title: Insight Is Not in the Problem: Investigating Insight in Problem Solving across Task Types.
abstract: The feeling of insight in problem solving is typically associated with the sudden realization of a solution that appears obviously correct (Kounios et al., 2006). Salvi et al. (2016) found that a solution accompanied with sudden insight is more likely to be correct than a problem solved through conscious and incremental steps. However, Metcalfe (1986) indicated that participants would often present an inelegant but plausible (wrong) answer as correct with a high feeling of warmth (a subjective measure of closeness to solution). This discrepancy may be due to the use of different tasks or due to different methods in the measurement of insight (i.e., using a binary vs. continuous scale). In three experiments, we investigated both findings, using many different problem tasks (e.g., Compound Remote Associates, so-called classic insight problems, and non-insight problems). Participants rated insight-related affect (feelings of Aha-experience, confidence, surprise, impasse, and pleasure) on continuous scales. As expected we found that, for problems designed to elicit insight, correct solutions elicited higher proportions of reported insight in the solution compared to non-insight solutions; further, correct solutions elicited stronger feelings of insight compared to incorrect solutions.
authors.affiliation: Melbourne School of Psychological Sciences, The University of Melbourne Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
authors.forename: Margaret E
authors.initials: ME
authors.lastname: Webb
authors.affiliation: Melbourne School of Psychological Sciences, The University of Melbourne Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
authors.forename: Daniel R
authors.initials: DR
authors.lastname: Little
authors.affiliation: Melbourne School of Psychological Sciences, The University of Melbourne Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
authors.forename: Simon J
authors.initials: SJ
authors.lastname: Cropper
keywords: accuracy; insight; problem solving