Transfer after Dual n-Back Training Depends on Striatal Activation Change.
The dual n-back working memory (WM) training paradigm (comprising auditory and visual stimuli) has gained much attention since studies have shown widespread transfer effects. By including a multimodal dual-task component, the task is demanding to the human cognitive system. We investigated whether dual n-back training improves general cognitive resources or a task-specific WM updating process in participants. We expected: (1) widespread transfer effects and the recruitment of a common neuronal network by the training and the transfer tasks and (2) narrower transfer results and that a common activation network alone would not produce transfer, but instead an activation focus on the striatum, which is associated with WM updating processes. The training group showed transfer to an untrained dual-modality WM updating task, but not to single-task versions of the training or the transfer task. They also showed diminished neuronal overlap between the training and the transfer task from pretest to posttest and an increase in striatal activation in both tasks. Furthermore, we found an association between the striatal activation increase and behavioral improvement. The control groups showed no transfer and no change in the amount of activation overlap or in striatal activation from pretest to posttest. We conclude that, instead of improving general cognitive resources (which would have required a transfer effect to all transfer tasks and that a frontal activation overlap between the tasks produced transfer), dual n-back training improved a task-specific process: WM updating of stimuli from two modalities.



The current study allows for a better understanding of the cognitive and neural effects of working memory (WM) training and transfer. It shows that dual n-back training mainly improves specific processes of WM updating, and this improvement leads to narrow transfer effects to tasks involving the same processes. On a neuronal level this is accompanied by increased neural activation in the striatum that is related to WM updating. The current findings challenge the view that dual n-back training provokes a general boosting of the WM system and of its neural underpinnings located in frontoparietal brain regions. Instead, the findings imply the relevance of task-specific brain regions which are involved in important cognitive processes during training and transfer tasks.
Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Faculty of Life Sciences, Department of Psychology, 12489 Berlin, Germany, tiina.salminen@hu-berlin.de.
Tiina
0000-0002-3920-2182
T
Salminen
Max Planck Institute for Human Development, Center for Lifespan Psychology, 14195 Berlin, Germany, University Clinic Hamburg-Eppendorf, Clinic and Policlinic for Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, 20246 Hamburg, Germany, and.
Simone
S
Kühn
Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Faculty of Life Sciences, Department of Psychology, 12489 Berlin, Germany.
Peter A
PA
Frensch
Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Faculty of Life Sciences, Department of Psychology, 12489 Berlin, Germany, Martin-Luther-Universität Halle-Wittenberg, Department of Psychology, 06108 Halle, Germany.
Torsten
T
Schubert
D000222:Adaptation, Physiological / Q000502:physiology; D000328:Adult; D001288:Attention / Q000502:physiology; D001307:Auditory Perception; D003071:Cognition / Q000502:physiology; D003213:Conditioning, Psychological / Q000502:physiology; D003342:Corpus Striatum / Q000502:physiology*; D056344:Executive Function / Q000502:physiology; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008570:Memory, Short-Term / Q000502:physiology*; D009415:Nerve Net / Q000502:physiology*; D009473:Neuronal Plasticity / Q000502:physiology*; D011214:Practice, Psychological; D013647:Task Performance and Analysis; D014163:Transfer, Psychology / Q000502:physiology*; D014796:Visual Perception; D055815:Young Adult
dual n-back; fMRI; training; transfer; working memory
Cogn Psychol. 2000 Aug;41(1):49-100
10945922
Nat Neurosci. 2000 Dec;3(12):1329-34
11100155
Annu Rev Neurosci. 2001;24:167-202
11283309
Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2002 Apr;12(2):223-9
12015241
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2001 Jun;1(2):137-60
12467110
J Cogn Neurosci. 2002 Nov 15;14(8):1184-99
12495525
Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 2003 Oct;17(3):733-46
14561459
Nat Neurosci. 2004 Jan;7(1):10-1
14699412
Am J Psychiatry. 2004 Apr;161(4):745-7
15056524
Neuroimage. 2005 Apr 15;25(3):653-60
15808966
Neural Comput. 2006 Feb;18(2):283-328
16378516
Neuropsychologia. 2006;44(11):2171-7
16405923
Psychol Sci. 2006 Feb;17(2):172-9
16466426
J Comput Neurosci. 2006 Apr;20(2):153-66
16699839
Science. 2006 Oct 6;314(5796):91-4
17023651
J Cogn Neurosci. 2008 Apr;20(4):613-28
18052784
Nat Neurosci. 2008 Jan;11(1):103-7
18066057
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008 May 13;105(19):6829-33
18443283
Science. 2008 Jun 13;320(5882):1510-2
18556560
Dev Sci. 2009 Nov;12(6):978-90
19840052
Neuropsychol Rev. 2009 Dec;19(4):504-22
19876740
J Neurosci. 2010 Mar 3;30(9):3297-303
20203189
Memory. 2010 May;18(4):394-412
20408039
Trends Cogn Sci. 2010 Jul;14(7):317-24
20630350
J Neurosci. 2010 Jul 21;30(29):9788-92
20660261
Neuroimage. 2011 Feb 1;54(3):1765-73
20688175
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010 Oct 19;107(42):18167-72
20921401
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2011 Jul;64(7):1251-72
21462091
Science. 2011 Aug 5;333(6043):718
21817043
Neuropsychologia. 2011 Oct;49(12):3466-73
21906608
Psychol Res. 2012 Nov;76(6):794-811
21947746
Hum Brain Mapp. 2013 Jul;34(7):1530-41
22331673
Psychol Bull. 2012 Jul;138(4):628-654
22409508
Front Hum Neurosci. 2012 Jun 06;6:166
22685428
Front Hum Neurosci. 2012 Jun 12;6:173
22701418
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2013 May;142(2):359-79
22708717
Psychon Bull Rev. 2013 Feb;20(1):135-41
23184506
PLoS One. 2013 May 22;8(5):e63614
23717453
Psychol Res. 2014 Nov;78(6):803-20
24213250
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2014 Mar;14(1):147-60
24496717
Psychon Bull Rev. 2015 Apr;22(2):366-77
25102926
Psychol Sci. 2014 Nov;25(11):2027-37
25298292
Annu Rev Neurosci. 1986;9:357-81
3085570
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1996 Oct 29;351(1346):1397-403; discussion 1403-4
8941951