A decision analysis framework for estimating the potential hazards for drinking water resources of chemicals used in hydraulic fracturing fluids.
Despite growing concerns over the potential for hydraulic fracturing to impact drinking water resources, there are limited data available to identify chemicals used in hydraulic fracturing fluids that may pose public health concerns. In an effort to explore these potential hazards, a multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) framework was employed to analyze and rank selected subsets of these chemicals by integrating data on toxicity, frequency of use, and physicochemical properties that describe transport in water. Data used in this analysis were obtained from publicly available databases compiled by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) as part of a larger study on the potential impacts of hydraulic fracturing on drinking water. Starting with nationwide hydraulic fracturing chemical usage data from EPA's analysis of the FracFocus Chemical Disclosure Registry 1.0, MCDAs were performed on chemicals that had either noncancer toxicity values (n=37) or cancer-specific toxicity values (n=10). The noncancer MCDA was then repeated for subsets of chemicals reported in three representative states (Texas, n=31; Pennsylvania, n=18; and North Dakota, n=20). Within each MCDA, chemicals received scores based on relative toxicity, relative frequency of use, and physicochemical properties (mobility in water, volatility, persistence). Results show a relative ranking of these chemicals based on hazard potential, and provide preliminary insight into chemicals that may be more likely than others to impact drinking water resources. Comparison of nationwide versus state-specific analyses indicates regional differences in the chemicals that may be of more concern to drinking water resources, although many chemicals were commonly used and received similar overall hazard rankings. Several chemicals highlighted by these MCDAs have been reported in groundwater near areas of hydraulic fracturing activity. This approach is intended as a preliminary analysis, and represents one possible method for integrating data to explore potential public health impacts.
United States Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, National Center for Environmental Assessment, Research Triangle Park, NC, United States.
Erin E
EE
Yost
United States Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, National Center for Environmental Assessment, Research Triangle Park, NC, United States.
John
J
Stanek
United States Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, National Center for Environmental Assessment, Research Triangle Park, NC, United States. Electronic address: Lyle.D.Burgoon@usace.army.mil.
Lyle D
LD
Burgoon
D003661:Decision Support Techniques; D060766:Drinking Water; D006801:Humans; D000067071:Hydraulic Fracking; D009658:North Dakota; D010414:Pennsylvania; D013781:Texas; D014481:United States; D014484:United States Environmental Protection Agency; D014876:Water Pollution / Q000032:analysis*; D060753:Water Quality / Q000592:standards*
D060766:Drinking Water
Exposure assessment; Hazard evaluation; Hydraulic fracturing
Ground Water. 2013 Jul-Aug;51(4):488-510
23745972
Environ Sci Technol. 2014;48(15):8334-48
24606408
Environ Sci Technol. 2015 Jul 7;49(13):8254-62
26079990
Nanotoxicology. 2014 Feb;8(1):72-87
23153309
Risk Anal. 2012 Aug;32(8):1382-93
22211399
PLoS One. 2013 Aug 05;8(8):e70911
23940664
Sci Total Environ. 2011 Sep 1;409(19):3578-94
21764422
Toxicol Sci. 2014 Jun;139(2):271-83
24706166
Science. 2013 May 17;340(6134):1235009
23687049
Environ Sci Technol. 2016 Apr 19;50(8):4524-36
27022977
Environ Sci Technol. 2016 May 3;50(9):4788-97
27050380
Risk Anal. 2011 Aug;31(8):1211-25
21371061
Environ Health Perspect. 2009 May;117(5):685-95
19479008
J Air Waste Manag Assoc. 2013 Apr;63(4):424-32
23687727
J Hazard Mater. 2014 Jun 30;275:37-54
24853136
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015 Oct 27;112(43):13184-9
26460018
J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol. 2017 Jan;27(1):90-99
26732376
J Occup Environ Hyg. 2015;12(9):611-24
25894916
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015 May 19;112(20):6325-30
25941400