title: Treatment of Ulnar Collateral Ligament Tears of the Elbow: Is Repair a Viable Option?
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) tears have become common, and UCL reconstruction (UCLR) is currently the preferred surgical treatment method for treating UCL tears.
  
  
  OBJECTIVE
  The purpose of this study was to review the literature surrounding UCL repair and determine the viability of new repair techniques for treatment of UCL tears. We hypothesized that UCL repair techniques will provide comparable results to UCLR for treatment of UCL tears.
  
  
  METHODS
  Systematic review and meta-analysis; Level of evidence, 4.
  
  
  METHODS
  A systematic review was registered with PROSPERO and performed with PRISMA guidelines using 3 publicly available free databases. Biomechanical and clinical outcome investigations reporting on UCL repair with levels of evidence 1 through 4 were eligible for inclusion. Descriptive statistics were calculated for each study and parameter/variable analyzed.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Of the 46 studies eligible, 4 studies (3 clinical and 1 biomechanical) were included. There were 92 patients (n = 92 elbows; 61 males [62.3%]; mean age, 21.9 ± 4.7 years) included in the clinical studies, with a mean follow-up of 49 ± 14.4 months. Eighty-six percent of repairs performed were on the dominant elbow, and 38% were in college athletes. Most UCL repairs (66.3%) were performed via suture anchors. After UCL repair, 87.0% of patients were able to return to sport. Overall, 94.9% of patients scored excellent/good on the Andrews-Carson score. Patients who were able to return to sport after UCL repair did so within 6 months after surgery. Biomechanically, when UCL repair was compared with the modified Jobe technique, the repair group showed significantly less gap formation than the reconstruction group.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  In patients for whom repair is properly indicated, UCL repair provides similar return-to-sport rates and clinical outcomes with shorter return-to-sport timing after repair compared with UCL reconstruction. Future outcome studies evaluating UCL repair with internal bracing are necessary before recommending this technique.
authors.affiliation: Midwest Orthopaedics at Rush, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
authors.forename: Brandon J
authors.initials: BJ
authors.lastname: Erickson
authors.affiliation: Midwest Orthopaedics at Rush, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
authors.forename: Bernard R
authors.initials: BR
authors.lastname: Bach
authors.affiliation: Midwest Orthopaedics at Rush, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
authors.forename: Nikhil N
authors.initials: NN
authors.lastname: Verma
authors.affiliation: Midwest Orthopaedics at Rush, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
authors.forename: Charles A
authors.initials: CA
authors.lastname: Bush-Joseph
authors.affiliation: Midwest Orthopaedics at Rush, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
authors.forename: Anthony A
authors.initials: AA
authors.lastname: Romeo
keywords: Tommy John; baseball; pitcher; repair; ulnar collateral ligament (UCL); ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction (UCLR)