Biostimulation proved to be the most efficient method in the comparison of in situ soil remediation treatments after a simulated oil spill accident.
The use of in situ techniques in soil remediation is still rare in Finland and most other European countries due to the uncertainty of the effectiveness of the techniques especially in cold regions and also due to their potential side effects on the environment. In this study, we compared the biostimulation, chemical oxidation, and natural attenuation treatments in natural conditions and pilot scale during a 16-month experiment. A real fuel spill accident was used as a model for experiment setup and soil contamination. We found that biostimulation significantly decreased the contaminant leachate into the water, including also the non-aqueous phase liquid (NAPL). The total NAPL leachate was 19 % lower in the biostimulation treatment that in the untreated soil and 34 % lower in the biostimulation than oxidation treatment. Soil bacterial growth and community changes were first observed due to the increased carbon content via oil amendment and later due to the enhanced nutrient content via biostimulation. Overall, the most effective treatment for fresh contaminated soil was biostimulation, which enhanced the biodegradation of easily available oil in the mobile phase and consequently reduced contaminant leakage through the soil. The chemical oxidation did not enhance soil cleanup and resulted in the mobilization of contaminants. Our results suggest that biostimulation can decrease or even prevent oil migration in recently contaminated areas and can thus be considered as a potentially safe in situ treatment also in groundwater areas.
Department of Environmental Sciences, University of Helsinki, Niemenkatu 73, 15140, Lahti, Finland. suvi.simpanen@helsinki.fi.
Suvi
S
Simpanen
Department of Environmental Sciences, University of Helsinki, Niemenkatu 73, 15140, Lahti, Finland.
Mari
M
Dahl
Department of Environmental Sciences, University of Helsinki, Niemenkatu 73, 15140, Lahti, Finland.
Magdalena
M
Gerlach
Department of Biological and Environmental Science, University of Jyväskylä, Survontie 9 C, 40014, Jyväskylä, Finland.
Anu
A
Mikkonen
Department of Environmental Sciences, University of Helsinki, Niemenkatu 73, 15140, Lahti, Finland.|Mikkeli University of Applied Sciences, Patteristonkatu 3, 50100, Mikkeli, Finland.
Vuokko
V
Malk
Department of Environmental Sciences, University of Helsinki, Niemenkatu 73, 15140, Lahti, Finland.
Juha
J
Mikola
Department of Environmental Sciences, University of Helsinki, Niemenkatu 73, 15140, Lahti, Finland.
Martin
M
Romantschuk
D000059:Accidents; D001673:Biodegradation, Environmental; D002244:Carbon / Q000032:analysis; D005387:Finland; D008962:Models, Theoretical; D059392:Petroleum Pollution / Q000032:analysis / Q000517:prevention & control*; D012987:Soil / Q000737:chemistry*; D012988:Soil Microbiology; D012989:Soil Pollutants / Q000032:analysis*; D014874:Water Pollutants, Chemical / Q000032:analysis*
D012987:Soil; D012989:Soil Pollutants; D014874:Water Pollutants, Chemical; D002244:Carbon
Biodegradation; Biostimulation; Chemical oxidation; Hydrocarbon contamination; Molecular monitoring; Soil bioremediation
Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2014 Mar;98(6):2751-64
24092007
Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2006 Sep;72(2):252-62
16804692
J Environ Monit. 2001 Jun;3(3):274-80
11432263
Environ Pollut. 2006 Nov;144(1):255-65
16487636
J Environ Manage. 2009 Apr;90(5):1715-27
19201076
Chemosphere. 2008 Mar;71(1):43-50
18068206
J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol. 2007 Mar;34(3):203-11
17131103
Waste Manag Res. 2013 Dec;31(12):1190-4
24163378
J Environ Manage. 2006 Mar;78(4):382-91
16154683
Bioresour Technol. 2005 Jun;96(9):1049-55
15668201
J Hazard Mater. 2014 Sep 15;280:595-602
25218258
J Environ Public Health. 2013;2013:158764
23843802
Sci Total Environ. 2016 Jan 15;542(Pt A):817-25
26556745
Environ Pollut. 2006 Sep;143(2):247-53
16412539
Waste Manag Res. 2012 Mar;30(3):225-36
21824988
J Environ Sci Health A Tox Hazard Subst Environ Eng. 2007 Feb 15;42(3):277-87
17365294
J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol. 2008 Oct;35(10):1165-73
18651188
Biotechnol Adv. 2007 Jan-Feb;25(1):99-121
17156965
Environ Sci Process Impacts. 2015 Jul;17(7):1201-19
26089295
Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2013 Mar;97(6):2327-39
23400445
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2015 Oct;22(20):15200-14
25869434
Adv Biochem Eng Biotechnol. 2014;142:123-46
24337042
Chemosphere. 2006 Jun;63(10):1754-63
16293288
Sci Total Environ. 2013 Feb 15;445-446:347-55
23354375
Environ Pollut. 2000 Feb;107(2):179-85
15092994
FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2014 Oct;90(1):103-14
24986450
Environ Sci Technol. 1995 Feb 1;29(2):537-45
22201403
Biodegradation. 2005 Mar;16(2):115-25
15730022
FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2011 Dec;78(3):604-16
22066474
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2014;21(16):9861-76
24764004
Biodegradation. 2006 Mar;17 (2):131-41
16456613