Intrusive Memories of Distressing Information: An fMRI Study.
Although intrusive memories are characteristic of many psychological disorders, the neurobiological underpinning of these involuntary recollections are largely unknown. In this study we used functional magentic resonance imaging (fMRI) to identify the neural networks associated with encoding of negative stimuli that are subsequently experienced as intrusive memories. Healthy partipants (N = 42) viewed negative and neutral images during a visual/verbal processing task in an fMRI context. Two days later they were assessed on the Impact of Event Scale for occurrence of intrusive memories of the encoded images. A sub-group of participants who reported significant intrusions (n = 13) demonstrated stronger activation in the amygdala, bilateral ACC and parahippocampal gyrus during verbal encoding relative to a group who reported no intrusions (n = 13). Within-group analyses also revealed that the high intrusion group showed greater activity in the dorsomedial (dmPFC) and dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (dlPFC), inferior frontal gyrus and occipital regions during negative verbal processing compared to neutral verbal processing. These results do not accord with models of intrusions that emphasise visual processing of information at encoding but are consistent with models that highlight the role of inhibitory and suppression processes in the formation of subsequent intrusive memories.
University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.
Eva
E
Battaglini
University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.
Belinda
B
Liddell
University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Pritha
P
Das
University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Gin
G
Malhi
University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
Kim
K
Felmingham
University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.
Richard A
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9607-819X
RA
Bryant
J Psychiatr Res. 2011 Jun;45(6):842-7
21159353
Biol Psychiatry. 2003 Mar 15;53(6):494-501
12644354
Neuropsychopharmacology. 2010 Jan;35(1):169-91
19625997
Trends Cogn Sci. 2008 Oct;12(10):388-96
18760955
Neuropsychologia. 2010 Oct;48(12):3459-69
20688087
Psychol Sci. 2006 May;17(5):441-7
16683933
J Psychiatr Res. 2006 Dec;40(8):709-29
16214172
Br J Psychol. 1973 Feb;64(1):17-24
4742442
Brain Cogn. 2013 Feb;81(1):151-9
23207576
Trends Cogn Sci. 2011 Feb;15(2):85-93
21167765
Nat Neurosci. 1999 Mar;2(3):289-93
10195224
Psychol Med. 2013 Jul;43(7):1521-32
23171530
Behav Brain Res. 2008 Jan 25;186(2):261-72
17913256
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2012 May;36(5):1382-99
22374224
Neuropsychologia. 2006;44(12):2189-208
16806314
Psychosom Med. 1979 May;41(3):209-18
472086
Behav Res Ther. 2000 Apr;38(4):319-45
10761279
Psychol Rev. 2010 Jan;117(1):210-32
20063969
Behav Res Ther. 2010 Aug;48(8):792-8
20627270
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2000 Oct;1(1):41-50
11252767
Annu Rev Psychol. 2000;51:59-91
10751965
PLoS One. 2012;7(11):e48107
23144849
Memory. 2008 Jan;16(1):48-57
17852728
Memory. 2004 Jul;12(4):416-27
15487538
Neuroimage. 2002 Jan;15(1):273-89
11771995
Science. 2000 Jun 9;288(5472):1835-8
10846167
Br J Psychiatry. 2002 Apr;180:363-8
11925361
Neurosci Lett. 2009 Aug 7;459(2):88-90
19422881
J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry. 2002 Jun;33(2):73-89
12472172
Psychol Rev. 2000 Apr;107(2):261-88
10789197
CNS Spectr. 2004 Apr;9(4):258-66
15048050
J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry. 2008 Dec;39(4):546-57
18328462
Behav Res Ther. 2003 Jan;41(1):1-10
12488116
Behav Res Ther. 1998 Jun;36(6):583-90
9648332
Behav Res Ther. 1999 Mar;37(3):201-15
10087639
Trends Cogn Sci. 2007 May;11(5):219-27
17382578
Behav Res Ther. 2000 Jun;38(6):601-10
10846808