Efficacy of Intense Pulsed Light Therapy in the Treatment of Facial Acne Vulgaris: Comparison of Two Different Fluences.
BACKGROUND
Acne vulgaris is the most common disease of the skin affecting adolescents and young adults causing psychological distress. The combination of antibiotic resistance, adverse effects of topical and systemic anti acne medications and desire for high tech approaches have all led to new enthusiasm for light based acne treatment. Intense pulse light (IPL) therapy has three modes of action in acne vulgaris i.e., photochemical, photo thermal and photo immunological.


OBJECTIVE
(1) to study efficacy of IPL therapy in facial acne vulgaris. (2) To compare two fluences - one normal and other subnormal on right and left side of face respectively.


METHODS
(Including settings and design and statistical analysis used). Total 45 patients in age group 16 to 28 years with inflammatory facial acne vulgaris were included in prospective study. Baseline data for each patient was recorded. All patients were given 4 sittings of IPL at 2 weeks interval and were followed for 2 months every 2 weeks. Fluence used was 35J/cm(2) on right and 20J/cm(2) on left side. Percentage reduction in lesion count was calculated at each sitting and follow up and graded as mild (0-25%), moderate (26-50%), good (51-75%) and excellent (76-100%). Side effects were noted. The results were analysed using Mann-Whitney Test.


RESULTS
On right side, excellent results were achieved in 10(22%), good in 22(49%) and moderate in 13(29%) patients. On left side excellent were results achieved in 7(15%), good in 19(42%) and moderate in 16(43%) patients. There was no statically significant difference noted in efficacy of two fluences used in treatment of facial acne vulgaris.


CONCLUSIONS
IPL is a effective and safe option for inflammatory acne vulgaris with minimal reversible side effects. Subnormal fluence is as effective as normal fluence in Indian skin.
Department of Dermatology, Leprology and Venereology, MGM Medical College and Hospital, Aurangabad, Maharashtra, India.
Monika V
MV
Patidar
Department of Dermatology, Leprology and Venereology, MGM Medical College and Hospital, Aurangabad, Maharashtra, India.
Ashish Ramchandra
AR
Deshmukh
Department of Dermatology, Leprology and Venereology, MGM Medical College and Hospital, Aurangabad, Maharashtra, India.
Maruti Yadav
MY
Khedkar
Acne vulgaris; Indian skin; intense pulsed light
Dermatol Ther. 2005 May-Jun;18(3):253-66
16229726
Dermatol Surg. 2005 Aug;31(8 Pt 1):910-5
16042935
Indian J Dermatol. 2010 Oct;55(4):370-2
21430893
Photochem Photobiol. 1987 Sep;46(3):363-6
3671513
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2010 Jul;24(7):773-80
20002654
Dermatol Surg. 2006 Aug;32(8):991-6; discussion 996-7
16918560
Acta Derm Venereol. 2002;82(2):104-7
12125936
N Engl J Med. 1997 Apr 17;336(16):1156-62
9099661
Lasers Surg Med. 1989;9(5):497-505
2811573
J Drugs Dermatol. 2008 Jul;7(7):627-32
18664153
Dermatol Surg. 2010;36(1):52-7
19912276
Lasers Surg Med. 2003;32(2):78-87
12561039
Lasers Surg Med. 2010 Feb;42(2):93-104
20166155
Curr Probl Dermatol. 2011;42:166-72
21865810
Adv Biomed Res. 2012;1:70
23326800
Dermatol Surg. 2007 Jun;33(6):676-9
17550443
Z Naturforsch C. 1987 Jan-Feb;42(1-2):123-8
2953128
Br J Dermatol. 1997 Aug;137(2):246-50
9292074
Lasers Surg Med. 2007 Jan;39(1):1-6
17252567
J Drugs Dermatol. 2004 Nov-Dec;3(6 Suppl):S15-9
15624737
FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol. 2003 Jan 21;35(1):17-24
12589953
Br J Dermatol. 2006 Oct;155(4):748-55
16965424
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2008 Mar;22(3):267-78
18221341
Br J Dermatol. 1998 Nov;139(5):846-50
9892952
Int J Dermatol. 2012 Apr;51(4):473-6
22435441
J Cosmet Laser Ther. 2004 Jun;6(2):91-5
15203999
J Drugs Dermatol. 2007 Oct;6(10):1010-6
17966178
Dermatol Surg. 2004 Feb;30(2 Pt 1):139-46
14756640
Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol. 2013 May-Jun;79(3):300-9
23619435
Facial Plast Surg. 2009 Dec;25(5):290-300
20024870