title: On the fly estimation of host-guest binding free energies using the movable type method: participation in the SAMPL5 blind challenge.
abstract: We review our performance in the SAMPL5 challenge for predicting host-guest binding affinities using the movable type (MT) method. The challenge included three hosts, acyclic Cucurbit[2]uril and two octa-acids with and without methylation at the entrance to their binding cavities. Each host was associated with 6-10 guest molecules. The MT method extrapolates local energy landscapes around particular molecular states and estimates the free energy by Monte Carlo integration over these landscapes. Two blind submissions pairing MT with variants of the KECSA potential function yielded mean unsigned errors of 1.26 and 1.53 kcal/mol for the non-methylated octa-acid, 2.83 and 3.06 kcal/mol for the methylated octa-acid, and 2.77 and 3.36 kcal/mol for Cucurbit[2]uril host. While our results are in reasonable agreement with experiment, we focused on particular cases in which our estimates gave incorrect results, particularly with regard to association between the octa-acids and an adamantane derivative. Working on the hypothesis that differential solvation effects play a role in effecting computed binding affinities for the parent octa-acid and the methylated octa-acid and that the ligands bind inside the pockets (rather than on the surface) we devised a new solvent accessible surface area term to better quantify solvation energy contributions in MT based studies. To further explore this issue a, molecular dynamics potential of mean force (PMF) study indicates that, as found by our docking calculations, the stable binding mode for this ligand is inside (rather than surface bound) the octa-acid cavity whether the entrance is methylated or not. The PMF studies also obtained the correct order for the methylation-induced change in binding affinities and associated the difference, to a large extent to differential solvation effects. Overall, the SAMPL5 challenge yielded in improvements our solvation modeling and also demonstrated the need for thorough validation of input data integrity prior to any computational analysis.
authors.affiliation: Department of Chemistry, Michigan State University, 578 South Shaw Lane, East Lansing, MI, 48824-1322, USA.
authors.forename: Nupur
authors.initials: N
authors.lastname: Bansal
authors.affiliation: Department of Chemistry, Michigan State University, 578 South Shaw Lane, East Lansing, MI, 48824-1322, USA.
authors.forename: Zheng
authors.initials: Z
authors.lastname: Zheng
authors.affiliation: Department of Chemistry, Michigan State University, 578 South Shaw Lane, East Lansing, MI, 48824-1322, USA.
authors.forename: David S
authors.initials: DS
authors.lastname: Cerutti
authors.affiliation: Department of Chemistry, Michigan State University, 578 South Shaw Lane, East Lansing, MI, 48824-1322, USA. kmerz1@gmail.com.
authors.forename: Kenneth M
authors.initials: KM
authors.lastname: Merz
mesh_terms: D001665:Binding Sites; D057927:Hydrophobic and Hydrophilic Interactions; D008024:Ligands; D047028:Macrocyclic Compounds / Q000737:chemistry*; D008968:Molecular Conformation; D056004:Molecular Dynamics Simulation; D015394:Molecular Structure; D011485:Protein Binding; D011506:Proteins / Q000737:chemistry*; D012997:Solvents; D013816:Thermodynamics; D000099246:Cucurbit(n)urils
chemical_list: D008024:Ligands; D047028:Macrocyclic Compounds; D011506:Proteins; D012997:Solvents; D000099246:Cucurbit(n)urils
keywords: Binding free energy; Blind challenge; Cucurbituril; Movable type; Octa-acid; SAMPL5