A workflow to preserve genome-quality tissue samples from plants in botanical gardens and arboreta.
OBJECTIVE
Internationally, gardens hold diverse living collections that can be preserved for genomic research. Workflows have been developed for genomic tissue sampling in other taxa (e.g., vertebrates), but are inadequate for plants. We outline a workflow for tissue sampling intended for two audiences: botanists interested in genomics research and garden staff who plan to voucher living collections.


RESULTS
Standard herbarium methods are used to collect vouchers, label information and images are entered into a publicly accessible database, and leaf tissue is preserved in silica and liquid nitrogen. A five-step approach for genomic tissue sampling is presented for sampling from living collections according to current best practices.


CONCLUSIONS
Collecting genome-quality samples from gardens is an economical and rapid way to make available for scientific research tissue from the diversity of plants on Earth. The Global Genome Initiative will facilitate and lead this endeavor through international partnerships.
Department of Botany, MRC 166, National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.C. 20013-7012 USA.
Morgan R
MR
Gostel
Department of Botany, MRC 166, National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.C. 20013-7012 USA.
Carol
C
Kelloff
United States Botanic Garden, 100 Maryland Avenue SW, Washington, D.C. 20024 USA.
Kyle
K
Wallick
Department of Botany, MRC 166, National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.C. 20013-7012 USA.
Vicki A
VA
Funk
arboreta; biorepository; botanic gardens; collection workflow; genomics; voucher preparation
Syst Biol. 2005 Oct;54(5):819-23
16243765
PLoS One. 2012;7(8):e43808
22952770
Gigascience. 2012 Jul 12;1(1):8
23587255
Mol Ecol Resour. 2011 Sep;11(5):759-69
21592312
Ann Bot. 2016 Sep;118(3):393-9
27328683
Trends Plant Sci. 2013 Apr;18(4):184-5
23312146
Biopreserv Biobank. 2012 Apr;10(2):79-161
24844904
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005 Jun 7;102(23):8369-74
15928076