title: Effects of different frequencies of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on the recovery of upper limb motor dysfunction in patients with subacute cerebral infarction.
abstract: Studies have confirmed that low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation can decrease the activity of cortical neurons, and high-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation can increase the excitability of cortical neurons. However, there are few studies concerning the use of different frequencies of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on the recovery of upper-limb motor function after cerebral infarction. We hypothesized that different frequencies of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in patients with cerebral infarction would produce different effects on the recovery of upper-limb motor function. This study enrolled 127 patients with upper-limb dysfunction during the subacute phase of cerebral infarction. These patients were randomly assigned to three groups. The low-frequency group comprised 42 patients who were treated with 1 Hz repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on the contralateral hemisphere primary motor cortex (M1). The high-frequency group comprised 43 patients who were treated with 10 Hz repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on ipsilateral M1. Finally, the sham group comprised 42 patients who were treated with 10 Hz of false stimulation on ipsilateral M1. A total of 135 seconds of stimulation was applied in the sham group and high-frequency group. At 2 weeks after treatment, cortical latency of motor-evoked potentials and central motor conduction time were significantly lower compared with before treatment. Moreover, motor function scores were significantly improved. The above indices for the low- and high-frequency groups were significantly different compared with the sham group. However, there was no significant difference between the low- and high-frequency groups. The results show that low- and high-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation can similarly improve upper-limb motor function in patients with cerebral infarction.
authors.affiliation: Shandong Provincial Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong Province, China; Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, Shandong Province, China.
authors.forename: Jiang
authors.identifier: 0000-0002-4395-5048
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Li
authors.affiliation: Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, Shandong Province, China.
authors.forename: Xiang-Min
authors.initials: XM
authors.lastname: Meng
authors.affiliation: Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, Shandong Province, China.
authors.forename: Ru-Yi
authors.initials: RY
authors.lastname: Li
authors.affiliation: Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, Shandong Province, China.
authors.forename: Ru
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Zhang
authors.affiliation: Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, Shandong Province, China.
authors.forename: Zheng
authors.initials: Z
authors.lastname: Zhang
authors.affiliation: Shandong Provincial Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong Province, China.
authors.forename: Yi-Feng
authors.initials: YF
authors.lastname: Du
keywords: brain injury; central motor conduction time; cerebral cortex; cerebral infarction; high-frequency stimulation; low-frequency stimulation; motor-evoked potential; nerve regeneration; neural regeneration; neural reorganization; neuroplasticity; primary motor cortex; repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation; stroke rehabilitation; upper-limb motor function