Wolff: straight not curved.
It was 140 years ago that George von Meyer presented his anatomical diagrams of human bones to a meeting in Zurich. There he was told by Prof. Karl Culmann that the trabecular lines shown within the diagram of the upper femur closely resembled those lines of force which Culmann had determined with Graphic Statics to be passing through a curved, loaded Fairbairn crane. This drew the attention of Julius Wolff, who used this as the basis for his 'Trajectorial theory' which was widely accepted and, to date, has been the underlying basis for all biomechanical investigations of this region. Following Wolff and Culmann, the upper femur is considered to be a curved structure and is investigated as such. Unfortunately, this concept is wrong. The upper femur is not curved but is angular. It is formed by the junction of two straight bones, the femoral neck and the femoral shaft, as may be simply seen as the neck/shaft angle constructed on the antero-posterior radiograph of any normal femur. The internal trabecular bone forms only part of the load bearing structure of the femoral neck. The configuration of this trabecular substance in this region suggests that it is related specifically to the force present during flexion and extension movements of the hip joint. This being so, combined with the delayed timing of the appearance of the trabecular columns, it must be questioned as to whether the remodelling of the upper femur is in response to one or to two distinct forces.
, 4 Clarendon Close, Bearsted, Maidstone, Kent, ME14 4JD, England, UK. hammer_alan@hotmail.com.
A
A
Hammer
D000715:Anatomy / Q000266:history*; D005269:Femur / Q000033:anatomy & histology*; D049672:History, 19th Century; D006801:Humans
Bone modeling; Compression force; Femoral cortex; Femoral neck; Femoral trabeculae; Femur; Hip Anatomy; Hip biomechanics; Hip forces; Neck/shaft angle; Neck/shaft junction; Trajectorial theory; Upper femur; Wolff’s law
J Biomech. 1987;20(8):785-94
3654678
Radiology. 1980 Oct;137(1 Pt 1):71-6
7422864
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1983 May;(175):286-92
6839601
J Biomed Eng. 1982 Jul;4(3):241-6
7120980
J Biomech. 2010 Jan 19;43(2):294-301
19762027
J Biomech. 2005 Jan;38(1):133-9
15519348
Ir J Med Sci. 2015 Mar;184(1):13-22
24473918
J Biomech. 1972 Mar;5(2):173-80
5020948
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1957 Feb;39-B(1):134-44
13405961
Angle Orthod. 1994;64(3):175-88
8060014
Am J Anat. 1970 Oct;129(2):121-40
5473773
Ann Anat. 2010 May 20;192(3):168-77
20395119
J Anat. 2000 Aug;197 ( Pt 2):145-56
11005707
J Rehabil Res Dev. 2000 Mar-Apr;37(2):209-16
10850827
Clin Anat. 2002 May;15(3):210-6
11948957
J Biomech. 1992 Jan;25(1):1-9
1733977
Folia Primatol (Basel). 2004 Jul-Aug;75(4):189-201
15316150
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009 Aug;467(8):2000-6
19459022
Acta Radiol Suppl. 1957;(146):1-166
13435002
J Biomech. 2007;40(16):3688-99
17706228
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011 Nov;469(11):3079-84
21912996
J Biomech. 1972 Mar;5(2):203-15
5020951
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1987 Dec;(225):255-72
3315379
Folia Morphol (Warsz). 2003 Nov;62(4):415-7
14655130
J Biomech. 1989;22(3):231-44
2722894
J Biomech. 1991;24 Suppl 1:135-50
1791174
J Biomech. 1990;23 (1):1-10
2307686
J Biomech. 2015 Mar 18;48(5):816-22
25582355
Ir J Med Sci. 1999 Apr-Jun;168(2):102-5
10422387
Ir J Med Sci. 1995 Apr-Jun;164(2):152-4
7607844