Hip Resurfacing: International Perspectives: Review Article.
BACKGROUND
The hip resurfacing concept was developed for young and active patients, especially for femoral bone stock preservation. However, concerns about metal-on-metal bearings with adverse reactions to metal debris have led to a drop off in hip-resurfacing procedures.


OBJECTIVE
The goal of this review is to evaluate our current knowledge of survivorship of second-generation hip resurfacing devices and elaborate international perspectives for product improvement.


METHODS
A comprehensive literature search provided information on national joint arthroplasty registers worldwide with a minimum of 3000 reported hip resurfacings. It culminated in the analysis of six registers.


RESULTS
Long-term data showed that available hip resurfacing device survivorship ranged from 95 to 99.7% with 10 years of follow-up, in selected patient populations. The criteria for success were well known, male gender, good bone quality, head component size greater than 48 mm, and cup inclination less than 45°. On the other hand, the recent recall of some hip-resurfacing devices has resulted in huge medico-legal problems and has discredited all implants. It has brought about the recent evolution of hip resurfacing. Femoral fixation is now available for cemented and cementless surfaces. Bearings are still always metal-on-metal, but new types have come on board. Newer designs suggest that ceramic-on-ceramic, cross-linked polyethylene, and oxinium may be applied in this configuration.


CONCLUSIONS
In 2015, the evolution of hip resurfacing is ongoing in terms of implant design, alternative bearings, and implant fixation with hopes of improving survivorship.
Service d'Orthopédie C, Hôpital Salengro, Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire de Lille and Université Lille Nord de France, Place de Verdun, F-59000 Lille, France.|Service d'Orthopédie C, CHRU de Lille, 2 Avenue Oscar Lambret, 59037 Lille Cedex, France.
Julien
J
Girard
bearing; cement; cementless; hip resurfacing