title: Low Prevalence of Clinically Significant Endoscopic Findings in Outpatients with Dyspepsia.
abstract: Background.The value of endoscopy in dyspeptic patients is questionable.Aims.To examine the prevalence of significant endoscopic findings (SEFs) and the utility of alarm features and age in predicting SEFs in outpatients with dyspepsia.Methods.A retrospective analysis of outpatient adults who had endoscopy for dyspepsia. Demographic variables, alarm features, and endoscopic findings were recorded. We defined SEFs as peptic ulcer disease, erosive esophagitis, malignancy, stricture, or findings requiring specific therapy.Results.Of 650 patients included in the analysis, 51% had a normal endoscopy. The most common endoscopic abnormality was nonerosive gastritis (29.7%) followed by nonerosive duodenitis (7.2%) and LA-class A esophagitis (5.4%). Only 10.2% had a SEF. Five patients (0.8%) had malignancy. SEFs were more likely present in patients with alarm features (12.6% versus 5.4%,p= 0.004). Age ≥ 55 and presence of any alarm feature were associated with SEFs (aOR 1.8 and 2.3, resp.).Conclusion.Dyspeptic patients have low prevalence of SEF. The presence of any alarm feature and age ≥ 55 are associated with higher risk of SEF. Endoscopy in young patients with no alarm features has a low yield; these patients can be considered for nonendoscopic approach for diagnosis and management.
authors.affiliation: Department of Medicine, Division of Digestive Diseases, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA.
authors.forename: Khaled
authors.initials: K
authors.lastname: Abdeljawad
authors.affiliation: Department of Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA.
authors.forename: Antonios
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Wehbeh
authors.affiliation: Department of Medicine, Division of Digestive Diseases, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA.
authors.forename: Emad
authors.identifier: 0000-0003-2129-7694
authors.initials: E
authors.lastname: Qayed