A Survey of Removable Partial Denture (RPD) Retentive Elements in Relation to the Type of Edentulism and Abutment Teeth Found in Commercial Laboratories, Athens, Greece.
OBJECTIVE
The aim of this survey was to record removable partial denture (RPD) retentive elements and abutment teeth in partially edentulous patients, identified in commercial laboratories in Athens, Greece.


METHODS
628 master casts with the corresponding cast metal frameworks used in the construction of RPDs were evaluated. Casts were photographed to identify the number and position of existing teeth, the partial edentulism class and the retentive elements. Prevalence tables and the x(2) test were used for the statistical analysis of the collected data (α=.05).


RESULTS
There were 276 maxillary (43.9%) and 352 (56.1%) mandibular casts. Maxillary edentulism entailed almost a total absence of right third molars in 96.7% and left third molars 96.0% of casts, with lower rates for the first and second molars. Edentulism in the posterior mandible presented a similar pattern. The most profound findings concerning retentive elements were: 91.9% of the retainers used were clasps and the remaining 8.1% were attachments. Of the clasps used, 48.9% were of the Roach Τ type, a finding more common in Kennedy Class I as compared to other Kennedy Classes (p<0.01). The circumferential clasps accounted for 19.3% of the total clasps used, and it was less frequently presented (8.8%) in Kennedy I Classes (p<0.01).


CONCLUSIONS
Roach clasps were used in the majority of cases whereas RPI clasps and attachments were rarely used.
Division of Removable Prosthodontics, Dental School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Greece.
Nick
N
Polychronakis
Division of Removable Prosthodontics, Dental School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Greece.
Michael
M
Sotiriou
Division of Removable Prosthodontics, Dental School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Greece.
Alcibiades
A
Zissis
Kennedy classification; remaining teeth; retentive elements
J Prosthet Dent. 2002 Jan;87(1):9-14
11807477
J Oral Rehabil. 2011 Jan;38(1):72-8
20626573
J Prosthet Dent. 1998 Jul;80(1):58-66
9656179
Quintessence Int. 1996 Dec;27(12):809-15
9452673
J Prosthet Dent. 1981 Oct;46(4):360-8
7028951
J Oral Rehabil. 1978 Jul;5(3):215-22
359768
Tex Dent J. 2010 Apr;127(4):365-72
20446487
J Prosthet Dent. 2011 Jul;106(1):48-56
21723993
Gerodontology. 2011 Sep;28(3):177-83
21284711
J Prosthet Dent. 1992 May;67(5):664-7
1527752
J Prosthet Dent. 1970 Jul;24(1):25-40
4913517
Quintessence Int. 1989 May;20(5):353-8
2756092
J Prosthet Dent. 1966 May-Jun;16(3):533-9
5218892
J Aging Health. 2014 Feb;26(1):54-71
24584260
J Epidemiol. 2013;23(4):301-6
23812101
Indian J Public Health. 2012 Jul-Sep;56(3):189-95
23229210
Fogorv Sz. 2008 Feb;101(1):3-11
18488739
Br Dent J. 1988 Oct 8;165(7):245-9
3052549
Int J Prosthodont. 2009 Sep-Oct;22(5):508-11
20095205
Quintessence Int. 1988 Jul;19(7):493-9
3269598
Am J Public Health. 2013 Sep;103(9):e76-82
23865668
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2007 Jun;18 Suppl 3:2-14
17594365
Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent. 2006 Mar;14(1):13-7
16599092
Quintessence Int. 1995 Sep;26(9):621-7
8602443
J Prosthet Dent. 2005 Jul;94(1):10-92
16080238
J Prosthet Dent. 1989 Apr;61(4):465-70
2657011