Nonmodular Tapered Fluted Titanium Stems Osseointegrate Reliably at Short Term in Revision THAs.
BACKGROUND
The ideal femoral component for revision THA is undecided. Cylindrical nonmodular stems have been associated with stress shielding, whereas junctional fractures have been reported with tapered fluted modular titanium stems. We have used a tapered fluted nonmodular titanium femoral component (Wagner Self-locking [SL] femoral stem) to mitigate this risk. This component has been used extensively in Europe by its designer surgeons, but to our knowledge, it has not been studied in North America. Added to this, the design of the component has changed since early reports.


OBJECTIVE
We asked: (1) Does the Wagner SL stem have low rates of rerevision and other complications at a minimum 2 years after surgery? (2) Is the Wagner SL stem associated with high levels of patient function and pain relief at a minimum 2 years after surgery? (3) Does the Wagner SL stem have low rates of subsidence at a minimum 2 years after surgery? (4) Is the Wagner SL stem associated with proximal femoral bone remodeling at a minimum 2 years after surgery?


METHODS
Between May 2011 and December 2012, we performed 198 femoral revisions, of which 104 (53%) were performed using the Wagner SL femoral stem; during that period, our institution gradually shifted toward increasing use of these stems for all but the most severe revisions, in which modular fluted stems and proximal femoral replacements still are used on an occasional basis. Median followup in this retrospective study was 32 months (range, 24-46 months), and one patient was lost to followup before the 2-year minimum. The femoral deformities in this series were Paprosky Type I (10 hips), Paprosky Type II (26), Paprosky Type IIIA (52), Paprosky Type IIIB (nine), and Paprosky Type IV (two). Functional assessment was performed using the Oxford Hip Score (OHS), WOMAC, SF-12, and the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) activity score. All complications and cases of revision were documented. All patients had radiographs performed within 1 year of the latest followup. These were assessed by two surgeons for signs of proximal femoral bone remodeling and subsidence.


RESULTS
Complete preoperative scores were available for 98 patients (98 of 104; 94%). The mean OHS preoperatively and at final followup were 39 (SD, 15) and 87 (SD, 19), respectively (p < 0.001; mean difference, 48; 95% CI, 43-53). Average WOMAC scores were 44 (SD, 15) and 87 (SD, 20), respectively (p < 0.001; mean difference, 43; 95% CI, 38-48). At final followup, signs of restoration of proximal femoral bone stock was noted in 45 of 103 hips (44%). Six (six of 104; 6%) patients had subsidence of 10 mm to 15 mm. In the remainder (98 of 104; 94%), the mean subsidence was 2 mm (range, 0-9 mm). One revision was performed for loosening associated with infection.


CONCLUSIONS
The Wagner SL stem is a viable option for patients with Paprosky Types II and III defects undergoing revision THA. This component provides high levels of patient function with low revision rates and low rates of subsidence during the early postoperative phase. They provide a viable alternative to modular components for treatment of Types II and III defects without the risk of junctional fractures. They can be used for very selected Type IV defects, however this extent of bone loss is most easily addressed with other techniques such as a proximal femoral replacement.


METHODS
Level IV, therapeutic study.
Division of Reconstructive Orthopaedics (Hip and Knee), Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, 3rd Floor 910 West 10th Avenue, Vancouver, BC, V5Z 4E3, Canada. nemsandiford@hotmail.com.
Nemandra A
NA
Sandiford
Division of Reconstructive Orthopaedics (Hip and Knee), Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, 3rd Floor 910 West 10th Avenue, Vancouver, BC, V5Z 4E3, Canada.
Donald S
DS
Garbuz
Department of Orthopaedics, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Bassam A
BA
Masri
Department of Orthopaedics, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Clive P
CP
Duncan
D000368:Aged; D019644:Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip / Q000379:methods*; D005260:Female; D005269:Femur / Q000601:surgery*; D006621:Hip Joint / Q000601:surgery*; D006622:Hip Prosthesis; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D016348:Osseointegration / Q000502:physiology*; D011474:Prosthesis Design; D012086:Reoperation; D012189:Retrospective Studies; D014025:Titanium; D016896:Treatment Outcome
D014025:Titanium
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2011 Oct;93(10 ):1320-6
21969429
J Arthroplasty. 2002 Jun;17(4 Suppl 1):142-6
12068426
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1992 Sep;74(5):721-4
1527121
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1994 Nov;76(11):1692-705
7962030
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2000;120(1-2):88-95
10653112
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2012 Nov;94(11 Suppl A):58-60
23118383
Orthopade. 2001 May;30(5):294-303
11417237
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1973 Dec;55(8):1629-32
4217797
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2011 Apr;97(2):121-6
21435964
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1985 Apr;67(4):517-26
3980495
Acta Orthop. 2014 Dec;85(6):562-9
25175667
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1972 Feb;54(1):61-76
5011747
Bone Joint J. 2013 Nov;95-B(11 Suppl A):17-20
24187345
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1996 Mar;78(2):185-90
8666621
Instr Course Lect. 2015;64:359-66
25745920
Hip Int. 2015 Jul-Aug;25(4):380-7
26351121
Orthop Clin North Am. 1992 Apr;23(2):291-302
1570141
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2001 Jul;83-A(7):1023-31
11451971
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2010 Oct;92 (10 ):1370-5
20884973
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2001;68(4):213-21
11706545
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1985 Sep;67(7):1074-85
4030826
Oper Orthop Traumatol. 2014 Apr;26(2):156-61
24699925
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010 Feb;468(2):491-6
19847578
Med Care. 1996 Mar;34(3):220-33
8628042
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 1996;115(1):5-9
8775702
Int Orthop. 2002;26(1):36-9
11954847
J Arthroplasty. 2007 Jun;22(4 Suppl 1):106-10
17570290
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013 Feb;471(2):454-62
22948527
J Arthroplasty. 2015 May;30(5):827-34
25677935
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1999 Dec;(369):230-42
10611878
J Rheumatol. 1988 Dec;15(12):1833-40
3068365
Bone Joint J. 2014 Jul;96-B(7):889-95
24986941
J Arthroplasty. 2007 Jun;22(4):515-24
17562407
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004 Dec;(429):227-31
15577492
J Arthroplasty. 2014 Sep;29(9 Suppl):214-8
24994705
J Arthroplasty. 2002 Jun;17(4 Suppl 1):134-7
12068424
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1984 Feb;66(2):228-41
6693450
Acta Orthop Scand. 1996 Dec;67(6):541-4
9065063