Novel Covariance-Based Neutrality Test of Time-Series Data Reveals Asymmetries in Ecological and Economic Systems.
Systems as diverse as the interacting species in a community, alleles at a genetic locus, and companies in a market are characterized by competition (over resources, space, capital, etc) and adaptation. Neutral theory, built around the hypothesis that individual performance is independent of group membership, has found utility across the disciplines of ecology, population genetics, and economics, both because of the success of the neutral hypothesis in predicting system properties and because deviations from these predictions provide information about the underlying dynamics. However, most tests of neutrality are weak, based on static system properties such as species-abundance distributions or the number of singletons in a sample. Time-series data provide a window onto a system's dynamics, and should furnish tests of the neutral hypothesis that are more powerful to detect deviations from neutrality and more informative about to the type of competitive asymmetry that drives the deviation. Here, we present a neutrality test for time-series data. We apply this test to several microbial time-series and financial time-series and find that most of these systems are not neutral. Our test isolates the covariance structure of neutral competition, thus facilitating further exploration of the nature of asymmetry in the covariance structure of competitive systems. Much like neutrality tests from population genetics that use relative abundance distributions have enabled researchers to scan entire genomes for genes under selection, we anticipate our time-series test will be useful for quick significance tests of neutrality across a range of ecological, economic, and sociological systems for which time-series data are available. Future work can use our test to categorize and compare the dynamic fingerprints of particular competitive asymmetries (frequency dependence, volatility smiles, etc) to improve forecasting and management of complex adaptive systems.
Department of Biology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, United States of America.|Nicholas School of the Environment, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, United States of America.
Alex D
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6174-0526
AD
Washburne
Plasma Physics Lab, Department of Physics, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey, United States of America.
Joshua W
JW
Burby
Department of Operations Research and Financial Engineering, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey, United States of America.
Daniel
D
Lacker
Genetics. 1989 Nov;123(3):585-95
2513255
Annu Rev Pathol. 2012;7:99-122
21910623
Am Nat. 2014 Oct;184(4):439-46
25226179
Genome Biol. 2011;12(5):R50
21624126
J Evol Biol. 2007 Nov;20(6):2075-91
17956380
Ecol Lett. 2014 Jul;17(7):855-65
24805976
Ecology. 2006 Jun;87(6):1411-23
16869415
Genetics. 1931 Mar;16(2):97-159
17246615
Am Nat. 2015 Sep;186(3):333-47
26655352
Genetics. 2000 Jul;155(3):1405-13
10880498
Science. 2006 Jul 14;313(5784):224-6
16840700
Nature. 2014 Jan 23;505(7484):559-63
24336217
Science. 1999 Apr 2;284(5411):107-9
10103172
Proc Biol Sci. 2004 Jul 22;271(1547):1443-50
15306315
Nature. 2003 Aug 28;424(6952):1035-7
12944964
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 Feb 8;108(6):2316-21
21262797
Nature. 2006 May 4;441(7089):E1; discussion E1-2
16672928