Introduction of an Area Deprivation Index Measuring Patient Socioeconomic Status in an Integrated Health System: Implications for Population Health.
BACKGROUND
Intermountain Healthcare is a fully integrated delivery system based in Salt Lake City, Utah. As a learning healthcare system with a mission of performance excellence, it became apparent that population health management and our efforts to move towards shared accountability would require additional patient-centric metrics in order to provide the right care to the right patients at the right time. Several European countries have adopted social deprivation indices in measuring the impact that social determinants can have on health. Such indices provide a geographic, area-based measure of how socioeconomically deprived residents of that area are on average. Intermountain's approach was to identify a proxy measure that did not require front-line data collection and could be standardized for our patient population, leading us to the area deprivation index or ADI. This paper describes the specifications and calculation of an ADI for the state of Utah. Results are presented along with introduction of three use cases demonstrating the potential for application of an ADI in quality improvement in a learning healthcare system.


METHODS
The Utah ADI shows promise in providing a proxy for patient-reported measures reflecting key socio-economic indicators useful for tailoring patient interventions to improve health care delivery and patient outcomes. Strengths of this approach include a consistent standardized measurement of social determinants, use of more granular block group level measures and a limited data capture burden for front-line teams. While the methodology is generalizable to other communities, results of this index are limited to block groups within the state of Utah and will differ from national calculations or calculations for other states. The use of composite measures to evaluate individual characteristics must also be approached with care. Other limitations with the use of U.S. Census data include use of estimates and missing data.


CONCLUSIONS
Initial applications in three meaningfully different areas of an integrated health system provide initial evidence of its broad applicability in addressing the impact of social determinants on health. The variation in socio-economic status by quintile also has potential for clinical significance, though more research is needed to link variation in ADI with variation in health outcomes overall and by disease type.
Institute for Healthcare Leadership, Intermountain Healthcare.
Andrew J
AJ
Knighton
Institute for Healthcare Leadership, Intermountain Healthcare; Division of Epidemiology, Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Utah.
Lucy
L
Savitz
Institute for Healthcare Leadership, Intermountain Healthcare.
Tom
T
Belnap
Institute for Healthcare Leadership, Intermountain Healthcare.
Brad
B
Stephenson
Division of Public Health, Department of Family and Preventive Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Utah.
James
J
VanDerslice
Learning health system; data analysis method; delivery of health care; health services research; individual who live in rural areas; individuals who live in inner-city areas; patient-centered care; patient-reported outcomes; population health
Health Aff (Millwood). 2008 May-Jun;27(3):759-69
18474969
BMJ. 2013 Jan 28;346:f167
23358487
Ann Intern Med. 2014 Dec 2;161(11):765-74
25437404
Am J Public Health. 2001 Apr;91(4):632-6
11291379
Health Serv Res. 1998 Jun;33(2 Pt 1):243-59
9618670
Am J Public Health. 2003 Jul;93(7):1137-43
12835199
Health Serv Res. 2013 Apr;48(2 Pt 1):539-59
22816561
Am J Epidemiol. 1998 Sep 1;148(5):475-86
9737560