title: Getting a consensus: advantages and disadvantages of Sepsis 3 in the context of middle-income settings.
authors.affiliation: Instituto Latino Americano de Sepse - São Paulo (SP), Brasil.
authors.forename: Flavia Ribeiro
authors.initials: FR
authors.lastname: Machado
authors.affiliation: Associação de Medicina Intensiva Brasileira - São Paulo (SP), Brasil.
authors.forename: Murillo Santucci Cesar de
authors.initials: MS
authors.lastname: Assunção
authors.affiliation: Instituto Latino Americano de Sepse - São Paulo (SP), Brasil.
authors.forename: Alexandre Biasi
authors.initials: AB
authors.lastname: Cavalcanti
authors.affiliation: Associação de Medicina Intensiva Brasileira - São Paulo (SP), Brasil.
authors.forename: André Miguel
authors.initials: AM
authors.lastname: Japiassú
authors.affiliation: Instituto Latino Americano de Sepse - São Paulo (SP), Brasil.
authors.forename: Luciano Cesar Pontes de
authors.initials: LC
authors.lastname: Azevedo
authors.affiliation: Associação de Medicina Intensiva Brasileira - São Paulo (SP), Brasil.
authors.forename: Mirella Cristine
authors.initials: MC
authors.lastname: Oliveira
mesh_terms: D032921:Consensus; D003422:Critical Care / Q000379:methods*; D006801:Humans; D018805:Sepsis / Q000175:diagnosis* / Q000628:therapy; D018746:Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome / Q000175:diagnosis*