Regenerate bone stimulation following limb lengthening: a meta-analysis.
BACKGROUND
Limb lengthening with external fixation is performed to treat patients with leg length discrepancy or short stature. Although the procedure has a high rate of success, one potential drawback from limb lengthening is the amount of time spent in the fixation device while regenerate bone consolidates. Although some studies have assessed different treatment modalities, there has not been a study that has systematically evaluated whether low intensity pulsed ultrasound (LIPUS) or pulsed electromagnetic fields (PEMF) have significant effects on regenerate bone growth. The purpose of this study was to evaluate these two non-pharmacological treatment options to stimulate regenerate bone, and to assess whether they affect the treatment time in limb lengthening.


METHODS
Utilizing the electronic databases Medline, Embase and Ovid, we performed a literature search for studies describing the application of LIPUS or PEMF following limb lengthening. With the aid of a statistical software package, Forest-Plots were generated to compare the differences in bone healing index with and without the use of regenerate bone stimulation.


RESULTS
A total of 7 studies assessed these two bone stimulation modalities in a cohort of 153 patients. Overall, the mean healing index was 11.7 days/cm faster when using bone stimulation that in the comparison cohorts (33.7 vs 45.4 day, standardized mean difference of 1.16; p = 0.003).


CONCLUSIONS
Amongst the drawbacks from limb lengthening is the relatively high rate of non- and delayed-union. Several methods, both pharmacological and non-pharmacological, have been investigated for their potential to stimulate the growth of regenerate bone. After systematically evaluating the limited and heterogeneous current literature, we found that LIPUS and PEMF both decreased the time for bone healing (healing index in days/cm) of the newly formed regenerate bone in an adequately selected cohort of patients that underwent limb lengthening. However, a high number of complications should be noted, which could be attributed to the lengthening procedure or to the additional bone stimulation.
CRD42016039024.
Department of Orthopaedics, University of Maryland Medical Center, 110 S. Paca Street, 6th Floor, Suite 300, Baltimore, Maryland, 21201, USA.
Julio J
JJ
Jauregui
SUNY Downstate Medical Center, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Rehabilitation, 450 Clarkson Avenue, Brooklyn, New York, 11203, USA.
Anthony V
AV
Ventimiglia
SUNY Downstate Medical Center, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Rehabilitation, 450 Clarkson Avenue, Brooklyn, New York, 11203, USA.
Preston W
PW
Grieco
SUNY Downstate Medical Center, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Rehabilitation, 450 Clarkson Avenue, Brooklyn, New York, 11203, USA.
David B
DB
Frumberg
Rubin Institute for Advanced Orthopedics, Sinai Hospital of Baltimore, 2401 West Belvedere Avenue, Baltimore, Maryland, 21215, USA. jherzenberg@lifebridgehealth.org.
John E
JE
Herzenberg
Bone Lengthening; Distraction; Fixation; Limb; Osteogenesis; Regenerate; Ultrasound
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1994 Apr;(301):10-8
8156659
JBJS Rev. 2016 Mar 29;4(3):null
27500435
J Orthop Trauma. 2005 Jan;19(1):10-6
15668578
Acta Orthop Belg. 2005 Oct;71(5):571-6
16305082
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1989 Feb;(239):263-85
2912628
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2008 Dec;466(12):2923-32
18800209
Lancet. 1984 May 5;1(8384):994-6
6143970
J Trauma. 2011 Nov;71(5):1376-80
22071933
Indian J Orthop. 2008 Jul;42(3):323-9
19753160
Bone. 2007 Feb;40(2):522-8
17070744
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010 Aug;468(8):2260-77
20387020
J Child Orthop. 2007 Mar;1(1):55-61
19308507
Cytotherapy. 2012 Mar;14 (3):315-26
22122301
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1990 Jan;(250):8-26
2403497
Injury. 2011 Dec;42(12 ):1467-73
21703614
Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 2001 Jun;30(6):479-83
11411874
J R Coll Surg Edinb. 1996 Aug;41(4):258-64
8772079
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005 Jan;(430):189-94
15662323
Injury. 2003 May;34(5):357-62
12719164
J Am Coll Surg. 1996 May;182(5):394-402
8620274
Bone. 1996 Jun;18(6):505-9
8805989
Prog Biophys Mol Biol. 2007 Jan-Apr;93(1-3):384-98
16934857
Orthop Clin North Am. 1991 Oct;22(4):625-31
1945340
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1994 Apr;(301):31-7
8156692
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1994 Jan;76(1):26-34
8288661
Int Orthop. 2005 Apr;29(2):121-4
15685456
J Child Orthop. 2011 Oct;5(5):343-9
23024725
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2001 Mar;83(2):157-64
11284556
Bone. 1999 Feb;24(2):81-8
9951774
J Orthop Res. 2006 Jan;24(1):2-10
16419963
BMJ. 2015 Jan 02;349:g7647
25555855
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1990 May;72 (3):347-55
2187877
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1993 Aug;(293):55-60
8339509
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2001 Feb;83-A(2):259-70
11216689
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2000 Sep;82(7):1077-82
11041605
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2014 Jul;24(5):693-8
23793730
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1990 May;72 (3):356-61
2341426
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1990 Jan;(250):81-104
2403498
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1996 Feb;(323):261-72
8625590
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1997 Sep;79(5):824-30
9331045
J Dent Res. 2008 Feb;87(2):107-18
18218835
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1994 Apr;(301):4-9
8156694
J Pediatr Orthop. 2005 Nov-Dec;25(6):750-4
16294131
HSS J. 2007 Feb;3(1):13-29
18751766
J Pediatr Orthop. 2003 Jan-Feb;23(1):46-51
12499942
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1997 Jul;79(7):961-73
9234872
J Orthop Res. 2002 Jul;20(4):793-800
12168669
J Orthop Res. 1996 Jul;14(4):582-9
8764867
Expert Rev Med Devices. 2015 May;12(3):231-49
25692375
Int Orthop. 2014 Jul;38(7):1477-82
24390009
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1989 Jan;(238):249-81
2910611
J Pediatr Orthop. 1988 Jan-Feb;8(1):73-92
3275690
J Pediatr Orthop. 2003 Jul-Aug;23 (4):478-83
12826946
J Pediatr Orthop. 1987 Mar-Apr;7(2):129-34
3558791
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014 Dec;472(12 ):3789-97
24599650
J Orthop Trauma. 1990;4(3):246-53
2231120
J Child Orthop. 2012 Jun;6(2):89-104
23730339
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1997 Oct;79(10):1464-80
9378732
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1998 Oct;(355 Suppl):S7-21
9917622