title: Does the sensorimotor system minimize prediction error or select the most likely prediction during object lifting?
abstract: The human sensorimotor system is routinely capable of making accurate predictions about an object's weight, which allows for energetically efficient lifts and prevents objects from being dropped. Often, however, poor predictions arise when the weight of an object can vary and sensory cues about object weight are sparse (e.g., picking up an opaque water bottle). The question arises, what strategies does the sensorimotor system use to make weight predictions when one is dealing with an object whose weight may vary? For example, does the sensorimotor system use a strategy that minimizes prediction error (minimal squared error) or one that selects the weight that is most likely to be correct (maximum a posteriori)? In this study we dissociated the predictions of these two strategies by having participants lift an object whose weight varied according to a skewed probability distribution. We found, using a small range of weight uncertainty, that four indexes of sensorimotor prediction (grip force rate, grip force, load force rate, and load force) were consistent with a feedforward strategy that minimizes the square of prediction errors. These findings match research in the visuomotor system, suggesting parallels in underlying processes. We interpret our findings within a Bayesian framework and discuss the potential benefits of using a minimal squared error strategy.
  
  
  
  Using a novel experimental model of object lifting, we tested whether the sensorimotor system models the weight of objects by minimizing lifting errors or by selecting the statistically most likely weight. We found that the sensorimotor system minimizes the square of prediction errors for object lifting. This parallels the results of studies that investigated visually guided reaching, suggesting an overlap in the underlying mechanisms between tasks that involve different sensory systems.
authors.affiliation: Brain and Mind Institute, Department of Psychology, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada; cashabackjga@gmail.com.
authors.forename: Joshua G A
authors.identifier: 0000-0002-8642-6648
authors.initials: JG
authors.lastname: Cashaback
authors.affiliation: Brain and Mind Institute, Department of Psychology, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada.|Graduate Program in Neuroscience, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada.
authors.forename: Heather R
authors.initials: HR
authors.lastname: McGregor
authors.affiliation: Department of Physiology and Pharmacology, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada; and.
authors.forename: Henry C H
authors.initials: HC
authors.lastname: Pun
authors.affiliation: Department of Sport and Health Sciences, University of Exeter, Devon, United Kingdom.
authors.forename: Gavin
authors.initials: G
authors.lastname: Buckingham
authors.affiliation: Brain and Mind Institute, Department of Psychology, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada.|Department of Physiology and Pharmacology, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada; and.
authors.forename: Paul L
authors.initials: PL
authors.lastname: Gribble
mesh_terms: D000293:Adolescent; D000704:Analysis of Variance; D005260:Female; D005385:Fingers / Q000502:physiology*; D018737:Hand Strength / Q000502:physiology*; D006801:Humans; D017770:Lifting; D008297:Male; D011237:Predictive Value of Tests; D011336:Probability; D011597:Psychomotor Performance / Q000502:physiology*; D055815:Young Adult
keywords: Bayesian; feedforward control; fingertip force; object lifting; prediction