title: Minimally invasive procedure reduces adjacent segment degeneration and disease: New benefit-based global meta-analysis.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  Adjacent segment pathology (ASP) is a common complication presenting in patients with axial pain and dysfunction, requiring treatment or follow-up surgery. However, whether minimally invasive surgery (MIS), including MIS transforaminal / posterior lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF/PLIF) decreases the incidence rate of ASP remains unknown. The aim of this meta-analysis was to compare the incidence rate of ASP in patients undergoing MIS versus open procedures.
  
  
  METHODS
  This systematic review was undertaken by following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Statement. We searched electronic databases, including PubMed, EMBASE, SinoMed, and the Cochrane Library, without language restrictions, to identify clinical trials comparing MIS to open procedures. The results retrieved were last updated on June 15, 2016.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Overall, 9 trials comprising 770 patients were included in the study; the quality of the studies included 4 moderate and 5 low-quality studies. The pooled data analysis demonstrated low heterogeneity between the trials and a significantly lower ASP incidence rate in patients who underwent MIS procedure, compared with those who underwent open procedure (p = 0.0001). Single-level lumbar interbody fusion was performed in 6 trials of 408 patients and we found a lower ASP incidence rate in MIS group, compared with those who underwent open surgery (p = 0.002). Moreover, the pooled data analysis showed a significant reduction in the incidence rate of adjacent segment disease (ASDis) (p = 0.0003) and adjacent segment degeneration (ASDeg) (p = 0.0002) for both procedures, favoring MIS procedure. Subgroup analyses showed no difference in follow-up durations between the procedures (p = 0.93).
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Therefore, we conclude that MIS-TLIF/PLIF can reduce the incidence rate of ASDis and ASDeg, compared with open surgery. Although the subgroup analysis did not indicate a difference in follow-up duration between the two procedures, larger-scale, well-designed clinical trials with extensive follow-up are needed to confirm and update the findings of this analysis.
authors.affiliation: Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Gaozhou People's Hospital, Guangdong, China.
authors.forename: Xiao-Chuan
authors.initials: XC
authors.lastname: Li
authors.affiliation: Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Gaozhou People's Hospital, Guangdong, China.
authors.forename: Chun-Ming
authors.initials: CM
authors.lastname: Huang
authors.affiliation: Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Gaozhou People's Hospital, Guangdong, China.
authors.forename: Cheng-Fan
authors.initials: CF
authors.lastname: Zhong
authors.affiliation: Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Gaozhou People's Hospital, Guangdong, China.
authors.forename: Rong-Wei
authors.initials: RW
authors.lastname: Liang
authors.affiliation: Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Gaozhou People's Hospital, Guangdong, China.
authors.forename: Shao-Jian
authors.initials: SJ
authors.lastname: Luo
mesh_terms: D006801:Humans; D055959:Intervertebral Disc Degeneration / Q000517:prevention & control* / Q000601:surgery; D019060:Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures / Q000379:methods*; D016896:Treatment Outcome