Technical note: how to determine the FDG activity for tumour PET imaging that satisfies European guidelines.
BACKGROUND
For tumour imaging with PET, the literature proposes to administer a patient-specific FDG activity that depends quadratically on a patient's body weight. However, a practical approach on how to implement such a protocol in clinical practice is currently lacking. We aimed to provide a practical method to determine a FDG activity formula for whole-body PET examinations that satisfies both the EANM guidelines and this quadratic relation.


RESULTS
We have developed a methodology that results in a formula describing the patient-specific FDG activity to administer. A PET study using the NEMA NU-2001 image quality phantom forms the basis of our method. This phantom needs to be filled with 2.0 and 20.0 kBq FDG/mL in the background and spheres, respectively. After a PET acquisition of 10 min, a reconstruction has to be performed that results in sphere recovery coefficients (RCs) that are within the specifications as defined by the EANM Research Ltd (EARL). By performing reconstructions based on shorter scan durations, the minimal scan time per bed position (T min) needs to be extracted using an image coefficient of variation (COV) of 15 %. At T min, the RCs should be within EARL specifications as well. Finally, the FDG activity (in MBq) to administer can be described by [Formula: see text] with c a constant that is typically 0.0533 (MBq/kg(2)), w the patient's body weight (in kg), and t the scan time per bed position that is chosen in a clinical setting (in seconds). We successfully demonstrated this methodology using a state-of-the-art PET/CT scanner.


CONCLUSIONS
We provide a practical method that results in a formula describing the FDG activity to administer to individual patients for whole-body PET examinations, taking into account both the EANM guidelines and a quadratic relation between FDG activity and patient's body weight. This formula is generally applicable to any PET system, using a specified image reconstruction and scan time per bed position.
Department of Nuclear Medicine, Isala, Zwolle, The Netherlands. d.koopman@isala.nl.|MIRA Institute for Biomedical Technology and Technical Medicine, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands. d.koopman@isala.nl.
Daniëlle
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8976-5434
D
Koopman
Department of Medical Physics, Isala, Zwolle, The Netherlands.
Jochen A C
JA
van Osch
Department of Nuclear Medicine, Isala, Zwolle, The Netherlands.
Pieter L
PL
Jager
Department of Nuclear Medicine, Isala, Zwolle, The Netherlands.|MIRA Institute for Biomedical Technology and Technical Medicine, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands.
Carlijn J A
CJ
Tenbergen
Department of Nuclear Medicine, Isala, Zwolle, The Netherlands.
Siert
S
Knollema
MIRA Institute for Biomedical Technology and Technical Medicine, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands.
Cornelis H
CH
Slump
Department of Medical Physics, Isala, Zwolle, The Netherlands.
Jorn A
JA
van Dalen
EANM guidelines; FDG-PET; Scan time protocol; Tumour imaging
J Nucl Med. 2009 Jun;50(6):844-8
19443586
J Digit Imaging. 2013 Jun;26(3):447-56
22850933
J Nucl Med. 2004 Sep;45(9):1519-27
15347719
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2003 Dec;30(12 ):1615-9
14504831
J Nucl Med. 2005 Apr;46(4):603-7
15809482
J Nucl Med. 2005 Nov;46(11):1825-34
16269596
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2010 Jan;37(1):181-200
19915839
J Nucl Med Technol. 2015 Mar;43(1):21-7
25613334
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2015 Feb;42(2):328-54
25452219
Phys Med Biol. 2013 Mar 7;58(5):1465-78
23403399
J Nucl Med. 2012 Jul;53(7):1041-7
22627001
EJNMMI Res. 2013 Aug 12;3(1):63
23938036