How Nectar-Feeding Bats Localize their Food: Echolocation Behavior of Leptonycteris yerbabuenae Approaching Cactus Flowers.
Nectar-feeding bats show morphological, physiological, and behavioral adaptations for feeding on nectar. How they find and localize flowers is still poorly understood. While scent cues alone allow no precise localization of a floral target, the spatial properties of flower echoes are very precise and could play a major role, particularly at close range. The aim of this study is to understand the role of echolocation for classification and localization of flowers. We compared the approach behavior of Leptonycteris yerbabuenae to flowers of a columnar cactus, Pachycereus pringlei, to that to an acrylic hollow hemisphere that is acoustically conspicuous to bats, but has different acoustic properties and, contrary to the cactus flower, present no scent. For recording the flight and echolocation behaviour we used two infrared video cameras under stroboscopic illumination synchronized with ultrasound recordings. During search flights all individuals identified both targets as a possible food source and initiated an approach flight; however, they visited only the cactus flower. In experiments with the acrylic hemisphere bats aborted the approach at ca. 40-50 cm. In the last instant before the flower visit the bats emitted a long terminal group of 10-20 calls. This is the first report of this behaviour for a nectar-feeding bat. Our findings suggest that L. yerbabuenae use echolocation for classification and localization of cactus flowers and that the echo-acoustic characteristics of the flower guide the bats directly to the flower opening.
Institute of Evolutionary Ecology and Conservation Genomics, University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany.
Tania P
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9271-1592
TP
Gonzalez-Terrazas
BioAcoustics Network, Neuss, Germany.
Jens C
JC
Koblitz
Department of Biology, University of Miami, Miami, Florida, United States of America.
Theodore H
TH
Fleming
Instituto de Ecología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, México D. F., México.
Rodrigo A
RA
Medellín
Institute of Evolutionary Ecology and Conservation Genomics, University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany.|Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute, Balboa, Panama.
Elisabeth K V
EK
Kalko
Animal Physiology, Institute of Neurobiology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Hans-Ulrich
HU
Schnitzler
Institute of Evolutionary Ecology and Conservation Genomics, University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany.|Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute, Balboa, Panama.
Marco
M
Tschapka
J Exp Biol. 2014 Aug 15;217(Pt 16):2876-84
24902745
J Acoust Soc Am. 2001 Oct;110(4):2207-26
11681397
J Exp Biol. 2003 Jan;206(Pt 1):93-104
12456700
J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol. 2009 Jun;195(6):603-17
19322570
Front Physiol. 2013 Nov 25;4:342
24324442
Proc Biol Sci. 2009 Mar 7;276(1658):853-60
19129126
PLoS Biol. 2006 Apr;4(4):e79
16509770
J Exp Biol. 2012 Nov 15;215(Pt 22):3989-96
22899529
Front Behav Neurosci. 2010 Aug 05;4:null
20740076
Front Physiol. 2013 Jul 03;4:164
23840190
J Acoust Soc Am. 2011 Nov;130(5):3090-9
22087937
Proc Biol Sci. 2013 Jan 16;280(1754):20122830
23325775
J Comp Physiol A. 2000 Feb;186(2):143-53
10707312
PLoS One. 2008 Apr 30;3(4):e2036
18446226
Naturwissenschaften. 2007 May;94(5):380-3
17149582
J Exp Biol. 2003 Mar;206(Pt 6):1025-34
12582145
J Exp Biol. 2006 Sep;209(Pt 18):3599-609
16943500
Q Rev Biol. 2009 Mar;84(1):51-74
19326788
Am J Bot. 2003 Jul;90(7):1016-24
21659200
J Acoust Soc Am. 2011 Jan;129(1):427-35
21303022
J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol. 2004 Jul;190(7):515-21
15103497
Science. 2011 Jul 29;333(6042):631-3
21798950
Naturwissenschaften. 2003 Oct;90(10):481-3
14564410
J Exp Biol. 2009 Jan;212(Pt 1):11-20
19088206
J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol. 2003 May;189(5):327-36
12712362
Front Physiol. 2014 May 12;5:168
24860509