title: Recommendations for Evaluating Practice-Related Activities of Pharmacy Faculty.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  To develop definitions of who pharmacy practice faculty and partners are, identify indicators to measure practice-related activities, and provide guidance for evaluating pharmacy practice faculty.
  
  
  METHODS
  A 4-round, online Delphi was conducted. Panelists with experience evaluating pharmacy practice faculty were invited. Consensus was achieved when there was agreement by at least 70% of panelists. Round 1: Panelists were asked to identify the essential distinguishing characteristics of pharmacy practice faculty and practice partners as well as metrics that could be used to measure practice productivity and quality. Responses were grouped into common themes. Round 2: Panelists were asked to agree, agree with changes, or disagree with themes and metrics identified. Round 3: Panelists were asked to agree, agree with changes, or disagree with definitions of pharmacy practice faculty and practice partners. Panelists were asked about procedural elements of evaluation processes that colleges/schools should adopt. Round 4: panelists were asked about areas of uncertainty that had not yet achieved consensus.
  
  
  RESULTS
  A total of 17 experts participated. Consensus definitions for pharmacy practice faculty and practice partners were achieved . From 291 submitted indicators, 14 productivity and 10 quality indicators reached consensus along with recommended frequencies for collection and review. Peer review was identified as an important quality indicator. Recommendations regarding who should participate in the evaluation process and how the data should be used also achieved consensus.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Formal mechanisms for evaluating the practice-related activities of pharmacy faculty are critical to ensure this area of responsibility is fairly recognized and considered.
authors.affiliation: 1 University of Mississippi School of Pharmacy, Jackson, MS, USA.
authors.forename: Stuart T
authors.initials: ST
authors.lastname: Haines
authors.affiliation: 1 University of Mississippi School of Pharmacy, Jackson, MS, USA.
authors.forename: Seena L
authors.initials: SL
authors.lastname: Haines
authors.affiliation: 2 Texas Tech University Health Science Center School of Pharmacy, Amarillo, TX, USA.
authors.forename: Eric J
authors.initials: EJ
authors.lastname: MacLaughlin
authors.affiliation: 3 Northeastern University Bouvé College of Health Sciences, Boston, MS, USA.
authors.forename: Jenny A
authors.initials: JA
authors.lastname: Van Amburgh
mesh_terms: D032921:Consensus; D003697:Delphi Technique; D000071216:Faculty, Pharmacy; D006801:Humans; D010607:Pharmacy Service, Hospital / Q000458:organization & administration* / Q000592:standards*; D015397:Program Evaluation / Q000379:methods* / Q000592:standards*; D011786:Quality Control
keywords: administration; clinical pharmacy; clinical practice; management; quality assurance