title: Evaluation of gene expression and DNA copy number profiles of adipose tissue-derived stromal cells and consecutive neurosphere-like cells generated from dogs with naturally occurring spinal cord injury.
abstract: OBJECTIVE To evaluate gene expression and DNA copy number in adipose tissue-derived stromal cells (ADSCs) and in ADSC-derived neurosphere-like cell clusters (ADSC-NSCs) generated from tissues of chronically paraplegic dogs. ANIMALS 14 client-owned paraplegic dogs. PROCEDURES Dorsal subcutaneous adipose tissue (< 1 cm3) was collected under general anesthesia; ADSCs were isolated and cultured. Third-passage ADSCs were cultured in neural cell induction medium to generate ADSC-NSCs. Relative gene expression of mesenchymal cell surface marker CD90 and neural progenitor marker nestin was assessed in ADSCs and ADSC-NSCs from 3 dogs by quantitative real-time PCR assay; expression of these and various neural lineage genes was evaluated for the same dogs by reverse transcription PCR assay. Percentages of cells expressing CD90, nestin, glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), and tubulin β 3 class III (TUJ1) proteins were determined by flow cytometry for all dogs. The DNA copy number stability (in samples from 6 dogs) and neural cell differentiation (14 dogs) were assessed with array-comparative genomic hybridization analysis and immunocytochemical evaluation, respectively. RESULTS ADSCs and ADSC-NSCs expressed neural cell progenitor and differentiation markers; GFAP and microtubule-associated protein 2 were expressed by ADSC-NSCs but not ADSCs. Relative gene expression of CD90 and nestin was subjectively higher in ADSC-NSCs than in ADSCs. Percentages of ADSC-NSCs expressing nestin, GFAP, and TUJ1 proteins were substantially higher than those of ADSCs. Cells expressing neuronal and glial markers were generated from ADSC-NSCs and had no DNA copy number instability detectable by the methods used. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE Results suggested ADSCs can potentially be a safe and clinically relevant autologous source for canine neural progenitor cells. Further research is needed to verify these findings.
authors.forename: Ji-Hey
authors.initials: JH
authors.lastname: Lim
authors.forename: Sehwon
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Koh
authors.forename: Rachael
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Thomas
authors.forename: Matthew
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Breen
authors.forename: Natasha J
authors.initials: NJ
authors.lastname: Olby
mesh_terms: D000273:Adipose Tissue / Q000166:cytology*; D000818:Animals; D002478:Cells, Cultured; D055028:Comparative Genomic Hybridization; D004285:Dogs; D005260:Female; D018628:Gene Dosage / Q000235:genetics*; D020869:Gene Expression Profiling; D005786:Gene Expression Regulation; D008297:Male; D058953:Neural Stem Cells / Q000166:cytology / Q000473:pathology; D009474:Neurons / Q000166:cytology / Q000473:pathology; D011506:Proteins / Q000235:genetics; D013119:Spinal Cord Injuries / Q000503:physiopathology / Q000662:veterinary*; D017154:Stromal Cells / Q000166:cytology* / Q000502:physiology*
chemical_list: D011506:Proteins