The similar and different evolutionary trends of MATE family occurred between rice and Arabidopsis thaliana.
BACKGROUND
Multidrug and toxic compound extrusion (MATE) transporter proteins are present in all organisms. Although the functions of some MATE gene family members have been studied in plants, few studies have investigated the gene expansion patterns, functional divergence, or the effects of positive selection.


RESULTS
Forty-five MATE genes from rice and 56 from Arabidopsis were identified and grouped into four subfamilies. MATE family genes have similar exon-intron structures in rice and Arabidopsis; MATE gene structures are conserved in each subfamily but differ among subfamilies. In both species, the MATE gene family has expanded mainly through tandem and segmental duplications. A transcriptome atlas showed considerable differences in expression among the genes, in terms of transcript abundance and expression patterns under normal growth conditions, indicating wide functional divergence in this family. In both rice and Arabidopsis, the MATE genes showed consistent functional divergence trends, with highly significant Type-I divergence in each subfamily, while Type-II divergence mainly occurred in subfamily III. The Type-II coefficients between rice subfamilies I/III, II/III, and IV/III were all significantly greater than zero, while only the Type-II coefficient between Arabidopsis IV/III subfamilies was significantly greater than zero. A site-specific model analysis indicated that MATE genes have relatively conserved evolutionary trends. A branch-site model suggested that the extent of positive selection on each subfamily of rice and Arabidopsis was different: subfamily II of Arabidopsis showed higher positive selection than other subfamilies, whereas in rice, positive selection was highest in subfamily III. In addition, the analyses identified 18 rice sites and 7 Arabidopsis sites that were responsible for positive selection and for Type-I and Type-II functional divergence; there were no common sites between rice and Arabidopsis. Five coevolving amino acid sites were identified in rice and three in Arabidopsis; these sites might have important roles in maintaining local structural stability and protein functional domains.


CONCLUSIONS
We demonstrate that the MATE gene family expanded through tandem and segmental duplication in both rice and Arabidopsis. Overall, the results of our analyses contribute to improved understanding of the molecular evolution and functions of the MATE gene family in plants.
College of Life Sciences, Capital Normal University, Beijing, 100048, China.
Lihui
L
Wang
College of Life Sciences, Capital Normal University, Beijing, 100048, China.
Xiujuan
X
Bei
College of Life Sciences, Capital Normal University, Beijing, 100048, China.
Jiansheng
J
Gao
College of Life Sciences, Capital Normal University, Beijing, 100048, China.
Yaxuan
Y
Li
College of Life Sciences, Capital Normal University, Beijing, 100048, China.
Yueming
Y
Yan
College of Life Sciences, Capital Normal University, Beijing, 100048, China. yingkaohu@yahoo.com.
Yingkao
Y
Hu
Functional divergence; MATE proteins; Phylogenetic tree; Positive selection; Segmental duplication; Tandem duplication
Curr Opin Plant Biol. 1998 Jun;1(3):258-66
10066594
Mol Biol Evol. 1999 Dec;16(12):1664-74
10605109
Genetics. 2000 Jan;154(1):459-73
10629003
Mol Microbiol. 2000 Jul;37(2):219-25
10931319
Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2000 Dec;64(4):672-93
11104814
J Biol Chem. 2001 Mar 23;276(12):8648-56
11115509
Mol Biol Evol. 2001 Apr;18(4):453-64
11264396
Plant Cell. 2001 Apr;13(4):853-71
11283341
Plant Cell. 2001 Jul;13(7):1625-38
11449055
J Biol Chem. 2002 Feb 15;277(7):5360-8
11739388
Plant Cell. 2002 Jan;14(1):275-86
11826312
Plant Physiol. 2002 Feb;128(2):726-33
11842175
Mol Biol Evol. 2002 Jun;19(6):950-8
12032251
Trends Biochem Sci. 2002 Jun;27(6):315-21
12069792
Plant Cell. 2002 Aug;14(8):1787-99
12172022
Eur J Biochem. 2003 Mar;270(5):799-813
