title: Scientific Evaluation and Review of Claims in Health Care (SEaRCH): A Streamlined, Systematic, Phased Approach for Determining "What Works" in Healthcare.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Answering the question of "what works" in healthcare can be complex and requires the careful design and sequential application of systematic methodologies. Over the last decade, the Samueli Institute has, along with multiple partners, developed a streamlined, systematic, phased approach to this process called the Scientific Evaluation and Review of Claims in Health Care (SEaRCH™). The SEaRCH process provides an approach for rigorously, efficiently, and transparently making evidence-based decisions about healthcare claims in research and practice with minimal bias.
  
  
  METHODS
  SEaRCH uses three methods combined in a coordinated fashion to help determine what works in healthcare. The first, the Claims Assessment Profile (CAP), seeks to clarify the healthcare claim and question, and its ability to be evaluated in the context of its delivery. The second method, the Rapid Evidence Assessment of the Literature (REAL©), is a streamlined, systematic review process conducted to determine the quantity, quality, and strength of evidence and risk/benefit for the treatment. The third method involves the structured use of expert panels (EPs). There are several types of EPs, depending on the purpose and need. Together, these three methods-CAP, REAL, and EP-can be integrated into a strategic approach to help answer the question "what works in healthcare?" and what it means in a comprehensive way.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  SEaRCH is a systematic, rigorous approach for evaluating healthcare claims of therapies, practices, programs, or products in an efficient and stepwise fashion. It provides an iterative, protocol-driven process that is customized to the intervention, consumer, and context. Multiple communities, including those involved in health service and policy, can benefit from this organized framework, assuring that evidence-based principles determine which healthcare practices with the greatest promise are used for improving the public's health and wellness.
authors.affiliation: 1 Samueli Institute , Alexandria, VA.
authors.forename: Wayne B
authors.initials: WB
authors.lastname: Jonas
authors.affiliation: 1 Samueli Institute , Alexandria, VA.
authors.forename: Cindy
authors.initials: C
authors.lastname: Crawford
authors.affiliation: 1 Samueli Institute , Alexandria, VA.|2 RAND Corporation , Santa Monica, CA.
authors.forename: Lara
authors.initials: L
authors.lastname: Hilton
authors.affiliation: 1 Samueli Institute , Alexandria, VA.
authors.forename: Pamela
authors.initials: P
authors.lastname: Elfenbaum
mesh_terms: D003695:Delivery of Health Care; D019317:Evidence-Based Medicine; D006801:Humans; D012586:Science
keywords: decision-making; evidence-based medicine; expert panel; patient-centered care; policy; systematic review