Bumblebees Perform Well-Controlled Landings in Dim Light.
To make a smooth touchdown when landing, an insect must be able to reliably control its approach speed as well as its body and leg position-behaviors that are thought to be regulated primarily by visual information. Bumblebees forage and land under a broad range of light intensities and while their behavior during the final moments of landing has been described in detail in bright light, little is known about how this is affected by decreasing light intensity. Here, we investigate this by characterizing the performance of bumblebees, B. terrestris, landing on a flat platform at two different orientations (horizontal and vertical) and at four different light intensities (ranging from 600 lx down to 19 lx). As light intensity decreased, the bees modified their body position and the distance at which they extended their legs, suggesting that the control of landing in these insects is visually mediated. Nevertheless, the effect of light intensity was small and the landings were still well controlled, even in the dimmest light. We suggest that the changes in landing behavior that occurred in dim light might represent adaptations that allow the bees to perform smooth landings across the broad range of light intensities at which they are active.
Department of Biology, Lund University Lund, Sweden.
Therese
T
Reber
Department of Biology, Lund University Lund, Sweden.
Marie
M
Dacke
Department of Biology, Lund University Lund, Sweden.
Eric
E
Warrant
Department of Biology, Lund University Lund, Sweden.
Emily
E
Baird
Bombus terrestris; behavioral adaptation; bumblebee; flight; insect; landing; light intensity; vision
Vision Res. 1999 May;39(9):1611-30
10343855
Biol Cybern. 2000 Sep;83(3):171-83
11007294
J Exp Biol. 2002 Sep;205(Pt 18):2785-98
12177144
J Opt Soc Am. 1956 Aug;46(8):634-9
13346424
Cell Tissue Res. 2004 Jun;316(3):377-90
15064946
Curr Biol. 2004 Aug 10;14(15):1309-18
15296747
Physiol Biochem Zool. 2006 Jan-Feb;79(1):188-93
16380940
J Exp Biol. 2006 Mar;209(Pt 5):789-800
16481568
Science. 1976 Oct 15;194(4262):341-2
17738051
J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol. 2008 Jan;194(1):97-107
18094978
J Exp Biol. 2010 Jan 15;213(2):262-70
20038660
J Exp Biol. 2012 May 1;215(Pt 9):1523-32
22496289
J Exp Biol. 2012 Jun 1;215(Pt 11):1783-98
22573757
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 Nov 12;110(46):18686-91
24167269
J Exp Biol. 2015 May;218(Pt 9):1339-46
25750416
Science. 2015 Jun 12;348(6240):1245-8
26068850
Front Physiol. 2015 Oct 28;6:305
26578977
J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol. 2016 Apr;202(4):277-85
26868924
Oecologia. 1982 Jun;53(3):394-398
28311747
J Physiol. 1982 Nov;332:25-45
7153928
Vision Res. 1981;21(2):291-6
7269306
Nature. 1979 Feb 15;277(5697):569-72
763342
Prog Neurobiol. 1993 Apr;40(4):413-61
8446759