title: Usefulness of component resolved analysis of cat allergy in routine clinical practice.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Cat allergy is of great importance, and its prevalence is increasing worldwide. Cat allergens and house dust mite allergens represent the major indoor allergens; however, they are ubiquitous. Cat sensitization and allergy are known risk factors for rhinitis, bronchial hyperreactivity and asthma. Thus, the diagnosis of sensitization to cats is important for any allergist.
  
  
  METHODS
  70 patients with positive skin prick tests for cats were retrospectively compared regarding their skin prick test results, as well as their specific immunoglobulin E antibody profiles with regard to their responses to the native cat extract, rFel d 1, nFel d 2 and rFel d 4. 35 patients were allergic to cats, as determined by positive anamnesis and/or nasal provocation with cat allergens, and 35 patients exhibited clinically non-relevant sensitization, as indicated by negative anamnesis and/or a negative nasal allergen challenge.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Native cat extract serology testing detected 100% of patients who were allergic to cats but missed eight patients who showed sensitization in the skin prick test and did not have allergic symptoms. The median values of the skin prick test, as well as those of the specific immunoglobulin E antibodies against the native cat extract, were significantly higher for allergic patients than for patients with clinically non-relevant sensitization. Component based diagnostic testing to rFel d 1 was not as reliable. Sensitization to nFel d 2 and rFel d 4 was seen only in individual patients.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Extract based diagnostic methods for identifying cat allergy and sensitization, such as the skin prick test and native cat extract serology, remain crucial in routine clinical practice. In our study, component based diagnostic testing could not replace these methods with regard to the detection of sensitization to cats and differentiation between allergy and sensitization without clinical relevance. However, component resolved allergy diagnostic tools have individual implications, and future studies may facilitate a better understanding of its use and subsequently may improve the clinical management of allergic patients.
authors.affiliation: Department of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, Head & Neck Surgery, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377 Munich, Germany.
authors.forename: Katharina
authors.initials: K
authors.lastname: Eder
authors.affiliation: Department of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, Head & Neck Surgery, Johannes-Gutenberg-University, Mainz, Germany.
authors.forename: Sven
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Becker
authors.affiliation: Department of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, Head & Neck Surgery, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377 Munich, Germany.
authors.forename: Marion
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: San Nicoló
authors.affiliation: Department of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, Head & Neck Surgery, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377 Munich, Germany.
authors.forename: Alexander
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Berghaus
authors.affiliation: Department of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, Head & Neck Surgery, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377 Munich, Germany.
authors.forename: Moritz
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Gröger
keywords: Cat allergy; Fel d 1; Fel d 2; Fel d 4; Native cat extract diagnostic