title: Litigation as TB Rights Advocacy: A New Delhi Case Study.
abstract: One thousand people die every day in India as a result of TB, a preventable and treatable disease, even though the Constitution of India, government schemes, and international law guarantee available, accessible, acceptable, quality health care. Failure to address the spread of TB and to provide quality treatment to all affected populations constitutes a public health and human rights emergency that demands action and accountability. As part of a broader strategy, health activists in India employ Public Interest Litigation (PIL) to hold the state accountable for rights violations and to demand new legislation, standards for patient care, accountability for under-spending, improvements in services at individual facilities, and access to government entitlements in marginalized communities. Taking inspiration from right to health PIL cases (PILs), lawyers in a New Delhi-based rights organization used desk research, fact-findings, and the Right To Information Act to build a TB PIL for the Delhi High Court,Sanjai Sharma v. NCT of Delhi and Others(2015). The case argues that inadequate implementation of government TB schemes violates the Constitutional rights to life, health, food, and equality. Although PILs face substantial challenges, this paper concludes that litigation can be a crucial advocacy and accountability tool for people living with TB and their allies.
authors: Reproductive rights activist and the former Litigation Director of the Reproductive Rights Initiative at the Human Rights Law Network, New Delhi, India.
authors: Kerry
authors: K
authors: McBroom
mesh_terms: D003254:Consumer Advocacy / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence*; D006297:Health Services Accessibility; D006806:Human Rights / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence*; D006801:Humans; D007194:India; D019982:Organizational Case Studies; D012941:Social Responsibility; D014376:Tuberculosis / Q000517:prevention & control / Q000628:therapy