title: The Australian Pelvic Floor Questionnaire is a valid measure of pelvic floor symptoms in patients following surgery for colorectal cancer.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  This study evaluated the construct validity of the Australian Pelvic Floor Questionnaire against two alternative measures of the severity of bladder and bowel symptoms.
  
  
  METHODS
  This was an exploratory analysis of data from two prospective studies. Patients who had undergone surgery for colorectal cancer were analysed. Bladder and bowel symptoms were measured using three validated questionnaires: the Australian Pelvic Floor Questionnaire, the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire Short Form Questionnaire for urinary incontinence and the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-Bowel Module post-cancer treatment.
  
  
  RESULTS
  The study sample consisted of 44 participants, including 25 men and 19 women. The Australian Pelvic Floor Questionnaire bladder and bowel domain scores demonstrated moderate positive correlations with the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire Short Form Questionnaire for urinary incontinence (r = 0.74, P < 0.01) and the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-Bowel Module (r = 0.69-0.78, P < 0.01). Similar results were obtained in each gender subgroup.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  This study suggested that the Australian Pelvic Floor Questionnaire may be a valid measurement tool for use in colorectal cancer populations in clinical trials and practice. Future research using larger cohorts is warranted.
authors: Department of Physiotherapy, School of Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.|Cabrini Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.|Department of Physiotherapy, Melbourne Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
authors: Kuan-Yin
authors: KY
authors: Lin
authors: Cabrini Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.|Physiotherapy, School of Allied Health, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
authors: Helena C
authors: HC
authors: Frawley
authors: Department of Physiotherapy, School of Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.|Department of Physiotherapy, Melbourne Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.|Institute for Breathing and Sleep, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
authors: Catherine L
authors: CL
authors: Granger
authors: Department of Physiotherapy, School of Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.|Institute for Breathing and Sleep, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
authors: Linda
authors: L
authors: Denehy
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D000369:Aged, 80 and over; D001315:Australia; D015179:Colorectal Neoplasms / Q000601:surgery*; D013505:Digestive System Surgical Procedures / Q000009:adverse effects*; D005242:Fecal Incontinence / Q000175:diagnosis* / Q000209:etiology / Q000503:physiopathology; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008875:Middle Aged; D017773:Pelvic Floor / Q000503:physiopathology*; D011183:Postoperative Complications / Q000175:diagnosis* / Q000209:etiology / Q000503:physiopathology; D011446:Prospective Studies; D011795:Surveys and Questionnaires; D014549:Urinary Incontinence / Q000175:diagnosis* / Q000209:etiology / Q000503:physiopathology
keywords: bladder dysfunction; bowel dysfunction; colorectal neoplasms; pelvic floor dysfunction; questionnaires; validity