title: Are Effects of Action on Perception Real? Evidence from Transformed Movements.
abstract: It has been argued that several reported non-visual influences on perception cannot be truly perceptual. If they were, they should affect the perception of target objects and reference objects used to express perceptual judgments, and thus cancel each other out. This reasoning presumes that non-visual manipulations impact target objects and comparison objects equally. In the present study we show that equalizing a body-related manipulation between target objects and reference objects essentially abolishes the impact of that manipulation so as it should do when that manipulation actually altered perception. Moreover, the manipulation has an impact on judgements when applied to only the target object but not to the reference object, and that impact reverses when only applied to the reference object but not to the target object. A perceptual explanation predicts this reversal, whereas explanations in terms of post-perceptual response biases or demand effects do not. Altogether these results suggest that body-related influences on perception cannot as a whole be attributed to extra-perceptual factors.
authors.affiliation: Department of Psychology, University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
authors.forename: Wladimir
authors.initials: W
authors.lastname: Kirsch
authors.affiliation: Department of Psychology, University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
authors.forename: Benjamin
authors.initials: B
authors.lastname: Ullrich
authors.affiliation: Department of Psychology, University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
authors.forename: Wilfried
authors.initials: W
authors.lastname: Kunde
mesh_terms: D005260:Female; D005556:Form Perception / Q000502:physiology; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008962:Models, Theoretical; D009068:Movement / Q000502:physiology*; D014796:Visual Perception / Q000502:physiology