Rapid forgetting results from competition over time between items in visual working memory.
Working memory is now established as a fundamental cognitive process across a range of species. Loss of information held in working memory has the potential to disrupt many aspects of cognitive function. However, despite its significance, the mechanisms underlying rapid forgetting remain unclear, with intense recent debate as to whether it is interference between stored items that leads to loss of information or simply temporal decay. Here we show that both factors are essential and interact in a highly specific manner. Although a single item can be maintained in memory with high fidelity, multiple items compete in working memory, progressively degrading each other's representations as time passes. Specifically, interaction between items is associated with both worsening precision and increased reporting errors of object features over time. Importantly, during the period of maintenance, although items are no longer visible, maintenance resources can be selectively redeployed to protect the probability to recall the correct feature and the precision with which cued items can be recalled, as if it was the only item in memory. These findings reveal that the biased competition concept could be applied not only to perceptual processes but also to active maintenance of working memory representations over time. (PsycINFO Database Record
Department of Psychology, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem.
Yoni
Y
Pertzov
Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, John Radcliffe Hospital.
Sanjay
S
Manohar
Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, John Radcliffe Hospital.
Masud
M
Husain
D000328:Adult; D001288:Attention / Q000502:physiology*; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007266:Inhibition, Psychological; D008297:Male; D008570:Memory, Short-Term / Q000502:physiology*; D011939:Mental Recall / Q000502:physiology*; D010775:Photic Stimulation; D013997:Time Factors; D014796:Visual Perception / Q000502:physiology*; D055815:Young Adult
Nat Commun. 2014 Dec 18;5:5768
25519874
Trends Cogn Sci. 2009 Apr;13(4):145-6; author reply 146-7
19285911
Trends Cogn Sci. 2012 Feb;16(2):129-35
22209601
Psychon Bull Rev. 2013 Aug;20(4):732-9
23456410
J Vis. 2012 Apr 20;12(4):null
22523399
Curr Biol. 2016 Jan 11;26(1):64-8
26711496
Nature. 2008 May 8;453(7192):233-5
18385672
Science. 2008 Aug 8;321(5890):851-4
18687968
Trends Cogn Sci. 2013 Mar;17(3):134-41
23428935
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2007 May;33(3):570-85
17470006
Neuropsychologia. 2011 May;49(6):1506-17
21335016
Annu Rev Psychol. 2004;55:235-69
14744216
Psychon Bull Rev. 2012 Feb;19(1):87-92
22184034
Annu Rev Neurosci. 1995;18:193-222
7605061
J Cogn Neurosci. 2003 Nov 15;15(8):1176-94
14709235
Vision Res. 1998 Jan;38(1):125-37
9474383
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2010 Nov;36(6):1355-68
20804281
PLoS One. 2012;7(10):e48214
23118956
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2013 Oct;39(5):1224-31
23244045
Psychol Sci. 2009 Apr;20(4):423-8
19320861
Psychon Bull Rev. 2004 Oct;11(5):771-90
15732687
Annu Rev Psychol. 2011;62:73-101
19575619
J Vis. 2010 Oct 22;10(12):27
21047759
Psychol Rev. 2007 Jul;114(3):539-76
17638496
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2014 Jul;40(4):1072-95
24564542
J Exp Psychol. 1966 Aug;72(2):221-31
5966621
Neuropsychologia. 2011 May;49(6):1407-9
21295047
J Vis. 2004 Dec 29;4(12):1120-35
15669916
J Vis. 2010 Feb 24;10(2):24.1-27
20462325
Neuropsychology. 2011 Mar;25(2):226-36
21090897
J Neurosci. 2009 Jun 24;29(25):8032-8
19553443
Mem Cognit. 2006 Dec;34(8):1704-19
17489296
Sci Rep. 2016 Jan 13;6:19203
26758902
Nature. 1997 Nov 20;390(6657):279-81
9384378
Psychon Bull Rev. 2010 Apr;17(2):243-9
20382927
Neuropsychologia. 2011 May;49(6):1559-68
21236273
Nature. 2000 Jan 6;403(6765):39-40
10638743
Brain Res. 2006 Aug 11;1105(1):20-31
16729979
Cogn Psychol. 1980 Jan;12(1):97-136
7351125
Curr Biol. 2011 Jun 7;21(11):975-9
21596568
Neuropsychologia. 2011 May;49(6):1622-31
21172364
Trends Cogn Sci. 2003 Dec;7(12):547-52
14643371
J Neuropsychol. 2015 Sep;9(2):319-29
25208525
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2002 Mar;131(1):48-64
11900102
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2004 Mar;133(1):83-100
14979753
Psychon Bull Rev. 2015 Feb;22(1):170-8
24965375
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2014 Oct;76(7):1914-24
24027033
Psychon Bull Rev. 2011 Dec;18(6):1098-104
21935737
J Vis. 2009 Sep 09;9(10):7.1-11
19810788
Psychol Rev. 2008 Jul;115(3):544-76
18729591
Psychon Bull Rev. 2015 Feb;22(1):156-62
24825306
Nat Neurosci. 2014 Mar;17(3):347-56
24569831
Science. 1992 Jan 31;255(5044):556-9
1736359
Trends Cogn Sci. 2009 Mar;13(3):120-6
19223224
Neuron. 2011 Nov 17;72(4):520-35
22099456
Mem Cognit. 1980 Mar;8(2):174-9
7382818
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2016 Mar;42(3):379-93
26371498
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2009 Jul;35(4):1012-28
19586267
Mem Cognit. 2015 Apr;43(3):453-68
25472902
J Cogn Neurosci. 1995 Winter;7(1):66-80
23961754
Curr Biol. 2010 Apr 27;20(8):777-82
20346673