Increased recovery of touch DNA evidence using FTA paper compared to conventional collection methods.
Tape lifting and FTA paper scraping methods were directly compared to traditional double swabbing for collecting touch DNA from car steering wheels (n = 70 cars). Touch DNA was collected from the left or right side of each steering wheel (randomized) using two sterile cotton swabs, while the other side was sampled using water-soluble tape or FTA paper cards. DNA was extracted and quantified in duplicate using qPCR. Quantifiable amounts of DNA were detected for 100% of the samples (n = 140) collected independent of the method. However, the DNA collection yield was dependent on the collection method. A statistically significant difference in DNA yield was observed between FTA scraping and double swabbing methods (p = 0.0051), with FTA paper collecting a two-fold higher amount. Statistical analysis showed no significant difference in DNA yields between the double swabbing and tape lifting techniques (p = 0.21). Based on the DNA concentration required for 1 ng input, 47% of the samples collected using FTA paper would be expected to yield a short tandem repeat (STR) profile compared to 30% and 23% using double swabbing or tape, respectively. Further, 55% and 77% of the samples collected using double swabbing or tape, respectively, did not yield a high enough DNA concentration for the 0.5 ng of DNA input recommended for conventional STR kits and would be expected to result in a partial or no profile compared to 35% of the samples collected using FTA paper. STR analysis was conducted for a subset of the higher concentrated samples to confirm that the DNA collected from the steering wheel was from the driver. 32 samples were selected with DNA amounts of at least 1 ng total DNA (100 pg/μl when concentrated if required). A mixed STR profile was observed for 26 samples (88%) and the last driver was the major DNA contributor for 29 samples (94%). For one sample, the last driver was the minor DNA contributor. A full STR profile of the last driver was observed for 21 samples (69%) and a partial profile was observed for nine samples (25%); STR analysis failed for two samples collected using tape (6%). In conclusion, we show that the FTA paper scraping method has the potential to collect higher DNA yields from touch DNA evidence deposited on non-porous surfaces often encountered in criminal cases compared to conventional methods.
Forensic Science Graduate Program, University of California, Davis, 1909 Galileo Court, Suite B., Davis, CA 95618, USA. Electronic address: i_ilyenko@yahoo.com.
Irina A
IA
Kirgiz
Forensic Science Graduate Program, University of California, Davis, 1909 Galileo Court, Suite B., Davis, CA 95618, USA; Children's Hospital Oakland Research Institute, Oakland, CA, USA. Electronic address: scalloway@chori.org.
Cassandra
C
Calloway
D004247:DNA / Q000032:analysis*; D016172:DNA Fingerprinting; D006801:Humans; D018895:Microsatellite Repeats; D010209:Paper; D060888:Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction; D013048:Specimen Handling / Q000295:instrumentation* / Q000379:methods*; D014110:Touch
D004247:DNA
DNA typing; Double swabbing; FTA paper scraping; Forensic science; Touch DNA; Water-soluble tape sampling