Impact of Reed Canary Grass Cultivation and Mineral Fertilisation on the Microbial Abundance and Genetic Potential for Methane Production in Residual Peat of an Abandoned Peat Extraction Area.
This study examined physiochemical conditions and prokaryotic community structure (the bacterial and archaeal 16S rRNA genes and mcrA gene abundances and proportions), and evaluated the effect of reed canary grass cultivation and mineral fertilisation on these factors, in the 60 cm thick residual peat layer of experimental plots located on an abandoned peat extraction area. The archaeal proportion was 0.67-39.56% in the prokaryotic community and the methanogens proportion was 0.01-1.77% in the archaeal community. When bacterial abundance was higher in the top 20 cm of peat, the archaea were more abundant in the 20-60 cm layer and methanogens in the 40-60 cm layer of the residual peat. The bacterial abundance was significantly increased, but archaeal abundance was not affected by cultivation. The fertiliser application had a slight effect on peat properties and on archaeal and methanogen abundances in the deeper layer of cultivated peat. The CH4 emission was positively related to mcrA abundance in the 20-60 cm of the bare peat, while in case of reed canary grass cultivation these two parameters were not correlated. Reed canary grass cultivation mitigated CH4 emission, although methanogen abundance remained approximately the same or even increased in different layers of residual peat under cultivated sites over time. This study supports the outlook of using abandoned peat extraction areas to produce reed canary grass for energy purposes as an advisable land-use practice from the perspective of atmospheric impact in peatland-rich Northern Europe.
Department of Geography, Institute of Ecology and Earth Sciences, University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia.
Mikk
M
Espenberg
Department of Geography, Institute of Ecology and Earth Sciences, University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia.
Marika
M
Truu
Department of Geography, Institute of Ecology and Earth Sciences, University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia.
Jaak
J
Truu
Department of Geography, Institute of Ecology and Earth Sciences, University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia.
Martin
M
Maddison
Department of Geography, Institute of Ecology and Earth Sciences, University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia.
Hiie
H
Nõlvak
Department of Geography, Institute of Ecology and Earth Sciences, University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia.
Järvi
J
Järveoja
Department of Geography, Institute of Ecology and Earth Sciences, University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia.
Ülo
Ü
Mander
Glob Chang Biol. 2013 May;19(5):1325-46
23505021
Nat Rev Microbiol. 2013 Nov;11(11):789-99
24056930
Environ Microbiol. 2003 Sep;5(9):787-97
12919414
Res Microbiol. 2006 Dec;157(10):914-21
17070673
Environ Microbiol. 2013 Sep;15(9):2395-417
23718889
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2012 Sep;78(17):6386-9
22752167
FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2012 Oct;82(1):118-34
22587395
Annu Rev Microbiol. 2013;67:437-57
23808334
ISME J. 2011 May;5(5):908-17
21085198
Bioresour Technol. 2009 Oct;100(20):4723-30
19467859