title: Reappraisal of Conventional Diagnosis for Dermatophytes.
abstract: Dermatophytoses include a wide variety of diseases involving glabrous skin, nails and hair. These superficial infections are a common cause of consultation in dermatology. In many cases, their diagnosis is not clinically obvious, and mycological analysis therefore is required. Direct microscopic examination of the samples using clearing agents provides a quick response to the clinician and is usually combined with cultures on specific media, which must be used to overcome the growth of contaminating moulds that may hamper the recovery of dermatophytes. Accurate identification of the causative agent (i.e. at the species level), currently based on morphological criteria, is necessary not only to initiate an appropriate treatment but also for setting prophylactic measures. However, conventional methods often lack sensitivity and species identification may require up to 4 weeks if subcultures are needed. Histological analysis, which is considered the "gold standard" for the diagnosis of onychomycoses, is seldom performed, and as direct examination, it does not allow precise identification of the pathogen. Nevertheless, a particular attention to the quality of clinical specimens is warranted. Moreover, the sensitivity of direct examination may be greatly enhanced by the use of fluorochromes such as calcofluor white. Likewise, sensitivity of the cultures could be enhanced by the use of culture media containing antifungal deactivators. With the generalization of molecular identification by gene sequencing or MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry, the contribution of historical biochemical or physiological tests to species identification of atypical isolates is now limited. Nevertheless, despite the recent availability of several PCR-based kits and an extensive literature on molecular methods allowing the detection of fungal DNA or both detection and direct identification of the main dermatophyte species, the biological diagnosis of dermatophytosis in 2016 still relies on both direct examination and cultures of appropriate clinical specimens.
authors.affiliation: Laboratoire de Parasitologie-Mycologie, Institut de Biologie en Santé, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire, 4 rue Larrey, 49933, Angers Cedex 9, France. mapihet@chu-angers.fr.|Groupe d'Etude des Interactions Hôte-Pathogène, UPRES-EA 3142, l'UNAM Université, Université d'Angers, Angers, France. mapihet@chu-angers.fr.
authors.forename: Marc
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Pihet
authors.affiliation: Laboratoire de Parasitologie-Mycologie, Institut de Biologie en Santé, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire, 4 rue Larrey, 49933, Angers Cedex 9, France.|Groupe d'Etude des Interactions Hôte-Pathogène, UPRES-EA 3142, l'UNAM Université, Université d'Angers, Angers, France.
authors.forename: Yohann
authors.initials: Y
authors.lastname: Le Govic
mesh_terms: D003883:Arthrodermataceae / Q000302:isolation & purification*; D003881:Dermatomycoses / Q000175:diagnosis*; D003955:Diagnostic Tests, Routine / Q000379:methods*; D006801:Humans; D008828:Microbiological Techniques / Q000379:methods; D008853:Microscopy / Q000379:methods; D025202:Molecular Diagnostic Techniques / Q000379:methods; D019032:Spectrometry, Mass, Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption-Ionization
keywords: Dermatophytes; Dermatophytosis; Direct examination; Mycological analysis; Specific culture media