Assessing and monitoring the effects of filter material amendments on the biophysicochemical properties during composting of solid winery waste under open field and varying climatic conditions.
Waste management in winery and distillery industries faces numerous disposal challenges as large volumes of both liquid and solid waste by-products are generated yearly during cellar practices. Composting has been suggested as a feasible option to beneficiate solid organic waste. This incentivized the quest for efficient composting protocols to be put in place. The objective of this study was to experiment with different composting strategies for spent winery solid waste. Compost materials consisting of chopped pruning grape stalks, skins, seed and spent wine filter material consisting of a mixture of organic and inorganic expend ingredients were mixed in compost heaps. The filter material component varied (in percentage) among five treatments: T1 (40%) lined, T2 (20%) lined, T3 (0%) lined, T4 (40%) ground material, lined and T5 (40%) unlined. Composting was allowed to proceed under open field conditions over 12months, from autumn to summer. Indicators such as temperature, moisture, enzyme activities, microbial counts, pH, and C/N ratio, were recorded. Generally, season (df=3, 16, P<0.05) had significant effects (df=1, 3, P<0.05) on heap temperature and moisture in all treatments. Similarly, microorganisms (actinobacteria and heterotrophs) varied significantly in all treatments in response to seasonal change (df=3, 16; P<0.05). Enzyme activities fluctuated in accordance with seasonal factors and compost maturity stages, with phosphatases, esterases, amino-peptidases, proteases and glycosyl-hydrolases being most prominent. Compared to treatments T2 and T3, compost treatments with higher percentage waste filter materials (T1, T4 and T5) had higher N (16,100-21,300mg/kg), P (1500-2300mg/kg), K (19,800-28,200mg/kg), neutral pH, and lower C/N ratios (13:1-10:1), which were also comparable with commercially produced composts. Filter materials therefore, appears to be a vital ingredient for composting of winery solid waste.
ARC Infruitec-Nietvoorbij, Private Bag X5026, Stellenbosch 7599, South Africa.
Y
Y
Mtimkulu
ARC Infruitec-Nietvoorbij, Private Bag X5026, Stellenbosch 7599, South Africa.
A H
AH
Meyer
ARC Infruitec-Nietvoorbij, Private Bag X5026, Stellenbosch 7599, South Africa.
A R
AR
Mulidzi
ARC Infruitec-Nietvoorbij, Private Bag X5026, Stellenbosch 7599, South Africa.
P L
PL
Shange
Department of Horticultural Sciences, Faculty of Applied Sciences, Cape Peninsula University of Technology, P.O. Box 1906, Bellville 7535, South Africa. Electronic address: felixnchu@gmail.com.
F
F
Nchu
D004798:Enzymes / Q000737:chemistry; D006863:Hydrogen-Ion Concentration; D007220:Industrial Waste; D009930:Organic Chemicals; D012037:Refuse Disposal; D012621:Seasons; D012722:Sewage / Q000737:chemistry; D012987:Soil / Q000737:chemistry*; D062611:Solid Waste; D013696:Temperature; D027843:Vitis; D018505:Waste Management / Q000379:methods; D014920:Wine
D004798:Enzymes; D007220:Industrial Waste; D009930:Organic Chemicals; D012722:Sewage; D012987:Soil; D062611:Solid Waste
Compost maturity; Extracellular enzymes; Microbial population; Spent wine filter material; Winery waste composting