title: Evaluation of PCR Systems for Field Screening of Bacillus anthracis.
abstract: There is little published data on the performance of hand-portable polymerase chain reaction (PCR) systems that can be used by first responders to determine if a suspicious powder contains a potential biothreat agent. We evaluated 5 commercially available hand-portable PCR instruments for detection of Bacillus anthracis. We used a cost-effective, statistically based test plan to evaluate systems at performance levels ranging from 0.85-0.95 lower confidence bound (LCB) of the probability of detection (POD) at confidence levels of 80% to 95%. We assessed specificity using purified genomic DNA from 13 B. anthracis strains and 18 Bacillus near neighbors, potential interference with 22 suspicious powders that are commonly encountered in the field by first responders during suspected biothreat incidents, and the potential for PCR inhibition when B. anthracis spores were spiked into these powders. Our results indicate that 3 of the 5 systems achieved 0.95 LCB of the probability of detection with 95% confidence levels at test concentrations of 2,000 genome equivalents/mL (GE/mL), which is comparable to 2,000 spores/mL. This is more than sufficient sensitivity for screening visible suspicious powders. These systems exhibited no false-positive results or PCR inhibition with common suspicious powders and reliably detected B. anthracis spores spiked into these powders, though some issues with assay controls were observed. Our testing approach enables efficient performance testing using a statistically rigorous and cost-effective test plan to generate performance data that allow users to make informed decisions regarding the purchase and use of field biodetection equipment.
authors.forename: Richard M
authors.initials: RM
authors.lastname: Ozanich
authors.forename: Heather A
authors.initials: HA
authors.lastname: Colburn
authors.forename: Kristin D
authors.initials: KD
authors.lastname: Victry
authors.forename: Rachel A
authors.initials: RA
authors.lastname: Bartholomew
authors.forename: Jennifer S
authors.initials: JS
authors.lastname: Arce
authors.forename: Alejandro
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Heredia-Langner
authors.forename: Kristin
authors.initials: K
authors.lastname: Jarman
authors.forename: Helen W
authors.initials: HW
authors.lastname: Kreuzer
authors.forename: Cynthia J
authors.initials: CJ
authors.lastname: Bruckner-Lea
mesh_terms: D000881:Anthrax / Q000175:diagnosis*; D001408:Bacillus anthracis / Q000302:isolation & purification*; D001431:Bacteriological Techniques / Q000379:methods; D016133:Polymerase Chain Reaction / Q000379:methods*; D011208:Powders / Q000302:isolation & purification; D015203:Reproducibility of Results; D012680:Sensitivity and Specificity; D013171:Spores, Bacterial / Q000302:isolation & purification
chemical_list: D011208:Powders
keywords: Anthrax; Bacillus anthracis; Field screening; First responders; PCR; Ricin