title: How to Allow Conscientious Objection in Medicine While Protecting Patient Rights.
abstract: Paradigmatic cases of conscientious objection in medicine are those in which a physician refuses to provide a medical service or good because doing so would conflict with that physician's personal moral or religious beliefs. Should such refusals be allowed in medicine? We argue that (1) many conscientious objections to providing certain services must be allowed because they fall within the range of freedom that physicians have to determine which services to offer in their practices; (2) at least some conscientious objections to serving particular groups of patients should be allowed because they are not invidiously discriminatory; and (3) even in cases of invidiously discriminatory conscientious objections, legally prohibiting individual physicians from refusing to serve patients on the basis of such objections is not always the best solution.
authors.forename: Aaron
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Ancell
authors.forename: Walter
authors.initials: W
authors.lastname: Sinnott-Armstrong
mesh_terms: D003242:Conscience; D003657:Decision Making; D005610:Freedom; D006801:Humans; D009014:Morals; D028701:Patient Rights; D010820:Physicians / Q000941:ethics*; D016079:Refusal to Treat / Q000941:ethics* / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence; D012068:Religion and Medicine
keywords: conscientious objection; discrimination; law; medicine; rights