title: Integrating psychology and neuroscience: Comment on Schwartz et al. (2016).
abstract: This article calls attention to a large body of uncited literature that renders the levels of analysis argument upon which Schwartz, Lilienfeld, Meca, and Sauvigné (2016) based their reappraisal of the role of neuroscience within psychology obsolete. Examples of effective integration of psychology and neuroscience without benefit of any bridging laws are provided. Implications for training are mentioned. (PsycINFO Database Record
authors.affiliation: Fordham University.
authors.forename: Warren W
authors.initials: WW
authors.lastname: Tryon
mesh_terms: D034462:Dissent and Disputes; D006801:Humans; D009488:Neurosciences