Herbicide resistance and biodiversity: agronomic and environmental aspects of genetically modified herbicide-resistant plants.
Farmland biodiversity is an important characteristic when assessing sustainability of agricultural practices and is of major international concern. Scientific data indicate that agricultural intensification and pesticide use are among the main drivers of biodiversity loss. The analysed data and experiences do not support statements that herbicide-resistant crops provide consistently better yields than conventional crops or reduce herbicide amounts. They rather show that the adoption of herbicide-resistant crops impacts agronomy, agricultural practice, and weed management and contributes to biodiversity loss in several ways: (i) many studies show that glyphosate-based herbicides, which were commonly regarded as less harmful, are toxic to a range of aquatic organisms and adversely affect the soil and intestinal microflora and plant disease resistance; the increased use of 2,4-D or dicamba, linked to new herbicide-resistant crops, causes special concerns. (ii) The adoption of herbicide-resistant crops has reduced crop rotation and favoured weed management that is solely based on the use of herbicides. (iii) Continuous herbicide resistance cropping and the intensive use of glyphosate over the last 20 years have led to the appearance of at least 34 glyphosate-resistant weed species worldwide. Although recommended for many years, farmers did not counter resistance development in weeds by integrated weed management, but continued to rely on herbicides as sole measure. Despite occurrence of widespread resistance in weeds to other herbicides, industry rather develops transgenic crops with additional herbicide resistance genes. (iv) Agricultural management based on broad-spectrum herbicides as in herbicide-resistant crops further decreases diversity and abundance of wild plants and impacts arthropod fauna and other farmland animals. Taken together, adverse impacts of herbicide-resistant crops on biodiversity, when widely adopted, should be expected and are indeed very hard to avoid. For that reason, and in order to comply with international agreements to protect and enhance biodiversity, agriculture needs to focus on practices that are more environmentally friendly, including an overall reduction in pesticide use. (Pesticides are used for agricultural as well non-agricultural purposes. Most commonly they are used as plant protection products and regarded as a synonym for it and so also in this text.).
FSP BIOGUM Universität Hamburg, Ohnhorststr. 18, 22609 Hamburg, Germany.
Gesine
G
Schütte
Umweltbundesamt GmbH/Environment Agency Austria (EAA), Spittelauer Lände 5, 1090 Vienna, Austria.
Michael
M
Eckerstorfer
Italian National Institute for Environmental Protection and Research (ISPRA), Via Vitaliano Brancati 48, 00144 Rome, Italy.
Valentina
V
Rastelli
Federal Agency for Nature Conservation (BfN), Konstantinstrasse 110, 53179 Bonn, Germany.
Wolfram
0000-0002-9149-6990
W
Reichenbecher
3130 1/2 Roberts Ave, Culver City, 90232 USA.
Sara
S
Restrepo-Vassalli
Natural Environment Centre, Finnish Environment Institute (SYKE), PO Box 140, FI-00251 Helsinki, Finland.
Marja
M
Ruohonen-Lehto
Federal Office for the Environment (FOEN), 3003 Bern, Switzerland.
Anne-Gabrielle Wuest
AW
Saucy
Institut für Biodiversität-Netzwerk e.V. (ibn), Nußbergerstr. 6a, 93059 Regensburg, Germany.
Martha
M
Mertens
Agricultural practice; Agriculture; Biodiversity; Farmland biodiversity; Genetically modified crops; Glyphosate; Herbicide resistance; Herbicide-resistant crops; Pollination; Sustainability