title: The Role of Conventional Surgery in Oropharyngeal Cancer.
abstract: Anatomically, the oropharynx can be divided into four subsites: the soft palate, pharyngeal wall, base of tongue, and the tonsillar complex. Surgical access to these tumours is often challenging due to the anatomic localization. For this reason, such tumours were traditionally managed with open surgical techniques, usually involving a mandibulotomy, to provide better visualization and access to the oropharynx, followed by free-flap reconstruction of the oropharyngeal defect. However, the invasiveness of this approach could lead to significant morbidity, including speech, swallowing, and airway dysfunction, in addition to poor cosmetic outcomes. In response, less invasive approaches (Mercante et al. 2013) have been developed including minimally invasive surgical approaches (chiefly transoral surgery) as well as non-surgical methods, primarily radiotherapy, and chemotherapy (Mercante et al. 2013).
authors.affiliation: Department of Head and Neck Surgery, The Greater Poland Cancer Centre, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Poznań, Poland. wgolus@ump.edu.pl.
authors.forename: Wojciech
authors.initials: W
authors.lastname: Golusinski
mesh_terms: D006801:Humans; D019060:Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures / Q000379:methods; D009959:Oropharyngeal Neoplasms / Q000601:surgery*; D009960:Oropharynx / Q000601:surgery*; D019651:Plastic Surgery Procedures / Q000379:methods
keywords: Minimally invasive surgical approaches; Open surgical approaches; Oropharyngeal cancer