Mechanical Demands of the Hang Power Clean and Jump Shrug: A Joint-Level Perspective.
Kipp, K, Malloy, PJ, Smith, J, Giordanelli, MD, Kiely, MT, Geiser, CF, and Suchomel, TJ. Mechanical demands of the hang power clean and jump shrug: a joint-level perspective. J Strength Cond Res 32(2): 466-474, 2018-The purpose of this study was to investigate the joint- and load-dependent changes in the mechanical demands of the lower extremity joints during the hang power clean (HPC) and the jump shrug (JS). Fifteen male lacrosse players were recruited from a National Collegiate Athletic Association DI team, and completed 3 sets of the HPC and JS at 30, 50, and 70% of their HPC 1 repetition maximum (1RM HPC) in a counterbalanced and randomized order. Motion analysis and force plate technology were used to calculate the positive work, propulsive phase duration, and peak concentric power at the hip, knee, and ankle joints. Separate 3-way analysis of variances were used to determine the interaction and main effects of joint, load, and lift type on the 3 dependent variables. The results indicated that the mechanics during the HPC and JS exhibit joint-, load-, and lift-dependent behavior. When averaged across joints, the positive work during both lifts increased progressively with external load, but was greater during the JS at 30 and 50% of 1RM HPC than during the HPC. The JS was also characterized by greater hip and knee work when averaged across loads. The joint-averaged propulsive phase duration was lower at 30% than at 50 and 70% of 1RM HPC for both lifts. Furthermore, the load-averaged propulsive phase duration was greater for the hip than the knee and ankle joint. The joint-averaged peak concentric power was the greatest at 70% of 1RM for the HPC and at 30%-50% of 1RM for the JS. In addition, the joint-averaged peak concentric power of the JS was greater than that of the HPC. Furthermore, the load-averaged peak knee and ankle concentric joint powers were greater during the execution of the JS than the HPC. However, the load-averaged power of all joints differed only during the HPC, but was similar between the hip and knee joints for the JS. Collectively, these results indicate that compared with the HPC the JS is characterized by greater hip and knee positive joint work, and greater knee and ankle peak concentric joint power, especially if performed at 30 and 50% of 1RM HPC. This study provides important novel information about the mechanical demands of 2 commonly used exercises and should be considered in the design of resistance training programs that aim to improve the explosiveness of the lower extremity joints.
Department of Physical Therapy, Program in Exercise Science, Marquette University, Milwaukee, Wisconsin.
Kristof
K
Kipp
Department of Physical Therapy, Program in Exercise Science, Marquette University, Milwaukee, Wisconsin.
Philip J
PJ
Malloy
Department of Physical Therapy, Program in Exercise Science, Marquette University, Milwaukee, Wisconsin.
Jordan C
JC
Smith
Department of Physical Therapy, Program in Exercise Science, Marquette University, Milwaukee, Wisconsin.
Matthew D
MD
Giordanelli
Department of Physical Therapy, Program in Exercise Science, Marquette University, Milwaukee, Wisconsin.
Michael T
MT
Kiely
Department of Physical Therapy, Program in Exercise Science, Marquette University, Milwaukee, Wisconsin.
Christopher F
CF
Geiser
Department of Exercise Science, East Stroudsburg University, East Stroudsburg, Pennsylvania.
Timothy J
TJ
Suchomel
D000843:Ankle Joint / Q000502:physiology; D056352:Athletes; D001696:Biomechanical Phenomena; D006621:Hip Joint / Q000502:physiology; D006801:Humans; D007719:Knee Joint / Q000502:physiology; D035002:Lower Extremity / Q000502:physiology*; D008297:Male; D009038:Motion; D053580:Muscle Strength / Q000502:physiology; D015865:Racquet Sports; D055070:Resistance Training / Q000379:methods*; D055815:Young Adult