title: Two paths to blame: Intentionality directs moral information processing along two distinct tracks.
abstract: There is broad consensus that features such as causality, mental states, and preventability are key inputs to moral judgments of blame. What is not clear is exactly how people process these inputs to arrive at such judgments. Three studies provide evidence that early judgments of whether or not a norm violation is intentional direct information processing along 1 of 2 tracks: if the violation is deemed intentional, blame processing relies on information about the agent's reasons for committing the violation; if the violation is deemed unintentional, blame processing relies on information about how preventable the violation was. Owing to these processing commitments, when new information requires perceivers to switch tracks, they must reconfigure their judgments, which results in measurable processing costs indicated by reaction time (RT) delays. These findings offer support for a new theory of moral judgment (the Path Model of Blame) and advance the study of moral cognition as hierarchical information processing. (PsycINFO Database Record
authors.affiliation: Department of Psychology, Appalachian State University.
authors.forename: Andrew E
authors.identifier: 0000-0002-9755-8726
authors.initials: AE
authors.lastname: Monroe
authors.affiliation: Department of Cognitive, Linguistic & Psychological Sciences, Brown University.
authors.forename: Bertram F
authors.initials: BF
authors.lastname: Malle
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D015984:Causality; D003469:Culture; D056344:Executive Function; D005260:Female; D006167:Guilt; D006801:Humans; D033182:Intention; D007600:Judgment; D008297:Male; D009014:Morals; D011930:Reaction Time; D012945:Social Values