Are horse age and incision length associated with surgical site infection following equine colic surgery?
It is our clinical impression that age and incision length are more strongly associated with surgical site infection (SSI) following colic surgery than skin closure or wound protection method. Therefore, the objective of this observational clinical cohort study was to identify the risks for SSI in horses undergoing colic surgery. Data collection included pre-, intra-, and postoperative variables. Variables with P < 0.2 following univariable analysis were used in a logistic regression multivariable model. Variables with P <0.05 were included in the final model. Odds ratios (OR; 95% confidence intervals, 95% CI) were determined. The area under the curve (AUC) for the receiver-operator characteristic was calculated. The final multivariable model included breed (P = 0.008), incision length (P = 0.004), surgical procedure classification (P <0.001), and postoperative (PO) colic (P = 0.037; overall model P <0.001, and AUC was 0.81 [excellent discrimination between SSI vs. no SSI]). Warmbloods (OR 12.0; 95% CI 2.7-74.8), American breeds (OR 6.4; 95% CI 1.2-43.0), and Thoroughbreds (4.5; 95% CI 1.1-25.5) more commonly had SSI than other breeds (ponies/miniature horses, Draft breeds, Standardbreds, Arabians, and Crossbreeds [referent]). A higher SSI rate was associated with incision lengths >27 cm (3.7; 95% CI 1.5-9.9), heavily contaminated procedures (12.0; 95% CI 3.3-49.9), and horses with PO colic (2.7; 95% CI 1.1-6.8). SSI appeared to be more common after heavily contaminated procedures and in horses with PO colic, which probably resulted in more incisional contamination and trauma. Some breeds appeared to have higher odds of SSI. Age was not associated with SSI. The risk of developing SSI was higher for horses with an incision >27 cm; therefore, surgeons are encouraged to use the minimum incision length required to accomplish the necessary abdominal exploration and bowel manipulation in the safest manner possible.
Dipartimento di Scienze Veterinarie, Università degli Studi di Torino, Grugliasco, TO, Italy.
S J M
SJ
Darnaud
Department of Clinical Studies, New Bolton Center, University of Pennsylvania School of Veterinary Medicine, Kennett Square, PA 19348, USA. Electronic address: southwoo@vet.upenn.edu.
L L
LL
Southwood
Department of Clinical Studies, New Bolton Center, University of Pennsylvania School of Veterinary Medicine, Kennett Square, PA 19348, USA.
H W
HW
Aceto
Department of Clinical Studies, New Bolton Center, University of Pennsylvania School of Veterinary Medicine, Kennett Square, PA 19348, USA.
D
D
Stefanovski
Dipartimento di Scienze Veterinarie, Università degli Studi di Torino, Grugliasco, TO, Italy.
L
L
Tomassone
Dipartimento di Scienze Veterinarie, Università degli Studi di Torino, Grugliasco, TO, Italy.
L
L
Zarucco
D000367:Age Factors; D000818:Animals; D015331:Cohort Studies; D003085:Colic / Q000601:surgery / Q000662:veterinary*; D006734:Horse Diseases / Q000453:epidemiology / Q000382:microbiology* / Q000473:pathology; D006736:Horses; D016015:Logistic Models; D059035:Perioperative Period; D011184:Postoperative Period; D057234:Preoperative Period; D012307:Risk Factors; D000072836:Surgical Wound / Q000662:veterinary*; D013530:Surgical Wound Infection / Q000453:epidemiology / Q000382:microbiology / Q000473:pathology / Q000662:veterinary*
Colic; Horse; Incision; Infection; Laparotomy