A Complex Network Perspective on Clinical Science.
Contemporary classification systems for mental disorders assume that abnormal behaviors are expressions of latent disease entities. An alternative to the latent disease model is the complex network approach. Instead of assuming that symptoms arise from an underlying disease entity, the complex network approach holds that disorders exist as systems of interrelated elements of a network. This approach also provides a framework for the understanding of therapeutic change. Depending on the structure of the network, change can occur abruptly once the network reaches a critical threshold (the tipping point). Homogeneous and highly connected networks often recover more slowly from local perturbations when the network approaches the tipping point, potentially making it possible to predict treatment change, relapse, and recovery. In this article, we discuss the complex network approach as an alternative to the latent disease model and its implications for classification, therapy, relapse, and recovery.
Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Boston University shofmann@bu.edu.
Stefan G
SG
Hofmann
Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Boston University.
Joshua
J
Curtiss
Department of Psychology, Harvard University.
Richard J
RJ
McNally
D006801:Humans; D001523:Mental Disorders / Q000145:classification* / Q000175:diagnosis / Q000503:physiopathology / Q000628:therapy*; D008962:Models, Theoretical
complex networks; nosology; psychopathology; psychotherapy
Nature. 2009 Sep 3;461(7260):53-9
19727193
J Clin Psychol. 2008 Sep;64(9):1089-108
18683856
Psychol Med. 2015 Mar;45(4):747-57
25191855
Science. 1999 Oct 15;286(5439):509-12
10521342
Psychol Med. 2012 Jun;42(6):1119-29
22008511
BMC Med. 2015 Apr 06;13:72
25879936
J Affect Disord. 2016 Jan 1;189:314-20
26458184
Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2013;9:91-121
23537483
PLoS One. 2013 Apr 04;8(4):e60188
23593171
World Psychiatry. 2014 Feb;13(1):68-77
24497255
Am J Psychiatry. 2014 Apr;171(4):395-7
24687194
J Anxiety Disord. 2007;21(2):233-41
17141468
PLoS One. 2015 Jun 02;10(6):e0128095
26034983
Nat Rev Genet. 2011 Jan;12(1):56-68
21164525
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014 Jan 7;111(1):87-92
24324144
Behav Res Ther. 1986;24(4):461-70
3741311
PLoS One. 2012;7(7):e41010
22815897
J Abnorm Psychol. 2014 Aug;123(3):510-22
24933281
Ecol Lett. 2006 Mar;9(3):311-8
16958897
Science. 2012 Oct 19;338(6105):344-8
23087241
J Abnorm Psychol. 2005 Nov;114(4):551-6
16351377
Behav Brain Sci. 2010 Jun;33(2-3):137-50; discussion 150-93
20584369
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2015 Aug;83(4):825-36
26009781
Hum Brain Mapp. 2007 Feb;28(2):85-93
16718669
Psychol Med. 2012 May;42(5):957-65
22093641
Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2014;10:477-501
24329179
Nature. 2010 Sep 23;467(7314):411-2
20864992
PLoS One. 2011;6(11):e27407
22114671
Am Psychol. 2010 May-Jun;65(4):262-78
20455620
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2011 Aug;79(4):552-63
21707138
Behav Ther. 2014 Jul;45(4):576-87
24912469
Ecol Lett. 2008 May;11(5):450-60
18279354
Nature. 1998 Jun 4;393(6684):440-2
9623998
Clin Psychol Rev. 2015 Nov;41:27-39
26197726
Psychol Methods. 2000 Jun;5(2):155-74
10937327
Br J Psychiatry. 1993 Sep;163:293-8
8401956