title: Evaluating an Advisor Program for Psychiatry Residents.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  A formal residency advisory program was instituted in 2010 to assist psychiatry residents in achieving academic and personal goals and to help identify additional mentors. In this project the authors sought to evaluate and improve resident and faculty satisfaction with the residency advisory program.
  
  
  METHODS
  At the end of the 2013-2014 academic period, residents completed an anonymous survey to determine baseline satisfaction with the residency advisory program. A series of interventions were then implemented including the addition of a resident liaison to the program, formal recognition of faculty advisors, and email reminders regarding regular residency advisory meetings. Eight months later a follow-up survey was distributed to assess the impact of the interventions on resident and faculty satisfaction with the residency advisory program and mentoring within the residency program.
  
  
  RESULTS
  There were notable improvements in overall satisfaction with a 58% increase (p<0.05) in residents meeting with their advisors. After the intervention, residents were more likely to seek their resident advisor for help in facilitating relationships with potential career mentors (28% vs 72%, OR=6.64, 95% CI =1.83-24.08). Although 87% of all residents reported having mentors outside of the formal residency advisory program, approximately half of those who are in their first year post medical school (PGY1s) reported having no mentors outside of the residency advisory program (notably all women).
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Resident advisory programs benefit from continuous evaluation and quality improvement with enhanced structure, including a senior resident position, leading to improved satisfaction. Residency advisory programs may be particularly useful in helping to facilitate relationships with other mentors, which may be particularly important for women early in their training.
authors.affiliation: New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY, USA. ojo9001@nyp.org.
authors.forename: Obianuju O
authors.initials: OO
authors.lastname: Berry
authors.affiliation: Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY, USA.
authors.forename: Mary
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Sciutto
authors.affiliation: Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY, USA.
authors.forename: Deborah
authors.initials: D
authors.lastname: Cabaniss
authors.affiliation: Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY, USA.
authors.forename: Melissa
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Arbuckle
mesh_terms: D006801:Humans; D007396:Internship and Residency / Q000379:methods*; D008611:Mentors / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D009518:New York; D010549:Personal Satisfaction; D011570:Psychiatry / Q000193:education*
keywords: Mentorship; Program evaluation; Residency; Women