title: ImpRess: an Implementation Readiness checklist developed using a systematic review of randomised controlled trials assessing cognitive stimulation for dementia.
abstract: Research reporting results of clinical trials, psychosocial or technological interventions frequently omit critical details needed to inform implementation in practice. The aim of this article is to develop an Implementation Readiness (ImpRess) checklist, that includes criteria deemed useful in measuring readiness for implementation and apply it to trials of cognitive stimulation in dementia, providing a systematic review of their readiness for widespread implementation.
  
  
  
  Five electronic databases were searched. After initial screening of papers, two reviewers assessed quality and scored the included studies based on the ImpRess checklist specifically developed for this review.
  
  
  
  Twenty studies met the inclusion criteria. As determined by the ImpRess checklist, scores ranged from 11 to 29 out of 52. According to the checklist the most comprehensive and ready to implement version of cognitive stimulation was Cognitive Stimulation Therapy.
  
  
  
  Reports of interventions rarely include consideration of implementation in practice. Contrary to the growing number of reporting guidelines, crucial items within the ImpRess checklist have been frequently overlooked. This study was able to show that the ImpRess checklist was feasible in practice and reliable. The checklist may be useful in evaluating readiness for implementation for other manualised interventions.
authors.affiliation: North East London Foundation Trust, London, UK.
authors.forename: Amy
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Streater
authors.affiliation: University College London, London, UK.
authors.forename: Aimee
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Spector
authors.affiliation: North East London Foundation Trust, London, UK.
authors.forename: Elisa
authors.initials: E
authors.lastname: Aguirre
authors.affiliation: University College London, London, UK. j.rutherford@ucl.ac.uk.
authors.forename: Jacki
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Stansfeld
authors.affiliation: University of Nottingham, London, UK.
authors.forename: Martin
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Orrell
mesh_terms: D057189:Checklist / Q000379:methods* / Q000592:standards; D003071:Cognition / Q000502:physiology*; D015928:Cognitive Behavioral Therapy / Q000379:methods*; D016208:Databases, Factual / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D003704:Dementia / Q000503:physiopathology / Q000523:psychology / Q000628:therapy*; D006801:Humans; D017063:Outcome Assessment, Health Care / Q000379:methods / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D016032:Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; D015203:Reproducibility of Results
keywords: Cognitive Stimulation Therapy (CST); Cognitive stimulation; Dementia; Implementation; Implementation Readiness (ImpRess); Reporting