Sex differences in obesity development in pair-fed neuronal lipoprotein lipase deficient mice.
OBJECTIVE
Compared to men, postmenopausal women suffer from a disproportionate burden of many co-morbidities associated with obesity, e.g. cardiovascular disease, cancer, and dementia. The underlying mechanism for this sex difference is not well understood but is believed to relate to absence of the protective effect of estrogen through the action of estrogen receptor alpha (ERα) in the central nervous system. With the recently developed neuron-specific lipoprotein lipase deficient mice (NEXLPL-/-) (Wang et al., Cell Metabolism, 2011 [15]), we set to explore the possible role of lipid sensing in sex differences in obesity development.


METHODS
Both male and female NEXLPL-/- mice and littermate WT controls were subjected to pair feeding (pf) where daily food amount given was adjusted according to body weight to match the food intake of ad libitum (ad) fed control WT mice. Food intake and body weight were measured daily, and pair feeding was maintained to 42 wk in male mice and to 38 wk in female mice. Various brain regions of the mice were harvested, and ERα gene expression was examined in both male and female NEXLPL-/- and WT control mice under both ad- and pf-fed conditions.


RESULTS
Although both male and female NEXLPL-/- mice developed obesity similarly on standard chow, male NEXLPL-/- mice still developed obesity under with pair feeding, but on a much delayed time course, while female NEXLPL-/- mice were protected from extra body weight and fat mass gain compared to pair-fed WT control mice. Pair feeding alone induced extra fat mass gain in both male and female WT mice, and this was mostly driven by the reduction in physical activity. LPL deficiency resulted in an increase in ERα mRNA in the hypothalamus of ad-fed female mice, while pair feeding alone also resulted in an increase of ERα in both female WT control and NEXLPL-/- mice. The effect on increasing ERα by pair feeding and LPL deficiency was additive in pair-fed female NEXLPL-/- mice. ERα mRNA levels were not significantly modified in other brain regions examined, nor in the hypothalamus of male NEXLPL-/- mice compared to control mice.


CONCLUSIONS
These results suggest that the mechanism underlying ERα regulation of body weight interacts with the LPL-dependent lipid processing in the hypothalamus in a sex specific way. ERα could provide the link between brain lipid sensing and sex differences in obesity development. This study has the potential important clinical implication to provide better management for women who suffer from obesity and obesity-related co-morbidities.
Division of Endocrinology, Metabolism, & Diabetes, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado Denver Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO 80045, USA. Electronic address: Hong.Wang@ucdenver.edu.
Hong
H
Wang
Division of Endocrinology, Metabolism, & Diabetes, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado Denver Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO 80045, USA.
Yongping
Y
Wang
Division of Endocrinology, Metabolism, & Diabetes, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado Denver Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO 80045, USA.
Matthew D
MD
Taussig
Division of Endocrinology, Metabolism, & Diabetes, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado Denver Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO 80045, USA.
Robert H
RH
Eckel
Estrogen receptor; Lipoprotein lipase; Obesity; Pair feeding; Sex-differences
Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2015 Dec 15;418 Pt 1:9-16
26261054
Menopause. 2014 Apr;21(4):424-32
24149922
Endocrinology. 2013 Mar;154(3):989-92
23429711
Cell Metab. 2011 Oct 5;14(4):453-65
21982706
Endocrinology. 2006 Dec;147(12):5855-64
16935845
Endocrinology. 2015 Dec;156(12 ):4474-91
26375425
PLoS One. 2015 Aug 11;10(8):e0135113
26263173
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2015 Jan 19;5:241
25646091
Biol Sex Differ. 2015 Sep 03;6:14
26339468
Cell Metab. 2011 Jan 5;13(1):105-13
21195353
J Clin Invest. 2015 Jul 1;125(7):2861-76
26098212
Acta Physiol (Oxf). 2011 Sep;203(1):259-69
21281456
Obesity (Silver Spring). 2015 May;23(5):919-26
25865677
Annu Rev Nutr. 2012 Aug 21;32:147-60
22540257
Int J Pharm Compd. 2015 Jul-Aug;19(4):289-93
26625564
Cell Rep. 2014 Oct 23;9(2):633-45
25373903
J Clin Invest. 2014 Oct;124(10):4351-62
25157819
Biol Sex Differ. 2012 May 31;3(1):13
22651247
Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2015 May;29(4):548-53
25579233
Diabetes Care. 1999 Jan;22(1):71-7
10333906
Eur Cytokine Netw. 2009 Mar;20(1):33-8
19318319
Front Neuroendocrinol. 2009 Aug;30(3):396-404
19341761
Gend Med. 2009;6 Suppl 1:60-75
19318219
Hum Reprod. 1997 Oct;12 Suppl 1:126-33
9403329
Metab Syndr Relat Disord. 2014 Aug;12(6):339-46
24730656
Trends Endocrinol Metab. 2014 Jan;25(1):8-14
24189266
Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2015 Sep 18;465(2):287-92
26265042
Obes Rev. 2009 Mar;10(2):154-67
19021872
J Appl Physiol (1985). 2009 Sep;107(3):824-31
19574502
Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2009 Aug;297(2):E271-88
19318514
J Adolesc Health Care. 1982 Jun;2(4):249-60
6749778
Metabolism. 2016 Jan;65(1):48-65
26683796
Endocrinology. 2001 Nov;142(11):4751-7
11606440
Endocrine. 2015 Nov;50(2):276-91
26089260
Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 1996 Jan;20(1):76-82
8788325
Mol Endocrinol. 2012 Dec;26(12):1957-60
23051593
J Appl Physiol (1985). 2001 Mar;90(3):912-8
11181600