title: Groupthink: How Should Clinicians Respond to Human Trafficking?
abstract: Human trafficking is a pervasive problem that exceeds the capacity of social and organizational resources to restrain and for which guidelines are inadequate to assist medical professionals in responding to the special needs of victims when they present as patients. One obstacle to appropriate disagreement with an inadequate status quo is the lure of group cohesion. "Groupthink" is a social psychological phenomenon in which presumed group consensus prevails despite potentially adverse consequences. In the context of the medical response to human trafficking, groupthink may foster complacency, rationalize acquiescence with inaction on the basis of perceived futility, create an illusion of unanimity, and accommodate negative stereotyping. Despite these inhibiting influences, even in apparently futile situations, medical professionals have unique opportunities to be a force for good.
authors.affiliation: Professor of neurology at the Mayo Clinic College of Medicine in Jacksonville, Florida, where he chairs the Medical Ethics Committee and leads the Program in Professionalism & Values.
authors.forename: William Polk
authors.initials: WP
authors.lastname: Cheshire
mesh_terms: D032921:Consensus; D019548:Crime Victims; D003695:Delivery of Health Care; D034462:Dissent and Disputes; D026690:Ethics, Clinical; D006282:Health Personnel / Q000523:psychology*; D006296:Health Services; D064410:Human Trafficking; D006801:Humans; D011593:Psychology, Social; D013240:Stereotyping; D013850:Thinking