A Biomass Flow Approach to Population Models and Food Webs.
The dominant differential equation paradigm for modeling the population dynamics of species interacting in the framework of a food web retains at its core the basic prey-predator and competition models formulation by Alfred J. Lotka (1880-1945) and Vito Volterra (1860-1940) nearly nine decades ago. This paradigm lacks a trophic-level-independent formulation of population growth leading to ambiguities in how to treat populations that are simultaneously both prey and predator. Also, this paradigm does not fundamentally include inertial (i.e. change resisting) processes needed to account for the response of populations to fluctuating resource environments. Here I present an approach that corrects both these deficits and provides a unified framework for accounting for biomass transformation in food webs that include both live and dead components of all species in the system. This biomass transformation formulation (BTW) allows for a unified treatment of webs that include consumers of both live and dead material-both carnivores and carcasivores, herbivores and detritivores-and incorporates scavengers, parasites, and other neglected food web consumption categories in a coherent manner. I trace how BTW is an outgrowth of the metaphysiological growth modeling paradigm and I provide a general compact formulation of BTW in terms of a three-variable differential equation formulation for each species in the food web: viz. live biomass, dead biomass, and a food-intake-related measure called deficit-stress. I then illustrate the application of this new paradigm to provide insights into two-species competition in variable environments and discuss application of BTW to food webs that incorporate parasites and pathogens.
Dept. Environmental Science, Policy and Management, University of California at Berkeley, CA 94720-3114, USA, getz@nature.berkeley.edu , 1-510-642-8745.
Wayne M
WM
Getz
Holling; Lotka-Volterra; competition; consumer-resource; functional response; host-parasite; pathogen dynamics; plant-herbivore; prey-predator; scavenger; trophic models
Phys Rev Lett. 2004 Oct 8;93(15):158701
15524949
Ecol Lett. 2011 Feb;14(2):113-24
21199247
Nature. 2000 Mar 9;404(6774):180-3
10724169
PLoS Biol. 2009 Sep;7(9):e1000209
19787027
Science. 1973 Aug 17;181(4100):630-4
17736970
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008 Dec 9;105(49):19120-5
19060193
J Anim Ecol. 2011 Jul;80(4):731-41
21644974
Trends Ecol Evol. 2000 Aug;15(8):337-341
10884706
J Theor Biol. 2007 Sep 21;248(2):382-90
17602706
Theor Popul Biol. 2006 Dec;70(4):527-41
16978675
Am Nat. 2004 Sep;164(3):364-77
15478091
Oecologia. 2010 May;163(1):111-8
20052492
Biometrika. 1945 Nov;33:183-212
21006835
Monogr Popul Biol. 1978;(13):III-VII, 1-237
732858
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006 Aug 22;103(34):12781-6
16912114
J Theor Biol. 2003 May 21;222(2):233-45
12727458
Ambio. 2004 Aug;33(6):276-82
15387059
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2009 Apr 27;364(1520):1117-24
19324616
Ecol Lett. 2010 Dec;13(12):1536-45
21054734
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008 Dec 9;105(49):19052-9
19060196
Am Nat. 2004 Nov;164(5):E130-53
15540147
Ecol Lett. 2008 Jun;11(6):533-46
18462196
PLoS One. 2011 Jan 20;6(1):e14539
21283752