12603313
Nature. 2003 Mar 27;422(6930):433-8
12660784
Plant Mol Biol. 2003 Apr;51(6):859-66
12777046
Plant Cell. 2003 Aug;15(8):1689-703
12897245
Plant Cell. 2003 Sep;15(9):2192-202
12953120
Nucleic Acids Res. 2004 Mar 19;32(5):1792-7
15034147
Plant Physiol. 2004 Sep;136(1):2523-31
15310833
BMC Bioinformatics. 2004 Aug 19;5:113
15318951
Genetics. 2004 Oct;168(2):1041-51
15514074
Mol Biol Evol. 2005 Apr;22(4):1107-18
15689528
J Bacteriol. 2005 Mar;187(5):1552-8
15716425
Nat Genet. 2005 May;37(5):501-6
15806101
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2005 May;49(5):1857-64
15855507
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2005 May;49(5):1865-71
15855508
Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2005 Jun;8(3):301-7
15860427
Genetics. 2006 May;173(1):9-23
16547113
Nat Genet. 2006 May;38(5):500-1
16642009
Mol Biol Evol. 2006 Oct;23(10):1937-45
16864604
Trends Pharmacol Sci. 2006 Nov;27(11):587-93
16996621
Plant Physiol. 2007 Apr;143(4):1467-83
17293439
Plant Physiol. 2007 May;144(1):197-205
17351051
Nature. 2007 Apr 12;446(7137):749-57
17429392
Plant J. 2007 Jun;50(5):873-85
17470057
Mol Biol Evol. 2007 Aug;24(8):1586-91
17483113
Nucleic Acids Res. 2007 Jul;35(Web Server issue):W585-7
17517783
Plant Cell. 2007 Jun;19(6):2023-38
17601828
Plant Cell Physiol. 2007 Aug;48(8):1081-91
17634181
Yi Chuan. 2007 Aug;29(8):1023-6
17681935
PLoS One. 2007 Aug 08;2(8):e718
17684564
Nat Genet. 2007 Sep;39(9):1156-61
17721535
Plant Cell Physiol. 2008 Jun;49(6):865-79
18413358
Plant Physiol. 2008 Oct;148(2):993-1003
18715958
Plant J. 2009 Feb;57(3):389-99
18826429
Genome Res. 2008 Dec;18(12):1944-54
18832442
Plant Physiol. 2009 Jan;149(1):297-305
19011004
Mol Genet Genomics. 2009 Jan;281(1):109-23
19018571
Plant Physiol. 2009 Feb;149(2):708-18
19098091
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 Feb 17;106(7):2447-52
19168636
Diabetes. 2009 Mar;58(3):745-9
19228809
Plant Physiol. 2009 May;150(1):402-15
19297587
Mol Pharmacol. 2009 Jun;75(6):1280-6
19332510
J Plant Physiol. 2009 Sep 1;166(13):1453-9
19342121
Plant Cell. 2009 Aug;21(8):2323-40
19684242
Science. 2009 Aug 28;325(5944):1089-93
19713519
J Exp Bot. 2010;61(2):439-51
19995827
Plant J. 2010 Mar;61(5):728-40
20003133
Nature. 2010 Oct 21;467(7318):991-4
20861838
Plant Biol (Stuttg). 2011 Jan;13(1):42-50
21143724
Plant Cell Physiol. 2011 Mar;52(3):518-27
21257605
Plant Cell. 2011 Apr;23(4):1536-55
21467581
New Phytol. 2011 Oct;192(2):471-82
21762165
Plant Cell Environ. 2011 Dec;34(12):2138-48
21848845
Plant J. 2011 Dec;68(6):1061-9
21880027
Biochem J. 2012 Mar 15;442(3):551-61
22150160
Planta. 2013 Apr;237(4):979-89
23187679
Plant Physiol. 2013 Feb;161(2):880-92
23204428
PLoS Genet. 2012;8(12):e1003120
23236296
Plant Signal Behav. 2013 Apr;8(4):e23603
23333976
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 Feb 5;110(6):2099-104
23341609
Plant Cell Physiol. 2013 Apr;54(4):585-94
23385147
Ann Bot. 2013 Aug;112(3):603-12
23798600
Plant J. 2013 Oct;76(2):297-307
23865685
Proteins. 2014 Feb;82(2):240-9
23873591
BMC Plant Biol. 2013 Oct 03;13:148
24088323
Mol Biol Evol. 2013 Dec;30(12):2725-9
24132122
Sci Rep. 2014 Feb 04;4:3964
24492654
PLoS One. 2014 Jan 30;9(1):e87438
24498106
Plant Cell Rep. 2014 Jul;33(7):1147-59
24700246
Plant Cell Physiol. 2014 Aug;55(8):1426-36
24850836
Mol Plant. 2014 Oct;7(10):1522-32
24851876
BMC Evol Biol. 2014 Jun 09;14:124
24913827
BMC Plant Biol. 2014 Dec 19;14:373
25524588
Microbiol Rev. 1985 Mar;49(1):1-32
2580220
J Exp Bot. 2015 Oct;66(20):6327-43
26160579
Plant Cell Physiol. 2016 May;57(5):976-85
26872836
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1989 Nov;33(11):1831-6
2692513
BMC Genomics. 2016 Mar 11;17:223
26968518
Ecol Evol. 2015 Nov 02;5(22):5394-5412
30151141
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1995 Mar;39(3):577-85
7793855
Science. 1994 Apr 15;264(5157):375-82
8153624
J Mol Biol. 1996 Mar 29;257(2):342-58
8609628
J Bacteriol. 1999 Feb;181(3):949-56
9922260