Experiments with More Than One Random Factor: Designs, Analytic Models, and Statistical Power.
Traditional methods of analyzing data from psychological experiments are based on the assumption that there is a single random factor (normally participants) to which generalization is sought. However, many studies involve at least two random factors (e.g., participants and the targets to which they respond, such as words, pictures, or individuals). The application of traditional analytic methods to the data from such studies can result in serious bias in testing experimental effects. In this review, we develop a comprehensive typology of designs involving two random factors, which may be either crossed or nested, and one fixed factor, condition. We present appropriate linear mixed models for all designs and develop effect size measures. We provide the tools for power estimation for all designs. We then discuss issues of design choice, highlighting power and feasibility considerations. Our goal is to encourage appropriate analytic methods that produce replicable results for studies involving new samples of both participants and targets.
Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado 80309; email: charles.judd@colorado.edu.
Charles M
CM
Judd
Department of Psychology, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas 78712; email: jake.westfall@utexas.edu.
Jacob
J
Westfall
Department of Psychological Sciences, University of Connecticut, Storrs, Connecticut 06269; email: david.kenny@uconn.edu.
David A
DA
Kenny
D006801:Humans; D015233:Models, Statistical; D011584:Psychology; D012107:Research Design
effect size; experimental design; mixed models; random factors; sample size; statistical power