Toward Optimal Decision Making among Vulnerable Patients Referred for Cardiac Surgery: A Qualitative Analysis of Patient and Provider Perspectives.
Comprehension of risks, benefits, and alternative treatment options has been shown to be poor among patients referred for cardiac interventions. Patients' values and preferences are rarely explicitly sought. An increasing proportion of frail and older patients are undergoing complex cardiac surgical procedures with increased risk of both mortality and prolonged institutional care. We sought input from patients and caregivers to determine the optimal approach to decision making in this vulnerable patient population.



Focus groups were held with both providers and former patients. Three focus groups were convened for Coronary Artery Bypass Graft (CABG), Valve, or CABG +Valve patients ≥ 70 y old (2-y post-op, ≤ 8-wk post-op, complicated post-op course) (n = 15). Three focus groups were convened for Intermediate Medical Care Unit (IMCU) nurses, Intensive Care Unit (ICU) nurses, surgeons, anesthesiologists and cardiac intensivists (n = 20). We used a semi-structured interview format to ask questions surrounding the informed consent process. Transcribed audio data was analyzed to develop consistent and comprehensive themes.



We identified 5 main themes that influence the decision making process: educational barriers, educational facilitators, patient autonomy and perceived autonomy, patient and family expectations of care, and decision making advocates. All themes were influenced by time constraints experienced in the current consent process. Patient groups expressed a desire to receive information earlier in their care to allow time to identify personal values and preferences in developing plans for treatment. Both groups strongly supported a formal approach for shared decision making with a decisional coach to provide information and facilitate communication with the care team.



Identifying the barriers and facilitators to patient and caretaker engagement in decision making is a key step in the development of a structured, patient-centered SDM approach. Intervention early in the decision process, the use of individualized decision aids that employ graphic risk presentations, and a dedicated decisional coach were identified by patients and providers as approaches with a high potential for success. The impact of such a formalized shared decision making process in cardiac surgery on decisional quality will need to be formally assessed. Given the trend toward older and frail patients referred for complex cardiac procedures, the need for an effective shared decision making process is compelling.
Division of Cardiac Surgery, Department of Cardiac Surgery, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada (RAG, JC, KJB, JGD, JL, GMH).
Ryan A
RA
Gainer
Division of Cardiac Surgery, Department of Cardiac Surgery, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada (RAG, JC, KJB, JGD, JL, GMH).
Janet
J
Curran
Division of Cardiac Surgery, Department of Cardiac Surgery, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada (RAG, JC, KJB, JGD, JL, GMH).
Karen J
KJ
Buth
Division of Cardiac Surgery, Department of Cardiac Surgery, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada (RAG, JC, KJB, JGD, JL, GMH).
Jennie G
JG
David
Division of Cardiac Surgery, Department of Cardiac Surgery, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada (RAG, JC, KJB, JGD, JL, GMH).
Jean-Francois
JF
Légaré
Division of Cardiac Surgery, Department of Cardiac Surgery, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada (RAG, JC, KJB, JGD, JL, GMH).
Gregory M
GM
Hirsch
D000368:Aged; D000369:Aged, 80 and over; D001026:Coronary Artery Bypass; D003657:Decision Making; D005260:Female; D017144:Focus Groups; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D036301:Qualitative Research
decision aids; health literacy; patient decision making; qualitative methods; shared decision making