title: Using Multicriteria Approaches to Assess the Value of Health Care.
abstract: Practitioners of cost-utility analysis know that their models omit several important factors that often affect real-world decisions about health care options. Furthermore, cost-utility analyses typically reflect only single perspectives (e.g., individual, business, and societal), further limiting the value for those with different perspectives (patients, providers, payers, producers, and planners-the 5Ps). We discuss how models based on multicriteria analyses, which look at problems from many perspectives, can fill this void. Each of the 5Ps can use multicriteria analyses in different ways to aid their decisions. Each perspective may lead to different value measures and outcomes, whereas no single-metric approach (such as cost-utility analysis) can satisfy all these stakeholders. All stakeholders have unique ways to measure value, even if assessing the same health intervention. We illustrate the benefits of this approach by comparing the value of five different hypothetical treatment choices for five hypothetical patients with cancer, each with different preference structures. Nine attributes describe each treatment option. We add a brief discussion regarding the use of these approaches in group-based decisions. We urge that methods to value health interventions embrace the multicriteria approaches that we discuss, because these approaches 1) increase transparency about the decision process, 2) allow flight simulator-type evaluation of alternative interventions before actual investment or deployment, 3) help focus efforts to improve data in an efficient manner, 4) at least in some cases help facilitate decision convergence among stakeholders with differing perspectives, and 5) help avoid potential cognitive errors known to impair intuitive judgments.
authors.affiliation: University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, USA. Electronic address: charles.phelps@rochester.edu.
authors.forename: Charles E
authors.initials: CE
authors.lastname: Phelps
authors.affiliation: The National Academies of Sciences, Engineering and Medicine, Washington, DC, USA.
authors.forename: Guruprasad
authors.initials: G
authors.lastname: Madhavan
mesh_terms: D003362:Cost-Benefit Analysis; D057240:Patient Preference; D011787:Quality of Health Care / Q000191:economics*; D013673:Technology Assessment, Biomedical / Q000379:methods*; D016896:Treatment Outcome; D062505:Value-Based Purchasing
keywords: multicriteria analysis; priority setting; systems analysis; value modeling