Male courtship decisions are influenced by light environment and female receptivity.
The appearance of animal colour signals depends jointly upon the ambient light spectrum and the signal's reflectance spectra. Light environment heterogeneity might, therefore, allow individuals to enhance their signal by signalling in an environment that increases signal efficacy. We tested this hypothesis by providing male guppies (Poecilia reticulata), a choice of three light environments in which to display their colour signal to females: green, lilac, and clear. We paired males with both receptive and non-receptive females to test whether female response might affect male behavioural decisions. Males preferred the clear environment in all trials and this environment also resulted in males having the highest average visual contrast. Sexual behaviour was influenced by complex interactions between female receptivity, light environment, and male colour pattern contrast. Males spent significantly more time in the environment in which their colour signal had the highest contrast, but only when paired with receptive females. Significant interactions between light environment and individual male colour components were also seen only in receptive trials. Our results suggest that males use light environment to enhance their colour pattern, but only in the presence of receptive females.
Centre for Integrative Ecology, Deakin University, Waurn Ponds, Victoria, Australia gemma.cole@deakin.edu.au.
Gemma L
GL
Cole
Centre for Integrative Ecology, Deakin University, Waurn Ponds, Victoria, Australia.
John A
JA
Endler
colour signals; light environment; receptivity; sexual selection; vision; visual contrast
Proc Biol Sci. 2015 Apr 7;282(1804):20143108
25740894
Proc Biol Sci. 2002 Jul 22;269(1499):1457-65
12137575
Am Nat. 2006 Jun;167(6):947-54
16615032
J Exp Biol. 2007 Mar;210(Pt 5):788-99
17297139
Am Nat. 2015 Apr;185(4):452-68
25811082
Evolution. 2005 Aug;59(8):1795-818
16329248
Evolution. 2003 Jul;57(7):1622-30
12940366
Science. 2003 Apr 4;300(5616):125-7
12677066
Nature. 2002 Jan 17;415(6869):279-80
11796996
J Evol Biol. 2005 May;18(3):516-23
15842481
Mol Ecol. 2005 Dec;14(14):4341-53
16313597
Proc Biol Sci. 2016 Sep 28;283(1839):
27683362
Am Nat. 2001 Mar;157(3):316-23
18707292
Vision Res. 1991;31(3):587-608
1843763
Psychol Methods. 2003 Dec;8(4):492-496
14664684
J Exp Biol. 2001 Jul;204(Pt 14):2509-15
11511666
Proc Biol Sci. 2007 Sep 7;274(1622):2115-22
17580294
Proc Biol Sci. 2004 Jan 7;271(1534):45-9
15002770
Nature. 2001 Jun 21;411(6840):944-8
11418857