title: Semantic prediction in language comprehension: evidence from brain potentials.
abstract: Do people predict specific word-forms during language comprehension? In an Event-Related Potential (ERP) study participants read German sentences with predictable (The goalkeeper claims that the slick ball was easy to CATCH.) and unpredictable (The kids boasted that the young horse was easy to SADDLE.) verbs. Verbs were either consistent with the expected word-form (catch/saddle) or inconsistent and therefore led to ungrammaticality (*catches/*saddles). ERPs within the N400 time-window were modulated by predictability but not by the surface-form of the verbs, suggesting that no exact word-forms were predicted. Based on our results we will argue that predictions included semantic rather than form-information. Furthermore, ungrammatical verbs led to a strong P600, probably due to task-saliency whereas correct unpredictable verbs elicited an anterior post-N400 positivity. Because the contexts were moderately constraining, this might reflect discourse revision processes rather than inhibition of a predicted word.
authors.affiliation: Centre for Cognitive Neuroscience, University of Salzburg , Salzburg , Austria.
authors.forename: Dominik
authors.initials: D
authors.lastname: Freunberger
authors.affiliation: Centre for Cognitive Neuroscience, University of Salzburg , Salzburg , Austria.
authors.forename: Dietmar
authors.initials: D
authors.lastname: Roehm
keywords: Language comprehension; N400; P300; prediction