Impact of the CONSORT Statement endorsement in the completeness of reporting of randomized clinical trials in restorative dentistry.
OBJECTIVE
The aim of this study was to assess if journal endorsement of the CONSORT Statement is associated with improved completeness of reporting of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in restorative dentistry.


METHODS
RCTs in restorative dentistry published in two journals that have (Journal of Dentistry and Clinical Oral Investigations) and have not (Operative Dentistry and Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry) endorsed the CONSORT Statement were selected. We compared the completeness of reporting between comparison groups (endorsers versus non-endorsers, before versus after endorsement) using a risk ratio (RR) with a 99% confidence interval for each outcome of CONSORT 2010. Also, the risk of bias of each study was evaluated.


RESULTS
The electronic search retrieved a total of 3701 records. After the title and abstract evaluation, 169 full texts were screened and 79 RCTs identified. Considering CONSORT-endorsing journals before and after CONSORT endorsement, six items had effect estimates indicating a relatively higher proportion of completely reported RCTs published after CONSORT endorsement. Considering CONSORT-endorsing journals compared to non-endorsing journals, twelve items indicated a relatively higher proportion of completely reported RCTs published in CONSORT-endorsing journals. In both analyses the overall evidence did not present statistical significance.


CONCLUSIONS
Although CONSORT endorsement has been linked with some improvement in the completeness of RCTs reports in the biomedical literature, this was not reflected in the present analysis confined to restorative dentistry. More innovative and involved approaches to enhancing reported may therefore be required.


CONCLUSIONS
Inadequate reporting of randomized controlled trials can produce important consequences for all stakeholders including waste of resources and implication on healthcare decisions. A broad understandment of the use of reporting guidelines is necessary to lead to better results.
Graduate Program in Dentistry, Federal University of Pelotas, Gonçalves Chaves St. 457, Pelotas, 96015560, RS, Brazil. Electronic address: rafaelonofre@gmail.com.
Rafael
R
Sarkis-Onofre
Graduate Program in Dentistry, Federal University of Pelotas, Gonçalves Chaves St. 457, Pelotas, 96015560, RS, Brazil. Electronic address: polettonetov@gmail.com.
Victório
V
Poletto-Neto
Graduate Program in Dentistry, Federal University of Pelotas, Gonçalves Chaves St. 457, Pelotas, 96015560, RS, Brazil. Electronic address: cencims@gmail.com.
Maximiliano Sérgio
MS
Cenci
Graduate Program in Dentistry, Federal University of Pelotas, Gonçalves Chaves St. 457, Pelotas, 96015560, RS, Brazil. Electronic address: tatiana.dds@gmail.com.
Tatiana
T
Pereira-Cenci
Center for Journalology, Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, 725 Parkdale Avenue, Ottawa, ON, K1Y 4E9, Canada; School of Epidemiology, Public Health and Preventive Medicine, University of Ottawa, 451 Smyth Road, Ottawa, ON, K1H 8M5, Canada. Electronic address: dmoher@ohri.ca.
David
D
Moher
D057189:Checklist / Q000592:standards; D003813:Dentistry; D019983:Guideline Adherence / Q000592:standards; D006801:Humans; D009909:Oral Health; D011476:Prosthodontics / Q000592:standards*; D011642:Publications; D011643:Publishing / Q000592:standards*; D016032:Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic / Q000592:standards*; D058028:Research Report / Q000592:standards*
CONSORT; Evidence-based dentistry/health care; Guideline adherence; Oral health; PRISMA