Critical Appraisal of Microbiology Guidelines Endorsed by two Professional Organisations: Société Française De Microbiologie (SFM) and American Society of Microbiology (ASM).
Medical practice guidelines (GLs) being tools that are mainly designed to evaluate medical professionals, it sounds logical, and fair, that professionals should in turn evaluate GLs. Microbiology being a medical discipline, we used the AGREE instrument, i.e. an established evaluation tool for GLs, in order to evaluate the quality of two major microbiology guidelines, i.e. the SFM GLs and the ASM GLs). Both guidelines remain sub-optimal in their levels of quality, and obtain scores that are not very different from the average scores obtained by many other guidelines in various medical disciplines. We therefore believe that both guidelines need to be modified before they can be recommended without provisos. A higher degree of multi-disciplinary work, including a more formal implication of methodologists, as well as of infectious disease clinicians, and of economists, might perhaps enable future editions of these guidelines to reach higher levels of quality.
Biochimie Métabolique, Hôpital de la Pitié-Salpétrière , Paris.
Michèle
M
Fonfrède
Biologie polyvalente, Hôpital de Cahors , Paris.
Jean Paul
JP
Couaillac
Biochimie, Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou , Paris.
Christine
C
Augereau
Directeur Médical , Novescia, Paris.
Jean Pierre
JP
Lepargneur
Biologie polyvalente, Hôpital de la Chartreuse , Villefranche-de-Rouergue.
Joseph
J
Watine
AGREE Quality; ASM; Evidence-Based-Medicine; SFM; practice guidelines; recommendations
J Clin Epidemiol. 2011 Apr;64(4):395-400
21194891
Clin Chem. 2004 May;50(5):806-18
15105349
Qual Saf Health Care. 2010 Dec;19(6):e58
21127089
J Health Serv Res Policy. 2006 Jul;11(3):172-9
16824265
Ann Biol Clin (Paris). 2011 Mar-Apr;69(2):239-45
21464020