Profiles of Stimulus-Frequency Otoacoustic Emissions from 0.5 to 20 kHz in Humans.
The characteristics of human otoacoustic emissions (OAEs) have not been thoroughly examined above the standard audiometric frequency range (>8 kHz). This is despite the fact that deterioration of cochlear function often starts at the basal, high-frequency end of the cochlea before progressing apically. Here, stimulus-frequency OAEs (SFOAEs) were obtained from 0.5 to 20 kHz in 23 young, audiometrically normal female adults and three individuals with abnormal audiograms, using a low-to-moderate probe level of 36 dB forward pressure level (FPL). In audiometrically normal ears, SFOAEs were measurable at frequencies approaching the start of the steeply sloping high-frequency portion of the audiogram (∼12-15 kHz), though their amplitudes often declined substantially above ∼7 kHz, rarely exceeding 0 dB SPL above 8 kHz. This amplitude decline was typically abrupt and occurred at a frequency that was variable across subjects and not strongly related to the audiogram. In contrast, certain ears with elevated mid-frequency thresholds but regions of normal high-frequency sensitivity could possess surprisingly large SFOAEs (>10 dB SPL) above 7 kHz. When also measured, distortion-product OAEs (DPOAEs) usually remained stronger at higher stimulus frequencies and mirrored the audiogram more closely than SFOAEs. However, the high-frequency extent of SFOAE and DPOAE responses was similar when compared as a function of the response frequency, suggesting that middle ear transmission may be a common limiting factor at high frequencies. Nevertheless, cochlear factors are more likely responsible for complexities observed in high-frequency SFOAE spectra, such as abrupt amplitude changes and narrowly defined response peaks above 10 kHz, as well as the large responses in abnormal ears. These factors may include altered cochlear reflectivity due to subtle damage or the reduced spatial extent of the SFOAE generation region at the cochlear base. The use of higher probe levels is necessary to further evaluate the characteristics and potential utility of high-frequency SFOAE measurements.
Roxelyn and Richard Pepper Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, Northwestern University, 2240 Campus Drive, Evanston, IL, 60208, USA. jbdewey@stanford.edu.|Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Stanford University, 300 Pasteur Drive, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA. jbdewey@stanford.edu.
James B
JB
Dewey
Roxelyn and Richard Pepper Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, Northwestern University, 2240 Campus Drive, Evanston, IL, 60208, USA.|Knowles Hearing Center, Northwestern University, 2240 Campus Drive, Evanston, IL, 60208, USA.
Sumitrajit
S
Dhar
D000161:Acoustic Stimulation; D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D001299:Audiometry; D001309:Auditory Threshold; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D017084:Otoacoustic Emissions, Spontaneous / Q000502:physiology*; D055815:Young Adult
distortion-product otoacoustic emissions; forward pressure level; high frequencies; stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emissions
Hear Res. 1984 Dec;16(3):299-314
6401089
J Acoust Soc Am. 2012 Aug;132(2):927-43
22894215
Ear Hear. 2012 May-Jun;33(3):315-29
22436407
J Acoust Soc Am. 2015 Feb;137(2):768-76
25698011
J Acoust Soc Am. 1999 Feb;105(2 Pt 1):782-98
9972564
J Acoust Soc Am. 2008 May;123(5):2651-69
18529185
Hear Res. 1984 Mar;13(3):293-6
6735936
Hear Res. 1980 Jun;2(3-4):533-48
7410259
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002 Oct 1;99(20):13206-10
12239353
J Acoust Soc Am. 2007 Dec;122(6):3562-75
18247764
Hear Res. 1983 Jun;10(3):283-300
6874602
Hear Res. 1993 Dec;71(1-2):170-82
8113135
J Acoust Soc Am. 2011 Oct;130(4):EL238-43
21974498
J Acoust Soc Am. 2013 Apr;133(4):2240-53
23556592
J Acoust Soc Am. 2001 Feb;109(2):622-37
11248969
Ear Hear. 2005 Oct;26(5):487-503
16230898
J Acoust Soc Am. 1981 May;69(5):1343-7
7240565
Scand Audiol Suppl. 1979;(9):35-47
294689
J Acoust Soc Am. 2013 Jul;134(1):356-68
23862813
J Acoust Soc Am. 2014 Oct;136(4):1768-87
25324079
J Acoust Soc Am. 2011 Dec;130(6):3873-81
22225043
J Acoust Soc Am. 2011 Jan;129(1):245-61
21303007
J Acoust Soc Am. 2001 Nov;110(5 Pt 1):2456-69
11757935
J Acoust Soc Am. 2006 Aug;120(2):901-14
16938978
J Acoust Soc Am. 2014 May;135(5):2862-72
24815267
J Acoust Soc Am. 2012 Nov;132(5):3319-50
23145615
J Acoust Soc Am. 2008 Sep;124(3):1613-26
19045653
Ear Hear. 2006 Oct;27(5):466-79
16957498
J Acoust Soc Am. 2005 Oct;118(4):2434-43
16266165
J Acoust Soc Am. 2000 Dec;108(6):2911-32
11144584
J Acoust Soc Am. 2014 Jan;135(1):287-99
24437769
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002 Mar 5;99(5):3318-23
11867706
J Otolaryngol. 1998 Dec;27(6):354-60
9857322
J Acoust Soc Am. 1995 Oct;98(4):2018-47
7593924
J Acoust Soc Am. 2011 Dec;130(6):3882-92
22225044
Nature. 1995 Jun 15;375(6532):585-7
7791874
J Acoust Soc Am. 2003 Jul;114(1):244-62
12880039
J Acoust Soc Am. 2010 May;127(5):2955-72
21117746
J Acoust Soc Am. 2007 Apr;121(4):2097-110
17471725
Hear Res. 1991 Mar;52(1):99-112
2061217
Otol Neurotol. 2012 Oct;33(8):1315-22
22931865
Audiol Neurootol. 1998 Nov-Dec;3(6):361-72
9732130
J Acoust Soc Am. 1990 Jun;87(6):2592-605
2373794
J Acoust Soc Am. 2009 Feb;125(2):1014-32
19206876
J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2012 Oct;13(5):591-607
22688355
J Acoust Soc Am. 1995 May;97(5 Pt 1):3012-20
7759641
J Acoust Soc Am. 2003 May;113(5):2773-89
12765395
Hear Res. 2003 Sep;183(1-2):7-17
13679133
J Acoust Soc Am. 2003 Oct;114(4 Pt 1):2021-43
14587602
J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2010 Sep;11(3):343-65
20440634
J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2015 Jun;16(3):317-29
25813430
J Acoust Soc Am. 2005 May;117(5):2980-8
15957768
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1999 Feb;125(2):215-22
10037289
J Acoust Soc Am. 2008 Jul;124(1):288-300
18646977
J Acoust Soc Am. 2013 Jun;133(6):4098-108
23742362
J Acoust Soc Am. 1997 Nov;102(5 Pt 1):2831-48
9373971
J Acoust Soc Am. 2008 Mar;123(3):1479-94
18345837
J Acoust Soc Am. 2003 May;113(5):2762-72
12765394
J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2015 Feb;16(1):29-45
25303881
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2011 Aug;58(8):null
21606018
Hear Res. 2000 Jan;139(1-2):1-12
10601708