title: Inferential and forward projection modeling to evaluate options for controlling invasive mammals on islands.
abstract: Successful pest-mammal eradications from remote islands have resulted in important biodiversity benefits. Near-shore islands can also serve as refuges for native biota but require ongoing effort to maintain low-pest or pest-free status. Three management options are available in the presence of reinvasion risk: (1) control-to-zero density, in which immigration may occur but reinvaders are removed; (2) sustained population suppression (to relatively low numbers); or (3) no action. Biodiversity benefits can result from options one and two. The management challenge is to make evidence-based decisions on the selection of an appropriate objective and to identify a financially feasible control strategy that has a high probability of success. This requires understanding the pest species population dynamics and how it will respond to a range of potential management strategies, each with an associated financial cost. We developed a two-stage modeling approach that consisted of (1) Bayesian inferential modeling to estimate parameters for a model of pest population dynamics and control, and (2) a forward projection model to simulate a range of plausible management scenarios and quantify the probability of obtaining zero density within four years. We applied the model to an ongoing, six-year trapping program to control stoats (Mustela erminea) on Resolution Island, New Zealand. Zero density has not yet been achieved. Results demonstrate that management objectives were impeded by a combination of a highly fecund population, insufficient trap attractiveness, and a substantial proportion of the population that did not enter traps. Immigration is known to occur because the founding population arrived on the island by swimming from the mainland. However, immigration rate during this study was indistinguishable from zero. The forward projection modeling showed that control-to-zero density was feasible but required greater than a two-fold budget increase to intensify the trapping rate relative to population growth. The two-stage modeling provides the foundation for a management program in which broad-scale trials of additional trapping effort or improved trap lures would test model predictions and increase our understanding of system dynamics.
authors.affiliation: Landcare Research, P.O. Box 69040, Lincoln, 7640, New Zealand.
authors.forename: D P
authors.initials: DP
authors.lastname: Anderson
authors.affiliation: New Zealand Department of Conservation, P.O. Box 29, Te Anau, 9640, New Zealand.
authors.forename: P
authors.initials: P
authors.lastname: McMurtrie
authors.affiliation: New Zealand Department of Conservation, P.O. Box 29, Te Anau, 9640, New Zealand.|Edge-Effect, 48 Bligh Street, Te Anau, 9600, New Zealand.
authors.forename: K-A
authors.initials: KA
authors.lastname: Edge
authors.affiliation: Centre for Applications in Natural Resource Mathematics, School of Mathematics and Physics, The University of Queensland, St. Lucia, Queensland, 4072, Australia.|Earth, Environmental and Biological Sciences School, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Queensland, 4000, Australia.
authors.forename: P W J
authors.initials: PW
authors.lastname: Baxter
authors.affiliation: Landcare Research, P.O. Box 69040, Lincoln, 7640, New Zealand.
authors.forename: A E
authors.initials: AE
authors.lastname: Byrom
mesh_terms: D000818:Animals; D001499:Bayes Theorem; D044822:Biodiversity; D062312:Islands; D008322:Mammals; D009520:New Zealand; D010571:Pest Control
keywords: 
  Mustela erminea
  ; Bayesian modeling; Resolution Island, New Zealand; control-to-zero density; eradication; forward projection; invasive predator; population dynamics; simulation; stoat