title: Clinical judgment research on economic topics: Role of congruence of tasks in clinical practice.
abstract: This paper discusses what can ensure the performance of judgment studies with an information design that integrates economics of medical systems, in the context of digitalization of healthcare. It is part of a series of 5 methodological papers on statistical procedures and problems to implement judgment research designs and decision models, especially to address cost of care, and ways to measure conversation on cost of care between physicians and patients, with unstructured data such as economic narratives to complement billing and financial information (e.g. cost cognitive cues in conjoint or reversed conjoint designs). The paper discusses how congruence of tasks can increase the reliability of data. It uses some results of two Meta reviews of judgment studies in different fields of applications: psychology, business, medical sciences and education. It compares tests for congruence in judgment studies and efficiency tests in econometric studies.
authors.affiliation: ENDEPUSresearch Inc, USA.|University Aix Marseille, France E-mail: chris.huttin@comcast.net.
authors.forename: Christine C
authors.initials: CC
authors.lastname: Huttin
mesh_terms: D003657:Decision Making; D003695:Delivery of Health Care / Q000191:economics*; D006801:Humans; D007600:Judgment; D018803:Models, Economic; D010820:Physicians / Q000523:psychology; D014481:United States
keywords: Judgment studies; congruence of clinical tasks; cost sharing research; decision models