Motor skill changes and neurophysiologic adaptation to recovery-oriented virtual rehabilitation of hand function in a person with subacute stroke: a case study.
The complexity of upper extremity (UE) behavior requires recovery of near normal neuromuscular function to minimize residual disability following a stroke. This requirement places a premium on spontaneous recovery and neuroplastic adaptation to rehabilitation by the lesioned hemisphere. Motor skill learning is frequently cited as a requirement for neuroplasticity. Studies examining the links between training, motor learning, neuroplasticity, and improvements in hand motor function are indicated.



This case study describes a patient with slow recovering hand and finger movement (Total Upper Extremity Fugl-Meyer examination score = 25/66, Wrist and Hand items = 2/24 on poststroke day 37) following a stroke. The patient received an intensive eight-session intervention utilizing simulated activities that focused on the recovery of finger extension, finger individuation, and pinch-grasp force modulation.



Over the eight sessions, the patient demonstrated improvements on untrained transfer tasks, which suggest that motor learning had occurred, as well a dramatic increase in hand function and corresponding expansion of the cortical motor map area representing several key muscles of the paretic hand. Recovery of hand function and motor map expansion continued after discharge through the three-month retention testing.



This case study describes a neuroplasticity based intervention for UE hemiparesis and a model for examining the relationship between training, motor skill acquisition, neuroplasticity, and motor function changes. Implications for rehabilitation Intensive hand and finger rehabilitation activities can be added to an in-patient rehabilitation program for persons with subacute stroke. Targeted training of the thumb may have an impact on activity level function in persons with upper extremity hemiparesis. Untrained transfer tasks can be utilized to confirm that training tasks have elicited motor learning. Changes in cortical motor maps can be used to document changes in brain function which can be used to evaluate changes in motor behavior persons with subacute stroke.
a Department of Rehabilitation & Movement Sciences , Rutgers The State University of New Jersey , Newark , NJ , USA.
Gerard G
GG
Fluet
a Department of Rehabilitation & Movement Sciences , Rutgers The State University of New Jersey , Newark , NJ , USA.
Jigna
J
Patel
a Department of Rehabilitation & Movement Sciences , Rutgers The State University of New Jersey , Newark , NJ , USA.
Qinyin
Q
Qiu
a Department of Rehabilitation & Movement Sciences , Rutgers The State University of New Jersey , Newark , NJ , USA.
Matthew
M
Yarossi
b St. Joseph's Wayne Hospital , Acute Rehabilitation Unit , Wayne , NJ , USA.
Supriya
S
Massood
a Department of Rehabilitation & Movement Sciences , Rutgers The State University of New Jersey , Newark , NJ , USA.|c Department of Biomedical Engineering , New Jersey Institute of Technology, University Heights , Newark , NJ , USA.
Sergei V
SV
Adamovich
d Department of Physical Therapy, Movement, and Rehabilitation Science, Bouve College of Health Sciences , Northeastern University , Boston , MA , USA.
Eugene
E
Tunik
a Department of Rehabilitation & Movement Sciences , Rutgers The State University of New Jersey , Newark , NJ , USA.
Alma S
AS
Merians
D005260:Female; D005385:Fingers / Q000503:physiopathology; D018737:Hand Strength; D006801:Humans; D008875:Middle Aged; D009048:Motor Skills / Q000502:physiology*; D009068:Movement; D010291:Paresis / Q000534:rehabilitation*; D020127:Recovery of Function; D012371:Robotics; D020521:Stroke / Q000503:physiopathology*; D000071939:Stroke Rehabilitation / Q000379:methods*; D000069350:Telerehabilitation / Q000379:methods*; D016896:Treatment Outcome; D063367:Virtual Reality Exposure Therapy
Stroke; hand; rehabilitation; robotics; upper extremity; virtual reality
J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2005 May 31;2:10
15927075
Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2010 Sep;24(7):620-35
20424192
Exp Brain Res. 2006 Feb;169(1):106-16
16273404
Restor Neurol Neurosci. 2011;29(5):287-98
21697589
Hum Brain Mapp. 2010 Aug;31(8):1272-80
20082330
J Neurol Phys Ther. 2012 Jun;36(2):79-86
22592063
Behav Brain Res. 2001 Sep 14;123(2):133-41
11399326
Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2007 Jan-Feb;21(1):14-24
17172550
Restor Neurol Neurosci. 2004;22(3-5):281-99
15502272
Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2006 Dec;20(4):444-54
17082499
Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2011;2011:3111-4
22254998
J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2014 Aug 23;11:126
25148846
Brain Res Bull. 2008 Sep 30;77(2-3):143-8
18588952
J Neurol Phys Ther. 2007 Mar;31(1):3-10
17419883
J Neurosci. 2004 Feb 4;24(5):1245-54
14762143
J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2009 Jul 17;6:28
19615045
Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2005 Sep;19(3):194-205
16093410
Top Stroke Rehabil. 2007 Jan-Feb;14 (1):1-12
17311785
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2006 Mar;87(3):443-5
16500182
JAMA. 2006 Nov 1;296(17 ):2095-104
17077374
Stroke. 1989 Jul;20(7):864-70
2749846
Neurosci Lett. 2016 Mar 23;617:52-8
26872851
Top Stroke Rehabil. 2011 Oct;18 Suppl 1:599-610
22120029
Neurosci Lett. 2010 Sep 20;482(1):21-5
20609381
Stroke. 2000 Dec;31(12 ):2984-8
11108760
Curr Opin Neurol. 2013 Dec;26(6):609-16
24136129
Am J Occup Ther. 1985 Jun;39(6):386-91
3160243
J Neurosci Methods. 2012 Mar 30;205(1):65-71
22227444
Disabil Rehabil. 1999 May-Jun;21(5-6):258-68
10381238