title: Systematic reviews in context: highlighting systematic reviews relevant to Africa in the Pan African Medical Journal.
abstract: Health research serves to answer questions concerning health and to accumulate facts (evidence) required to guide healthcare policy and practice. However, research designs vary and different types of healthcare questions are best answered by different study designs. For example, qualitative studies are best suited for answering questions about experiences and meaning; cross-sectional studies for questions concerning prevalence; cohort studies for questions regarding incidence and prognosis; and randomised controlled trials for questions on prevention and treatment. In each case, one study would rarely yield sufficient evidence on which to reliably base a healthcare decision. An unbiased and transparent summary of all existing studies on a given question (i.e. a systematic review) tells a better story than any one of the included studies taken separately. A systematic review enables producers and users of research to gauge what a new study has contributed to knowledge by setting the study's findings in the context of all previous studies investigating the same question. It is therefore inappropriate to initiate a new study without first conducting a systematic review to find out what can be learnt from existing studies. There is nothing new in taking account of earlier studies in either the design or interpretation of new studies. For example, in the 18th century James Lind conducted a clinical trial followed by a systematic review of contemporary treatments for scurvy; which showed fruits to be an effective treatment for the disease. However, surveys of the peer-reviewed literature continue to provide empirical evidence that systematic reviews are seldom used in the design and interpretation of the findings of new studies. Such indifference to systematic reviews as a research function is unethical, unscientific, and uneconomical. Without systematic reviews, limited resources are very likely to be squandered on ill-conceived research and policies. In order to contribute in enhancing the value of research in Africa, the Pan African Medical Journal will start a new regular column that will highlight priority systematic reviews relevant to the continent.
authors: Centre for Evidence-based Health Care, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, South Africa; Cochrane South Africa, South African Medical Research Council, Cape Town, South Africa.
authors: Charles Shey
authors: CS
authors: Wiysonge
authors: The Pan African Medical Journal, Center for Public Health Research and Information, Nairobi, Kenya.
authors: Raoul
authors: R
authors: Kamadjeu
authors: The Pan African Medical Journal, Center for Public Health Research and Information, Nairobi, Kenya.
authors: Landry
authors: L
authors: Tsague
mesh_terms: D000349:Africa; D006291:Health Policy; D006302:Health Services Research / Q000379:methods; D006801:Humans; D010506:Periodicals as Topic; D012107:Research Design; D012196:Review Literature as Topic
keywords: Africa; Systematic reviews; evidence-informed policy; evidence-informed research; meta-analysis