A Bayesian paradigm for decision-making in proof-of-concept trials.
Decision-making is central to every phase of drug development, and especially at the proof of concept stage where risk and evidence must be weighed carefully, often in the presence of significant uncertainty. The decision to proceed or not to large expensive Phase 3 trials has significant implications to both patients and sponsors alike. Recent experience has shown that Phase 3 failure rates remain high. We present a flexible Bayesian quantitative decision-making paradigm that evaluates evidence relative to achieving a multilevel target product profile. A framework for operating characteristics is provided that allows the drug developer to design a proof-of-concept trial in light of its ability to support decision-making rather than merely achieve statistical significance. Operating characteristics are shown to be superior to traditional p-value-based methods. In addition, discussion related to sample size considerations, application to interim futility analysis and incorporation of prior historical information is evaluated.
a Department of Biostatistics , MedImmune , Gaithersburg , Maryland , USA.
Erik
E
Pulkstenis
a Department of Biostatistics , MedImmune , Gaithersburg , Maryland , USA.
Kaushik
K
Patra
a Department of Biostatistics , MedImmune , Gaithersburg , Maryland , USA.
Jianliang
J
Zhang
D001499:Bayes Theorem; D017326:Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; D003657:Decision Making; D015195:Drug Design; D006801:Humans; D000075082:Proof of Concept Study; D012107:Research Design; D035501:Uncertainty
Bayesian methods; GO/No-GO; decision-making; proof of concept; target product profile