title: Home-Made Cost Effective Preservation Buffer Is a Better Alternative to Commercial Preservation Methods for Microbiome Research.
abstract: The investigation of wildlife gastrointestinal microbiomes by next-generation sequencing approaches is a growing field in microbial ecology and conservation. Such studies often face difficulties in sample preservation if neither freezing facilities nor liquid nitrogen (LQN) are readily available. Thus, in order to prevent microbial community changes because of bacterial growth after sampling, preservation buffers need to be applied to samples. However, the amount of microbial community variation attributable to the different preservation treatments and potentially affecting biological interpretation is hardly known. Here, we sampled feces of 11 sheep (Ovis ariessp.) by using swabs and analyzed the effect of air-drying, an inexpensive self-made nucleic acid preservation buffer (NAP), DNA/RNA Shield™, and RNAlater®, each together with freezing (for 10 days) or storing at room temperature (for 10 days) prior to 16S rRNA gene high-throughput sequencing to determine bacterial communities. Results revealed that the proportions of operational taxonomic units (OTUs) belonging to a bacterial phylum were affected by the preservation treatments, and that alpha diversities [observed OTUs, Shannon index, and phylogenetic diversity (PD)] were lower in all preservation treatments than in samples taken by forensic swabs and immediately frozen which is considered as the favored preservation treatment in the absence of any logistic constraints. Overall, NAP had better preservation qualities than RNAlater® and DNA/RNA Shield™ making this self-made buffer a valuable solution in wildlife microbiome studies.
authors.affiliation: Institute of Evolutionary Ecology and Conservation Genomics, University of Ulm Ulm, Germany.
authors.forename: Sebastian
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Menke
authors.affiliation: Institute of Evolutionary Ecology and Conservation Genomics, University of Ulm Ulm, Germany.
authors.forename: Mark A F
authors.initials: MA
authors.lastname: Gillingham
authors.affiliation: Institute of Evolutionary Ecology and Conservation Genomics, University of Ulm Ulm, Germany.
authors.forename: Kerstin
authors.initials: K
authors.lastname: Wilhelm
authors.affiliation: Institute of Evolutionary Ecology and Conservation Genomics, University of Ulm Ulm, Germany.
authors.forename: Simone
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Sommer
keywords: buffer; fecal samples; freezing; gut microbiome; next-generation sequencing; sample preservation; sheep; swabs