Global change, life-history complexity and the potential for evolutionary rescue.
Most organisms have complex life cycles, and in marine taxa, larval life-history stages tend to be more sensitive to environmental stress than adult (reproductive) life-history stages. While there are several models of stage-specific adaptation across the life history, the extent to which differential sensitivity to environmental stress (defined here as reductions in absolute fitness across the life history) affects the tempo of adaptive evolution to change remains unclear. We used a heuristic model to explore how commonly observed features associated with marine complex life histories alter a population's capacity to cope with environmental change. We found that increasing the complexity of the life history generally reduces the evolutionary potential of taxa to cope with environmental change. Our model also predicted that genetic correlations in stress tolerance between stages, levels of genetic variance in each stage, and the relative plasticity of different stages, all interact to affect the maximum rate of environmental change that will permit species persistence. Our results suggest that marine organisms with complex life cycles are particularly vulnerable to anthropogenic global change, but we lack empirical estimates of key parameters for most species.
Centre for Geometric Biology Monash University Melbourne Vic.Australia; School of Biological Sciences Monash University Melbourne Vic. Australia.
Dustin J
DJ
Marshall
Department of Biological Science Florida State University Tallahassee FL USA.
Scott C
SC
Burgess
School of Biological Sciences Monash University Melbourne Vic. Australia.
Tim
T
Connallon
evolutionary theory; life history evolution; quantitative genetics
Evolution. 2001 Aug;55(8):1668-77
11580026
Proc Biol Sci. 2003 Jul 22;270(1523):1433-40
12965006
Am Nat. 2006 Mar;167(3):410-28
16673349
J Evol Biol. 2007 Jan;20(1):1-8
17209986
Evolution. 2007 Dec;61(12):2832-8
17908250
Genetica. 2009 Apr;135(3):289-98
18500651
Am Nat. 2008 Nov;172(5):599-612
18840061
Trends Ecol Evol. 2008 Dec;23(12):649-54
18848367
Proc Biol Sci. 2009 Mar 22;276(1659):1183-91
19129097
J Evol Biol. 2009 Jul;22(7):1435-46
19467134
Am Nat. 2009 Dec;174(6):E218-29
19821744
Evolution. 2010 Apr 1;64(4):1143-50
19863583
PLoS Biol. 2010 Apr 27;8(4):e1000357
20463950
Proc Biol Sci. 2010 Nov 22;277(1699):3391-400
20554553
Nature. 2011 Feb 24;470(7335):479-85
21350480
Am Nat. 2011 Apr;177(4):397-409
21460563
Science. 2011 Jul 22;333(6041):418-22
21778392
Curr Biol. 2011 Sep 27;21(18):R718-25
21959162
Mar Environ Res. 2012 May;76:3-15
22154473
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2013 Jan 19;368(1610):20120080
23209162
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2013 Jan 19;368(1610):20120089
23209170
Naturwissenschaften. 2013 Mar;100(3):281-4
23435592
Evolution. 2013 Mar;67(3):708-21
23461322
Ecol Lett. 2013 Dec;16(12):1488-500
24119205
Am Nat. 2014 Jan;183(1):108-25
24334740
Evol Appl. 2014 Jan;7(1):169-91
24454555
Proc Biol Sci. 2014 Jul 7;281(1786):null
24827437
Evolution. 2014 Sep;68(9):2481-93
24909756
Proc Biol Sci. 2014 Aug 7;281(1788):20141091
24966319
Glob Chang Biol. 2015 Jun;21(6):2122-40
25488061
Evol Appl. 2011 Mar;4(2):326-37
25567976
J Anim Ecol. 2016 Mar;85(2):329-42
26899421
Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 1989 Aug;18(1):15-26
2776686
Oecologia. 1986 Oct;70(3):362-366
28311922
Evolution. 1985 May;39(3):505-522
28561964
Evolution. 1980 Mar;34(2):292-305
28563426
Evolution. 1991 Mar;45(2):380-397
28567881
Evolution. 1979 Mar;33(1Part2):402-416
28568194
Evolution. 1995 Feb;49(1):201-207
28593677