title: Modeling the cost-effectiveness of insect rearing on artificial diets: A test with a tephritid fly used in the sterile insect technique.
abstract: We modeled the cost-effectiveness of rearing Anastrepha ludens, a major fruit fly pest currently mass reared for sterilization and release in pest control programs implementing the sterile insect technique (SIT). An optimization model was generated by combining response surface models of artificial diet cost savings with models of A. ludens pupation, pupal weight, larval development time and adult emergence as a function of mixtures of yeast, a costly ingredient, with corn flour and corncob fractions in the diet. Our model revealed several yeast-reduced mixtures that could be used to prepare diets that were considerably cheaper than a standard diet used for mass rearing. Models predicted a similar production of insects (pupation and adult emergence), with statistically similar pupal weights and larval development times between yeast-reduced diets and the standard mass rearing diet formulation. Annual savings from using the modified diets could be up to 5.9% of the annual cost of yeast, corn flour and corncob fractions used in the standard diet, representing a potential saving of US $27.45 per ton of diet (US $47,496 in the case of the mean annual production of 1,730.29 tons of artificial diet in the Moscafrut mass rearing facility at Metapa, Chiapas, Mexico). Implementation of the yeast-reduced diet on an experimental scale at mass rearing facilities is still required to confirm the suitability of new mixtures of artificial diet for rearing A. ludens for use in SIT. This should include the examination of critical quality control parameters of flies such as adult flight ability, starvation resistance and male sexual competitiveness across various generations. The method used here could be useful for improving the cost-effectiveness of invertebrate or vertebrate mass rearing diets worldwide.
authors.affiliation: Red de Manejo Biorracional de Plagas y Vectores, Clúster Científico y Tecnológico BioMimic®, Instituto de Ecología, A.C., Xalapa, Veracruz, Mexico.
authors.forename: Carlos
authors.identifier: http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1431-9667
authors.initials: C
authors.lastname: Pascacio-Villafán
authors.affiliation: Red de Manejo Biorracional de Plagas y Vectores, Clúster Científico y Tecnológico BioMimic®, Instituto de Ecología, A.C., Xalapa, Veracruz, Mexico.
authors.forename: Andrea
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Birke
authors.affiliation: Red de Manejo Biorracional de Plagas y Vectores, Clúster Científico y Tecnológico BioMimic®, Instituto de Ecología, A.C., Xalapa, Veracruz, Mexico.
authors.forename: Trevor
authors.initials: T
authors.lastname: Williams
authors.affiliation: Red de Manejo Biorracional de Plagas y Vectores, Clúster Científico y Tecnológico BioMimic®, Instituto de Ecología, A.C., Xalapa, Veracruz, Mexico.
authors.forename: Martín
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Aluja
mesh_terms: D000818:Animals; D003362:Cost-Benefit Analysis; D004032:Diet; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008800:Mexico; D010572:Pest Control, Biological / Q000191:economics*; D011679:Pupa / Q000235:genetics / Q000254:growth & development* / Q000472:pathogenicity; D013242:Sterilization; D033621:Tephritidae / Q000235:genetics / Q000254:growth & development* / Q000472:pathogenicity; D003313:Zea mays / Q000469:parasitology