title: Why Border Enforcement Backfired.
abstract: In this article we undertake a systematic analysis of why border enforcement backfired as a strategy of immigration control in the United States. We argue theoretically that border enforcement emerged as a policy response to a moral panic about the perceived threat of Latino immigration to the United States propounded by self-interested bureaucrats, politicians, and pundits who sought to mobilize political and material resources for their own benefit. The end result was a self-perpetuating cycle of rising enforcement and increased apprehensions that resulted in the militarization of the border in a way that was disconnected from the actual size of the undocumented flow. Using an instrumental variable approach, we show how border militarization affected the behavior of unauthorized migrants and border outcomes to transform undocumented Mexican migration from a circular flow of male workers going to three states into an eleven-million person population of settled families living in 50 states.
authors.affiliation: Princeton University.
authors.forename: Douglas S
authors.initials: DS
authors.lastname: Massey
authors.affiliation: CIDE and the University of Guadalajara.
authors.forename: Jorge
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Durand
authors.affiliation: Princeton University.
authors.forename: Karen A
authors.initials: KA
authors.lastname: Pren
mesh_terms: D003710:Demography; D004641:Emigration and Immigration / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence*; D006801:Humans; D007878:Legislation as Topic; D008297:Male; D008800:Mexico; D009656:North America; D057766:Policy; D011157:Population Dynamics; D011640:Public Policy; D012926:Social Control, Formal; D014171:Transients and Migrants; D014481:United States