Metaphilosophy of Mind: how Do Minds Investigate Minds? Refutation of the Theocentric View.
I shall propose metaphilosophy of mind as the philosophy of mind investigating mind. That is to say, I pose the question of how knowledge of mind provided by cognitive science, broadly construed, is constrained by the epistemic position of the knower, i.e. by the very fact that it is undertaken by a mind. Here I would like to propose a minimal framework, based on two distinctions: (i) the standard one between empirical and conceptual analysis; (ii) a new one, between the internal questions of mind and the boundary questions of mind. I shall then combine these distinctions to arrive at several ways of investigating the mind, the brain and cognition. On this ground, I will discuss the notion of epistemological theocentrism as outlined by Henry Allison and argue against the perspective I call theocentric philosophy of mind. From this angle I will be able to address skepticism which cannot be defeated but actually can be, as I put it, disarmed. Finally, metaphilosophy of mind based on the abovementioned distinctions elicits a perspective that is not sufficiently delineated by cognitive scientists and philosophers: empirical way of addressing the boundary questions of mind.
Institute of Philosophy, Cognitive Science Department, Jagiellonian University in Kraków, Grodzka 52, 31-044, Kraków, Poland. konrad.t.werner@gmail.com.
Konrad
K
Werner
D019336:Cognitive Science; D006801:Humans; D000067489:Metacognition; D010684:Philosophy; D056345:Theory of Mind
Knowledge; Metaphilosophy; Mind; Philosophy of cognitive science; Philosophy of mind
Integr Psychol Behav Sci. 2016 Mar;50(1):62-76
26111737
Philosophia (Ramat Gan). 2016;44(3):921-946
30158727