title: Against Cursory Treatments in Ethics of Medical Migration from Underserved Countries.
abstract: In a recent paper, Mpofu, Sen Gupta, and Hays (2016) attempt to outline the obligations of recruiting high-income countries (HICs) and would-be emigrant health workers (HWs) to tackle the effects of mass exodus of health workers from underserved regions. They reconstruct (i) Rawlsian and Kantian global justice approaches to argue for moral obligations of HICs and (ii) an individual justice approach to point to non-enforceable social responsibilities of HWs to assist their compatriots. This critical commentary demonstrates that the argumentation within their individual justice approach is problematic on the basis of three reasons: (1) their discussion under-theorizes and undervalues individual rights and more specifically the right to exit, (2) their argumentation in the latter part, even if problematically, does rather point to moral obligations in lieu of social responsibilities of HWs, and (3) they overlook many other important freedoms, interests, and values pertinent to the issue of retention.
authors.affiliation: Centre for Applied Ethics, Linköping University, Hus Key, Campus Valla, 58431, Linköping, Sweden. yusuf.yuksekdag@liu.se.
authors.forename: Yusuf
authors.identifier: http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2867-1212
authors.initials: Y
authors.lastname: Yuksekdag
mesh_terms: D019049:Developed Countries; D003906:Developing Countries; D004641:Emigration and Immigration; D014943:Global Health; D006282:Health Personnel / Q000941:ethics*; D006297:Health Services Accessibility; D006280:Health Workforce; D006806:Human Rights; D006801:Humans; D028681:Moral Obligations; D012935:Social Justice; D012941:Social Responsibility; D035862:Vulnerable Populations
keywords: Ethics; Medical migration; Retention; Right to exit