title: Epistemic Benefits of Elaborated and Systematized Delusions in Schizophrenia.
abstract: In this article I ask whether elaborated and systematized delusions emerging in the context of schizophrenia have the potential for epistemic innocence. Cognitions are epistemically innocent if they have significant epistemic benefits that could not be attained otherwise. In particular, I propose that a cognition is epistemically innocent if it delivers some significant epistemic benefit to a given agent at a given time, and if alternative cognitions delivering the same epistemic benefit are unavailable to that agent at that time. Elaborated and systematized delusions in schizophrenia are typically false and exemplify failures of rationality and self-knowledge. Empirical studies suggest that they may have psychological benefits by relieving anxiety and enhancing meaningfulness. Moreover, these delusions have been considered as adaptive in virtue of the fact that they enable automated learning to resume after a significant disruption caused by incorrect prediction-error signalling. I argue that such psychological benefits and adaptive features also have positive epistemic consequences. More precisely, delusions can be a means to restoring epistemic functionality in agents who are overwhelmed by hypersalient experiences in the prodromal stage of psychosis. The analysis leads to a more complex view of the epistemic status of delusions than is found in the contemporary philosophical literature and has some implications for clinical practice.1Introduction2Types of Delusions3What Is Wrong with Elaborated and Systematized Delusions?4Finding Life Meaningful5Learning Resumed6Epistemic Innocence7Epistemic Benefit8No Alternatives9Conclusions and Implications.
authors.affiliation: University of Birmingham Birmingham B15 2TT, UK, l.bortolotti@bham.ac.uk.
authors.forename: Lisa
authors.initials: L
authors.lastname: Bortolotti