Type of High School Predicts Academic Performance at University Better than Individual Differences.
Psychological correlates of academic performance have always been of high relevance to psychological research. The relation between psychometric intelligence and academic performance is one of the most consistent and well-established findings in psychology. It is hypothesized that intelligence puts a limit on what an individual can learn or achieve. Moreover, a growing body of literature indicates a relationship between personality traits and academic performance. This relationship helps us to better understand how an individual will learn or achieve their goals. The aim of this study is to further investigate the relationship between psychological correlates of academic performance by exploring the potentially moderating role of prior education. The participants in this study differed in the type of high school they attended. They went either to gymnasium, a general education type of high school that prepares students specifically for university studies, or to vocational school, which prepares students both for the labour market and for further studies. In this study, we used archival data of psychological testing during career guidance in the final year of high school, and information about the university graduation of those who received guidance. The psychological measures included intelligence, personality and general knowledge. The results show that gymnasium students had greater chances of performing well at university, and that this relationship exceeds the contribution of intelligence and personality traits to university graduation. Moreover, psychological measures did not interact with type of high school, which indicates that students from different school types do not profit from certain individual characteristics.
Independent researcher, Osijek, Croatia.
Benjamin
B
Banai
Croatian Employment Service, Zadar Regional Office, Zadar, Croatia.
Višnja
V
Perin
D000124:Achievement; D006801:Humans; D007206:Individuality; D007360:Intelligence; D008137:Longitudinal Studies; D010551:Personality; D011594:Psychometrics / Q000379:methods; D012574:Schools; D013334:Students / Q000523:psychology; D014495:Universities
Psychol Bull. 1997 Mar;121(2):219-45
9100487
Annu Rev Psychol. 2014;65:693-717
24050188
Am Psychol. 1997 Oct;52(10):1134-9
9329294
Annu Rev Psychol. 1998;49:479-502
9496630
Contemp Educ Psychol. 2001 Apr;26(2):149-170
11273654
J Appl Psychol. 1947 Aug;31(4):372-6
20258406
Am Psychol. 2012 Feb-Mar;67(2):130-59
22233090
Psychol Bull. 2004 Mar;130(2):261-88
14979772
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2007 Dec;2(4):346-60
26151972
Psychon Bull Rev. 2004 Oct;11(5):791-806
15732688
Br J Educ Psychol. 2011 Mar;81(Pt 1):41-58
21391963
Br J Educ Psychol. 2009 Dec;79(Pt 4):769-82
19245744
Br J Psychol. 2002 Nov;93(Pt 4):545-56
12519533
Br J Educ Psychol. 2005 Jun;75(Pt 2):239-55
16033665
Psychol Bull. 2009 Mar;135(2):322-38
19254083
Br J Educ Psychol. 2011 Mar;81(Pt 1):78-96
21199485
Psychol Bull. 2012 Mar;138(2):353-87
22352812