title: Validation of Milliflex®Quantum for Bioburden Testing of Pharmaceutical Products.
abstract: This article reports the validation strategy used to demonstrate that the Milliflex®Quantum yielded non-inferior results to the traditional bioburden method. It was validated according to USP <1223>, European Pharmacopoeia 5.1.6, and Parenteral Drug Association Technical Report No. 33 and comprised the validation parametersrobustness, ruggedness, repeatability, specificity, limit of detection and quantification, accuracy, precision, linearity, range,andequivalence in routine operation.For the validation, a combination of pharmacopeial ATCC strains as well as a broad selection of in-house isolates were used. In-house isolates were used in stressed state. Results were statistically evaluated regarding the pharmacopeial acceptance criterion of ≥70% recovery compared to the traditional method. Post-hoc test power calculations verified the appropriateness of the used sample size to detect such a difference. Furthermore, equivalence tests verified non-inferiority of the rapid method as compared to the traditional method. In conclusion, the rapid bioburden on basis of the Milliflex®Quantum was successfully validated as alternative method to the traditional bioburden test.LAY ABSTRACT:Pharmaceutical drug products must fulfill specified quality criteria regarding their microbial content in order to ensure patient safety. Drugs that are delivered into the body via injection, infusion, or implantation must be sterile (i.e., devoid of living microorganisms). Bioburden testing measures the levels of microbes present in the bulk solution of a drug before sterilization, and thus it provides important information for manufacturing a safe product. In general, bioburden testing has to be performed using the methods described in the pharmacopoeias (membrane filtration or plate count). These methods are well established and validated regarding their effectiveness; however, the incubation time required to visually identify microbial colonies is long. Thus, alternative methods that detect microbial contamination faster will improve control over the manufacturing process and speed up product release. Before alternative methods may be used, they must undergo a side-by-side comparison with pharmacopeial methods. In this comparison, referred to asvalidation,it must be shown in a statistically verified manner that the effectiveness of the alternative method is at least equivalent to that of the pharmacopeial methods. Here we describe the successful validation of an alternative bioburden testing method based on fluorescent staining of growing microorganisms applying the Milliflex®Quantum system by MilliporeSigma.
authors.affiliation: Microbiological Quality Control Unit, Novartis Pharma Stein AG, Stein, Switzerland; and.
authors.forename: Oliver
authors.initials: O
authors.lastname: Gordon
authors.affiliation: MGP Consulting GmbH, Binningen, Switzerland goverde@mgp-consulting.ch.
authors.forename: Marcel
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Goverde
authors.affiliation: Microbiological Quality Control Unit, Novartis Pharma Stein AG, Stein, Switzerland; and.
authors.forename: Alexandra
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Staerk
authors.affiliation: Microbiological Quality Control Unit, Novartis Pharma Stein AG, Stein, Switzerland; and.
authors.forename: David
authors.initials: D
authors.lastname: Roesti
mesh_terms: D015169:Colony Count, Microbial; D004340:Drug Contamination / Q000517:prevention & control*; D004867:Equipment Design; D005374:Filtration / Q000295:instrumentation*; D005452:Fluoresceins / Q000737:chemistry; D005456:Fluorescent Dyes / Q000737:chemistry; D057230:Limit of Detection; D008163:Luminescent Measurements; D008828:Microbiological Techniques / Q000295:instrumentation*; D004364:Pharmaceutical Preparations / Q000032:analysis*; D015203:Reproducibility of Results; D013997:Time Factors; D057188:Workflow
chemical_list: D005452:Fluoresceins; D005456:Fluorescent Dyes; D004364:Pharmaceutical Preparations; C027780:carboxyfluoresceindiacetate
keywords: Bioburden testing; Compendial method; Non-inferiority test; Rapid microbiological methods; Validation