title: Effects of shepherds and dogs on livestock depredation by leopards (Panthera pardus) in north-eastern Iran.
abstract: Human-carnivore conflicts over livestock depredation are increasingly common, yet little is understood about the role of husbandry in conflict mitigation. As shepherds and guarding dogs are most commonly used to curb carnivore attacks on grazing livestock, evaluation and improvement of these practices becomes an important task. We addressed this issue by studying individual leopard (Panthera pardus) attacks on sheep and goats in 34 villages near Golestan National Park, Iran. We obtained and analyzed data on 39 attacks, which included a total loss of 31 sheep and 36 goats in 17 villages. We applied non-parametric testing, Poisson Generalized Linear Modelling (GLM) and model selection to assess how numbers of sheep and goats killed per attack are associated with the presence and absence of shepherds and dogs during attacks, depredation in previous years, villages, seasons, ethnic groups, numbers of sheep and goats kept in villages, and distances from villages to the nearest protected areas. We found that 95.5% of losses were inflicted in forests when sheep and goats were accompanied by shepherds (92.5% of losses) and dogs (77.6%). Leopards tended to kill more sheep and goats per attack (surplus killing) when dogs were absent in villages distant from protected areas, but still inflicted most losses when dogs were present, mainly in villages near protected areas. No other variables affected numbers of sheep and goats killed per attack. These results indicate that local husbandry practices are ineffectual and the mere presence of shepherds and guarding dogs is not enough to secure protection. Shepherds witnessed leopard attacks, but could not deter them while dogs did not exhibit guarding behavior and were sometimes killed by leopards. In an attempt to make practical, low-cost and socially acceptable improvements in local husbandry, we suggest that dogs are raised to create a strong social bond with livestock, shepherds use only best available dogs, small flocks are aggregated into larger ones and available shepherds herd these larger flocks together. Use of deterrents and avoidance of areas close to Golestan and in central, core areas of neighboring protected areas is also essential to keep losses down.
authors.affiliation: Workgroup on Endangered Species, J.F. Blumenbach Institute of Zoology and Anthropology, Georg-August-Universität Göttingen , Göttingen , Germany.
authors.forename: Igor
authors.initials: I
authors.lastname: Khorozyan
authors.affiliation: Workgroup on Endangered Species, J.F. Blumenbach Institute of Zoology and Anthropology, Georg-August-Universität Göttingen , Göttingen , Germany.
authors.forename: Mahmood
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Soofi
authors.affiliation: Department of Environmental Sciences, Gorgan University of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources , Gorgan , Iran.
authors.forename: Mobin
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Soufi
authors.affiliation: Persian Wildlife Heritage Foundation , Tehran , Iran.
authors.forename: Amirhossein Khaleghi
authors.initials: AK
authors.lastname: Hamidi
authors.affiliation: Workgroup on Endangered Species, J.F. Blumenbach Institute of Zoology and Anthropology, Georg-August-Universität Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany; Conservation Biogeography Lab, Geography Department, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
authors.forename: Arash
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Ghoddousi
authors.affiliation: Workgroup on Endangered Species, J.F. Blumenbach Institute of Zoology and Anthropology, Georg-August-Universität Göttingen , Göttingen , Germany.
authors.forename: Matthias
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Waltert
keywords: Carnivore conservation; Human-wildlife conflict; Husbandry; Mitigation