Efficient evaluation of cellulose digestibility by Trichoderma reesei Rut-C30 cultures in online monitored shake flasks.
BACKGROUND
Pretreated lignocellulosic biomass is considered as a suitable feedstock for the sustainable production of chemicals. However, the recalcitrant nature of cellulose often results in very cost-intensive overall production processes. A promising concept to reduce the costs is consolidated bioprocessing, which integrates in a single step cellulase production, cellulose hydrolysis, and fermentative conversion of produced sugars into a valuable product. This approach, however, requires assessing the digestibility of the applied celluloses and, thus, the released sugar amount during the fermentation. Since the released sugars are completely taken up by Trichoderma reesei Rut-C30 and the sugar consumption is stoichiometrically coupled to oxygen uptake, the respiration activity was measured to evaluate the digestibility of cellulose.


RESULTS
The method was successfully tested on commercial cellulosic substrates identifying a correlation between the respiration activity and the crystallinity of the substrate. Pulse experiments with cellulose and cellulases suggested that the respiration activity of T. reesei on cellulose can be divided into two distinct phases, one limited by enzyme activity and one by cellulose-binding-sites. The impact of known (cellobiose, sophorose, urea, tween 80, peptone) and new (miscanthus steepwater) compounds enhancing cellulase production was evaluated. Furthermore, the influence of two different pretreatment methods, the OrganoCat and OrganoSolv process, on the digestibility of beech wood saw dust was tested.


CONCLUSIONS
The introduced method allows an online evaluation of cellulose digestibility in complex and non-complex cultivation media. As the measurements are performed under fermentation conditions, it is a valuable tool to test different types of cellulose for consolidated bioprocessing applications. Furthermore, the method can be applied to identify new compounds, which influence cellulase production.
AVT‑Biochemical Engineering, RWTH Aachen University, Worringerweg 1, 52074, Aachen, Germany.
Elena
E
Antonov
AVT‑Biochemical Engineering, RWTH Aachen University, Worringerweg 1, 52074, Aachen, Germany.
Steffen
S
Wirth
AVT‑Biochemical Engineering, RWTH Aachen University, Worringerweg 1, 52074, Aachen, Germany.
Tim
T
Gerlach
Institute of Applied Microbiology, RWTH Aachen University, Worringerweg 1, 52074, Aachen, Germany.
Ivan
I
Schlembach
Institute of Applied Microbiology, RWTH Aachen University, Worringerweg 1, 52074, Aachen, Germany.
Miriam A
MA
Rosenbaum
AVT‑Biochemical Engineering, RWTH Aachen University, Worringerweg 1, 52074, Aachen, Germany.
Lars
L
Regestein
AVT‑Biochemical Engineering, RWTH Aachen University, Worringerweg 1, 52074, Aachen, Germany. jochen.buechs@avt.rwth-aachen.de.
Jochen
http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5397-5782
J
Büchs
Beech wood; Cellulose; Consolidated bioprocessing; Digestibility; OrganoCat; OrganoSolv; Respiration activity measurement; Trichoderma reesei Rut-C30
Microbiology. 2005 Jan;151(Pt 1):135-43
15632433
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 Sep 3;110(36):14592-7
23959872
Microbiology. 2012 Jan;158(Pt 1):46-57
22053009
Biotechnol Bioeng. 2004 Dec 30;88(7):797-824
15538721
J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol. 2016 Sep;43(9):1215-26
27400988
Biotechnol Bioeng. 1990 Jul;36(3):275-87
18595079
Biotechnol J. 2011 Jan;6(1):74-85
21184439
J Biosci Bioeng. 2012 Aug;114(2):198-203
22578592
Bioresour Technol. 2015 Mar;180:59-65
25585255
Int J Biol Sci. 2009 Sep 04;5(6):578-95
19774110
Microbiology. 2012 Jan;158(Pt 1):58-68
21998163
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2011 Dec;77(23):8288-94
21965408
Anal Biochem. 1972 May;47(1):273-9
5031119
Biotechnol Bioeng. 2006 Aug 20;94(6):1122-8
16732604
Appl Biochem Biotechnol. 2004 Spring;113-116:115-24
15054199
Metab Eng. 2008 Nov;10(6):370-81
18647658
Biochem J. 2001 Jan 1;353(Pt 1):117-127
11115405
Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2009 Apr;82(5):815-27
19214499
Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2012 Jun;23(3):396-405
22176748
Nat Biotechnol. 2008 Feb;26(2):169-72
18259168
FEBS J. 2010 Mar;277(6):1571-82
20148968
J Bacteriol. 1962 Feb;83:400-8
14469205
Appl Environ Microbiol. 1997 Apr;63(4):1298-306
9097427
Biotechnol Bioeng. 2012 Apr;109(4):1083-7
22095526
Bioresour Technol. 2007 Mar;98(4):753-60
16759853
Biotechnol Bioeng. 2011 Jun;108(6):1290-7
21280028
Enzyme Microb Technol. 2011 Apr 7;48(4-5):408-15
22112958
Biotechnol Bioeng. 2004 Dec 30;88(7):832-7
15459905
Biochem Eng J. 2001 Mar;7(2):157-162
11173305
Biotechnol Biofuels. 2010 May 24;3:10
20497524
Eur J Biochem. 1985 Jan 15;146(2):301-8
3917923
Microb Cell Fact. 2014 Nov 07;13:149
25376163
Anal Biochem. 1969 Dec;32(3):420-4
5361396
Anal Biochem. 1976 May 7;72:248-54
942051
Biotechnol Bioeng. 1985 Nov;27(11):1540-7
18553606
J Biosci Bioeng. 2014 Dec;118(6):702-9
24982019
Biotechnol Bioeng. 1988 Jun 20;32(1):38-45
18584716
Biotechnol Bioeng. 2012 Aug;109(8):2025-38
22389072
Biotechnol Biofuels. 2011 Feb 10;4:3
21310050
Bioresour Technol. 2005 Apr;96(6):673-86
15588770
Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2002 Sep;66(3):506-77, table of contents
12209002