title: The Creativity of Natural Selection? Part I: Darwin, Darwinism, and the Mutationists.
abstract: This is the first of a two-part essay on the history of debates concerning the creativity of natural selection, from Darwin through the evolutionary synthesis and up to the present. Here I focus on the mid-late nineteenth century to the early twentieth, with special emphasis on early Darwinism and its critics, the self-styled "mutationists." The second part focuses on the evolutionary synthesis and some of its critics, especially the "neutralists" and "neo-mutationists." Like Stephen Gould, I consider the creativity of natural selection to be a key component of what has traditionally counted as "Darwinism." I argue that the creativity of natural selection is best understood in terms of (1) selection initiating evolutionary change, and (2) selection being responsible for the presence of the variation it acts upon, for example by directing the course of variation. I consider the respects in which both of these claims sound non-Darwinian, even though they have long been understood by supporters and critics alike to be virtually constitutive of Darwinism.
authors.affiliation: Department of Philosophy, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, V6T 1Z1, Canada. john.beatty@ubc.ca.
authors.forename: John
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Beatty
mesh_terms: D000818:Animals; D005075:Biological Evolution; D034462:Dissent and Disputes / Q000266:history*; D049672:History, 19th Century; D049673:History, 20th Century; D009154:Mutation; D012641:Selection, Genetic
keywords: Creativity; Darwinism; Mutationism; Natural selection