title: In vitrogametogenesis: just another way to have a baby?
abstract: Advances in science have made possible the derivation of reproductively viable gametesin vitrofrom mice. The research on human cells suggests thatin vitrogametogenesis ("IVG") with reproductive potential may one day be possible with humans. This technology would allow same-sex couples to have children who are biologically related to both of them; allow single individuals to procreate without the genetic contribution of another individual; and facilitate "multiplex" parenting, where groups of more than two individuals procreate together, producing children who are the genetic progeny of them all. IVG could also make prenatal selection a much more refined and comprehensive process than it is today, allowing for the selection of embryos on the basis of multiple factors. Evaluating IVG under a relational autonomy framework, this article argues that the potential benefits or harms of IVG depend on the social, scientific, and legal context in which it is situated and how it is used. It concludes that IVG is preferable to some forms of assisted reproductive technologies in certain instances and substantially more problematic in others. Finally, it suggests that its capacity to "perfect" prenatal selection in many ways exacerbates the problematic aspects of increasingly expansive prenatal selection.
authors: Law School, George Washington University, 2000 H St, NW, Washington, DC 20052, USA.
authors: Sonia M
authors: SM
authors: Suter
keywords: Assisted reproductive technologies; equality; gametogenesis; genetics; prenatal selection; relational autonomy