title: [Clinical evaluation of endoscopic hemostasis in patients with ulcerative gastroduodenal bleeding].
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  To compare the effectiveness of various methods of endoscopic hemostasis in patients with ulcerative gastroduodenal bleeding.
  
  
  METHODS
  Several surgical techniques in treatment of 117 patients with ulcerative gastroduodenal bleeding were anayzed. Isolated and combined methods of endoscopic hemostasis were used in control and study groups.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Combined endoscopic hemostasis is bettercompared with isolated techniques. It reduces the incidence of recurrence, surgical activity and mortality.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  The effectiveness of combined endoscopic hemostasis was 88.2% for primary hemostasis in acute ulcerative gastroduodenal bleeding. Herewith, surgical activity and mortality were decreased.
authors.affiliation: 'Dmitrov City Hospital', Dmitrov, Russia.
authors.forename: V V
authors.initials: VV
authors.lastname: Mozharovsky
authors.affiliation: 'Dmitrov City Hospital', Dmitrov, Russia.
authors.forename: A G
authors.initials: AG
authors.lastname: Mutnyh
authors.affiliation: 'Dmitrov City Hospital', Dmitrov, Russia.
authors.forename: I N
authors.initials: IN
authors.lastname: Zhukov
authors.affiliation: 'Dmitrov City Hospital', Dmitrov, Russia.
authors.forename: K V
authors.initials: KV
authors.lastname: Mozharovsky
mesh_terms: D016063:Blood Loss, Surgical / Q000517:prevention & control / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D057186:Comparative Effectiveness Research; D005260:Female; D016558:Hemostasis, Endoscopic / Q000009:adverse effects / Q000379:methods / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D006801:Humans; D007430:Intraoperative Care / Q000379:methods*; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D010043:Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care; D010438:Peptic Ulcer Hemorrhage / Q000175:diagnosis / Q000401:mortality / Q000601:surgery; D012426:Russia / Q000453:epidemiology; D055502:Secondary Prevention / Q000379:methods; D012720:Severity of Illness Index