title: Refractory patella tendinopathy with failed conservative treatment-shock wave or arthroscopy?
abstract: To identify whether the location of refractory patella tendinopathy (PT) has an effect on treatment modality (radial extracorporeal shock wave therapy (rESWT) or arthroscopic debridement).
  
  
  
  Between 2012 and 2014, 40 patients with PT underwent a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan. This confirmed the diagnosis as either involving the tendon itself (group A, 20) or with retropatella fat pad extension (group B, 20). All patients underwent rESWT. If there was no improvement patients proceeded with surgery in the form of arthroscopic debridement (by senior authors CW and AG). Outcomes were assessed before and after treatment using the Victorian Institute of Sports Assessment-Patella (VISA-P) score.
  
  
  
  There were 18 males and 2 females in group A and 15 males and 5 females in group B. The mean age was 41.4 years in group A (23-59) and 34.7 in group B (19-52). Seventeen of 20 in group A reported good or excellent outcomes and did not require surgical intervention (remaining three improved after second course of ESWT). All patients in group B failed to improve with rESWT, resulting in arthroscopic debridement and reported good or excellent outcomes. After 6 months, group A mean VISA-P score increased from 50.2 to 65.0 ( p = 0.01) and group B from 39.6 to 78.4 ( p = <0.001).
  
  
  
  An MRI should be performed to determine the precise location of tendinosis in patients with refractory PT who fail standard conservative management. If the MRI scan shows intratendon changes only, ESWT should be performed and those with extension into the fat pad should proceed to arthroscopic debridement without rESWT.
authors.affiliation: Department of Trauma and Orthopaedics, University Hospital of Wales, Cardiff, UK.
authors.forename: Hlm
authors.initials: H
authors.lastname: Williams
authors.affiliation: Department of Trauma and Orthopaedics, University Hospital of Wales, Cardiff, UK.
authors.forename: S A
authors.initials: SA
authors.lastname: Jones
authors.affiliation: Department of Trauma and Orthopaedics, University Hospital of Wales, Cardiff, UK.
authors.forename: C
authors.initials: C
authors.lastname: Lyons
authors.affiliation: Department of Trauma and Orthopaedics, University Hospital of Wales, Cardiff, UK.
authors.forename: C
authors.initials: C
authors.lastname: Wilson
authors.affiliation: Department of Trauma and Orthopaedics, University Hospital of Wales, Cardiff, UK.
authors.forename: A
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Ghandour
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D001182:Arthroscopy; D000072700:Conservative Treatment; D003646:Debridement; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008279:Magnetic Resonance Imaging; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D017847:Patellar Ligament; D018579:Patient Selection; D012189:Retrospective Studies; D052256:Tendinopathy / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging / Q000601:surgery*; D016896:Treatment Outcome; D014464:Ultrasonic Therapy; D055815:Young Adult
keywords: arthroscopy; overuse injuries; patella tendinitis; shock wave