title: How Are We Measuring Patient Satisfaction After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction?
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) is one of the most common orthopaedic operations in the United States. The long-term impact of ACL reconstruction is controversial, however, as longer term data have failed to demonstrate that ACL reconstruction helps alter the natural history of early onset osteoarthritis that occurs after ACL injury. There is significant interest in evaluating the value of ACL reconstruction surgeries.
  
  
  OBJECTIVE
  To examine the quality of patient satisfaction reporting after ACL reconstruction surgery.
  
  
  METHODS
  Systematic review; Level of evidence, 4.
  
  
  METHODS
  A systematic review of the MEDLINE database was performed using the PubMed interface. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines as well as the PRISMA checklist were employed. The initial search yielded 267 studies. The inclusion criteria were: English language, US patient population, clinical outcome study of ACL reconstruction surgery, and reporting of patient satisfaction included in the study. Study quality was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale.
  
  
  RESULTS
  A total of 22 studies met the inclusion criteria. These studies comprised a total of 1984 patients with a mean age of 31.9 years at the time of surgery and a mean follow-up period of 59.3 months. The majority of studies were evidence level 4 (n = 18; 81.8%), had a mean Newcastle-Ottawa scale score of 5.5, and were published before 2006 (n = 17; 77.3%); 5 studies (22.7%) failed to clearly describe their method for determining patient satisfaction. The most commonly used method for assessing satisfaction was a 0 to 10 satisfaction scale (n = 11; 50.0%). Among studies using a 0 to 10 scale, mean satisfaction ranged from 7.4 to 10.0. Patient-reported outcome and objective functional measures for ACL stability and knee function were positively correlated with patient satisfaction. Degenerative knee change was negatively correlated with satisfaction.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  The level of evidence for studies reporting patient satisfaction is low, and the methodologies for reporting patient satisfaction are variable. Additionally, within the past decade there has been a significant decline in the inclusion of this outcome measure within published ACL studies. As sports surgeons are increasingly called on to demonstrate the value of operative procedures, attention should be paid to understanding and reporting patient satisfaction.
authors.affiliation: Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York, USA.
authors.forename: Cynthia A
authors.initials: CA
authors.lastname: Kahlenberg
authors.affiliation: Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York, USA.
authors.forename: Benedict U
authors.initials: BU
authors.lastname: Nwachukwu
authors.affiliation: Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York, USA.
authors.forename: Richard A
authors.initials: RA
authors.lastname: Ferraro
authors.affiliation: Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York, USA.
authors.forename: William W
authors.initials: WW
authors.lastname: Schairer
authors.affiliation: Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York, USA.
authors.forename: Michael E
authors.initials: ME
authors.lastname: Steinhaus
authors.affiliation: Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York, USA.
authors.forename: Answorth A
authors.initials: AA
authors.lastname: Allen
keywords: ACL; clinical assessment/grading scales; knee ligaments; satisfaction