title: Three Ways That Non-associative Knowledge May Affect Associative Learning Processes.
abstract: Associative learning theories offer one account of the way animals and humans assess the relationship between events and adapt their behavior according to resulting expectations. They assume knowledge about event relations is represented in associative networks, which consist of mental representations of cues and outcomes and the associative links that connect them. However, in human causal and contingency learning, many researchers have found that variance in standard learning effects is controlled by "non-associative" factors that are not easily captured by associative models. This has given rise to accounts of learning based on higher-order cognitive processes, some of which reject altogether the notion that humans learn in the manner described by associative networks. Despite the renewed focus on this debate in recent years, few efforts have been made to consider how the operations of associative networks and other cognitive operations could potentially interact in the course of learning. This paper thus explores possible ways in which non-associative knowledge may affect associative learning processes: (1) via changes to stimulus representations, (2) via changes to the translation of the associative expectation into behavior (3) via a shared source of expectation of the outcome that is sensitive to both the strength of associative retrieval and evaluation from non-associative influences.
authors.affiliation: Department of Psychology, Philipps-Universität Marburg Marburg, Germany.
authors.forename: Anna
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Thorwart
authors.affiliation: School of Psychology, The University of Sydney, Sydney NSW, Australia.
authors.forename: Evan J
authors.initials: EJ
authors.lastname: Livesey
keywords: associative learning; blocking; causal learning; expectation; prediction error