Assessment of Transvaginal Ultrasound Cervical Length Image Quality.
To use data from the Cervical Length Education and Review program to evaluate the quality of transvaginal cervical length ultrasonography by trained imagers (ie, ultrasonographers, radiologists, perinatologists).



This is a retrospective observational study of data from the Cervical Length Education and Review program. Candidates underwent an online lecture series, examination, and submitted a batch of images for review. For a candidate's batch of images to pass, all images must meet at least seven of the nine criteria assessed, the overall batch score needs to be 80% or greater, correct caliper placement must be met for all images, and the same criterion cannot be consistently missed. We also examined a subset of these criteria-appropriate image acquisitions, defined as an image that demonstrated both internal and external os and visualization of the entire endocervical canal. Primary outcome was the overall initial candidate pass rate; secondary outcomes included distribution of criteria missed in images and percentage of images that was inadequately acquired.



Six hundred eighty-seven candidates submitted 3,748 images between June 10, 2012, and August 18, 2016. Eighty-five percent of candidates were ultrasonographers. Of the 687 initial batches submitted, 105 (15%) did not pass. Eight hundred thirty-seven images (22%) of all images failed at least one criterion; the most common image deficiencies were in "anterior width of cervix equals the posterior width" (33%), "failure to visualize" the internal or external os (29%), "cervix occupies 75% of image and bladder area visible" (33%), and incorrect caliper placement (24%). Two hundred fifty-six (7%) of all images failed to meet our criteria for adequate image acquisition.



Fifteen percent of trained imagers failed to obtain appropriate cervical length imaging. This highlights the importance of a standardized cervical length training and certification program.
Division of Maternal Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Sydney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; the Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Obstetrics & Gynecology, Intermountain Healthcare, Utah Valley Hospital, Provo, Utah; the Perinatal Quality Foundation, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma; and the Ohio Perinatal Quality Collaborative, Columbus, Ohio.
Rupsa C
RC
Boelig
Helen
H
Feltovich
Jean Lea
JL
Spitz
Gregory
G
Toland
Vincenzo
V
Berghella
Jay D
JD
Iams
D054791:Cervical Length Measurement / Q000379:methods / Q000592:standards*; D002584:Cervix Uteri / Q000033:anatomy & histology* / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging*; D002983:Clinical Competence; D019160:Endosonography / Q000592:standards*; D005260:Female; D006282:Health Personnel / Q000193:education / Q000592:standards*; D006801:Humans; D009929:Organ Size; D011247:Pregnancy; D012189:Retrospective Studies; D014621:Vagina