Code Saturation Versus Meaning Saturation: How Many Interviews Are Enough?
Saturation is a core guiding principle to determine sample sizes in qualitative research, yet little methodological research exists on parameters that influence saturation. Our study compared two approaches to assessing saturation: code saturation and meaning saturation. We examined sample sizes needed to reach saturation in each approach, what saturation meant, and how to assess saturation. Examining 25 in-depth interviews, we found that code saturation was reached at nine interviews, whereby the range of thematic issues was identified. However, 16 to 24 interviews were needed to reach meaning saturation where we developed a richly textured understanding of issues. Thus, code saturation may indicate when researchers have "heard it all," but meaning saturation is needed to "understand it all." We used our results to develop parameters that influence saturation, which may be used to estimate sample sizes for qualitative research proposals or to document in publications the grounds on which saturation was achieved.
1 Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Monique M
MM
Hennink
2 Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Bonnie N
BN
Kaiser
1 Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.|3 Atlanta Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Vincent C
VC
Marconi
D006801:Humans; D007407:Interviews as Topic / Q000592:standards*; D036301:Qualitative Research; D012107:Research Design / Q000592:standards*; D018401:Sample Size
HIV/AIDS; USA; behavior; in-depth interviews; infection; methodology; qualitative; saturation
AIDS. 2009 Jul 17;23(11):1397-404
19381076
Psychol Health. 2010 Dec;25(10):1229-45
20204937
Res Nurs Health. 1995 Apr;18(2):179-83
7899572
N Engl J Med. 2011 Aug 11;365(6):493-505
21767103
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2011 Mar 11;11:26
21396104
J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2012 May 1;60(1):77-82
22267016
Qual Health Res. 2016 Nov;26(13):1753-1760
26613970
Qual Health Res. 2015 May;25(5):587-8
25829508
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2011 Dec 2;60(47):1618-23
22129997
Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2010 Jun;10(3):269-81
20545592