Depth versus subdural temporal electrodes revisited: Impact on surgical outcome after resective surgery for epilepsy.
OBJECTIVE
To study retrospectively the impact of electrode modality (subdural or depth electrodes) during presurgical assessment on surgical outcome after temporal lobectomy.


METHODS
The study included 17 patients assessed with depth electrodes and 57 with bitemporal subdural strips.


RESULTS
MRI showed a larger proportion of bilateral pathology in patients undergoing depth recordings (29.41% versus 3.5%, p=0.00069). Among the operated patients, those undergoing depth electrode recordings showed better outcome at one year after surgery (11/12 versus 22/33; p=0.046). This difference disappears at longest follow up (10/12 versus 22/33; p=0.138). Moreover, the probability of undergoing surgery and having good outcome after assessment with intracranial recordings is higher for the depth electrode group at one-year follow up (11/17 versus 22/57; p=0.029) but statistical differences decrease to a trend for the longest follow up (10/17 versus 22/57; p=0.069). No other statistical differences were noted between subdural and depth electrodes. Depth electrodes showed lower complication rates than subdural electrodes.


CONCLUSIONS
Both depth and subdural electrodes are effective for presurgical assessment of temporal lobe epilepsy.


CONCLUSIONS
Assessment with depth electrodes is associated with slightly increased likelihood of surgery and marginally better surgical outcome at one year follow up which disappears for longer follow up periods. Initial assessment with depth electrodes would have avoided a second implantation in 15% of patients.
Department of Basic and Clinical Neuroscience, King's College London, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience (IoPPN), UK; Department of Clinical Neurophysiology, King's College Hospital NHS Trust, London, UK. Electronic address: antonio.valentin@kcl.ac.uk.
A
A
Valentín
Department of Basic and Clinical Neuroscience, King's College London, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience (IoPPN), UK.
N
N
Hernando-Quintana
Department of Basic and Clinical Neuroscience, King's College London, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience (IoPPN), UK.
J
J
Moles-Herbera
Department of Basic and Clinical Neuroscience, King's College London, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience (IoPPN), UK.
D
D
Jimenez-Jimenez
Department of Basic and Clinical Neuroscience, King's College London, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience (IoPPN), UK.
S
S
Mourente
Department of Neurosurgery, King's College Hospital NHS Trust, London, UK.
I
I
Malik
Department of Neurosurgery, King's College Hospital NHS Trust, London, UK.
R P
RP
Selway
Department of Basic and Clinical Neuroscience, King's College London, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience (IoPPN), UK; Department of Clinical Neurophysiology, King's College Hospital NHS Trust, London, UK.
G
G
Alarcón
D000328:Adult; D000069279:Drug Resistant Epilepsy / Q000601:surgery*; D004567:Electrodes, Implanted / Q000009:adverse effects*; D004833:Epilepsy, Temporal Lobe / Q000601:surgery*; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D019635:Neurosurgical Procedures / Q000009:adverse effects / Q000379:methods*; D011183:Postoperative Complications
Depth electrodes; Drug-resistant epilepsy; Epilepsy surgery; Intracranial electrodes; Seizures; Subdural electrodes; Temporal lobe epilepsy