title: What have we learned from 100% success of press fit condylar rotating platform posterior stabilized knees?: A 5-10 years followup by a nondesigner.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Total joint arthroplasties of the hip and knee represent a remarkable feat of modern medicine in terms of reducing pain and restoring function to millions of patients afflicted with severe arthritis. Oftentimes, the performance and longevity of new implants and devices are based on limited data. This is the first study by a non-designer on the press fit condylar rotating platform posterior stabilized (PFC-RP-PS) design with 100' success. This has a relevance, vis-á -vis bias that one may have in terms of reproducibility of technique and funding from the manufacturer. We associate our excellent mid-term results to intra operative technical aspects and stringent intra operative exclusion criteria.
  
  
  METHODS
  Our study includes a cohort of 121 selected knees operated between January 2003 and October 2010. We used cemented, posterior stabilized (PS), mobile bearing (MB), and RP prosthesis from the same manufacturer in all these 121 knees. The patients were evaluated bi-annually with the calculation of their Knee Society Scores (KSS) and a radiological assessment for loosening/osteolysis.
  
  
  RESULTS
  120 knees were available for followup. The average Knee Society clinical and functional scores, respectively, were 27 points and 40 points preoperatively and 93 points and 95 points postoperatively. This indicates a mean increase of about 71' in the clinical score and about 58' in the functional score, which is statistically significant. The mean postoperative flexion was 124°, a mean increase of 23° from the preoperative flexion of 101°. There were no revisions (Kaplan--Meier survivorship of 100').
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  We feel durable and reproducible results of PFC-RP-PS design knees are very technique sensitive. The way ahead with the PFC-RP-PS knees looks promising when the exclusion criteria for this design are strictly met. Coming from a non-designer, this study acquires a higher degree of relevance without any designer's or manufacturer's bias.
authors.affiliation: Department of Orthopaedics, Seth G.S. Medical College, Parel, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.
authors.forename: Shrinand V
authors.initials: SV
authors.lastname: Vaidya
authors.affiliation: Department of Orthopaedics, King Edward VII Memorial Hospital, Parel, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.
authors.forename: Siddharth
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Virani
authors.affiliation: Department of Orthopaedics, King Edward VII Memorial Hospital, Parel, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.
authors.forename: Rajendra
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Phunde
authors.affiliation: Department of Orthopaedics, King Edward VII Memorial Hospital, Parel, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.
authors.forename: Abhishek
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Mahajan
keywords: Arthroplasty; Midterm results; knee; knee joint; knee prosthesis; nondesigner; replacement; rotating platform; total knee arthroplasty