title: Organ donation and imminent death: pro position.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  Donation after cardiac death is associated with many problems including ischemic injury, high rates of delayed allograft function, prolonged time to asystole, and frequent organ discard. Imminent death donation (IDD) has been proposed as a separate category of organ donation: distinct from living donation and donation after cardiac death.
  
  
  RESULTS
  A protocol for IDD was developed at Rhode Island Hospital and published in the ethics literature. The United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) Ethics Committee reviewed the protocol and stated that IDD was ethically appropriate in some cases. A wider review by a working group within UNOS concluded similarly, but felt that a myriad of policy revisions would be required and were concerned about a possible negative impact on public trust in organ donation. Nonetheless, IDD and other nontraditional strategies continue to be proposed, implemented in other countries and discussed by patients and donor families.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  This review, on the 'Pro' side of IDD, proposes that the medical community continue to work toward implementing IDD. Donor family's wishes are best met by organ donation, successful outcomes for the recipients, and a dignified death for their loved one. In some cases, IDD is the best strategy to meet these goals.
authors.affiliation: Division of Organ Transplantation, Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, USA.
authors.forename: Paul E
authors.initials: PE
authors.lastname: Morrissey
mesh_terms: D003643:Death; D006801:Humans; D013727:Terminal Care / Q000592:standards*; D009927:Tissue and Organ Procurement / Q000592:standards*