title: Limb Bone Structural Proportions and Locomotor Behavior in A.L. 288-1 ("Lucy").
abstract: While there is broad agreement that early hominins practiced some form of terrestrial bipedality, there is also evidence that arboreal behavior remained a part of the locomotor repertoire in some taxa, and that bipedal locomotion may not have been identical to that of modern humans. It has been difficult to evaluate such evidence, however, because of the possibility that early hominins retained primitive traits (such as relatively long upper limbs) of little contemporaneous adaptive significance. Here we examine bone structural properties of the femur and humerus in the Australopithecus afarensis A.L. 288-1 ("Lucy", 3.2 Myr) that are known to be developmentally plastic, and compare them with other early hominins, modern humans, and modern chimpanzees. Cross-sectional images were obtained from micro-CT scans of the original specimens and used to derive section properties of the diaphyses, as well as superior and inferior cortical thicknesses of the femoral neck. A.L. 288-1 shows femoral/humeral diaphyseal strength proportions that are intermediate between those of modern humans and chimpanzees, indicating more mechanical loading of the forelimb than in modern humans, and by implication, a significant arboreal locomotor component. Several features of the proximal femur in A.L. 288-1 and other australopiths, including relative femoral head size, distribution of cortical bone in the femoral neck, and cross-sectional shape of the proximal shaft, support the inference of a bipedal gait pattern that differed slightly from that of modern humans, involving more lateral deviation of the body center of mass over the support limb, which would have entailed increased cost of terrestrial locomotion. There is also evidence consistent with increased muscular strength among australopiths in both the forelimb and hind limb, possibly reflecting metabolic trade-offs between muscle and brain development during hominin evolution. Together these findings imply significant differences in both locomotor behavior and ecology between australopiths and later Homo.
authors.affiliation: Center for Functional Anatomy and Evolution, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America.
authors.forename: Christopher B
authors.initials: CB
authors.lastname: Ruff
authors.affiliation: Center for Functional Anatomy and Evolution, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America.
authors.forename: M Loring
authors.initials: ML
authors.lastname: Burgess
authors.affiliation: Department of Geological Sciences, The University of Texas Austin, Austin, Texas, United States of America.
authors.forename: Richard A
authors.initials: RA
authors.lastname: Ketcham
authors.affiliation: Department of Geological Sciences, The University of Texas Austin, Austin, Texas, United States of America.|Department of Anthropology, The University of Texas Austin, Austin, Texas, United States of America.
authors.forename: John
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Kappelman
mesh_terms: D000818:Animals; D001842:Bone and Bones / Q000033:anatomy & histology*; D005121:Extremities / Q000033:anatomy & histology*; D005272:Femur Neck / Q000033:anatomy & histology*; D015186:Hominidae / Q000033:anatomy & histology* / Q000502:physiology; D008124:Locomotion / Q000502:physiology*