Eavesdropping on cooperative communication within an ant-butterfly mutualism.
Signalling is necessary for the maintenance of interspecific mutualisms but is vulnerable to exploitation by eavesdropping. While eavesdropping of intraspecific signals has been studied extensively, such exploitation of interspecific signals has not been widely documented. The juvenile stages of the Australian lycaenid butterfly, Jalmenus evagoras, form an obligate association with several species of attendant ants, including Iridomyrmex mayri. Ants protect the caterpillars and pupae, and in return are rewarded with nutritious secretions. Female and male adult butterflies use ants as signals for oviposition and mate searching, respectively. Our experiments reveal that two natural enemies of J. evagoras, araneid spiders and braconid parasitoid wasps, exploit ant signals as cues for increasing their foraging and oviposition success, respectively. Intriguingly, selection through eavesdropping is unlikely to modify the ant signal.
School of BioSciences, University of Melbourne, Victoria, 3010, Australia. m.elgar@unimelb.edu.au.
Mark A
MA
Elgar
Centre for Social Evolution, Department of Biology, University of Copenhagen, 2100, Copenhagen, Denmark.
David R
DR
Nash
Department of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA.
Naomi E
NE
Pierce
D000819:Animal Communication; D000818:Animals; D001000:Ants / Q000502:physiology*; D002080:Butterflies / Q000502:physiology*; D005260:Female; D008297:Male; D010058:Oviposition / Q000502:physiology; D011235:Predatory Behavior / Q000502:physiology; D012726:Sexual Behavior, Animal / Q000502:physiology; D013112:Spiders / Q000502:physiology; D013559:Symbiosis; D014863:Wasps / Q000502:physiology
Araneidae; Chemical signals; Exploitation; Foraging; Iridomyrmex; Jalmenus evagoras; Kairomone; Mating costs
Science. 1990 Jun 1;248(4959):1104-6
17733373
Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2007 Feb;82(1):27-48
17313523
Anim Behav. 2012 Dec 1;84(6):1457-1462
23888083
J Fish Biol. 2009 Apr;74(6):1280-90
20735631
Nature. 2005 Feb 17;433(7027):704
15716942
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998 Jul 21;95(15):8676-80
9671737
Proc Biol Sci. 2015 Jul 22;282(1811):null
26156773
J Evol Biol. 2006 Jul;19(4):1283-93
16780529
J Chem Ecol. 2005 Dec;31(12):2805-21
16365706
Biol Lett. 2010 Apr 23;6(2):174-6
19864269
Proc Biol Sci. 2012 May 7;279(1734):1824-30
22113027
Curr Biol. 2012 Jul 24;22(14):R563-4
22835788
Anim Behav. 2000 Jul;60(1):13-26
10924199
J Chem Ecol. 2006 Jul;32(7):1565-76
16718557
Science. 1981 Nov 6;214(4521):677-8
17839660
J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol. 2008 Dec;194(12):1043-52
18830605
Science. 1987 Oct 2;238(4823):64-7
17835656
Annu Rev Entomol. 2002;47:733-71
11729090
Proc Biol Sci. 2001 Jun 7;268(1472):1183-7
11375107
Proc Biol Sci. 2000 Sep 22;267(1455):1857-61
11052536
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008 Aug 19;105(33):11812-7
18695227
Science. 2009 Feb 6;323(5915):782-5
19197065
Ecol Evol. 2012 Sep;2(9):2181-91
23139877
Evolution. 1980 Jan;34(1):76-91
28563214
Proc Biol Sci. 2014 Sep 22;281(1791):20141232
25080343
Trends Ecol Evol. 2010 Jun;25(6):354-61
20153073
Science. 1981 Mar 13;211(4487):1185-7
17755156
Naturwissenschaften. 2012 Aug;99(8):597-605
22760732
Proc Biol Sci. 2015 Jun 22;282(1809):20150798
26041353