title: A review on robotic surgery in rectal cancer.
abstract: Robotic surgery has the upper hand when compared to the laparoscopic approach in terms of superior visualisation, flexibility in movement, steadiness and accessibility to confined anatomical spaces. Nevertheless, limitations still exist with regards to cost, reduced tactile sensation, time-consuming setup and a significant learning curve to achieve. Although studies have shown better or at least comparable outcomes between the robotic and laparoscopic approach, the limitations mentioned result in poor penetrance among centres and surgeons. Advancements in robotic surgery technology and attaining the acquired skillset will translate into better clinical outcomes for patients.
authors.affiliation: Department of Surgery, Korea University Anam Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea;; Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia Medical Centre, Cheras, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
authors.forename: Zairul Azwan
authors.initials: ZA
authors.lastname: Mohd Azman
authors.affiliation: Department of Surgery, Korea University Anam Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
authors.forename: Seon-Hahn
authors.initials: SH
authors.lastname: Kim
keywords: Robotic surgery; minimally invasive surgery (MIS); rectal dissection; robotic-assisted surgery; total mesorectal excision (TME)