title: Key Recommendations from the MedtecHTA Project.
abstract: There are particular characteristics of Medical Devices, such as the device-user interaction, the incremental nature of innovation and the broader organizational impact that lead to additional challenges for health technology assessment (HTA). The project explored key aspects of the conduct and methods of HTA for MDs. Systematic reviews and original research studies were conducted to determine improvements in processes and methods that could enhance the potential for HTA and optimize the diffusion of MDs. Regulatory processes for MDs should be more closely aligned, the HTA evaluative framework should be harmonized and processes for conditional coverage and evidence development should be used. The methods for HTA should consider MDs as complex interventions, require the establishment of high quality registries, consider an iterative approach to the evaluation over time, recognize and allow for the particular characteristics of devices and use appropriate approaches for confounder adjustment in comparative effectiveness studies. To optimize the diffusion, a common classification should be developed across countries in order to facilitate international comparisons, factors driving diffusion should be explored in HTA reports and physicians' personal goals and motivation should be better understood. The key recommendations of the MedtecHTA project should improve the conduct and use of HTA for MDs. © 2017 The Authors. Health Economics published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
authors.affiliation: Cergas, Bocconi University, Milan, Italy.|Department of Policy Analysis and Public Management, Bocconi University, Milan, Italy.
authors.forename: Rosanna
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Tarricone
authors.affiliation: Cergas, Bocconi University, Milan, Italy.|Department of Policy Analysis and Public Management, Bocconi University, Milan, Italy.
authors.forename: Aleksandra
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Torbica
authors.affiliation: Cergas, Bocconi University, Milan, Italy.|Centre for Health Economics, University of York, York, UK.
authors.forename: Michael
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Drummond
mesh_terms: D003362:Cost-Benefit Analysis / Q000379:methods / Q000592:standards*; D004059:Diffusion of Innovation; D004864:Equipment and Supplies / Q000191:economics / Q000592:standards*; D006804:Ergonomics / Q000191:economics / Q000379:methods / Q000592:standards*; D019317:Evidence-Based Medicine / Q000191:economics / Q000379:methods / Q000592:standards*; D017408:Guidelines as Topic; D006291:Health Policy; D006801:Humans; D059032:Learning Curve; D013673:Technology Assessment, Biomedical / Q000191:economics / Q000379:methods / Q000592:standards*; D013997:Time Factors
keywords: MedtecHTA; economic evaluation; health technology assessment; medical devices; methods; recommendations