title: Medical Students' Development of Ethical Judgment - Exploring the Learners' Perspectives using a mixed methods approach.
abstract: Objective:Contemporary healthcare requires physicians to have well developed ethical judgment skills in addition to excellent clinical skills. However, no consensus has been reached on how to best teach ethical judgment skills during medical training. Previous studies revealed inconclusive results and applied varying theoretical frameworks. To date, the students' perspectives on their development in ethical judgment has received less attention. Better insights in the learners' experiences can help to improve educational interventions in medical ethics.Methods:A vignette featuring a challenging case with opposing views between a patient's parents and a physician followed by a questionnaire was presented to a cohort of medical students at a German medical school at three points in time during their medical training (Year 1, 2 and 5). The questionnaire included closed and open-ended questions addressing the participant's preferred, hypothetical actions, their reasoning as well as the resources informing their reasoning. Content analysis was used for qualitative data; frequencies and percentages were used to describe quantitative findings.Results:The response rate remained stable (28%) over the study period. Participants' responses changed overtime. Accepting parents' autonomy in the decision-making process was the majority standpoint of students in year 1 and 2 and became less often cited in year 5 (Year 1/2/5: 68/67/48%). On the contrary, not readily following the parents' decision for medical reasons was a minority standpoint in year 1 and became more prevalent over time (year 1/2/5: 12/17/42%). Judgments were only partly based on ethics training. Instead, participants drew on experiences from their clinical clerkships and their personal lives. Throughout the study, participants did not feel well-prepared to make a judgment in the case (Average 2.7 on a Likert-Scale; 1=very well prepared, 4=very poor).Conclusions:Over the course of their medical training, the participants seemed to increasingly frame the presented vignette as a medical problem. To optimize the development of ethical judgment teaching of ethics should be more integrated in clinical teaching. In addition to the analysis of rare and extreme cases, teaching ethics should also expand on challenges students and junior doctors commonly encounter themselves to promote ethical sensitivity and confidence in students.
authors.affiliation: University Children's Hospital Freiburg, Division of Neuropediatrics and Muscle Disorders, Freiburg, Germany; Harvard Medical School, Boston Children's Hospital, Institute for Professionalism and Ethical Practice, Boston, USA.
authors.forename: Thorsten
authors.initials: T
authors.lastname: Langer
authors.affiliation: Witten/Herdecke University, Institute for Ethics and Communication in Healthcare, Witten, Germany.
authors.forename: Danny
authors.initials: D
authors.lastname: Jazmati
authors.affiliation: Witten/Herdecke University, Institute for Ethics and Communication in Healthcare, Witten, Germany.
authors.forename: Ole
authors.initials: O
authors.lastname: Jung
authors.affiliation: King's College London, Institute of Psychiatry and Neuroscience (IoPPN), Maudsley Training Programme, London, UK.
authors.forename: Christian
authors.initials: C
authors.lastname: Schulz
authors.affiliation: Witten/Herdecke University, Institute for Ethics and Communication in Healthcare, Witten, Germany.
authors.forename: Martin W
authors.initials: MW
authors.lastname: Schnell
mesh_terms: D004992:Ethics, Medical; D006801:Humans; D007600:Judgment; D009014:Morals; D012577:Schools, Medical; D013337:Students, Medical
keywords: medical ethics; mixed methods; students; teaching