In ovo validation model to assess the efficacy of commercial prebiotics on broiler performance and oxidative stability of meat.
The purpose of this study was to examine the effect of in ovo injection of 2 different prebiotics, DiNovo (DN; Laminaria spp., extract containing laminarin and fucoidan) and Bi2tos (BI; non-digestive trans-galactooligosaccharides from milk lactose digested with Bifidobacterium bifidum NCIMB 41171), on growth, slaughter traits, intramuscular fat percentage (IF) and muscle fiber diameter, and lipid oxidation of meat in chickens reared under commercial conditions, following an in ovo trial protocol. On d 12 of embryonic incubation, 350,560 Ross 308 eggs were randomly divided into 3 experimental groups and automatically injected in ovo with: physiological saline (control group), BI at dose of 3.5 mg/embryo and DN at dose of 0.88 mg/embryo. Hatched chicks (males and females) were allocated dependent on treatment group into 3 poultry houses on each farm (3 farms in total) with a stocking density of 21.2 to 21.5 chicks/m2At 42 d of age, 14 randomly chosen birds (7 males and 7 females), per each treatment from each farm, were individually weighed and slaughtered. The results showed no significant differences of final number of chickens/chicken house, mortality, BW per treatment, stocking density (kg/m2), feed intake, feed conversion rate (FCR), and European Broiler Index among 3 experimental groups. Treatments with BI and DN were associated with slight increases (P > 0.05) in average BW and a minor improvement (P > 0.05) of FCR in BI group. Slaughtered chickens from DN and BI treated groups had significantly increase of BW, carcass weight, carcass yield, and breast muscle weight compared with the control group. IF and muscle fiber diameter were similar among groups. Males had significantly higher slaughter traits compared to females, except for breast muscle yield. The prebiotic treatments led to a higher lipid oxidation in meat, even if the detected TBA reactive substances were below the critical value recognized for meat acceptability. In conclusion, in ovo administration of prebiotics was associated with improvements in a number of parameters of relevance to commercial poultry production.
Department of Agricultural, Environmental and Food Sciences, University of Molise, 86100 Campobasso, Italy maior@unimol.it.
Giuseppe
G
Maiorano
Department of Animal Biochemistry and Biotechnology, UTP University of Science and Technology, 85-064 Bydgoszcz, Poland.
Katarzyna
K
Stadnicka
Department of Agricultural, Environmental and Food Sciences, University of Molise, 86100 Campobasso, Italy.
Siria
S
Tavaniello
Department of Agricultural, Environmental and Food Sciences, University of Molise, 86100 Campobasso, Italy.
Cinzia
C
Abiuso
Department of Animal Biochemistry and Biotechnology, UTP University of Science and Technology, 85-064 Bydgoszcz, Poland.
Joanna
J
Bogucka
Department of Animal Biochemistry and Biotechnology, UTP University of Science and Technology, 85-064 Bydgoszcz, Poland.
Marek
M
Bednarczyk
D000273:Adipose Tissue / Q000378:metabolism; D000818:Animals; D050260:Carbohydrate Metabolism; D002642:Chick Embryo; D002645:Chickens / Q000254:growth & development / Q000502:physiology*; D005260:Female; D007795:Laminaria / Q000737:chemistry; D050356:Lipid Metabolism; D008297:Male; D008460:Meat / Q000592:standards*; D008954:Models, Biological; D018485:Muscle Fibers, Skeletal / Q000378:metabolism; D009844:Oligosaccharides / Q000378:metabolism*; D010063:Ovum / Q000378:metabolism; D010084:Oxidation-Reduction; D056692:Prebiotics / Q000592:standards*; D011897:Random Allocation
D009844:Oligosaccharides; D056692:Prebiotics
chickens; in ovo technology; lipid oxidation; performance traits; prebiotics