title: Tracking down a solution: exploring the acceptability and value of wearable GPS devices for older persons, individuals with a disability and their support persons.
abstract: To explore the acceptability and value of three wearable GPS devices for older persons and individuals with a disability and safety concerns when accessing the community.
  
  
  
  This pilot study explored six wearers' and their support persons' experience of using three different wearable GPS devices (a pendant, watch, and mini GPS phone), each for a two-week period.
  
  
  
  Participants identified safety as the main value of using a wearable GPS device. The acceptability and value of these devices was strongly influenced by device features, ease of use, cost, appearance, the reliability of the GPS coordinates, the wearer's health condition and the users familiarity with technology. Overall, participants indicated that they preferred the pendant.
  
  
  
  Wearable GPS devices are potentially useful in providing individuals who have safety concerns with reassurance and access to assistance as required. To ensure successful utilization, future device design and device selection should consider the user's familiarity with technology and their health condition. This study also revealed that not all wearable GPS devices provide continuous location tracking. It is therefore critical to ensure that the device's location tracking functions address the wearer's requirements and reason for using the device. Implications for Rehabilitation The acceptability and usability of wearable GPS devices is strongly influenced by the device features, ease of use, cost, appearance, the reliability of the device to provide accurate and timely GPS coordinates, as well as the health condition of the wearer and their familiarity with technology. Wearable GPS devices need to be simple to use and support and training is essential to ensure they are successfully utilized. Not all wearable GPS devices provide continuous location tracking and accuracy of location is impacted by line of sight to satellites. Therefore, care needs to be taken when choosing a suitable device, to ensure that the device's location tracking features are based on the wearer's requirements and value behind using the device.
authors.affiliation: a School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences , The University of Queensland , St Lucia , Australia.
authors.forename: Brittany
authors.initials: B
authors.lastname: Williamson
authors.affiliation: a School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences , The University of Queensland , St Lucia , Australia.
authors.forename: Tammy
authors.initials: T
authors.lastname: Aplin
authors.affiliation: b LifeTec Australia , Brisbane , Australia.
authors.forename: Desleigh
authors.initials: D
authors.lastname: de Jonge
authors.affiliation: b LifeTec Australia , Brisbane , Australia.
authors.forename: Matthew
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Goyne
mesh_terms: D000368:Aged; D000369:Aged, 80 and over; D017028:Caregivers; D006233:Persons with Disabilities; D004867:Equipment Design; D005260:Female; D040362:Geographic Information Systems / Q000295:instrumentation*; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D017060:Patient Satisfaction; D010865:Pilot Projects; D015203:Reproducibility of Results; D000076251:Wearable Electronic Devices; D055815:Young Adult
keywords: Global positioning system; acceptability; assistive technology; disability; older persons; value