Efficacy and Safety of Dexmedetomidine as an Adjuvant in Epidural Analgesia and Anesthesia: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.
OBJECTIVE
Several clinical trials have examined and indicated the usefulness of epidural dexmedetomidine therapy. However, there has been no systematic analysis of the findings of these trials to date. We undertook this systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate the efficacy and safety of epidural dexmedetomidine adjunctive therapy in different surgical procedures.


METHODS
We searched EMBASE, PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and the Clinical Trials.gov database to identify randomized controlled trials investigating the effects of epidural dexmedetomidine adjunctive therapy. The article search was conducted without language or date restrictions. The date of the last search was 27 July 2016. The mean differences (MD) or standardized mean differences (SMD) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated for continuous variables, and risk ratios (RRs) were presented for dichotomous outcomes. Heterogeneity was assessed using τ2, χ2and I2analyses.


RESULTS
Twelve randomized controlled trials were included in the final analysis. Compared with the control treatment, epidural dexmedetomidine administration prolonged the duration of analgesia (P < 0.0001), reduced the time to sensory block (P = 0.002), decreased the requirement for rescue analgesia (P < 0.00001) and achieved a significantly higher sedation score (P < 0.0001). Although dexmedetomidine adjunctive therapy did not affect mean arterial pressure (P = 0.33), systolic blood pressure (P = 0.32) or diastolic blood pressure (P = 0.28), it significantly lowered heart rate (P = 0.0009). Symptoms indicative of hypotension and bradycardia events were more common in the dexmedetomidine group, but the difference in the overall risk of hypotension and bradycardia was statistically insignificant (P > 0.05) in comparison with that reported for the control therapies. Furthermore, dexmedetomidine effectively reduced post-operative pain (P = 0.03), whilst the occurrence of other side effects, such as pruritus, dizziness, dry mouth, nausea and vomiting did not differ significantly from that reported for the control therapies, except the risk of shivering was significantly higher with control therapies (P = 0.03).


CONCLUSIONS
This systematic review and meta-analysis demonstrates that dexmedetomidine as an adjuvant in epidural procedures is generally safe and well tolerated. Furthermore, dexmedetomidine acted synergistically and provided an improved sedation and analgesic profile.
Department of Anesthesiology, Guilin 181st Hospital, No. 1 Xinqiaoyuan Street, Guilin, 541002, Guangxi, People's Republic of China.
Xu
X
Zhang
Department of Anesthesiology, Guilin 181st Hospital, No. 1 Xinqiaoyuan Street, Guilin, 541002, Guangxi, People's Republic of China.
Dong
D
Wang
Department of Anesthesiology, Guilin 181st Hospital, No. 1 Xinqiaoyuan Street, Guilin, 541002, Guangxi, People's Republic of China.
Min
M
Shi
Department of Anesthesiology, Guilin 181st Hospital, No. 1 Xinqiaoyuan Street, Guilin, 541002, Guangxi, People's Republic of China. yuanguoluo@qq.com.
YuanGuo
Y
Luo
D015360:Analgesia, Epidural / Q000379:methods*; D000700:Analgesics / Q000627:therapeutic use; D000758:Anesthesia / Q000379:methods*; D020927:Dexmedetomidine / Q000627:therapeutic use*; D006801:Humans; D059408:Pain Management; D010149:Postoperative Pain / Q000188:drug therapy; D016032:Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
D000700:Analgesics; D020927:Dexmedetomidine