title: Interviewers' Experiences with Two Multiple Mini-Interview Scoring Methods Used for Admission to a Master of Physical Therapy Programme.
abstract: Purpose:To describe participants' attitudes, beliefs, and experiences with the use of two methods of scoring the Multiple Mini-Interview (MMI) for admission to a Master of Physical Therapy program: a rank-based scoring system (RBS; used from 2007 to 2013) and a criterion-based scoring system (CBS; tested in 2014). The MMI uses short independent assessments to obtain an aggregate score of candidates' professionalism and interpersonal skills, based on behavioural questions within scenarios that assess one attribute at a time.Method:This qualitative descriptive inquiry sought to capture the experiences of 18 MMI interviewers primarily through semi-structured interviews. Interviews were transcribed verbatim, and the data were analyzed using thematic analysis. The results were validated by theoretical and investigator triangulation and member checking.Results:One major theme, scoring systems, and two sub-themes, CBS and RBS, emerged across all data. Participants unanimously agreed that CBS is a more fair and objective way to score candidates' interviews.Conclusions:CBS was well accepted by participants, and the majority preferred it over RBS. Participants felt that CBS presented a more accurate depiction of candidates.
authors.affiliation: School of Physical Therapy, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon.
authors.forename: Ina
authors.initials: I
authors.lastname: van der Spuy
authors.affiliation: School of Physical Therapy, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon.
authors.forename: Angela
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Busch
authors.affiliation: School of Physical Therapy, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon.
authors.forename: Julia
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Bidonde
keywords: evaluation studies as topic; qualitative research; students