title: The role of scientific self-regulation for the control of genome editing in the human germline: The lessons from the Asilomar and the Napa meetings show how self-regulation and public deliberation can lead to regulation of new biotechnologies.
authors.affiliation: Institute for Biomedical Ethics and History of Medicine, University of Zurich, Zürich, Switzerland.
authors.forename: Daniel
authors.initials: D
authors.lastname: Gregorowius
authors.affiliation: Institute for Biomedical Ethics and History of Medicine, University of Zurich, Zürich, Switzerland.
authors.forename: Nikola
authors.initials: N
authors.lastname: Biller-Andorno
authors.affiliation: Institute for Biomedical Ethics and History of Medicine, University of Zurich, Zürich, Switzerland.
authors.forename: Anna
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Deplazes-Zemp
mesh_terms: D064113:CRISPR-Cas Systems; D032921:Consensus; D000072669:Gene Editing / Q000941:ethics*; D005818:Genetic Engineering / Q000941:ethics*; D015894:Genome, Human; D005854:Germ Cells / Q000166:cytology / Q000378:metabolism; D006801:Humans; D017410:Practice Guidelines as Topic; D011641:Public Relations; D012927:Social Control, Informal / Q000379:methods*