Identifying weaknesses in national health emergency response skills and techniques with emergency responders: A cross-sectional study from China.
To identify the weakest skill areas perceived by participants among key skills highly demanded during emergencies and to explore factors influencing the self-rated overall skill proficiency of public health emergency responders.



The participants were selected by a multistage, stratified cluster sampling method in Heilongjiang CDC to complete questionnaires that assessed their perceptions of health emergency response skills and techniques. A final sample of 1,740 staff members was obtained and analyzed.



The 5 top skill deficiency areas perceived by participants were field epidemiologic investigation, personal protection, effective nuclear and radioactive response as well as psychological interventio (for these two areas gain the equal score), and risk assessment. The logistic regression revealed personal protective skills as the most important factor contributing to the self-rated overall skill proficiency of public health emergency responders, followed by field epidemiologic investigation skills.



More attention should be given to emergency response skill training and education programs. Major obstacles hindering the promotion of key skills and techniques among front-line emergency responders should be addressed urgently. Continuous efforts should be made to remove the financial, technical, and resource obstacles to improve public health emergency response capacity.
Department of Social Medicine, School of Public Health, Harbin Medical University, Heilongjiang, China.
Jiaojiao
J
Ren
Department of Social Medicine, School of Public Health, Harbin Medical University, Heilongjiang, China; Collaborative Innovation Centre of Social Risks Governance in Health, Subcenter of Harbin Medical University, Heilongjiang, China. Electronic address: wuqunhong@163.com.
Qunhong
Q
Wu
Department of Social Medicine, School of Public Health, Harbin Medical University, Heilongjiang, China; Collaborative Innovation Centre of Social Risks Governance in Health, Subcenter of Harbin Medical University, Heilongjiang, China. Electronic address: hyhyjw@126.com.
Yanhua
Y
Hao
School of Psychology and Public Health, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Adamm
A
Ferrier
Department of Social Medicine, School of Public Health, Harbin Medical University, Heilongjiang, China; Collaborative Innovation Centre of Social Risks Governance in Health, Subcenter of Harbin Medical University, Heilongjiang, China.
Hong
H
Sun
Department of Social Medicine, School of Public Health, Harbin Medical University, Heilongjiang, China.
Ding
D
Ding
Department of Social Medicine, School of Public Health, Harbin Medical University, Heilongjiang, China; Collaborative Innovation Centre of Social Risks Governance in Health, Subcenter of Harbin Medical University, Heilongjiang, China.
Ning
N
Ning
Department of Social Medicine, School of Public Health, Harbin Medical University, Heilongjiang, China; Collaborative Innovation Centre of Social Risks Governance in Health, Subcenter of Harbin Medical University, Heilongjiang, China.
Yu
Y
Cui
D000328:Adult; D002681:China; D002959:Civil Defense; D003430:Cross-Sectional Studies; D060731:Emergency Responders; D005260:Female; D006302:Health Services Research; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D011635:Public Health Administration; D011795:Surveys and Questionnaires
Chinese Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; Public health emergency