title: Evaluating everyday explanations.
abstract: People frequently rely on explanations provided by others to understand complex phenomena. A fair amount of attention has been devoted to the study of scientific explanation, and less on understanding how people evaluate naturalistic, everyday explanations. Using a corpus of diverse explanations from Reddit's "Explain Like I'm Five" and other online sources, we assessed how well a variety of explanatory criteria predict judgments of explanation quality. We find that while some criteria previously identified as explanatory virtues do predict explanation quality in naturalistic settings, other criteria, such as simplicity, do not. Notably, we find that people have a preference for complex explanations that invoke more causal mechanisms to explain an effect. We propose that this preference for complexity is driven by a desire to identify enough causes to make the effect seem inevitable.
authors.affiliation: Department of Cognitive, Linguistic, and Psychological Sciences, Brown University, Providence, RI, 02912, USA. jzemla@brown.edu.
authors.forename: Jeffrey C
authors.initials: JC
authors.lastname: Zemla
authors.affiliation: Department of Cognitive, Linguistic, and Psychological Sciences, Brown University, Providence, RI, 02912, USA.
authors.forename: Steven
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Sloman
authors.affiliation: University College London, London, UK.
authors.forename: Christos
authors.initials: C
authors.lastname: Bechlivanidis
authors.affiliation: University College London, London, UK.
authors.forename: David A
authors.initials: DA
authors.lastname: Lagnado
mesh_terms: D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D001290:Attitude; D032882:Comprehension; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007600:Judgment; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D055815:Young Adult
keywords: Causal reasoning; Explanation; Knowledge