title: Patient Satisfaction with Collection of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Routine Care.
abstract: Systematic collection of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) during ambulatory clinic visits can enhance communication between patient and provider, and provide the ability to evaluate outcomes of care. Little is known about patient satisfaction of PROM data collection in routine clinical care. To evaluate patient reaction to the routine collection of PROMs in the ambulatory setting.
  
  
  
  Before all ambulatory clinic visits at our neurological institute, patients electronically complete health status questionnaires. We administered an 8-question patient satisfaction survey to a sample of patients seen across the institute after their clinical visit.
  
  
  
  Of 343 patients approached, 323 agreed to participate. The majority responded that the questionnaire system was easy to use, was an appropriate length, and benefited their care overall (strongly agree or agree = 92.3%, 87.6%, and 77.3%, respectively). Provider review of the PROMs with the patient during the clinic visit was associated with significantly higher positive responses to all questions, even those regarding logistical aspects of the collection process. There were significant age and race differences in response to perceived benefit: those in the Black/other race category had a markedly lower probability of viewing the process favorably with increasing age.
  
  
  
  Systematic collection of PROMs via an electronic questionnaire appears to be well accepted by patients. A minority of patients did not feel the questionnaire content applied to their appointment or that the system was a beneficial feature of the clinical practice. The provider can significantly improve the patient's perception of PROM collection and the patient-physician encounter by reviewing the questionnaire results with the patient.
authors.affiliation: Cleveland Clinic, Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Neurological Institute, Cleveland, OH, USA.|Cleveland Clinic, Rose Ella Burkhardt Brain Tumor and Neuro-Oncology Center, Neurological Institute, Cleveland, OH, USA.
authors.forename: Pablo F
authors.initials: PF
authors.lastname: Recinos
authors.affiliation: Cleveland Clinic, Clinical Systems Office, Cleveland, OH, USA.
authors.forename: Cheryl J
authors.initials: CJ
authors.lastname: Dunphy
authors.affiliation: Cleveland Clinic, Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Neurological Institute, Cleveland, OH, USA.
authors.forename: Nicolas
authors.initials: N
authors.lastname: Thompson
authors.affiliation: Cleveland Clinic, Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Neurological Institute, Cleveland, OH, USA.
authors.forename: Jesse
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Schuschu
authors.affiliation: Cleveland Clinic, Clinical Systems Office, Cleveland, OH, USA.
authors.forename: John L
authors.initials: JL
authors.lastname: Urchek
authors.affiliation: Cleveland Clinic, Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Neurological Institute, Cleveland, OH, USA. katzani@ccf.org.|Cleveland Clinic, Clinical Systems Office, Cleveland, OH, USA. katzani@ccf.org.
authors.forename: Irene L
authors.initials: IL
authors.lastname: Katzan
mesh_terms: D000368:Aged; D000553:Ambulatory Care / Q000523:psychology / Q000592:standards / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D009462:Neurology / Q000458:organization & administration*; D000071066:Patient Reported Outcome Measures; D017060:Patient Satisfaction / Q000208:ethnology / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D010817:Physician-Patient Relations; D058996:Quality Improvement; D011795:Surveys and Questionnaires; D014481:United States / Q000453:epidemiology
keywords: Clinical research; Electronic survey; Patient satisfaction; Patient-reported outcome measures