[Intramedullary ependymomas: A French retrospective multicenter study of 221 cases].
OBJECTIVE
Intramedullary ependymomas (IE) are the most frequent intramedullary tumors in the adult population. The gold standard treatment is to obtain gross total removal without any new postoperative neurological deficit. The authors report the results of a multicenter series with a long-term follow-up and the analysis of clinical, radiological, surgical data as well as the complementary treatments.


METHODS
A retrospective analysis of adult patients with IE operated on between January 1984 and December 2011 at 7 French centers (Bordeaux, Kremlin-Bicêtre, Lille, Lyon, Marseille, Montpellier, Nice, and Nîmes) was performed. The minimal follow-up was 12 months. The clinical evaluation was based on the McCormick classification in the pre and postoperative period at 3 months, 1 and 5 years.


RESULTS
Data of 221 adult patients with a pathologically confirmed diagnosis of IE were considered: 134 patients were treated at the Neurosurgical Department of Kremlin-Bicêtre Hospital, 26 were treated at Lille and 61 were treated in the southern region of France (Marseille, Bordeaux, Montpellier, and Lyon). The epidemiological analysis was performed on the entire cohort of patients, while follow-up considerations were made solely on the 134 patients managed at Kremlin-Bicêtre Hospital to obtain homogeneous data. A slight male prevalence was observed (59 % of cases), with an average age of 41.8 years at diagnosis. The mean age at first clinical manifestations was 39.6 years, thus the average duration of symptoms before the diagnosis was 29 months. Neuropathic pain and neurological deficit were the most revealing symptoms in 64 % and 32 % of cases respectively. The localization of the IE was basically cervical in 35.7 %, primarily thoracic in 25.8 % and cervico-thoracic in 22.2 %. The mean tumor length in the sagittal plan was 20.4mm (range 1 to 99mm). A cystic cavity was present in 76.5 % of cases while an intratumoral hemorrhage was detected in 30.3 % of cases. The rate of complete removal was performed in 79.2 % of cases when considering the whole cohort and in 91 % of cases treated at Bicêtre Hospital. In 95 % of cases a WHO grade I or II ependymoma was isolated and in 5 % of cases a WHO grade III. The McCormick scale (MCs) (Lou et al., 2012) [1] was used to rate the degree of preoperative functional impairment in 4 grades. In the immediate postoperative period a worsening of functional capacity was observed. Only 28.8 % of patients had MCs 1 in the immediate postoperative period; 34.8 % had MCs 2; 20.4 % had MCs 3 and 16 % had MCs 4. At 5 years of follow-up (101 patients) the frequencies of grades 1 and 2 were increased: 59 % of patients had MCs 1, 20.8 % had MCs 2, 10,9 % had MCs 3 and 9.3 % had MCs 4. The extension of the lesion on the sagittal plan calculated on the preoperative MRI, was the only predictive factor associated with the immediate postoperative outcome and the short-term follow-up (P=0.04), whereas the preoperative neurological status is the only predictive factor for long-term follow-up (P=0.005).


CONCLUSIONS
Gross total removal remains the mainstay treatment for IE. Early surgery is indicated if the patient is symptomatic or the tumor increases in size. A postoperative regular follow-up is mandatory for at least 10 years due to the risk of recurrence. If a growing residue is detected, a second intervention is recommended without any adjuvant treatment if a WHO grade I lesion is confirmed by the pathological analysis. Complementary treatment should be reserved for high-grade ependymomas or in case of unresectable and progressive residue.
Service de neurochirurgie, hôpital Bicêtre, université Paris-Sud, Assistance publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, 78, rue du General-Leclerc, 94275 Kremlin-Bicêtre cedex, France.
N
N
Aghakhani
Service de neurochirurgie, hôpital Bicêtre, université Paris-Sud, Assistance publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, 78, rue du General-Leclerc, 94275 Kremlin-Bicêtre cedex, France. Electronic address: mahmoud.messerer@chuv.ch.
M
M
Messerer
Service de neurochirurgie, hôpital Bicêtre, université Paris-Sud, Assistance publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, 78, rue du General-Leclerc, 94275 Kremlin-Bicêtre cedex, France.
P
P
David
Service de neurochirurgie, hôpital Bicêtre, université Paris-Sud, Assistance publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, 78, rue du General-Leclerc, 94275 Kremlin-Bicêtre cedex, France.
A
A
Herbrecht
Service de neurochirurgie, hôpital Bicêtre, université Paris-Sud, Assistance publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, 78, rue du General-Leclerc, 94275 Kremlin-Bicêtre cedex, France.
F
F
Parker
D000328:Adult; D004806:Ependymoma / Q000175:diagnosis / Q000601:surgery* / Q000628:therapy; D005260:Female; D005500:Follow-Up Studies; D005602:France; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D012189:Retrospective Studies; D013120:Spinal Cord Neoplasms / Q000175:diagnosis / Q000601:surgery* / Q000628:therapy
Chirurgie; Grade histologique; Histology; Intramedullary ependymoma; Intramedullary tumors; Microsurgery; Recurrence; Récidive; Tumeurs intramédullaires; Épendymomes intramédullaires