Do weaponless males of the hermit crabPagurus minutusgive up contests without escalation? Behavior of intruders that lack their major cheliped in male-male contests.
In dyadic contests, theoretical studies have predicted that weaker contestants are less likely to engage in fights to minimize the cost of aggression. Since the major cheliped of decapod crustaceans is critically important as a weapon, contestants without a major cheliped should be more likely to give up the contests. We therefore examined whether loss of the major cheliped by the hermit crabPagurus minutuswould affect their decision to escalate male-male contests over guarded females. Intruders without a major cheliped showed no difference in the frequency of escalation compared with intact intruders, and the decision to give up was affected by the body size difference between the contestants. After escalation, compared with intact intruders, intruders without a major cheliped had significantly decreased success of takeover of a female from opponents, suggesting a strong disadvantage of losing their major cheliped. Although the decision of weaponless intruders to escalate seems irrational, several factors, such as poor accuracy of resource holding potential assessment, the influence of body size, and a high benefit to cost ratio of male-male contests, may have affected their behavior.
Faculty of Education, Wakayama University, Sakaedani 930, Wakayama, 640-8510 Japan.
Chiaki I
CI
Yasuda
Faculty of Education, Wakayama University, Sakaedani 930, Wakayama, 640-8510 Japan.
Tsunenori
T
Koga
Assessment; Autotomy; Decision making; Male–male competition; Resource holding potential