Expected pairwise congruence among gene trees under the coalescent model.
Although it is widely appreciated that gene trees may differ from the overall species tree and from one another due to various evolutionary processes (e.g., incomplete lineage sorting (ILS), horizontal gene transfer, etc.), the extent of this incongruence is rarely quantified and discussed. Here we consider the expected amount of incongruence arising from ILS, as modeled by the coalescent process. In particular, we compute the probability that two gene trees randomly sampled from the same species tree agree with one another as well as the distribution of the Robinson-Foulds distance between them, for species trees with three to eight taxa. We demonstrate that, as expected under the coalescent model, the amount of discordance is affected by species tree-specific factors such as speciation times and effective population sizes for the species under consideration. Our results highlight the fact that substantial discordance may occur, even when the number of species is very small, which has implications both for larger taxon samples and for any method that uses estimated gene trees as the basis for further statistical inference. The amount of incongruence is substantial enough that such methods may need to be modified to account for variability in the underlying gene trees.
Department of Evolution, Ecology, and Organismal Biology, The Ohio State University, United States.
Yuan
Y
Tian
Department of Evolution, Ecology, and Organismal Biology, The Ohio State University, United States; Department of Statistics, The Ohio State University, United States. Electronic address: kubatko.2@osu.edu.
Laura S
LS
Kubatko
D056426:Genetic Loci; D049810:Genetic Speciation; D008957:Models, Genetic; D010802:Phylogeny; D011995:Recombination, Genetic
Coalescent; Comparative methods; Gene tree; Incomplete lineage sorting; Incongruence; Mapping traits; RF distance; Species tree