title: [Epi-Bowman Keratectomy: Clinical Evaluation of a New Method of Surface Ablation].
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  A new device for epithelial abrasion before excimer laser surface ablation or corneal cross-linking (CXL) has recently been introduced (Epi-Clear™, Orca Surgical, Kiryat-Shmona, Israel). We have reviewed the literature on the clinical results, potential benefits and drawbacks of this instrument, compared to other methods of epithelial removal.
  
  
  METHODS
  Literature search for "Epi-Bowman Keratectomy", "Epi-clear", and "Epikeratome" yielded 1 peer-review publication, 1 non-peer-review publication, 18 posters and presentations at international conferences (European Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgeons [ESCRS] and American Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgery [ASCRS]) on the use of the Epi-Clear™ device before surface ablation, 2 posters on the use of Epi-Clear before corneal crosslinking and 1 presentation on the experimental use of Epi-Clear for removal of a pterygium.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Comparison of laser ablation after epithelial removal with the Epi-Clear device (Epi-Bowman Keratectomy™, EBK™) to other established methods of surface ablation, i.e. alcohol-assisted PRK or PRK with a metallic scraper, EBK, suggests that the results are generally similar. Pain perception, haze formation, and epithelial healing are reported to be better than with conventional surface ablation methods. Studies evaluating the use of the Epi-Clear device before CXL report that the healing time is significantly reduced and that less pain is perceived.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  The Epi-Clear device seems to be a promising new option for epithelial removal before refractive laser ablation, although a convincing explanation for its potential superiority is still missing. In contrast, when the Epi-Clear device is used before CXL, then the Bowman's layer remains intact; this may provide an adequate explanation for the reported benefits of this application. However, currently available studies are of low level of evidence, so that more prospective randomised trials are needed for a robust evaluation of this treatment.
authors.affiliation: Zentrum für Refraktive Chirurgie, Augenklinik am St. Franziskus Hospital, Münster.|Augenklinik, Universität Bochum.
authors.forename: S
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Taneri
authors.affiliation: Zentrum für Refraktive Chirurgie, Augenklinik am St. Franziskus Hospital, Münster.
authors.forename: S
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Kießler
authors.affiliation: Zentrum für Refraktive Chirurgie, Augenklinik am St. Franziskus Hospital, Münster.
authors.forename: A
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Rost
authors.affiliation: Augenklinik, Universität Bochum.
authors.forename: T
authors.initials: T
authors.lastname: Schultz
authors.affiliation: Augenklinik, Universität Bochum.
authors.forename: M
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Elling
authors.affiliation: Augenklinik, Universität Bochum.
authors.forename: B
authors.initials: B
authors.lastname: Dick
mesh_terms: D019573:Epithelium, Corneal / Q000601:surgery*; D006801:Humans; D000074431:Keratectomy; D020731:Keratomileusis, Laser In Situ / Q000379:methods; D054018:Lasers, Excimer / Q000627:therapeutic use; D018903:Photorefractive Keratectomy / Q000379:methods; D011446:Prospective Studies; D014792:Visual Acuity