Aortic root stiffness affects the kinematics of bioprosthetic aortic valves.
In this study, the influence of aortic root distensibility on the haemodynamic parameters and valve kinematics of a bioprosthetic aortic valve was investigated in a controlled in vitro experiment.



An Edwards INTUITY Elite 21 mm sutureless aortic valve (Edwards Lifesciences, Irvine, CA, USA) was inserted in three transparent aortic root phantoms with different wall thicknesses (0.55, 0.85 and 1.50 mm) mimicking different physiological distensibilities. Haemodynamic measurements were performed in an in vitro flow loop at heart rates of 60, 80 and 100 bpm with corresponding cardiac outputs of 3.5, 4.0 and 5.0 l/min and aortic pressures of 100/60, 120/90 and 145/110 mmHg, respectively. Aortic valve kinematics were assessed using a high-speed camera. The geometric orifice area (GOA) was measured by counting pixels in the lumen of the open aortic valve. The effective orifice area (EOA) was calculated from the root-mean-square value of the systolic aortic valve flow rate and the mean systolic trans-valvular pressure gradient.



The tested aortic root phantoms reproduce physiological distensibilities of healthy individuals in age groups ranging from 40 to 70 years (±10 years). The haemodynamic results show only minor differences between the aortic root phantoms: the trans-valvular pressure gradient tends to increase for stiffer aortic roots, whereas the systolic aortic valve flow rate remains constant. As a consequence, the EOA decreased slightly for less distensible aortic roots. The GOA and the aortic valve opening and closing velocities increase significantly with reduced distensibility for all haemodynamic measurements. The resulting mean systolic flow velocity in the aortic valve orifice is lower for the stiffer aortic root.



Aortic root distensibility may influence GOA and aortic valve kinematics, which affects the mechanical load on the aortic valve cusps. Whether these changes have a significant effect on the onset of structural valve deterioration of bioprosthetic heart valves needs to be further investigated.
ARTORG Center, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Silje Ekroll
SE
Jahren
Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, University Hospital Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Bernhard Michael
BM
Winkler
Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, University Hospital Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Paul Philipp
PP
Heinisch
ARTORG Center, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Jessica
J
Wirz
Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, University Hospital Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Thierry
T
Carrel
ARTORG Center, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Dominik
D
Obrist
D001021:Aortic Valve / Q000503:physiopathology*; D001696:Biomechanical Phenomena; D001705:Bioprosthesis; D001794:Blood Pressure / Q000502:physiology; D002302:Cardiac Output / Q000502:physiology; D006350:Heart Valve Prosthesis; D006439:Hemodynamics / Q000502:physiology; D006801:Humans; D011474:Prosthesis Design; D059289:Vascular Stiffness / Q000502:physiology*
Aortic root distensibility; Aortic valve; Bioprosthetic valve