title: The Narrative-Emotion Process Coding System 2.0: A multi-methodological approach to identifying and assessing narrative-emotion process markers in psychotherapy.
abstract: Recent studies suggest that it is not simply the expression of emotion or emotional arousal in session that is important, but rather it is the reflective processing of emergent, adaptive emotions, arising in the context of personal storytelling and/or Emotion-Focused Therapy (EFT) interventions, that is associated with change.
  
  
  
  To enhance narrative-emotion integration specifically in EFT, Angus and Greenberg originally identified a set of eight clinically derived narrative-emotion integration markers were originally identified for the implementation of process-guiding therapeutic responses. Further evaluation and testing by the Angus Narrative-Emotion Marker Lab resulted in the identification of 10 empirically validated Narrative-Emotion Process (N-EP) markers that are included in the Narrative-Emotion Process Coding System Version 2.0 (NEPCS 2.0).
  
  
  
  Based on empirical research findings, individual markers are clustered into Problem (e.g., stuckness in repetitive story patterns, over-controlled or dysregulated emotion, lack of reflectivity), Transition (e.g., reflective, access to adaptive emotions and new emotional plotlines, heightened narrative and emotion integration), and Change (e.g., new story outcomes and self-narrative discovery, and co-construction and re-conceptualization) subgroups. To date, research using the NEPCS 2.0 has investigated the proportion and pattern of narrative-emotion markers in Emotion-Focused, Client-Centered, and Cognitive Therapy for Major Depression, Motivational Interviewing plus Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Generalized Anxiety Disorder, and EFT for Complex Trauma. Results have consistently identified significantly higher proportions of N-EP Transition and Change markers, and productive shifts, in mid- and late phase sessions, for clients who achieved recovery by treatment termination.
  
  
  
  Recovery is consistently associated with client storytelling that is emotionally engaged, reflective, and evidencing new story outcomes and self-narrative change. Implications for future research, practice and training are discussed.
authors: a Department of Psychology , York University , Toronto , Ontario , Canada.
authors: Lynne E
authors: LE
authors: Angus
authors: b Centre for Addiction and Mental Health (CAMH), Department of Psychiatry , University of Toronto , Toronto , Ontario , Canada.
authors: Tali
authors: T
authors: Boritz
authors: a Department of Psychology , York University , Toronto , Ontario , Canada.
authors: Emily
authors: E
authors: Bryntwick
authors: a Department of Psychology , York University , Toronto , Ontario , Canada.
authors: Naomi
authors: N
authors: Carpenter
authors: a Department of Psychology , York University , Toronto , Ontario , Canada.
authors: Christianne
authors: C
authors: Macaulay
authors: a Department of Psychology , York University , Toronto , Ontario , Canada.
authors: Jasmine
authors: J
authors: Khattra
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D001008:Anxiety Disorders / Q000628:therapy; D015928:Cognitive Behavioral Therapy / Q000379:methods; D003865:Major Depressive Disorder / Q000628:therapy; D004644:Emotions; D006801:Humans; D062405:Motivational Interviewing / Q000379:methods; D033262:Narration; D010043:Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care / Q000379:methods*; D000067073:Psychological Trauma / Q000628:therapy; D013811:Psychotherapeutic Processes; D011613:Psychotherapy / Q000379:methods*
keywords: narrative measure; narrative-emotion markers; process–outcome research