title: An Investigation of the Complexities of Successful and Unsuccessful Guide Dog Matching and Partnerships.
abstract: Matching a person who is blind or visually impaired with a guide dog is a process of finding the most suitable guide dog available for that individual. Not all guide dog partnerships are successful, and the consequences of an unsuccessful partnership may result in reduced mobility and quality of life for the handler (owner), and are costly in time and resources for guide dog training establishments. This study examined 50 peoples' partnerships with one or more dogs (118 pairings) to ascertain the outcome of the relationship. Forty-three of the 118 dogs were returned to the guide dog training establishment before reaching retirement age, with the majority (n= 40) being categorized as having dog-related issues. Most (n= 26) of these dogs' issues were classified as being behavioral in character, including work-related and non-work-related behavior, and 14 were due to physical causes (mainly poor health). Three dogs were returned due to matters relating to the handlers' behavior. More second dogs were returned than the handlers' first or third dogs, and dogs that had been previously used as a guide could be rematched successfully. Defining matching success is not clear-cut. Not all dogs that were returned were considered by their handlers to have been mismatched, and not all dogs retained until retirement were thought to have been good matches, suggesting that some handlers were retaining what they considered to be a poorly matched dog. Almost all the handlers who regarded a dog as being mismatched conceded that some aspects of the match were good. For example, a dog deemed mismatched for poor working behavior may have shown good home and/or other social behaviors. The same principle was true for successful matches, where few handlers claimed to have had a perfect dog. It is hoped that these results may help the guide dog industry identify important aspects of the matching process, and/or be used to identify areas where a matching problem exists.
authors.affiliation: Discipline of Veterinary Sciences, James Cook University , Townsville, QLD , Australia.
authors.forename: Janice
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Lloyd
authors.affiliation: College of Health, Massey University , Palmerston North , New Zealand.
authors.forename: Claire
authors.initials: C
authors.lastname: Budge
authors.affiliation: College of Health, Massey University , Palmerston North , New Zealand.
authors.forename: Steve
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: La Grow
authors.affiliation: Institute of Veterinary, Animal and Biomedical Sciences, Massey University , Palmerston North , New Zealand.
authors.forename: Kevin
authors.initials: K
authors.lastname: Stafford
keywords: blind mobility; guide dogs; human–animal relationships; matching success; vision impairment