title: Patient-specific instrumentation for total knee arthroplasty.
abstract: To assess the accuracy of total knee replacements (TKRs) performed using CT-based patient-specific instrumentation by postoperative CT scan.
  
  
  
  Approval from the Ethics Committee was granted prior to commencement of this study. Fifty prospective and consecutive patients who had undergone TKR (Evolis, Medacta International) using CT-based patient-specific instrumentation (MY KNEE, Medacta International) were assessed postoperatively using a CT scan and the validated Perth protocol measurement technique. The hip-knee-ankle (HKA) angle of the lower limb in the coronal plane; the coronal, sagittal, and rotational orientation of the femoral component; and the coronal and sagittal orientation of the tibial component were measured. These results were then compared to each patient's preoperative planning. The percentage of patients found to be less than or equal to 3° of planned alignment was calculated. One patient was excluded as the femoral cutting block did not fit the femur as predicted by planning and therefore underwent a conventional TKR.
  
  
  
  Ninety-eight percent of patients were within 3° of planned alignment in the coronal plane reproducing the predicted HKA angle. Predicted coronal plane orientation of the tibial and femoral component was achieved in 100% and 96% of patients, respectively. The sagittal orientation of the femoral component was within 3° in 98% of patients. The planned sagittal positioning of the tibial component was achieved in 92% of patients. Furthermore, 90% of patients were found to have a femoral rotation within 3° of planning. Eighty-six percent of patients achieved good-to-excellent outcome at 12 months (Oxford Knee Score > 34).
  
  
  
  We have found that TKR using this patient-specific instrumentation accurately reproduces preoperative planning in all six of the parameters measured in this study.
authors.affiliation: 1 Sydney Bone and Joint Clinic, Chipping Norton, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
authors.forename: Arash
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Nabavi
authors.affiliation: 1 Sydney Bone and Joint Clinic, Chipping Norton, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
authors.forename: Caroline M
authors.initials: CM
authors.lastname: Olwill
authors.affiliation: 2 Ultrascan Radiology, Campbelltown Private Hospital, Campbelltown, NSW, Australia.
authors.forename: Mike
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Do
authors.affiliation: 2 Ultrascan Radiology, Campbelltown Private Hospital, Campbelltown, NSW, Australia.
authors.forename: Tanya
authors.initials: T
authors.lastname: Wanasawage
authors.affiliation: 3 Ingham Institute for Applied Medical Research, South Western Sydney Clinical School, UNSW Australia, Liverpool, NSW, Australia.
authors.forename: Ian A
authors.initials: IA
authors.lastname: Harris
mesh_terms: D000368:Aged; D019645:Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee / Q000295:instrumentation*; D002985:Clinical Protocols; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007720:Knee Prosthesis; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D020370:Osteoarthritis, Knee / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging* / Q000601:surgery*; D011446:Prospective Studies; D016059:Range of Motion, Articular; D014057:Tomography, X-Ray Computed
keywords: computed tomography; patient-specific instrumentation; total knee arthroplasty;