title: Fuzzy Nonnative Phonolexical Representations Lead to Fuzzy Form-to-Meaning Mappings.
abstract: The present paper explores nonnative (L2) phonological encoding of lexical entries and dissociates the difficulties associated with L2 phonological and phonolexical encoding by focusing on similarly sounding L2 words that are not differentiated by difficult phonological contrasts. We test two main claims of the fuzzy lexicon hypothesis: (1) L2 fuzzy phonolexical representations are not fully specified and lack details at both phonological and phonolexical levels of representation (Experiment 1); and (2) fuzzy phonolexical representations can lead to establishing incorrect form-to-meaning mappings (Experiment 2). The Russian-English Translation Judgment Task (Experiment 1, TJT) explores how the degree of phonolexical similarity between a word and its lexical competitor affects lexical access of Russian words. Words with smaller phonolexical distance (e.g.,parent-parrot) show longer reaction times and lower accuracy compared to words with a larger phonolexical distance (e.g.,parent-parchment) in lower-proficiency nonnative speakers, and, to a lesser degree, higher-proficiency speakers. This points to a lack of detail in nonnative phonolexical representations necessary for efficient lexical access. The Russian Pseudo-Semantic Priming task (Experiment 2, PSP) addresses the vulnerability of form-to-meaning mappings as a consequence of fuzzy phonolexical representations in L2. We primed the target with a word semantically related to its phonological competitor, or a potentially confusable word. The findings of Experiment 2 extend the results of Experiment 1 that, unlike native speakers, nonnative speakers do not properly encode phonolexical information. As a result, they are prone to access an incorrect lexical representation of a competitor word, as indicated by a slowdown in the judgments to confusable words. The study provides evidence that fuzzy phonolexical representations result in unfaithful form-to-meaning mappings, which lead to retrieval of incorrect semantic content. The results of the study are in line with existing research in support of less detailed L2 phonolexical representations, and extend the findings to show that the fuzziness of phonolexical representations can arise even when confusable words are not differentiated by difficult phonological contrasts.
authors.affiliation: National Foreign Language Center, University of Maryland, College Park College Park, MD, USA.
authors.forename: Svetlana V
authors.initials: SV
authors.lastname: Cook
authors.affiliation: Graduate Program in Second Language Acquisition, School of Languages, Literatures, and Cultures, University of Maryland, College ParkCollege Park, MD, USA; Center for Advanced Study of Language, University of Maryland, College ParkCollege Park, MD, USA.
authors.forename: Nick B
authors.initials: NB
authors.lastname: Pandža
authors.affiliation: Graduate Program in Second Language Acquisition, School of Languages, Literatures, and Cultures, University of Maryland, College ParkCollege Park, MD, USA; Center for Advanced Study of Language, University of Maryland, College ParkCollege Park, MD, USA.
authors.forename: Alia K
authors.initials: AK
authors.lastname: Lancaster
authors.affiliation: Graduate Program in Second Language Acquisition, School of Languages, Literatures, and Cultures, University of Maryland, College Park College Park, MD, USA.
authors.forename: Kira
authors.initials: K
authors.lastname: Gor
keywords: Russian; form-to-meaning mapping; lexical access; nonnative auditory perception; phonological representations