Morphological Response of Eight Quercus Species to Simulated Wind Load.
Leaf shape, including leaf size, leaf dissection index (LDI), and venation distribution, strongly impacts leaf physiology and the forces of momentum exerted on leaves or the canopy under windy conditions. Yet, little has been known about how leaf shape affects the morphological response of trees to wind load. We studied eight Quercus species, with different leaf shapes, to determine the morphological response to simulated wind load. Quercus trees with long elliptical leaves, were significantly affected by wind load (P< 0.05), as indicted by smaller specific leaf area (SLA), stem base diameter and stem height under windy conditions when compared to the control. The Quercus trees with leaves characterized by lanceolate or sinuous edges, showed positive morphological responses to wind load, such as bigger leaf thickness, larger stem diameter, allocation to root biomass, and smaller stem height (P< 0.05). These morphological responses to wind can reduce drag and increase the mechanical strength of the tree. Leaf dissection index (LDI), an important index of leaf shape, was correlated with morphological response to wind load (P< 0.05), including differences in SLA, in stem base diameter and in allocation to root biomass. These results suggest that trees with higher LDI, such as those with more and/or deeper lobes, are better adapted to wind load.
East China Coastal Forest Ecosystem Long-term Research Station, Research Institute of Subtropical Forestry, Chinese Academy of Forestry, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 311400, PR China.
Tonggui
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8775-597X
T
Wu
East China Coastal Forest Ecosystem Long-term Research Station, Research Institute of Subtropical Forestry, Chinese Academy of Forestry, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 311400, PR China.
Peng
P
Zhang
East China Coastal Forest Ecosystem Long-term Research Station, Research Institute of Subtropical Forestry, Chinese Academy of Forestry, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 311400, PR China.
Lei
L
Zhang
Department of Forestry and Environment Conservation, Clemson University, Clemson, SC29634-0317, United States of America.
Geoff G
GG
Wang
East China Coastal Forest Ecosystem Long-term Research Station, Research Institute of Subtropical Forestry, Chinese Academy of Forestry, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 311400, PR China.
Mukui
M
Yu
Tree Physiol. 1999 Mar;19(3):153-163
12651578
Oecologia. 2008 Jan;154(4):625-35
17943318
Front Plant Sci. 2015 Apr 22;6:266
25954292
Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2006;57:361-81
16669766
Plant Physiol. 2007 Aug;144(4):1890-8
17556506
J Exp Bot. 2009;60(1):43-56
19088336
Physiol Plant. 1986;66:219-26
11538655
Am J Bot. 2005 May;92(5):810-8
21652461
Ann Bot. 2008 Jun;101(9):1421-32
18448448
Tree Physiol. 1989 Mar;5(1):113-21
14973003
Tree Physiol. 2000 Apr;20(8):535-540
12651434
Am J Bot. 2006 Oct;93(10):1522-30
21642099
J Exp Bot. 2003 Feb;54(383):845-9
12554727
Planta. 1973 Jun;114(2):143-57
24458719
New Phytol. 2008;179(3):808-17
18507771
Tree Physiol. 1998 Jan;18(1):65-68
12651301
Tree Physiol. 2006 Jan;26(1):73-9
16203716
Plant Sci. 2012 Mar;184:20-8
22284706
Tree Physiol. 2005 Oct;25(10):1243-51
16076773
J Exp Bot. 2011 Aug;62(12):4295-307
21617246
New Phytol. 2005 Feb;165(2):373-89
15720650
New Phytol. 2009;183(1):13-26
19413689
J Exp Bot. 2000 Nov;51(352):1825-42
11113161
New Phytol. 2010 Oct;188(2):554-64
20663062