title: Opposing Responses of Bird Functional Diversity to Vegetation Structural Diversity in Wet and Dry Forest.
abstract: Disturbance regimes are changing worldwide, and the consequences for ecosystem function and resilience are largely unknown. Functional diversity (FD) provides a surrogate measure of ecosystem function by capturing the range, abundance and distribution of trait values in a community. Enhanced understanding of the responses of FD to measures of vegetation structure at landscape scales is needed to guide conservation management. To address this knowledge gap, we used a whole-of-landscape sampling approach to examine relationships between bird FD, vegetation diversity and time since fire. We surveyed birds and measured vegetation at 36 landscape sampling units in dry and wet forest in southeast Australia during 2010 and 2011. Four uncorrelated indices of bird FD (richness, evenness, divergence and dispersion) were derived from six bird traits, and we investigated responses of these indices and species richness to both vertical and horizontal vegetation diversity using linear mixed models. We also considered the extent to which the mean and diversity of time since fire were related to vegetation diversity. Results showed opposing responses of FD to vegetation diversity in dry and wet forest. In dry forest, where fire is frequent, species richness and two FD indices (richness and dispersion) were positively related to vertical vegetation diversity, consistent with theory relating to environmental variation and coexistence. However, in wet forest subject to infrequent fire, the same three response variables were negatively associated with vertical diversity. We suggest that competitive dominance by species results in lower FD as vegetation diversity increases in wet forest. The responses of functional evenness were opposite to those of species richness, functional richness and dispersion in both forest types, highlighting the value of examining multiple FD metrics at management-relevant scales. The mean and diversity of time since fire were uncorrelated with vegetation diversity in wet forest, but positively correlated with vegetation diversity in dry forest. We therefore suggest that protection of older vegetation is important, but controlled application of low-severity fire in dry forest may sustain ecosystem function by enhancing different elements of FD.
authors.affiliation: School of Ecosystem and Forest Sciences, University of Melbourne, Creswick, Victoria, Australia.
authors.forename: Holly
authors.identifier: http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6313-6779
authors.initials: H
authors.lastname: Sitters
authors.affiliation: School of Ecosystem and Forest Sciences, University of Melbourne, Creswick, Victoria, Australia.
authors.forename: Alan
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: York
authors.affiliation: School of Ecosystem and Forest Sciences, University of Melbourne, Creswick, Victoria, Australia.
authors.forename: Matthew
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Swan
authors.affiliation: School of Ecosystem and Forest Sciences, University of Melbourne, Creswick, Victoria, Australia.
authors.forename: Fiona
authors.initials: F
authors.lastname: Christie
authors.affiliation: School of Ecosystem and Forest Sciences, University of Melbourne, Creswick, Victoria, Australia.
authors.forename: Julian
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Di Stefano
mesh_terms: D000818:Animals; D001315:Australia; D044822:Biodiversity; D001717:Birds / Q000502:physiology*; D017753:Ecosystem; D065928:Forests; D016014:Linear Models; D011157:Population Dynamics