Promise and Ontological Ambiguity in theIn vitroMeat Imagescape: From Laboratory Myotubes to the Cultured Burger.
In vitromeat (IVM), also known as cultured meat, involves growing cells into muscle tissue to be eaten as food. The technology had its most high-profile moment in 2013 when a cultured burger was cooked and tasted in a press conference. Images of the burger featured in the international media and were circulated across the Internet. These images-literally marks on a two-dimensional surface-do important work in establishing what IVM is and what it can do. A combination of visual semiotics and narrative analysis shows that images of IVM afford readings of their story that are co-created by the viewer. Before the cultured burger, during 2011, images of IVM fell into four distinct categories: cell images, tissue images, flowcharts, and meat in a dish images. The narrative infrastructure of each image type affords different interpretations of what IVM can accomplish and what it is. The 2013 cultured burger images both draw upon and depart from these image types in an attempt to present IVM as a normal food stuff, and as 'matter in place' when placed on the plate. The analysis of individual images and the collection of images about a certain object or subject-known as the imagescape-is a productive approach to understanding the ontology and promise of IVM and is applicable to other areas of social life.
Social Sciences, Media and Communications, Brunel University London , Middlesex , UK.
Neil
N
Stephens
Kenniscentrum Publieke Zaak, HAN University of Applied Sciences , Nijmegen , The Netherlands.
Martin
M
Ruivenkamp
In vitro meat; ambiguity; cultured meat; images; imagescape; promise
Animals (Basel). 2013 Jul 26;3(3):647-62
26479525
J Cell Biochem. 2008 Dec 1;105(5):1228-39
18821573
Exp Cell Res. 2010 Feb 1;316(3):341-52
19853598
Public Health Nutr. 2015 Sep;18(13):2457-67
25818555
Theriogenology. 2011 Feb;75(3):513-26
21074831
Environ Sci Technol. 2011 Jul 15;45(14):6117-23
21682287
Public Underst Sci. 2017 Feb;26(2):148-163
27029766
J Tissue Eng Regen Med. 2011 Jul;5(7):529-39
21695794
Nanoethics. 2011 Aug;5(2):185-193
21957436
Tissue Eng Part A. 2008 Jan;14(1):161-71
18333814
J Biomech. 2010 May 28;43(8):1514-21
20189177
Nature. 2010 Dec 9;468(7325):752-3
21150970
BMC Dev Biol. 2007 May 31;7:58
17540017
Minerva. 2011 Sep;49(3):349-354
21957318
Acta Astronaut. 2002 Dec;51(12):879-89
12416526
Dev Dyn. 2008 Apr;237(4):918-27
18330925
Stem Cells Dev. 2010 Jan;19(1):61-70
19400743
Stem Cell Res. 2011 Sep;7(2):112-23
21763619
Public Underst Sci. 2015 Jul;24(5):547-62
24553438
Meat Sci. 2015 Apr;102:49-58
25541372