title: Characterizing the Nature of Scan Results Discussions: Insights Into Why Patients Misunderstand Their Prognosis.
abstract: Patients with incurable cancer have poor prognostic awareness. We present a detailed analysis of the dialogue between oncologists and patients in conversations with prognostic implications.
  
  
  
  A total of 128 audio-recorded encounters from a large multisite trial were obtained, and 64 involved scan results. We used conversation analysis, a qualitative method for studying human interaction, to analyze typical patterns and conversational devices.
  
  
  
  Four components consistently occurred in sequential order: symptom-talk, scan-talk, treatment-talk, and logistic-talk. Six of the encounters (19%) were identified as good news, 15 (45%) as stable news, and 12 (36%) as bad news. The visit duration varied by the type of news: good, 15 minutes (07:00-29:00); stable, 17 minutes (07:00-41:00); and bad, 20 minutes (07:00-28:00). Conversational devices were common, appearing in half of recordings. Treatment-talk occupied 50% of bad-news encounters, 31% of good-news encounters, and 19% of stable-news encounters. Scan-talk occupied less than 10% of all conversations. There were only four instances of frank prognosis discussion.
  
  
  
  Oncologists and patients are complicit in constructing the typical encounter. Oncologists spend little time discussing scan results and the prognostic implications in favor of treatment-related talk. Conversational devices routinely help transition from scan-talk to detailed discussions about treatment options. We observed an opportunity to create prognosis-talk after scan-talk with a new conversational device, the question "Would you like to talk about what this means?" as the oncologist seeks permission to disclose prognostic information while ceding control to the patient.
authors.affiliation: University of Colorado Denver, Aurora, CO; and University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI.
authors.forename: Sarguni
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Singh
authors.affiliation: University of Colorado Denver, Aurora, CO; and University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI.
authors.forename: Dagoberto
authors.initials: D
authors.lastname: Cortez
authors.affiliation: University of Colorado Denver, Aurora, CO; and University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI.
authors.forename: Douglas
authors.initials: D
authors.lastname: Maynard
authors.affiliation: University of Colorado Denver, Aurora, CO; and University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI.
authors.forename: James F
authors.initials: JF
authors.lastname: Cleary
authors.affiliation: University of Colorado Denver, Aurora, CO; and University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI.
authors.forename: Lori
authors.initials: L
authors.lastname: DuBenske
authors.affiliation: University of Colorado Denver, Aurora, CO; and University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI.
authors.forename: Toby C
authors.initials: TC
authors.lastname: Campbell
mesh_terms: D003142:Communication; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008495:Medical Oncology / Q000941:ethics*; D010817:Physician-Patient Relations / Q000941:ethics*; D011379:Prognosis