Selecting caudal fusion levels: 2 year functional and stiffness outcomes with matched pairs analysis in multilevel fusion to L5 versus S1.
Controversy persists as to whether to end multilevel thoracolumbar fusions caudally at L5 or S1. Some argue that stopping at L5 may preserve greater function, but there are few data comparing functional limitations due to lumbar stiffness in patients with fusion to L5 versus S1. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether patients undergoing multilevel thoracolumbar fusions with an L5 caudal endpoint have a better lumbosacral function than patients with an S1 caudal endpoint.



Patients undergoing successful thoracolumbar fusion of 5 or more levels to L5 or S1, with solid fusion at 2 year follow-up, were examined from a single European center in addition to a multi-center North American database of 237 patients. In total, 40 patients with a distal stopping point of L5 were matched with a subset of 40 patients with a distal endpoint of S1 ± pelvic fixation. The L5 and S1 groups were matched for the final Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Sagittal Vertical Axis (SVA C7-S1), number of fusion levels, and age. Impacts of lumbar stiffness on function as measured by the Lumbar Stiffness Disability Index (LSDI) were compared using the conditional logistic regression.



After matching, there was no significant difference between the S1 and L5 groups for the final ODI (29.22 ± 21.6 for S1 versus 29.21 ± 21.7 for L5; p = 0.98), SVA (29.5 ± 40.3 mm for S1 versus 33.7 ± 37.1 mm for L5; p = 0.97), mean age (61.6 ± 11.0 years for S1 versus 58.3 ± 12.6 years for L5; p = 0.23), and number of fusion levels (9.7 ± 3.3 levels for S1 versus 9.0 ± 3 levels for L5; p = 0.34). The final 2-year postoperative LSDI scores were not significantly different between the S1 group (28.08 ± 21.47) and L5 group (29.21 ± 21.66) (hazard ratio 0.99, 95 % CI 0.97-1.03, p = 0.81).



The analysis of patients with multilevel thoracolumbar fusions demonstrated that after minimum 2 year follow-up, self-reported functional impacts of lumbar stiffness were not significantly different between the patients with distal endpoints of L5 versus S1. The choice of distal fusion level of L5 does not appear to retain sufficient spinal flexibility to substantially affect postoperative function.



Level III.
Department of Orthopedics, Adult Spinal Deformity Service, Brown University, 100 Butler Drive, Providence, RI, 02906, USA. alandanielsmd@gmail.com.
Alan H
AH
Daniels
Spine-Center, Werner-Wicker-Clinic, Bad Wildungen, Germany.
Heiko
H
Koller
Orthopaedics, Spinal Deformity Service, Swedish Health System, Seattle, WA, USA.
Shannon L
SL
Hiratzka
Spine-Center, Werner-Wicker-Clinic, Bad Wildungen, Germany.
Michael
M
Mayer
Spine-Center, Werner-Wicker-Clinic, Bad Wildungen, Germany.
Oliver
O
Meier
Orthopaedics, Spinal Deformity Service, Swedish Health System, Seattle, WA, USA.
Alec Gabriel
AG
Contag
Department of Orthopedics, Adult Spinal Deformity Service, Brown University, 100 Butler Drive, Providence, RI, 02906, USA.
Adam E M
AEM
Eltorai
Orthopaedics, Spinal Deformity Service, Swedish Health System, Seattle, WA, USA.
Jayme
J
Hiratzka
Neurosurgery, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, USA.
D
D
Kojo Hamilton
Neurosurgery, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, USA.
Christopher I
CI
Shaffrey
Neurosurgery, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, USA.
Justin S
JS
Smith
Orthopaedics, Denver International Spine Clinic. Presbyterian/St. Luke's Rocky Mountain Hospital for Children, Denver, CO, USA.
Shay
S
Bess
Orthopaedics, University of California, Davis, USA.
Eric O
EO
Klineberg
Neurosurgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, USA.
Christopher P
CP
Ames
Orthopaedics, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, USA.
Virginie
V
Lafage
ISSGF, Littleton, USA.
Breton
B
Line
Orthopaedics, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, USA.
Frank J
FJ
Schwab
Orthopaedics, Spinal Deformity Service, Swedish Health System, Seattle, WA, USA.
Robert A
RA
Hart
ISSGF, Littleton, USA.
International Spine Study
ISS
Group
D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D004185:Disability Evaluation; D005500:Follow-Up Studies; D006801:Humans; D008159:Lumbar Vertebrae / Q000601:surgery*; D016555:Matched-Pair Analysis; D008875:Middle Aged; D063868:Patient Outcome Assessment; D012447:Sacrum / Q000601:surgery*; D013123:Spinal Fusion / Q000379:methods*; D013904:Thoracic Vertebrae / Q000601:surgery*
Adult spinal deformity; Adverse outcomes; Collateral outcomes; LSDI; Lumbar spine; Spine fusion
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006 Sep 1;31(19 Suppl):S179-84
16946636
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005 Apr;(433):111-4
15805945
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007 Nov 15;32(24):2771-6
18007259
Neurosurg Clin N Am. 2007 Apr;18(2):281-8
17556129
Eur Spine J. 2016 Feb;25(2):532-48
25917822
J Spinal Disord Tech. 2004 Oct;17 (5):358-66
15385874
Eur Spine J. 2006 Jan;15(1):55-65
15856341
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2004 Sep 15;29(18):1996-2005
15371700
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2012 Aug 15;37(18):1628-33
22460923
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2011 May 1;36(10):817-24
20683385
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2017 Aug 1;42(15):1151-1157
27902557
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2015 Sep 1;40(17):1338-44
25943083
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013 Aug 1;38(17):1508-15
23324934
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006 Aug 1;31(17 ):1943-51
16924211
Spine J. 2013 Feb;13(2):157-61
23337543
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2003 Aug 15;28(16):1836-43; discussion 1844
12923471
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2015 Oct 15;40(20):1599-604
26731705
J Neurosurg Spine. 2004 Jul;1(1):1-8
15291013
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2003 Oct 15;28(20):S234-42
14560197