Comparing 3-month recall to daily reporting of sexual behaviours.
This study aimed to examine discrepancies between self-report methods and methodological issues related to sexual risk taking. We examined sexual behaviour assessed via 3-month electronic recall and by daily electronic reporting among a large cohort of patients attending STI clinics.



STI clinic attenders (N= 628) aged 15 to 60 years reported on demographic information (at baseline), penile-vaginal sex acts, condom-unprotected penile-vaginal sex and STI history using 3-month recall and daily reports. Additionally, interviewer-participant match related to race and gender, as well as study site were considered as covariates.



Concordance between recall and daily reports on penile-vaginal sex was moderately strong (Spearman's r (rs)=0.62; p<0.001). Comparison for reports for condom-unprotected penile-vaginal sex resulted in a correlation coefficient of 0.61 (p<0.001), also indicating moderately strong agreement between the two methods. Two generalised logit models were conducted to explain lack of strong concordance in penile-vaginal sex acts and condom-unprotected penile-vaginal sex. The odds of a female reporting higher frequency of sex in daily reports compared with recall were more than two times that of a male. Every five person increase in the number of lifetime sexual partners was associated with five times the odds of a discrepancy in reporting methods. Age was also significantly associated with unequal daily versus recall sex frequency reporting.



Shifting focus to methodological considerations of technological reports can help ensure better investment of resources into sexual health research due to greater understanding of the methodological properties of data collection methods.
Department of Kinesiology & Health Promotion, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky, USA.
Kristen P
KP
Mark
Departments of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky, USA.
Rachel V
RV
Smith
Department of Epidemiology, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky, USA.
April M
AM
Young
Department of Health Behavior, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky, USA.
Richard
R
Crosby
D000328:Adult; D017280:Condoms / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D003430:Cross-Sectional Studies; D005260:Female; D006306:Health Surveys / Q000379:methods* / Q000592:standards; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D011939:Mental Recall; D015203:Reproducibility of Results; D012309:Risk-Taking; D057566:Self Report; D012725:Sexual Behavior / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D012747:Sexual Partners; D014481:United States / Q000453:epidemiology; D047568:Unsafe Sex / Q000706:statistics & numerical data
CONDOMS; GENDER; HEALTH PROMOTION; REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH; SEXUAL HEALTH
Int J STD AIDS. 2001 Jun;12(6):365-75
11368817
Sex Transm Infect. 2014 Aug;90(5):374-81
24723619
Sex Transm Dis. 2010 Aug;37(8):497-501
20414147
J Adolesc Health. 1999 Sep;25(3):199-206
10475496
Arch Sex Behav. 2000 Aug;29(4):309-22
10948721
Sex Transm Infect. 2001 Apr;77(2):84-92
11287683
Am J Public Health. 2002 Feb;92(2):294-7
11818309
Health Psychol. 2002 Nov;21(6):629-34
12433018
J Sex Res. 2003 Nov;40(4):325-32
14735406
Ann Behav Med. 2003 Oct;26(2):104-23
14534028
Annu Rev Sex Res. 2005;16:20-52
16913286
Sex Transm Infect. 2012 Nov;88(7):484-9
23002192
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2009 Jan;163(1):61-4
19124705
AIDS. 1991 Mar;5(3):333-6
2059375
J Sex Res. 2012;49(2-3):212-26
22380589
J Adolesc Health. 2003 Dec;33(6):436-57
14642706
Psychol Bull. 1990 Nov;108(3):339-62
2270232
Sex Transm Infect. 2002 Aug;78(4):228-31
12181456
Trop Med Int Health. 2010 Mar;15(3):362-81
20409291
Am J Public Health. 1995 Nov;85(11):1492-9
7485660
Pediatrics. 2005 May;115(5):e573-81
15867022
Am J Epidemiol. 1999 May 15;149(10):950-4
10342804
Science. 1998 May 8;280(5365):867-73
9572724
Sex Transm Infect. 2007 Oct;83(6):490-6; discussion 496-7
17660325