title: Narrative Style Influences Citation Frequency in Climate Change Science.
abstract: Peer-reviewed publications focusing on climate change are growing exponentially with the consequence that the uptake and influence of individual papers varies greatly. Here, we derive metrics of narrativity from psychology and literary theory, and use these metrics to test the hypothesis that more narrative climate change writing is more likely to be influential, using citation frequency as a proxy for influence. From a sample of 732 scientific abstracts drawn from the climate change literature, we find that articles with more narrative abstracts are cited more often. This effect is closely associated with journal identity: higher-impact journals tend to feature more narrative articles, and these articles tend to be cited more often. These results suggest that writing in a more narrative style increases the uptake and influence of articles in climate literature, and perhaps in scientific literature more broadly.
authors.affiliation: School of Marine & Environmental Affairs, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.
authors.forename: Ann
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Hillier
authors.affiliation: School of Marine & Environmental Affairs, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.
authors.forename: Ryan P
authors.initials: RP
authors.lastname: Kelly
authors.affiliation: School of Marine & Environmental Affairs, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.
authors.forename: Terrie
authors.initials: T
authors.lastname: Klinger
mesh_terms: D015706:Bibliometrics; D057231:Climate Change; D055811:Journal Impact Factor; D017712:Peer Review, Research; D011643:Publishing / Q000706:statistics & numerical data