title: [Answer to the article by F. Vialrd et al.: Does the prevalence of recurrent pathogenic microdeletions and microdoublements in prenatal diagnosis lead to a reassessment of the evolution of non-invasive screening techniques? The example of region 22q11.2].
authors.affiliation: Centre pluridiciplinaire de diagnostic Prénatal, hôpital américain de Paris, 63, boulevard Victor-Hugo, 92200 Neuilly-sur-Seine, France.
authors.forename: G
authors.initials: G
authors.lastname: Viot
authors.affiliation: Centre pluridiciplinaire de diagnostic Prénatal, hôpital américain de Paris, 63, boulevard Victor-Hugo, 92200 Neuilly-sur-Seine, France. Electronic address: jacquemard@gmail.com.
authors.forename: F
authors.initials: F
authors.lastname: Jacquemard
mesh_terms: D002872:Chromosome Deletion; D022004:Chromosome Structures; D002892:Chromosomes, Human, Pair 22; D055028:Comparative Genomic Hybridization; D004062:DiGeorge Syndrome; D005260:Female; D006330:Heart Defects, Congenital; D006801:Humans; D017404:In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence; D010641:Phenotype; D011247:Pregnancy; D011296:Prenatal Diagnosis; D015995:Prevalence
keywords: Diagnostic anténéal; Dépistage prénatal non invasif; Microdeletions; Microduplications; Microdélétions; Non-invasive prenatal screening; Prenatal diagnosis