False Memories and Free Speech: Is Scientific Debate Being Suppressed?
Commentators have raised important points, including the relative contribution of false beliefs versus false memories and the issue of how findings in the laboratory can be generalized to the real world, which we have addressed here. However, some of the commentaries misrepresent what we said, make criticisms that are unfounded, or imply that our article should not have been published in Applied Cognitive Psychology. We relate these responses to a more general literature on the suppression of unwanted scientific findings and suggest that the study of false memory would be better served by more openness to alternative perspectives.
Royal Holloway University of London London UK.
Bernice
B
Andrews
University College London London UK.
Chris R
CR
Brewin