title: Why NOBLE and EXCEL Are Consistent With Each Other and With Previous Trials.
authors.affiliation: From Division of Cardiac Surgery, University of Ottawa, Canada (M.R.); and Peter Munk Cardiac Centre and Heart and Stroke Richard Lewar Centre of Excellence in Cardiovascular Research, University of Toronto, Canada (M.E.F.). mruel@ottawaheart.ca.
authors.forename: Marc
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Ruel
authors.affiliation: From Division of Cardiac Surgery, University of Ottawa, Canada (M.R.); and Peter Munk Cardiac Centre and Heart and Stroke Richard Lewar Centre of Excellence in Cardiovascular Research, University of Toronto, Canada (M.E.F.).
authors.forename: Michael E
authors.initials: ME
authors.lastname: Farkouh
mesh_terms: D002986:Clinical Trials as Topic; D001026:Coronary Artery Bypass; D003324:Coronary Artery Disease / Q000628:therapy*; D006801:Humans; D062645:Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; D015203:Reproducibility of Results; D016896:Treatment Outcome
keywords: clinical trials as topics; coronary artery disease; patient outcome assessment; percutaneous coronary intervention; surgery