Spatio-Temporal Variation in Age Structure and Abundance of the Endangered Snail Kite: Pooling across Regions Masks a Declining and Aging Population.
While variation in age structure over time and space has long been considered important for population dynamics and conservation, reliable estimates of such spatio-temporal variation in age structure have been elusive for wild vertebrate populations. This limitation has arisen because of problems of imperfect detection, the potential for temporary emigration impacting assessments of age structure, and limited information on age. However, identifying patterns in age structure is important for making reliable predictions of both short- and long-term dynamics of populations of conservation concern. Using a multistate superpopulation estimator, we estimated region-specific abundance and age structure (the proportion of individuals within each age class) of a highly endangered population of snail kites for two separate regions in Florida over 17 years (1997-2013). We find that in the southern region of the snail kite-a region known to be critical for the long-term persistence of the species-the population has declined significantly since 1997, and during this time, it has increasingly become dominated by older snail kites (> 12 years old). In contrast, in the northern region-a region historically thought to serve primarily as drought refugia-the population has increased significantly since 2007 and age structure is more evenly distributed among age classes. Given that snail kites show senescence at approximately 13 years of age, where individuals suffer higher mortality rates and lower breeding rates, these results reveal an alarming trend for the southern region. Our work illustrates the importance of accounting for spatial structure when assessing changes in abundance and age distribution and the need for monitoring of age structure in imperiled species.
Department of Wildlife Ecology and Conservation, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States of America.
Brian E
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9640-0695
BE
Reichert
U.S. Geological Survey, Colorado Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit, Fort Collins, CO, United States of America.
William L
WL
Kendall
Department of Wildlife Ecology and Conservation, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States of America.
Robert J
RJ
Fletcher
Department of Wildlife Ecology and Conservation, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States of America.
Wiley M
WM
Kitchens
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000 Jun 6;97(12):6562-7
10823920
Trends Ecol Evol. 2001 May 1;16(5):219-221
11301139
Biometrics. 2001 Dec;57(4):1113-22
11764251
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2002 Sep 29;357(1425):1285-98
12396519
J Anim Ecol. 2006 Mar;75(2):527-39
16638005
Trends Ecol Evol. 2004 Jan;19(1):39-45
16701224
Conserv Biol. 2007 Apr;21(2):472-81
17391197
Oecologia. 2007 Aug;153(2):291-301
17530294
Ecology. 2007 Nov;88(11):2857-67
18051655
Biometrika. 1945 Nov;33:183-212
21006835
Ecology. 2012 Dec;93(12):2580-9
23431589
Nat Commun. 2013;4:2572
24096937
Ecol Appl. 2014 Jan;24(1):196-203
24640544
Proc Biol Sci. 2015 Sep 7;282(1814):null
26336178
J Anim Ecol. 2016 Nov;85(6):1563-1573
27392248
Ecol Lett. 2016 Sep;19(9):1023-31
27401966
Ecol Appl. 2016 Oct;26(7):1952-1968
27755742
Monogr Popul Biol. 1972;5:1-217
4680650
Demography. 1971 Feb;8(1):71-80
5163984