Expansion of medical vocabularies using distributional semantics on Japanese patient blogs.
BACKGROUND
Research on medical vocabulary expansion from large corpora has primarily been conducted using text written in English or similar languages, due to a limited availability of large biomedical corpora in most languages. Medical vocabularies are, however, essential also for text mining from corpora written in other languages than English and belonging to a variety of medical genres. The aim of this study was therefore to evaluate medical vocabulary expansion using a corpus very different from those previously used, in terms of grammar and orthographics, as well as in terms of text genre. This was carried out by applying a method based on distributional semantics to the task of extracting medical vocabulary terms from a large corpus of Japanese patient blogs.


METHODS
Distributional properties of terms were modelled with random indexing, followed by agglomerative hierarchical clustering of 3 ×100 seed terms from existing vocabularies, belonging to three semantic categories: Medical Finding, Pharmaceutical Drug and Body Part. By automatically extracting unknown terms close to the centroids of the created clusters, candidates for new terms to include in the vocabulary were suggested. The method was evaluated for its ability to retrieve the remaining n terms in existing medical vocabularies.


RESULTS
Removing case particles and using a context window size of 1+1 was a successful strategy for Medical Finding and Pharmaceutical Drug, while retaining case particles and using a window size of 8+8 was better for Body Part. For a 10n long candidate list, the use of different cluster sizes affected the result for Pharmaceutical Drug, while the effect was only marginal for the other two categories. For a list of top n candidates for Body Part, however, clusters with a size of up to two terms were slightly more useful than larger clusters. For Pharmaceutical Drug, the best settings resulted in a recall of 25 % for a candidate list of top n terms and a recall of 68 % for top 10n. For a candidate list of top 10n candidates, the second best results were obtained for Medical Finding: a recall of 58 %, compared to 46 % for Body Part. Only taking the top n candidates into account, however, resulted in a recall of 23 % for Body Part, compared to 16 % for Medical Finding.


CONCLUSIONS
Different settings for corpus pre-processing, window sizes and cluster sizes were suitable for different semantic categories and for different lengths of candidate lists, showing the need to adapt parameters, not only to the language and text genre used, but also to the semantic category for which the vocabulary is to be expanded. The results show, however, that the investigated choices for pre-processing and parameter settings were successful, and that a Japanese blog corpus, which in many ways differs from those used in previous studies, can be a useful resource for medical vocabulary expansion.
, Stockholm, Sweden.
Magnus
M
Ahltorp
Department of Computer Science, Linnaeus University/Gavagai, Växjö/Stockholm, Sweden. maria@gavagai.se.
Maria
M
Skeppstedt
Graduate School of Information Science and Technology, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan.
Shiho
S
Kitajima
Department of Computer and Systems Sciences (DSV), Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden.
Aron
A
Henriksson
Graduate School of Information Science and Technology, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan.
Rafal
R
Rzepka
Graduate School of Information Science and Technology, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan.
Kenji
K
Araki
Agglomerative hierarchical clustering; Distributional semantics; Japanese language processing; Medical vocabulary expansion; Random indexing
Proc AMIA Symp. 2001;:17-21
11825149
BMC Bioinformatics. 2005 Apr 22;6:103
15847682
AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2005;:470-4
16779084
J Biomed Semantics. 2014 Feb 05;5(1):6
24499679
Emerg Health Threats J. 2010;3:e3
22460393
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2004 Sep-Oct;11(5):392-402
15187068
AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2012;2012:522-31
23304324
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2003 Nov-Dec;10(6):580-7
12925544
PLoS Comput Biol. 2011 Aug;7(8):e1002141
21901084
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2013 Sep-Oct;20(5):922-30
23355458
Nucleic Acids Res. 2004 Jan 1;32(Database issue):D267-70
14681409
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2010 Sep-Oct;17(5):514-8
20819854
Int J Med Inform. 2008 Feb;77(2):107-13
17317291
J Biomed Inform. 2015 Oct;57:333-49
26291578
Artif Intell Med. 2005 Jan;33(1):31-40
15617980
J Biomed Inform. 2009 Apr;42(2):390-405
19232399
BMC Bioinformatics. 2008 Mar 24;9:159
18366721
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2015 May;22(3):671-81
25755127
Bioinformatics. 2003;19 Suppl 1:i340-9
12855479
AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2003;:763-7
14728276
AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2013 Nov 16;2013:600-9
24551362
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2005 Jul-Aug;12(4):448-57
15802475
J Biomed Inform. 2013 Dec;46(6):1088-98
23954592
J Biomed Inform. 2009 Oct;42(5):950-66
19535011
J Biomed Inform. 2012 Feb;45(1):129-40
22085698