Are Categorical Spatial Relations Encoded by Shifting Visual Attention between Objects?
Perceiving not just values, but relations between values, is critical to human cognition. We tested the predictions of a proposed mechanism for processing categorical spatial relations between two objects-the shift account of relation processing-which states that relations such as 'above' or 'below' are extracted by shifting visual attention upward or downward in space. If so, then shifts of attention should improve the representation of spatial relations, compared to a control condition of identity memory. Participants viewed a pair of briefly flashed objects and were then tested on either the relative spatial relation or identity of one of those objects. Using eye tracking to reveal participants' voluntary shifts of attention over time, we found that when initial fixation was on neither object, relational memory showed an absolute advantage for the object following an attention shift, while identity memory showed no advantage for either object. This result is consistent with the shift account of relation processing. When initial fixation began on one of the objects, identity memory strongly benefited this fixated object, while relational memory only showed a relative benefit for objects following an attention shift. This result is also consistent, although not as uniquely, with the shift account of relation processing. Taken together, we suggest that the attention shift account provides a mechanistic explanation for the overall results. This account can potentially serve as the common mechanism underlying both linguistic and perceptual representations of spatial relations.
Department of Psychology, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois, United States of America.
Lei
http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1280-2599
L
Yuan
Department of Psychology, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois, United States of America.
David
D
Uttal
Department of Psychology, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois, United States of America.
Steven
S
Franconeri
D000328:Adult; D000704:Analysis of Variance; D001288:Attention / Q000502:physiology*; D003071:Cognition / Q000502:physiology; D005133:Eye Movements / Q000502:physiology; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008568:Memory / Q000502:physiology*; D011930:Reaction Time / Q000502:physiology; D013028:Space Perception / Q000502:physiology*; D014785:Vision, Ocular / Q000502:physiology; D014796:Visual Perception / Q000502:physiology*
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2014 Sep;45:142-8
24858009
Percept Psychophys. 1995 Aug;57(6):787-95
7651803
J Opt Soc Am A. 1990 Oct;7(10):2032-40
2231113
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2007 Jul;33(4):720-33
17576149
Vision Res. 1994 Jul;34(13):1703-21
7941377
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2005 Jul;89(1):1-21
16060739
Psychol Rev. 2003 Apr;110(2):220-64
12747523
Spat Vis. 1997;10(4):433-6
9176952
Br J Psychol. 1971 Aug;62(3):311-26
5160435
Psychol Sci. 2015 Aug;26(8):1241-51
26174781
Mem Cognit. 1974 Jan;2(1):101-11
24214706
Psychol Bull. 2006 May;132(3):416-42
16719568
Cognition. 2012 Feb;122(2):210-27
22119165
Hum Brain Mapp. 2011 Jul;32(7):1036-49
20665723
Cognition. 1989 Jun;32(1):65-97
2752706
Cogn Sci. 2010 Jul;34(5):752-75
21564235
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2011 Jun;64(6):1138-56
21271464
Vis cogn. 2009;17(1-2):null
24235876
Br J Psychol. 1975 Nov;66(4):427-41
1203643
Cogn Sci. 2011 Mar;35(2):297-329
21429001
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006 Nov 14;103(46):17568-73
17079489
Top Cogn Sci. 2011 Jul;3(3):446-74
25164399
Trends Cogn Sci. 2007 Dec;11(12):520-7
18024143
Psychol Sci. 2004 Apr;15(4):243-7
15043641
Front Psychol. 2012 Nov 20;3:464
23181036
Psychol Sci. 2013 May;24(5):613-21
23538914
Cognition. 2008 Feb;106(2):579-93
17509553
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2016 Dec;69(12 ):2319-2337
26911205
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2014 Apr;143(2):510-20
23957280
Cogn Psychol. 1995 Apr;28(2):103-74
7736720
Spat Vis. 1997;10(4):437-42
9176953
Vision Res. 1995 Jul;35(13):1897-916
7660596
Cereb Cortex. 2003 Jan;13(1):90-9
12466220
Cogn Psychol. 1980 Jan;12(1):97-136
7351125
Trends Cogn Sci. 2003 Oct;7(10):425-7
14550482
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1989 Nov;15(4):723-35
2531207
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1994 Oct;20(5):1015-36
7964527
Science. 1981 Jan 30;211(4481):453-8
7455683
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998 Feb 3;95(3):825-30
9448247
Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci. 2011 May;2(3):266-76
26302075
Cognition. 1998 Jul;67(1-2):1-20
9735534
Vision Res. 1997 Jan;37(1):25-43
9068829
Neurology. 1994 Apr;44(4):703-6
8164830
Curr Biol. 2011 Jul 12;21(13):1135-9
21703857
Cognition. 2011 Jan;118(1):123-9
21030013
Cognition. 1995 Apr;55(1):39-84
7758270
Cogn Psychol. 2001 Nov;43(3):171-216
11689021
Neuropsychologia. 2010 Jul;48(9):2769-72
20434469
Psychol Rev. 1992 Jul;99(3):480-517
1502274
Cognition. 2008 Aug;108(2):590-9
18514179
Cognition. 1996 Mar;58(3):321-76
8871343
J Exp Psychol. 1974 Mar;102(3):447-55
4815191
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2003 Feb;29(1):121-38
12669752
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2009 Aug;71(6):1251-62
19633341
J Mem Lang. 2007 Nov;57(4):544-569
18978929
Percept Psychophys. 1998 Jan;60(1):140-56
9503918
Mem Cognit. 1999 Nov;27(6):1073-9
10586582