Conscientious objection in healthcare, referral and the military analogy.
An analogy is sometimes drawn between the proper treatment of conscientious objectors in healthcare and in military contexts. In this paper, I consider an aspect of this analogy that has not, to my knowledge, been considered in debates about conscientious objection in healthcare. In the USA and elsewhere, tribunals have been tasked with the responsibility of recommending particular forms of alternative service for conscientious objectors. Military conscripts who have a conscientious objection to active military service, and whose objections are deemed acceptable, are required either to serve the military in a non-combat role, or assigned some form of community service that does not contribute to the effectiveness of the military. I argue that consideration of the role that military tribunals have played in determining the appropriate form of alternative service for conscripts who are conscientious objectors can help us to understand how conscientious objectors in healthcare ought to be treated. Additionally, I show that it helps us to address the vexed issue of whether or not conscientious objectors who refuse to provide a service requested by a patient should be required to refer that patient to another healthcare professional.
Centre for Applied Philosophy and Public Ethics, Charles Sturt University, Barton, Australian Capital Territory, Australia.|Uehiro Centre for Practical Ethics, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Steve
S
Clarke
D003242:Conscience; D034462:Dissent and Disputes; D028781:Ethical Relativism; D006801:Humans; D008889:Military Personnel; D009014:Morals; D026684:Personal Autonomy; D010820:Physicians / Q000941:ethics; D012017:Referral and Consultation / Q000941:ethics; D016079:Refusal to Treat / Q000941:ethics; D012067:Religion
Abortion; Conscientious Objection; Health Workforce; Religious Ethics; War
J Med Ethics. 2009 Oct;35(10):599-602
19793938
J Med Ethics. 2016 Feb;42(2):78-9
26044166
Public Health Rep. 2001 Jul-Aug;116(4):289-95
12037257
J Med Ethics. 2015 Feb;41(2):170-3
24861043
Camb Q Healthc Ethics. 2017 Jan;26(1):97-108
27934569
Am J Bioeth. 2007 Jun;7(6):8-14
17558978
J Med Ethics. 2012 Jan;38(1):22-5
21768618
Am J Bioeth. 2007 Jun;7(6):19-20
17558982
Bioethics. 2014 Jan;28(1):16-23
24117510
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008 Sep;199(3):232.e1-3
18667194
J Med Ethics. 2016 Feb;42(2):69-72
25887516
J Med Ethics. 2007 May;33(5):249-54
17470498