of dominant species in our study system. Multivariate functional diversity was ineffective in predicting ecosystem function due to the trade-offs among different traits or traits selection criterions. Our study contributes to a better understanding of the mechanisms driving the BEF relationships in stressed ecosystems, and especially emphasizes that abiotic and biotic factors affect the BEF relationships in alpine grasslands.
Lhasa Plateau Ecosystem Research Station, Key Laboratory of Ecosystem Network Observation and Modeling, Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100101, China.
Juntao
J
Zhu
School of Biology, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, 30332, USA.
Lin
L
Jiang
Lhasa Plateau Ecosystem Research Station, Key Laboratory of Ecosystem Network Observation and Modeling, Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100101, China.|CAS Center for Excellence in Tibetan Plateau Earth Sciences, Beijing 100101, China.
Yangjian
Y
Zhang
Science. 1999 Nov 5;286(5442):1123-7
10550043
Nature. 2000 May 11;405(6783):234-42
10821284
Science. 2000 Aug 25;289(5483):1255
10979839
Science. 2001 Oct 26;294(5543):804-8
11679658
Nature. 2004 Apr 22;428(6985):821-7
15103368
Ecol Lett. 2006 Jun;9(6):741-58
16706917
Science. 2006 Nov 3;314(5800):812-4
17023613
Proc Biol Sci. 2007 Mar 22;274(1611):871-6
17251113
Ecology. 2008 Jun;89(6):1510-20
18589516
Ecol Lett. 2009 Jan;12(1):22-33
19087109
Ecology. 2009 Mar;90(3):637-48
19341135
PLoS One. 2009 May 27;4(5):e5695
19479086
Trends Ecol Evol. 2009 Sep;24(9):505-14
19595476
Ecology. 2010 Jan;91(1):299-305
20380219
Sci China Life Sci. 2010 Sep;53(9):1142-51
21104375
PLoS One. 2011 Mar 10;6(3):e17476
21423747
PLoS One. 2012;7(5):e36760
22623961
Ecol Lett. 2012 Dec;15(12):1397-405
22943183
Science. 2013 May 10;340(6133):741-4
23539179
Ecology. 2013 Aug;94(8):1878-85
24015531
Nature. 2014 Nov 6;515(7525):44-5
25317559
Oecologia. 1997 May;110(4):449-460
28307235