An economic evaluation of intervention strategies for Porcine Epidemic Diarrhea (PED).
The economic losses of Porcine Epidemic Diarrhea (PED) and the net benefits of strategies to control the virus are calculated for individual farrow-to-finish herds. A production simulation model that estimates the number of pigs by population cohorts on a weekly basis for a farrow-to-finish farm depending on production parameters is simulated under normal operating conditions and then with an outbreak of PED. The estimated annual costs of a PED outbreak with the closure of the breeding herd as the only intervention is approximately $300,000 for a 700-sow farrow-to-finishing herd. The net returns per sow (hog) fall from $255 ($11.54) to a loss of $174 ($10.68). These losses can be significantly reduced with any of the 16 intervention strategies considered in this study. The most profitable strategy involving front loading of gilts with average feedback of infected material to improve herd immunity, intensive biosecurity protocols and no vaccination costs $27,000 to implement but reduces losses by 10 times this amount. Even the implementation of the least comprehensive strategy, which involves back-loading gilts after the herd reopens and an average feedback practice at a cost of $1000 reduces the losses caused by a PED outbreak by $130,000. Front-loading gilts in combination with herd closure is more cost-effective than back-loading. Despite the extra spending on intensive biosecurity protocols, the overall loss reductions achieved by the intensive biosecurity effort can be significant. Vaccination is the least cost-effective of the intervention practices considered. Even with significant increases in cost or effectiveness in the practices, intervention is justified across all strategies. The spreadsheet model of a farrow-finish hog farm developed in this study can be used to examine changes to the production parameters or to consider other swine disease outbreaks.
Department of Food, Agricultural and Resource Economics (FARE), University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, Canada.
Longfeng
L
Weng
Department of Food, Agricultural and Resource Economics (FARE), University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, Canada. Electronic address: aweersin@uoguelph.ca.
Alfons
A
Weersink
Department of Population Medicine, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, Canada.
Zvonimir
Z
Poljak
Department of Animal Biosciences, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, Canada.
Kees
K
de Lange
Department of Food, Agricutural and Resource Economics (FARE), University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, Canada.
Mike
M
von Massow
D000822:Animal Husbandry; D000818:Animals; D003140:Communicable Disease Control / Q000191:economics* / Q000379:methods; D018352:Coronavirus Infections / Q000191:economics / Q000453:epidemiology / Q000517:prevention & control / Q000662:veterinary*; D003362:Cost-Benefit Analysis; D003967:Diarrhea / Q000191:economics / Q000453:epidemiology / Q000517:prevention & control / Q000662:veterinary*; D004196:Disease Outbreaks / Q000191:economics / Q000662:veterinary*; D005260:Female; D008962:Models, Theoretical; D053485:Porcine epidemic diarrhea virus / Q000502:physiology; D013552:Swine; D013553:Swine Diseases / Q000191:economics / Q000453:epidemiology* / Q000517:prevention & control* / Q000821:virology; D014611:Vaccination / Q000191:economics / Q000662:veterinary
Intervention strategies; Net benefits; PED