title: Bias Analysis for Uncontrolled Confounding in the Health Sciences.
abstract: Uncontrolled confounding due to unmeasured confounders biases causal inference in health science studies using observational and imperfect experimental designs. The adoption of methods for analysis of bias due to uncontrolled confounding has been slow, despite the increasing availability of such methods. Bias analysis for such uncontrolled confounding is most useful in big data studies and systematic reviews to gauge the extent to which extraneous preexposure variables that affect the exposure and the outcome can explain some or all of the reported exposure-outcome associations. We review methods that can be applied during or after data analysis to adjust for uncontrolled confounding for different outcomes, confounders, and study settings. We discuss relevant bias formulas and how to obtain the required information for applying them. Finally, we develop a new intuitive generalized bias analysis framework for simulating and adjusting for the amount of uncontrolled confounding due to not measuring and adjusting for one or more confounders.
authors.affiliation: Department of Epidemiology, Fielding School of Public Health; UCLA Center for Health Policy Research; and California Center for Population Research, University of California, Los Angeles, California 90095; email: arah@ucla.edu.
authors.forename: Onyebuchi A
authors.initials: OA
authors.lastname: Arah
mesh_terms: D015982:Bias; D015986:Confounding Factors, Epidemiologic; D006801:Humans; D012107:Research Design
keywords: Monte Carlo sensitivity analysis; bias modeling; causal inference; probabilistic bias analysis; quantitative methodology; unmeasured confounders