title: The Impact of Non-attempted and Dually-Attempted Items on Person Abilities Using Item Response Theory.
abstract: The purpose of the present study was to relate response strategy with person ability estimates. Two behavioral strategies were examined: (a) the strategy to skip items in order to save time on timed tests, and, (b) the strategy to select two responses on an item, with the hope that one of them may be considered correct. Participants were 4,422 individuals who were administered a standardized achievement measure related to math, biology, chemistry, and physics. In the present evaluation, only the physics subscale was employed. Two analyses were conducted: (a) a person-based one to identify differences between groups and potential correlates of those differences, and, (b) a measure-based analysis in order to identify the parts of the measure that were responsible for potential group differentiation. For (a) person abilities the 2-PL model was employed and later the 3-PL and 4-PL models in order to estimate upper and lower asymptotes of person abilities. For (b) differential item functioning, differential test functioning, and differential distractor functioning were investigated. Results indicated that there were significant differences between groups with completers having the highest ability compared to both non-attempters and dual responders. There were no significant differences between no-attempters and dual responders. The present findings have implications for response strategy efficacy and measure evaluation, revision, and construction.
authors: Clinical Research Center, Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, BostonMA, USA; Faculty of Primary Education, National and Kapodistrian University of AthensAthens, Greece.
authors: Georgios D
authors: GD
authors: Sideridis
authors: Department of Psychology, University of Crete Rethymno, Greece.
authors: Ioannis
authors: I
authors: Tsaousis
authors: National Center for Assessment in Higher EducationRiyadh, Saudi Arabia; College of Education, Taibah UniversityMedina, Saudi Arabia.
authors: Khaleel
authors: K
authors: Al Harbi
keywords: 4-PL; IRT; carelessness; differential distractor functioning; dually attempted items; guessing; non-attempted items; response styles