title: The Politics of Evidence Use in Health Policy Making in Germany-the Case of Regulating Hospital Minimum Volumes.
abstract: This article examines the role of scientific evidence in informing health policy decisions in Germany, using minimum volumes policy as a case study. It argues that scientific evidence was used strategically at various stages of the policy process both by individual corporatist actors and by the Federal Joint Committee as the regulator. Minimum volumes regulation was inspired by scientific evidence suggesting a positive relationship between service volume and patient outcomes for complex surgical interventions. Federal legislation was introduced in 2002 to delegate the selection of services and the setting of volumes to corporatist decision makers. Yet, despite being represented in the Federal Joint Committee, hospitals affected by its decisions took the Committee to court to seek legal redress and prevent policy implementation. Evidence has been key to support, and challenge, decisions about minimum volumes, including in court. The analysis of the role of scientific evidence in minimum volumes regulation in Germany highlights the dynamic relationship between evidence use and the political and institutional context of health policy making, which in this case is characterized by the legislative nature of policy making, corporatism, and the role of the judiciary in reviewing policy decisions.
authors.affiliation: London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine.
authors.forename: Stefanie
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Ettelt
mesh_terms: D003657:Decision Making / Q000941:ethics*; D005858:Germany; D006291:Health Policy; D061847:Hospitals, High-Volume; D006801:Humans; D011050:Policy Making; D011057:Politics; D011634:Public Health / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence*
keywords: corporatism; courts; health policy making; institutional context; scientific evidence