Quantitative assessment of washout in hepatocellular carcinoma using MRI.
BACKGROUND
Arterial hyperenhancement and washout on computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are described by all major guidelines as specific criteria for non-invasive diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, publications on the quantitative assessment of washout in MRI are lacking. Therefore, we evaluated a method for quantitatively measuring and defining washout in MRI in order to determine a cutoff value that allows objective HCC diagnosis.


METHODS
We analyzed all patients who underwent liver transplantation for cirrhosis or liver resection for HCC at our institution between 2003 and 2014. Washout was quantitatively investigated by placing a 25-mm2region of interest (ROI) over each nodule and two 25-mm2ROIs over adjacent liver parenchyma. The percentage signal ratio (PSR = 100 × ratio of signal intensity of adjacent liver to that of the lesion) was calculated for each series in both groups. Accordingly, this quantitative measurement was compared to a qualitative approach.


RESULTS
A total of 16 hypervascularized non-HCC nodules and 69 HCC nodules were identified. Interobserver reliability was reasonably good for the measurement of PSRs and readers showed a substantial agreement for the qualitative assessment. In the HCC group, the median PSR was 116.2 at equilibrium and 112.9 in the delayed phase. In the non-HCC group, the median PSR was 93.8 at equilibrium and 96.0 in the delayed phase. Receiver operating characteristic analysis indicated areas under the curve of 0.902 (p < 0.001) and 0.873 (p < 0.001) at equilibrium and in the delayed phase. PSR values of 102 at equilibrium and 101.5 in the delayed phase led to the highest Youden's index of 0.82 and 0.77, respectively. These PSR cutoffs yielded sensitivities of 82 and 77 %, respectively, with specificities of 100 %. The sensitivity for the qualitative assessment of washout was 88 and 93 % and the specificity was 48 and 56 %. For the classification of HCC, sensitivity yielded 95 and 97 % and specificity was 68 and 56 %, respectively.


CONCLUSIONS
Quantitatively measuring HCC washout in MRI is easy and reproducible. It can objectify and support diagnosis of HCC. However, the quantitative measurement of washout can only serve as one of several components of HCC assessment.
Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Johannes Gutenberg-University Medical Centre, Langenbeckst.1, 55131, Mainz, Germany. roman.kloeckner@unimedizin-mainz.de.
Roman
R
Kloeckner
Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Johannes Gutenberg-University Medical Centre, Langenbeckst.1, 55131, Mainz, Germany.
Daniel
D
Pinto Dos Santos
Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Johannes Gutenberg-University Medical Centre, Langenbeckst.1, 55131, Mainz, Germany.
Karl-Friedrich
KF
Kreitner
Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Johannes Gutenberg-University Medical Centre, Langenbeckst.1, 55131, Mainz, Germany.
Anne
A
Leicher-Düber
Department of Internal Medicine, Johannes Gutenberg-University Medical Centre, Langenbeckst.1, 55131, Mainz, Germany.
Arndt
A
Weinmann
Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, Johannes Gutenberg-University Medical Centre, Langenbeckst.1, 55131, Mainz, Germany.
Jens
J
Mittler
Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Johannes Gutenberg-University Medical Centre, Langenbeckst.1, 55131, Mainz, Germany.
Christoph
C
Düber
Decision Support Techniques; Hepatocellular Carcinoma; Liver Cirrhosis; Liver Neoplasms; Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Hepatology. 2011 Mar;53(3):1020-2
21374666
Liver Transpl. 2005 Mar;11(3):281-9
15719410
Hepatology. 2008 Jan;47(1):97-104
18069697
J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2014 Aug;12(8):1152-82
25099447
Clin Imaging. 2016 May-Jun;40(3):352-6
27133666
Am J Gastroenterol. 2010 Mar;105(3):599-609
19935786
Gastroenterology. 2004 Nov;127(5):1372-80
15521006
Abdom Radiol (NY). 2016 May;41(5):963-9
27193793
Epidemiology. 2005 Jan;16(1):73-81
15613948
J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2016 May-Jun;40(3):493-7
26953766
Biometrics. 1977 Mar;33(1):159-74
843571
Radiology. 2015 Apr;275(1):97-109
25559230
Radiology. 2013 Feb;266(2):376-82
23362092
Gastroenterology. 2007 Jun;132(7):2557-76
17570226
CA Cancer J Clin. 2011 Mar-Apr;61(2):69-90
21296855
N Engl J Med. 1999 Mar 11;340(10):745-50
10072408
Hepatology. 2003 Oct;38(4):1034-42
14512891
Acad Radiol. 2016 Mar;23 (3):344-52
26777590
J Hepatol. 2012 Apr;56(4):908-43
22424438
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2013 Jan;200(1):84-9
23255745