title: Health, physiology, and behavior of dairy calves reared on 4 different substrates.
abstract: The objective of this study was to compare the health, physiology, and behavior of group-housed calves reared on wood shavings with those reared on alternative surfaces. At 1 wk of age, 80 calves were moved into 1 of 20 experimental pens (n = 4 calves/pen) where they remained until 6 wk of age. Pens had floors covered with pea gravel (PG), rubber chip (RC), sand (SA), or wood shavings (WS; n = 5 pens/substrate). Body weight, cleanliness, health, and skin surface and vaginal temperature were recorded at 1, 3, and 6 wk of age. Escherichia coli numbers were assessed on the skin surface of the shoulder and in the feces of calves at 3 and 6 wk of age. Blood samples were taken at 1, 3, and 6 wk of age to measure hematological values and cortisol, IgG, and lactate concentrations. Behaviors (lying, running, and self-grooming) were recorded in the home pen at 1, 3, and 6 wk of age using video recorders and accelerometer data loggers. At 6 wk of age, calves were tested individually in an arena test and behavior was recorded continuously for 20 min. Body weight did not differ among calves reared on PG, RC, SA, or WS, regardless of age. All calves were clean and no calves displayed any signs of lameness, leg lesions, or injuries at wk 1, 3, or 6, regardless of substrate. The number of E. coli recovered from a surface area of 100 cm2on the shoulder of each calf was affected by rearing substrate, with more E. coli recovered from calves reared on WS than PG, RC, or SA at 3 and 6 wk of age. Fecal E. coli counts were not affected by rearing substrate at 3 or 6 wk of age. Over the entire study period, calves reared on PG and SA had lower skin temperatures than calves reared on RC or WS, but skin temperature was similar between calves reared on PG and SA. However, vaginal temperature did not differ among calves reared on different substrates at 1, 3, or 6 wk of age. Hematology values and cortisol, IgG, and lactate concentrations of calves were similar among rearing substrates over the 6-wk study period. In the home pen, rearing substrate did not influence time spent lying; however, calves reared on WS performed more lying bouts than calves reared on PG or SA. In addition, rearing substrate did not influence the time calves spent running; however, calves reared on WS spent more time self-grooming than calves reared on PG, RC, and SA. During a 20-min arena test, running, bucks, jumps, and kicks performed by calves was not affected by rearing substrate. In conclusion, the physiology and behavior of calves reared on PG, RC, and SA was similar to WS, which is considered the preferred rearing substrate to use when rearing calves. Therefore, PG, RC, and SA may be acceptable substrate options when rearing group-housed dairy calves.
authors.affiliation: AgResearch Ltd., Ruakura Research Centre, Hamilton 3214, New Zealand. Electronic address: mhairi.sutherland@agresearch.co.nz.
authors.forename: M A
authors.initials: MA
authors.lastname: Sutherland
authors.affiliation: AgResearch Ltd., Ruakura Research Centre, Hamilton 3214, New Zealand.
authors.forename: G M
authors.initials: GM
authors.lastname: Worth
authors.affiliation: AgResearch Ltd., Ruakura Research Centre, Hamilton 3214, New Zealand.
authors.forename: C
authors.initials: C
authors.lastname: Cameron
authors.affiliation: AgResearch Ltd., Ruakura Research Centre, Hamilton 3214, New Zealand.
authors.forename: C M
authors.initials: CM
authors.lastname: Ross
authors.affiliation: AgResearch Ltd., Ruakura Research Centre, Hamilton 3214, New Zealand.
authors.forename: D
authors.initials: D
authors.lastname: Rapp
mesh_terms: D000818:Animals; D001522:Behavior, Animal; D001835:Body Weight; D002417:Cattle; D004926:Escherichia coli; D006799:Housing, Animal; D012919:Social Behavior
keywords: behavior; dairy calf; housing; welfare