title: Forms of presentism in the history of science. Rethinking the project of historical epistemology.
abstract: Since the late 1980s, presentism has seen a resurgence among some historians of science. Most of them draw a line between a good form of presentism and typical anachronism, but where the line should be drawn remains an open question. The present article aims at resolving this problem. In the first part I define the four main distinct forms of presentism at work in the history of science and the different purposes they serve. Based on this typology, the second part reconsiders what counts as anachronism, Whiggism and positivist history. This clarification is used as a basis to rethink the research program of historical epistemology in the third section. Throughout this article, I examine the conceptual core of historical epistemology more than its actual history, from Bachelard to Foucault or others. Its project should be defined - as Canguilhem suggested - as an attempt to account for both the contingency and the rationality of science. As such, historical epistemology is based on a complex fifth form of presentism, which I call critical presentism. The critical relation at stake not only works from the present to the past, because of the acknowledged rationality of science, but also from the past to the present because of the contingency and historicity of scientific knowledge.
authors.affiliation: IHPST, UMR 8590, CNRS, Paris-1 University, Paris, France. Electronic address: laurentloison@yahoo.fr.
authors.forename: Laurent
authors.initials: L
authors.lastname: Loison
keywords: Georges Canguilhem; Historical epistemology; Presentism; Whiggism