Moving beyond the "Five Freedoms" by Updating the "Five Provisions" and Introducing Aligned "Animal Welfare Aims".
Although the Five Freedoms paradigm has been very influential in shaping animal welfare thinking for the last two decades, it has two key disadvantages. First, the focus on "freedom" from a range of negative experiences and states has been misunderstood in a number of quarters to mean that complete freedom from these experiences and states is possible, when in fact the best that can be achieved is for them to be minimised. Second, the major focus of the Freedoms on negative experiences and states is now seen to be a disadvantage in view of current understanding that animal welfare management should also include the promotion of positive experiences and states. The challenge therefore was to formulate a paradigm that overcame these two main problems and yet was straightforward enough to be accessible to non-specialists, including members of the lay public who are interested in animal welfare. This was achieved by highlighting the Five Provisions, originally aligned with the Five Freedoms, but now updated to direct welfare management towards activities that both minimise negative experiences or states and promote positive experiences or states as specified by particular Animal Welfare Aims assigned to each Provision. Aspects of the four welfare principles from the European Welfare Quality assessment system (WQ (®) ) and elements of all domains of the Five Domains Model for animal welfare assessment have been incorporated into the new Five Provisions/Welfare Aims paradigm. Thus, the paradigm is easily understood and provides clear guidance on beneficial objectives for animal welfare management. It is anticipated that the paradigm will have application to many species found in a wide range of circumstances.
Animal Welfare Science and Bioethics Centre, Institute of Veterinary, Animal and Biomedical Sciences, Massey University, Palmerston North 4442, New Zealand. D.J.Mellor@massey.ac.nz.
David J
DJ
Mellor
European Welfare Quality assessment system (WQ®); Five Animal Welfare Aims; Five Domains Model; Five Freedoms; Five Provisions; negative and positive experiences and states
Equine Vet J. 2012 Mar;44(2):244-9
21767299
N Z Vet J. 2015 Jan;63(1):17-23
24875152
Aust Vet J. 2001 Nov;79(11):762-8
11789912
N Z Vet J. 2015 Jan;63(1):9-16
24875367
Vet J. 2008 Mar;175(3):293-300
17613265
Animals (Basel). 2016 Mar 14;6(3):null
27102171
J Appl Anim Welf Sci. 2015;18 Suppl 1:S1-10
26440493
N Z Vet J. 2012 Jan;60(1):1-8
22175422
N Z Vet J. 2015 Jan;63(1):44-51
25004795
N Z Vet J. 2015 Jan;63(1):3-8
24875268
N Z Vet J. 2011 Nov;59(6):263-71
22040330
Conscious Cogn. 2005 Mar;14(1):30-80
15766890
Acta Biotheor. 2011 Jun;59(2):121-37
21347723
N Z Vet J. 2015 Jan;63(1):24-30
25263963
Conscious Cogn. 2009 Jun;18(2):500-14
18701321
Animals (Basel). 2013 Jul 05;3(3):584-605
26479523
Animals (Basel). 2016 May 24;6(6):null
27231943