title: Immune genes and divergent antimicrobial peptides in flies of the subgenus Drosophila.
abstract: Drosophila is an important model for studying the evolution of animal immunity, due to the powerful genetic tools developed for D. melanogaster. However, Drosophila is an incredibly speciose lineage with a wide range of ecologies, natural histories, and diverse natural enemies. Surprisingly little functional work has been done on immune systems of species other than D. melanogaster. In this study, we examine the evolution of immune genes in the speciose subgenus Drosophila, which diverged from the subgenus Sophophora (that includes D. melanogaster) approximately 25-40 Mya. We focus on D. neotestacea, a woodland species used to study interactions between insects and parasitic nematodes, and combine recent transcriptomic data with infection experiments to elucidate aspects of host immunity.
  
  
  
  We found that the vast majority of genes involved in the D. melanogaster immune response are conserved in D. neotestacea, with a few interesting exceptions, particularly in antimicrobial peptides (AMPs); until recently, AMPs were not thought to evolve rapidly in Drosophila. Unexpectedly, we found a distinct diptericin in subgenus Drosophila flies that appears to have evolved under diversifying (positive) selection. We also describe the presence of the AMP drosocin, which was previously thought to be restricted to the subgenus Sophophora, in the subgenus Drosophila. We challenged two subgenus Drosophila species, D. neotestacea and D. virilis with bacterial and fungal pathogens and quantified AMP expression.
  
  
  
  While diptericin in D. virilis was induced by exposure to gram-negative bacteria, it was not induced in D. neotestacea, showing that conservation of immune genes does not necessarily imply conservation of the realized immune response. Our study lends support to the idea that invertebrate AMPs evolve rapidly, and that Drosophila harbor a diverse repertoire of AMPs with potentially important functional consequences.
authors: Department of Biology, University of Victoria, Victoria, BC, Canada. markhans@uvic.ca.
authors: Mark A
authors: MA
authors: Hanson
authors: Department of Biology, University of Victoria, Victoria, BC, Canada.
authors: Phineas T
authors: PT
authors: Hamilton
authors: Department of Biology, University of Victoria, Victoria, BC, Canada.|Integrated Microbial Biodiversity Program, Canadian Institute for Advanced Research, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
authors: Steve J
authors: SJ
authors: Perlman
mesh_terms: D000595:Amino Acid Sequence; D000818:Animals; D023181:Antimicrobial Cationic Peptides / Q000235:genetics* / Q000378:metabolism; D005075:Biological Evolution; D004330:Drosophila / Q000235:genetics* / Q000276:immunology* / Q000382:microbiology; D029721:Drosophila Proteins / Q000737:chemistry / Q000235:genetics; D005658:Fungi / Q000276:immunology; D005786:Gene Expression Regulation; D017344:Genes, Insect; D014644:Genetic Variation; D006020:Glycopeptides / Q000737:chemistry / Q000235:genetics; D007109:Immunity / Q000235:genetics*; D010802:Phylogeny
chemical_list: D023181:Antimicrobial Cationic Peptides; D029721:Drosophila Proteins; D006020:Glycopeptides; C082117:drosocin
keywords: AMP; Antimicrobial peptide; Diptericin; Drosocin; Drosophila; Immunity