title: No evidence that a range of artificial monitoring cues influence online donations to charity in an MTurk sample.
abstract: Monitoring cues, such as an image of a face or pair of eyes, have been found to increase prosocial behaviour in several studies. However, other studies have found little or no support for this effect. Here, we examined whether monitoring cues affect online donations to charity while manipulating the emotion displayed, the number of watchers and the cue type. We also include as statistical controls a range of likely covariates of prosocial behaviour. Using the crowdsourcing Internet marketplace, Amazon Mechanical Turk (MTurk), 1535 participants completed our survey and were given the opportunity to donate to charity while being shown an image prime. None of the monitoring primes we tested had a significant effect on charitable giving. By contrast, the control variables of culture, age, sex and previous charity giving frequency did predict donations. This work supports the importance of cultural differences and enduring individual differences in prosocial behaviour and shows that a range of artificial monitoring cues do not reliably boost online charity donation on MTurk.
authors.affiliation: School of Psychology , University of Auckland , Auckland , New Zealand.
authors.forename: Timothy J
authors.initials: TJ
authors.lastname: Saunders
authors.affiliation: School of Psychology , University of Auckland , Auckland , New Zealand.
authors.forename: Alex H
authors.identifier: 0000-0003-3492-7667
authors.initials: AH
authors.lastname: Taylor
authors.affiliation: School of Psychology , University of Auckland , Auckland , New Zealand.
authors.forename: Quentin D
authors.initials: QD
authors.lastname: Atkinson
keywords: charity donation; eye images; online behaviour; prosociality; reputation