Trade-Offs in Male Display Activity with Lek Size.
In lek mating systems, males aggregate and defend arenas where they display for females; females select and mate with a male and then solely raise their offspring. Generally, female visits and copulations increase and reproductive variance in male mating success declines with lek size. Here we investigate how male display effort changes across a gradient in lek size. We expect male display effort, an energetically expensive activity, will increase with lek size and male rank due to changes in breeding opportunities and competition among males. We test the interaction of male rank and lek size on display effort using the white-bearded manakin, Manacus manacus (Aves: Pipridae), a well-studied species with a wide geographic distribution in the new world tropics. We used mini-video recorders to simultaneously capture female visits and display behaviors of 41 males distributed over 10 leks. We found that overall display effort increased disproportionately with lek size due to males of both high and low ranks increasing their display effort at larger leks. Our results suggest that increased breeding opportunities and intrasexual competition at larger leks result in males of different ranks investing similarly in increased display effort in order to attract females.
Departamento de Zoologia, Universidade Estadual Paulista ''Julio de Mesquita Filho" (Unesp), Avenida 24A, 1515, Bela Vista, Rio Claro, SP, CEP 13506-900, Brazil.
César
C
Cestari
Department of Wildlife Ecology and Conservation and Center for Latin American Studies, P.O. Box 110430, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, 32611, United States of America.
Bette A
BA
Loiselle
Departamento de Zoologia, Universidade Estadual Paulista ''Julio de Mesquita Filho" (Unesp), Avenida 24A, 1515, Bela Vista, Rio Claro, SP, CEP 13506-900, Brazil.
Marco Aurélio
MA
Pizo
Endocrinology. 2013 Sep;154(9):3168-77
23782945
Proc Biol Sci. 2009 May 22;276(1663):1875-81
19324796
Anim Behav. 1998 Sep;56(3):755-612
9784227
Nature. 2000 Nov 16;408(6810):352-3
11099040
Z Tierpsychol. 1974;36:1-36
4478736
Proc Biol Sci. 2011 Dec 7;278(1724):3523-8
21508030
Anim Behav. 1999 Dec;58(6):1217-1221
10600142
Z Tierpsychol. 1974;36:513-30
4478741