title: Metasynthetic Madness: What Kind of Monster Have We Created?
abstract: From its origins in the 1990s, the qualitative health research metasynthesis project represented a methodological maneuver to capitalize on a growing investment in qualitatively derived study reports to create an interactive dialogue among them that would surface expanded insights about complex human phenomena. However, newer forms positioning themselves as qualitative metasynthesis but representing a much more technical and theoretically superficial form of scholarly enterprise have begun to appear in the health research literature. It seems imperative that we think through the implications of this trend and determine whether it is to be afforded the credibility of being a form of qualitative scholarship and, if so, what kind of scholarship it represents. As the standardization trend in synthesis research marches forward, we will need clarity and a strong sense of purpose if we are to preserve the essence of what the qualitative metasynthesis project was intended to be all about.
authors.affiliation: University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada sally.thorne@nursing.ubc.ca.
authors.forename: Sally
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Thorne
mesh_terms: D006801:Humans; D036301:Qualitative Research; D012107:Research Design / Q000592:standards*; D012196:Review Literature as Topic; D009626:Terminology as Topic
keywords: literature review; metastudy; metasynthesis; qualitative; qualitative synthesis; systematic review