title: Similar to the category, but not the exemplars: A study of generalization.
abstract: Reference point approaches have dominated the study of categorization for decades by explaining classification learning in terms of similarity to stored exemplars or averages of exemplars. The most successful reference point models are firmly grounded in the associative learning tradition-treating categorization as a stimulus generalization process based on inverse exponential distance in psychological space augmented by a dimensional selective attention mechanism. We present experiments that pose a significant challenge to popular reference point accounts which explain categorization in terms of stimulus generalization from exemplars, prototypes, or adaptive clusters. DIVA, a similarity-based alternative to the reference point framework, provides a successful account of the human data. These findings suggest that a successful psychology of categorization may need to look beyond stimulus generalization and toward a view of category learning as the induction of a richer model of the data.
authors.affiliation: Department of Psychology, Binghamton University, Binghamton, NY, USA. nconaway@wisc.edu.|University of Wisconsin-Madison, 1202 West Johnson Street, Madison, WI, 53706, USA. nconaway@wisc.edu.
authors.forename: Nolan
authors.identifier: 0000-0002-1886-4304
authors.initials: N
authors.lastname: Conaway
authors.affiliation: Department of Psychology, Binghamton University, Binghamton, NY, USA.
authors.forename: Kenneth J
authors.initials: KJ
authors.lastname: Kurtz
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D003210:Concept Formation / Q000502:physiology*; D005793:Generalization, Psychological / Q000502:physiology*; D006801:Humans; D008960:Models, Psychological; D055815:Young Adult
keywords: Categorization; Classification learning; Concepts; Formal models; Generalization; Neural network models; Stimulus generalization theory