title: Military Genitourinary Trauma: Policies, Implications, and Ethics.
abstract: The men and women who serve in the armed forces, in the words of Major General Joseph Caravalho, "sign a blank check, co-signed by their families, payable to the Army, Navy, Air Force, or Marines, up to and including their lives." It is human nature to consider such a pact in polarized terms; the pact concludes in either a celebratory homecoming or funereal mourning. But in reality, surviving catastrophic injury may incur the greatest debt. The small but real possibility of losing the ability to bear biological children due to genitourinary combat injury has been a topic of discussion in hushed tones, behind closed doors. But as policy changes move the conversation into the open, we must be fully aware of the far-reaching and long-term impacts of decisions on those who have sustained genitourinary injury. In January 2016, Secretary of Defense Ashton Carter outlined a set of reforms that would improve the quality of life for military families by recognizing the importance of maintaining fertility, even in the face of severe injury. This first promising step could build a solid foundation of insuring fertility preservation for wounded service members with genitourinary injury, and it could set a precedent beyond the military for insuring treatment for people who have lost their reproductive capacity. Thus, the ethical challenges raised by the new policy require careful analysis.
authors.forename: Wendy K
authors.initials: WK
authors.lastname: Dean
authors.forename: Arthur L
authors.initials: AL
authors.lastname: Caplan
authors.forename: Brendan
authors.initials: B
authors.lastname: Parent
mesh_terms: D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D015601:Injury Severity Score; D008297:Male; D008887:Military Medicine / Q000941:ethics*; D008889:Military Personnel; D009104:Multiple Trauma; D011788:Quality of Life; D014566:Urogenital System / Q000293:injuries*