title: Claim Assessment Profile: A Method for Capturing Healthcare Evidence in the Scientific Evaluation and Review of Claims in Health Care (SEaRCH).
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Grounding health claims in an evidence base is essential for determining safety and effectiveness. However, it is not appropriate to evaluate all healthcare claims with the same methods. "Gold standard" randomized controlled trials may skip over important qualitative and observational data about use, benefits, side effects, and preferences, issues especially salient in research on complementary and integrative health (CIH) practices. This gap has prompted a move toward studying treatments in their naturalistic settings. In the 1990s, a program initiated under the National Institutes of Health was designed to provide an outreach to CIH practices for assessing the feasibility of conducting retrospective or prospective evaluations. The Claim Assessment Profile further develops this approach, within the framework of Samueli Institute's Scientific Evaluation and Review of Claims in Health Care (SEaRCH) method.
  
  
  METHODS
  The goals of a Claim Assessment Profile are to clarify the elements that constitute a practice, define key outcomes, and create an explanatory model of these impacts. The main objective is to determine readiness and capacity of a practice to engage in evaluation of effectiveness. This approach is informed by a variety of rapid assessment and stakeholder-driven methods. Site visits, structured qualitative interviews, surveys, and observational data on implementation provide descriptive data about the practice. Logic modeling defines inputs, processes, and outcome variables; Path modeling defines an analytic map to explore.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  The Claim Assessment Profile is a rapid assessment of the evaluability of a healthcare practice. The method was developed for use on CIH practices but has also been applied in resilience research and may be applied beyond the healthcare sector. Findings are meant to provide sufficient data to improve decision-making for stakeholders. This method provides an important first step for moving existing promising yet untested practices into comprehensive evaluation.
authors.affiliation: 1 Samueli Institute , Alexandria, VA.|2 RAND Corporation , Santa Monica, CA.
authors.forename: Lara
authors.initials: L
authors.lastname: Hilton
authors.affiliation: 1 Samueli Institute , Alexandria, VA.
authors.forename: Wayne B
authors.initials: WB
authors.lastname: Jonas
mesh_terms: D000529:Complementary Therapies; D005069:Evaluation Studies as Topic; D006801:Humans; D007345:Insurance Claim Review; D055048:Integrative Medicine; D063868:Patient Outcome Assessment
keywords: complementary and integrative health; evaluability assessment; evaluation; patient-centered research; qualitative methods