title: [Is histopathology still the gold standard?]
abstract: In the diagnostic process, microscopical analysis is considered to be the gold standard in determining the presence and nature of a disease. In some cases, in particular in rare diseases and in precursor lesions in which pathological changes have not yet fully developed, histological assessment is subject to diagnostic uncertainty. This uncertainty may be further compounded by the increasing tendency to submit small biopsies which may only harbour part of a pathological process. Several strategies may be adopted to increase the precision of histological analysis. While it is reasonable to assume that these strategies will lead to improved performance, systematic research to confirm this assumption is lacking. It is important to be aware of the limitations of histopathological testing.
authors.affiliation: Maasstad Ziekenhuis, afd. Pathologie, Rotterdam (tevens: Erasmus MC, Rotterdam).
authors.forename: M A
authors.initials: MA
authors.lastname: den Bakker
mesh_terms: D001706:Biopsy; D006801:Humans; D010336:Pathology / Q000592:standards*