title: Strategies to Increase Cancer Detection: Review of True-Positive and False-Negative Results at Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Screening.
abstract: Digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) represents a valuable addition to breast cancer screening by decreasing recall rates while increasing cancer detection rates. The increased accuracy achieved with DBT is due to the quasi-three-dimensional format of the reconstructed images and the ability to "scroll through" breast tissue in the reconstructed images, thereby reducing the effect of tissue superimposition found with conventional planar digital mammography. The margins of both benign and malignant lesions are more conspicuous at DBT, which allows improved lesion characterization, increased reader confidence, and improved screening outcomes. However, even with the improvements in accuracy achieved with DBT, there remain differences in breast cancer conspicuity by mammographic view. Early data suggest that breast cancers may be more conspicuous on craniocaudal (CC) views than on mediolateral oblique (MLO) views. While some very laterally located breast cancers may be visualized on only the MLO view, the increased conspicuity of cancers on the CC view compared with the MLO view suggests that DBT screening should be performed with two-view imaging. Even with the improved conspicuity of lesions at DBT, there may still be false-negative studies. Subtle lesions seen on only one view may be discounted, and dense and/or complex tissue patterns may make some cancers occult or extremely difficult to detect. Therefore, radiologists should be cognizant of both perceptual and cognitive errors to avoid potential pitfalls in lesion detection and characterization.©RSNA, 2016 Online supplemental material is available for this article.
authors.affiliation: From the Division of Breast Imaging, Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Spruce St, 1 Silverstein, Philadelphia, PA 19104.
authors.forename: Katrina E
authors.initials: KE
authors.lastname: Korhonen
authors.affiliation: From the Division of Breast Imaging, Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Spruce St, 1 Silverstein, Philadelphia, PA 19104.
authors.forename: Susan P
authors.initials: SP
authors.lastname: Weinstein
authors.affiliation: From the Division of Breast Imaging, Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Spruce St, 1 Silverstein, Philadelphia, PA 19104.
authors.forename: Elizabeth S
authors.initials: ES
authors.lastname: McDonald
authors.affiliation: From the Division of Breast Imaging, Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Spruce St, 1 Silverstein, Philadelphia, PA 19104.
authors.forename: Emily F
authors.initials: EF
authors.lastname: Conant
mesh_terms: D001943:Breast Neoplasms / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging*; D003951:Diagnostic Errors / Q000517:prevention & control*; D055088:Early Detection of Cancer / Q000379:methods*; D019317:Evidence-Based Medicine; D005188:False Negative Reactions; D005189:False Positive Reactions; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D021621:Imaging, Three-Dimensional / Q000379:methods*; D008327:Mammography / Q000379:methods*; D011829:Radiation Dosage; D011856:Radiographic Image Enhancement / Q000379:methods*; D015203:Reproducibility of Results; D012680:Sensitivity and Specificity