Adaptive pattern of nectar volume within inflorescences: bumblebee foraging behavior and pollinator-mediated natural selection.
Larger floral displays increase pollinator visitation as well as among-flower self-pollination (geitonogamy) in self-compatible species. Dichogamy (temporal separation of gender expression) can limit geitonogamy and increase outcrossing but this depends on pollinator behavior within inflorescences. Declining nectar volume from lower to upper flowers is a hypothesized adaptation to increase outcrossing and pollen export by encouraging the upward movment of pollinators from female to male flowers and by reducing the number of flowers probed per inflorescence, but supporting evidence has been equivocal. We tested this hypothesis in Aconitum gymnandrum by studying floral display and rewards, pollinator visitation, and pollinator-mediated selection on floral traits. We found that larger inflorescences of A. gymnandrum attracted more pollinators, but did not increase the number of flowers probed per visit. Nectar production declined with increasing flower height on average, but the opposite pattern was also common. Bumblebees responded strongly to the nectar pattern, moving from higher to lower nectar concentration. Finally, there was significant pollinator-mediated direct selection for this pattern of declining nectar volume after correcting for correlations with flower size, number, and mean nectar volume. Together, the results strongly suggest that declining nectar production in higher flowers is an adaptation to enhance outcrossing in A. gymnandrum.
State Key Laboratory of Grassland and Agro-Ecosystems, School of Life Sciences, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, 730000, China.
Zhigang
Z
Zhao
College of Life Sciences, Northwest Normal University, 730000 Lanzhou, China.
Ningna
N
Lu
Kellogg Biological Station and Department of Plant Biology, Michigan State University, Hickory Corners, Michigan, 49060, USA.
Jeffrey K
JK
Conner
Proc Biol Sci. 2000 Feb 22;267(1441):315-20
10722210
Evolution. 2003 Feb;57(2):240-8
12683521
Am Nat. 2008 Jul;172(1):63-74
18507519
Ann Bot. 2009 Jun;103(9):1547-56
19324895
Ann Bot. 2009 Dec;104(7):1405-12
19767308
BMC Plant Biol. 2010 May 20;10:91
20482889
Trends Ecol Evol. 1993 Sep;8(9):321-5
21236182
Am J Bot. 1998 Feb;85(2):219
21684905
Ann Bot. 2012 Feb;109(3):563-70
21880660
Plant Biol (Stuttg). 2011 Nov;13(6):848-56
21972840
Am Nat. 2014 Nov;184(5):580-92
25325743
Ecology. 2015 Sep;96(9):2360-9
26594694
Oecologia. 1996 Mar;105(4):509-516
28307144
Evolution. 1983 Nov;37(6):1210-1226
28556011
Evolution. 1996 Feb;50(1):120-125
28568888
Evolution. 1982 Jan;36(1):70-79
28581114
Theor Popul Biol. 1978 Feb;13(1):72-98
644520