How anorexia nervosa patients with high and low autistic traits respond to group Cognitive Remediation Therapy.
BACKGROUND
The current study aimed to evaluate group Cognitive remediation therapy (CRT) inpatients with Anorexia Nervosa (AN). We aimed to examine the treatment response of group CRT in AN patients with high or low levels of autistic traits.


METHODS
Thirty-five in patients with an AN diagnosis received group CRT intervention for 6 sessions in a national eating disorder unit. All participants completed self-report questionnaires on thinking styles and motivation before and after the intervention.


RESULTS
Patients with low autistic traits had statistically significant medium size effect improvements in self-reported thinking style scales as well as confidence (ability) to change. Patients with high autistic traits showed no statistically significant improvements in any outcome measure.


CONCLUSIONS
The brief group format CRT intervention improves self-reported cognitive and motivational aspects in people with AN without autistic traits. For patients with higher autistic traits brief group CRT does not improve self-reported cognitive style or motivation. This finding suggests that brief group format CRT might not be the best suited format for individuals with elevated autistic traits and individual or more tailored CRT should be explored.
King's College London, Division of Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, London, SE5 8AF, UK. kate.tchanturia@kcl.ac.uk.|Eating Disorders Unit, South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, Beckenham, UK. kate.tchanturia@kcl.ac.uk.|Illia State University Tbilisi, Tbilisi, Georgia. kate.tchanturia@kcl.ac.uk.
Kate
K
Tchanturia
King's College London, Division of Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, London, SE5 8AF, UK.
Emma
E
Larsson
Eating Disorders Unit, South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, Beckenham, UK.
James
J
Adamson
Anorexia nervosa; Autism spectrum disorders; CRT; Central coherence; Cognitive flexibility; Group therapy
Mol Autism. 2015 May 13;6:6
26056560
Psychiatry Res. 2015 Feb 28;225(3):387-94
25555418
Int J Group Psychother. 2016 Jul;66(3):431-442
38449129
BMC Psychiatry. 2013 Nov 07;13:287
24200194
Mol Autism. 2013 Nov 12;4(1):44
24220604
Eur Eat Disord Rev. 2012 Jul;20(4):321-5
22488792
Eur Eat Disord Rev. 2014 Nov;22(6):454-62
25277720
World J Biol Psychiatry. 2014 Dec;15(8):586-98
24882144
Eur Eat Disord Rev. 2013 Sep;21(5):345-51
23900859
BMC Psychiatry. 2013 Sep 10;13:222
24015680
Clin Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2011 Apr;16(2):225-31
21571765
PLoS One. 2012;7(1):e28331
22253689
PLoS One. 2011;6(6):e20462
21698277
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2012 Feb;51(2):202-212.e7
22265366
Neuropsychiatr. 2016 Mar;30(1):42-9
26943839
Eat Behav. 2011 Aug;12(3):168-74
21741013
J Autism Dev Disord. 2016 Mar;46(3):964-77
26542816
Eat Weight Disord. 2010 Dec;15(4):e234-9
21406946
Int J Eat Disord. 2013 Jul;46(5):492-5
23658098
Psychol Med. 2016 Jul;46(9):1809-27
27109830
Encephale. 2014 Jun;40(3):240-6
24636282
Eat Weight Disord. 2013 Sep;18(3):269-73
23765593
Br J Psychiatry. 1983 Apr;142:428
6850191
Eur Eat Disord Rev. 2011 Nov-Dec;19(6):462-74
21280165