Imprinting and flexibility in human face cognition.
Faces are an important cue to multiple physiological and psychological traits. Human preferences for exaggerated sex typicality (masculinity or femininity) in faces depend on multiple factors and show high inter-subject variability. To gain a deeper understanding of the mechanisms underlying facial femininity preferences in men, we tested the interactive effect of family structure (birth order, sibling sex-ratio and number of siblings) and parenthood status on these preferences. Based on a group of 1304 heterosexual men, we have found that preference for feminine faces was not only influenced by sibling age and sex, but also that fatherhood modulated this preference. Men with sisters had a weaker preference for femininity than men with brothers, highlighting a possible effect of a negative imprinting-like mechanism. What is more, fatherhood increased strongly the preference for facial femininity. Finally, for fathers with younger sisters only, the more the age difference increased between them, the more femininity preference increased. Overall our findings bring new insight into how early-acquired experience at the individual level may determine face preference in adulthood, and what is more, how these preferences are flexible and potentially dependent on parenthood status in adult men.
Department of Public Health, Jagiellonian University, Medical College, Grzegorzecka st. 20, 31-531 Cracow, Poland.
Urszula M
UM
Marcinkowska
Department of Biology, University of Turku, FI-20014, Finland.|Metapopulation Research Centre, Department of Biosciences, University of Helsinki, Finland.
Julien
J
Terraube
Cognition, Langues, Langage, Ergonomie, Université de Toulouse, CNRS-UMR 5263, Toulouse 31000, France.|Institut Universitaire de France, 103 boulevard Saint-Michel 75005 Paris, France.
Gwenaël
G
Kaminski
J Cogn Neurosci. 2004 Oct;16(8):1412-25
15509387
Psychol Sci. 2010 Dec;21(12):1746-50
21051523
Horm Behav. 2012 Jan;61(1):12-6
21983237
Annu Rev Psychol. 2015 Jan 3;66:519-45
25196277
Horm Behav. 2008 Nov;54(5):703-8
18755192
Nature. 2007 Feb 15;445(7129):727-31
17301784
Arch Sex Behav. 1971 Dec;1(4):293-307
24179077
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014 Oct 7;111(40):14388-93
25246593
Biol Psychol. 2013 Feb;92(2):233-40
23182875
Science. 2002 May 17;296(5571):1321-3
12016317
J Psychosom Res. 1999 Jul;47(1):27-49
10511419
Proc Biol Sci. 2004 Jun 7;271(1544):1129-34
15306362
Behav Res Ther. 1964;2(2-4):185-90
14253217
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2015 Feb 21;15:44
25886162
J Biosoc Sci. 1981 Oct;13(4):409-18
7287783
Nature. 1978 Jun 22;273(5664):659-60
661972
Hum Nat. 2007 Dec;18(4):355-64
26181312
Biol Lett. 2014 Apr 30;10(4):20130850
24789138
Behav Genet. 2014 May;44(3):270-81
24213680
Horm Behav. 2012 Sep;62(4):413-7
22846725
Psychol Sci. 2004 Oct;15(10):643-9
15447633
Br J Psychol. 2014 Aug;105(3):364-81
25040006
Psychol Sci. 2009 Jul;20(7):853-9
19493318
Annu Rev Psychol. 2006;57:199-226
16318594
J Endocrinol Invest. 2003;26(3 Suppl):54-7
12834022
Proc Biol Sci. 2002 May 7;269(1494):873-80
12028768
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 Sep 27;108(39):16194-9
21911391
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2010 Jun;36(3):751-8
20515201
Mayo Clin Proc. 2001 Jun;76(6):582-92
11393496
J Sex Med. 2011 Jan;8(1):140-7
20946158
Nature. 1998 Aug 27;394(6696):884-7
9732869
J Exp Child Psychol. 2015 Jan;129:148-56
25311545
Nat Commun. 2012 Feb 21;3:694
22353724
Evol Psychol. 2012 Sep 05;10(3):621-30
22947684