[The most important current guideline recommendations on the topic urolithiasis : A brief comparison].
For the development of patient-specific therapies the guidelines offer the physician a valuable catalogue of possible treatment options. They are based on the current level of knowledge and urological research, but also let some space for individual treatment at the same time. In this article, the current guidelines of several urological associations on the topic of urolithiasis regarding recommendations are described and the differences are highlighted.
Urologische Klinik und Poliklinik, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Ismaninger Straße 22, 81675, München, Deutschland.
E
E
Storz
Urologische Klinik und Poliklinik, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Ismaninger Straße 22, 81675, München, Deutschland.
F
F
Kurtz
Urologische Klinik und Poliklinik, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Ismaninger Straße 22, 81675, München, Deutschland. michael.straub@tum.de.
M
M
Straub
D019317:Evidence-Based Medicine / Q000592:standards; D006801:Humans; D018802:Patient-Centered Care / Q000592:standards*; D017410:Practice Guidelines as Topic / Q000592:standards*; D011871:Radiology / Q000592:standards; D052878:Urolithiasis / Q000175:diagnosis* / Q000628:therapy*; D014572:Urology / Q000592:standards
Metaphylaxis; Renal colic, acute; Stone therapy, conservative; Ureteral calculi; Urinary stone therapy, interventional
Can Urol Assoc J. 2015 Nov-Dec;9(11-12):E837-51
26788233
Can Urol Assoc J. 2010 Dec;4(6):375-9
21191493
Eur Urol. 2003 Dec;44(6):709-13
14644124
Lancet. 2015 Jul 25;386(9991):341-9
25998582
J Urol. 2014 Aug;192(2):316-24
24857648