title: CORP: Minimizing the chances of false positives and false negatives.
abstract: Statistics is essential to the process of scientific discovery. An inescapable tenet of statistics, however, is the notion of uncertainty which has reared its head within the arena of reproducibility of research. The Journal of Applied Physiology's recent initiative, "Cores of Reproducibility in Physiology," is designed to improve the reproducibility of research: each article is designed to elucidate the principles and nuances of using some piece of scientific equipment or some experimental technique so that other researchers can obtain reproducible results. But other researchers can use some piece of equipment or some technique with expert skill and still fail to replicate an experimental result if they neglect to consider the fundamental concepts of statistics of hypothesis testing and estimation and their inescapable connection to the reproducibility of research. If we want to improve the reproducibility of our research, then we want to minimize the chance that we get a false positive and-at the same time-we want to minimize the chance that we get a false negative. In this review I outline strategies to accomplish each of these things. These strategies are related intimately to fundamental concepts of statistics and the inherent uncertainty embedded in them.
authors.affiliation: Division of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, National Jewish Health, Denver, Colorado; and Department of Biostatistics and Informatics, Colorado School of Public Health, University of Colorado Denver, Denver, Colorado EverettD@NJHealth.org.
authors.forename: Douglas
authors.initials: D
authors.lastname: Curran-Everett
mesh_terms: D005188:False Negative Reactions; D005189:False Positive Reactions; D010827:Physiology / Q000379:methods*; D015203:Reproducibility of Results; D012107:Research Design / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*
keywords: estimation; hypothesis test; power; reproducibility; significance test