title: Did trees grow up to the light, up to the wind, or down to the water? How modern high productivity colors perception of early plant evolution.
abstract: Contents I. II. III. IV. V. Acknowledgements References SUMMARY: Flowering plants can be far more productive than other living land plants. Evidence is reviewed that productivity would have been uniformly lower and less CO2-responsive before angiosperm evolution, particularly during the early evolution of vascular plants and forests in the Devonian and Carboniferous. This introduces important challenges because paleoecological interpretations have been rooted in understanding of modern angiosperm-dominated ecosystems. One key example is tree evolution: although often thought to reflect competition for light, light limitation is unlikely for plants with such low photosynthetic potential. Instead, during this early evolution, the capacities of trees for enhanced propagule dispersal, greater leaf area, and deep-rooting access to nutrients and the water table are all deemed more fundamental potential drivers than light.
authors.affiliation: Geological Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA.
authors.forename: C Kevin
authors.initials: CK
authors.lastname: Boyce
authors.affiliation: Earth & Planetary Sciences, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ, 08544, USA.
authors.forename: Ying
authors.initials: Y
authors.lastname: Fan
authors.affiliation: Plant Sciences, University of California at Davis, Davis, CA, 95616, USA.
authors.forename: Maciej A
authors.initials: MA
authors.lastname: Zwieniecki
mesh_terms: D005075:Biological Evolution; D008027:Light; D019684:Magnoliopsida / Q000502:physiology*; D014197:Trees / Q000502:physiology*; D014919:Wind
keywords: Paleozoic; arborescence; hydraulic physiology; photosynthesis; plant ecology; root; tracheophyte; water table