Associations between an Invasive Plant (Taeniatherum caput-medusae, Medusahead) and Soil Microbial Communities.
Understanding plant-microbe relationships can be important for developing management strategies for invasive plants, particularly when these relationships interact with underlying variables, such as habitat type and seedbank density, to mediate control efforts. In a field study located in California, USA, we investigated how soil microbial communities differ across the invasion front of Taeniatherum caput-medusae (medusahead), an annual grass that has rapidly invaded most of the western USA. Plots were installed in habitats where medusahead invasion is typically successful (open grassland) and typically not successful (oak woodland). Medusahead was seeded into plots at a range of densities (from 0-50,000 seeds/m2) to simulate different levels of invasion. We found that bacterial and fungal soil community composition were significantly different between oak woodland and open grassland habitats. Specifically, ectomycorrhizal fungi were more abundant in oak woodlands while arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and plant pathogens were more abundant in open grasslands. We did not find a direct effect of medusahead density on soil microbial communities across the simulated invasion front two seasons after medusahead were seeded into plots. Our results suggest that future medusahead management initiatives might consider plant-microbe interactions.
Department of Plant Sciences, University of California Davis, Davis, California, United States of America.
Elise S
ES
Gornish
Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences, University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado, United States of America.|Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado, United States of America.
Noah
N
Fierer
Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences, University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado, United States of America.
Albert
A
Barberán
Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2000 Feb;75(1):65-93
10740893
Nature. 2002 May 2;417(6884):67-70
11986666
Nature. 2003 Feb 6;421(6923):625-7
12571594
Oecologia. 2004 Jan;138(2):275-84
14614618
PLoS Biol. 2006 May;4(5):e140
16623597
New Phytol. 2006;170(3):445-57
16626467
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2007 Aug;73(16):5261-7
17586664
Microb Ecol. 2008 Jul;56(1):55-63
17912579
ISME J. 2007 May;1(1):28-37
18043611
Ecology. 2009 Feb;90(2):399-407
19323224
Ecology. 2009 Mar;90(3):649-62
19341136
New Phytol. 2010 Apr;186(2):281-5
20409185
Trends Ecol Evol. 2010 Sep;25(9):512-9
20638747
Ecology. 2010 Sep;91(9):2572-82
20957952
Mycorrhiza. 2011 Feb;21(2):71-90
21140277
Oecologia. 2012 May;169(1):235-43
22101382
ISME J. 2012 Mar;6(3):610-8
22134646
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012 Dec 26;109(52):21390-5
23236140
PLoS One. 2013;8(3):e58020
23469260
ISME J. 2013 Jul;7(7):1424-33
23486251
Nat Methods. 2013 Oct;10(10):996-8
23955772
Nat Methods. 2013 Dec;10(12):1200-2
24076764
BMC Biol. 2014 Nov 12;12:87
25387460
AoB Plants. 2015 Apr 08;7:null
25854693
Front Microbiol. 2015 May 20;6:466
26042104
Ecol Lett. 2015 Dec;18(12):1397-405
26472095
Oecologia. 2016 Jun;181(2):543-57
26920900
Nat Microbiol. 2016 Dec 19;2:16242
27991881