title: Intraocular Pressure Is a Poor Predictor of Hydration Status following Intermittent Exercise in the Heat.
abstract: Current hydration assessments involve biological fluids that are either compromised in dehydrated individuals or require laboratory equipment, making timely results unfeasible. The eye has been proposed as a potential site to provide a field-based hydration measure. The present study evaluated the efficacy and sensitivity of intraocular pressure (IOP) to assess hydration status. Twelve healthy males undertook two 150 min walking trials in 40°C 20% relative humidity. One trial matched fluid intake to body mass loss (control, CON) and the other had fluid restricted (dehydrated, DEH). IOP (rebound tonometry) and hydration status (nude body mass and serum osmolality) were determined every 30 min. Body mass and serum osmolality were significantly (p< 0.05) different between trials at all-time points following baseline. Body mass losses reached 2.5 ± 0.2% and serum osmolality 299 ± 5 mOsmol.kg-1in DEH. A significant trial by time interaction was observed for IOP (p= 0.042), indicating that over the duration of the trials IOP declined to a greater extent in the DEH compared with the CON trial. Compared with baseline measurements IOP was reduced during DEH (150 min: -2.7 ± 1.9 mm Hg;p< 0.05) but remained stable in CON (150 min: -0.3 ± 2.4 mm Hg). However, using an IOP value of 13.2 mm Hg to predict a 2% body mass loss resulted in only 57% of the data being correctly classified (sensitivity 55% and specificity 57%). The use of ΔIOP (-2.4 mm Hg) marginally improved the predictive ability with 77% of the data correctly classified (sensitivity: 55%; specificity: 81%). The present study provides evidence that the large inter-individual variability in baseline IOP and in the IOP response to progressive dehydration, prevents the use of IOP as an acute single assessment marker of hydration status.
authors.affiliation: School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences and Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation, Kelvin Grove, Queensland University of Technology Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
authors.forename: Ian B
authors.initials: IB
authors.lastname: Stewart
authors.affiliation: School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences and Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation, Kelvin Grove, Queensland University of Technology Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
authors.forename: Brittany
authors.initials: B
authors.lastname: Dias
authors.affiliation: School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences and Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation, Kelvin Grove, Queensland University of Technology Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
authors.forename: David N
authors.initials: DN
authors.lastname: Borg
authors.affiliation: School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences and Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation, Kelvin Grove, Queensland University of Technology Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
authors.forename: Aaron J E
authors.initials: AJ
authors.lastname: Bach
authors.affiliation: School of Biomedical Sciences and Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation, Kelvin Grove, Queensland University of Technology Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
authors.forename: Beatrix
authors.initials: B
authors.lastname: Feigl
authors.affiliation: School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences and Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation, Kelvin Grove, Queensland University of TechnologyBrisbane, QLD, Australia; Extreme Environments Laboratory, Department of Sport and Exercise Science, University of PortsmouthPortsmouth, UK.
authors.forename: Joseph T
authors.initials: JT
authors.lastname: Costello
keywords: dehydration; exercise; eye; heat; hydration assessment; intraocular pressure