Radiographic assessment of degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis: is MRI superior to CT?
To determine the reliability and dependability of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and computerized tomography (CT) in the assessment of lumbar spinal stenosis and correlate the qualitative assessment to both a quantitative assessment and functional outcome measures. Multiple studies have addressed the issue of CT and MRI imaging in lumbar spinal stenosis. None showed superiority of one modality.



We performed a standardized qualitative and quantitative review of CT and MRI scans of 54 patients. Intra-observer and inter-observer reliability was determined between three reviewer using Kappa coefficient. Agreement between the two modalities was analyzed. ODI and SF-36 outcomes were correlated with the imaging assessments.



Almost perfect intra-observer reliability for MRI was achieved by the two expert reviewers (κ = 0.91 for surgeon and κ = 0.92 for neuro-radiologist). For CT, substantial intra-observer agreement was found for the surgeon (κ = 0.77) while the neuro-radiologist was higher (κ = 0.96). For both CT and MRI the standardized qualitative assessment used by the two expert reviewers had a better inter-observer reliability than that between the expert reviewers and the general reporting radiologist, who did not utilize a standardized assessment system. When the qualitative assessment was compared directly, CT overestimated the degree of stenosis 20-35 % of the time (p < 0.05) while MRI overestimated the degree of stenosis 2-11 % of the time (p < 0.05). No correlation was found between qualitative and quantitative analysis with functional status.



This study directly demonstrates that MRI is a more reliable tool than CT, but neither correlates with functional status. Both experience of the reader and the standardization of a qualitative assessment are influential to the reliability.
Division of Orthopaedics, Department of Surgery, University of Western Ontario, London, Canada. khalsaleh@ksu.edu.sa.|Orthopaedic Spine Program, Victoria Hospital, London Health Science Centre, London, Canada. khalsaleh@ksu.edu.sa.|Department of Orthopedics (49), College of Medicine, King Saud University, P. O. Box 7805, Riyadh, 11472, Saudi Arabia. khalsaleh@ksu.edu.sa.
Khalid
K
Alsaleh
Department of Radiology, University of Western Ontario, London, Canada.
Derek
D
Ho
Orthopaedic Spine Program, Victoria Hospital, London Health Science Centre, London, Canada.
M Patricia
MP
Rosas-Arellano
Orthopaedic Spine Program, Victoria Hospital, London Health Science Centre, London, Canada.
Tanya Charyk
TC
Stewart
Division of Orthopaedics, Department of Surgery, University of Western Ontario, London, Canada.|Orthopaedic Spine Program, Victoria Hospital, London Health Science Centre, London, Canada.
Kevin Roger
KR
Gurr
Division of Orthopaedics, Department of Surgery, University of Western Ontario, London, Canada.|Orthopaedic Spine Program, Victoria Hospital, London Health Science Centre, London, Canada.
Christopher Stewart
CS
Bailey
D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D000369:Aged, 80 and over; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008159:Lumbar Vertebrae / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging*; D008279:Magnetic Resonance Imaging; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D015588:Observer Variation; D011446:Prospective Studies; D015203:Reproducibility of Results; D013130:Spinal Stenosis / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging*; D014057:Tomography, X-Ray Computed
CT scan; Lumbar spine; MRI; Reliability; Spinal stenosis
Diagn Interv Imaging. 2013 Apr;94(4):371-88
23273948
J Spinal Disord. 2000 Jun;13(3):253-8
10872765
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1989 Mar;14(3):332-7
2711248
Spine J. 2008 Mar-Apr;8(2):305-10
18082461
Eur Spine J. 2015 Oct;24(10):2236-43
26292958
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2008 Jun 15;33(14):1605-10
18552677
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2011 Jul 28;12 :175
21798008
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006 May 1;31(10):1168-76
16648755
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2001 Mar;(384):122-36
11249157
Biometrics. 1977 Mar;33(1):159-74
843571
Eur Spine J. 2015 Oct;24(10):2264-8
25987454
Eur Spine J. 2014 Jan;23 (1):74-9
23817960
Eur Spine J. 2014 Jun;23(6):1320-4
24573778