title: Social influence and mental routes to the production of authentic false memories and inauthentic false memories.
abstract: Two studies assessed the extent to which people incorporated false facts provided by bogus others into their own recognition memory reports, and how these false memory reports were affected by: (a) truth of the information in others' summaries supporting the false facts, (b) motivation to process stories and summaries, (c) source credibility, and (d) ease of remembering original facts. False memory report frequency increased when false facts in a summary were supported by true information and varied inversely with the ease with which original facts could be remembered. Results from a measure probing participants' memory perceptions suggest that some false memories are authentic: People sometimes lack awareness of both the incorporation of false facts into their memory reports and where the false facts came from. However, many false memories are inauthentic: Despite reporting a false memory, people sometimes retain knowledge of the original stimulus and/or the origin of false facts.
authors.affiliation: Department of Psychology, Northern Illinois University, DeKalb, IL, USA. Electronic address: mwagner1032@gmail.com.
authors.forename: Michael F
authors.initials: MF
authors.lastname: Wagner
authors.affiliation: Department of Psychology, Northern Illinois University, DeKalb, IL, USA. Electronic address: jskowron@niu.edu.
authors.forename: John J
authors.initials: JJ
authors.lastname: Skowronski
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007398:Interpersonal Relations; D008297:Male; D011939:Mental Recall / Q000502:physiology*; D008875:Middle Aged; D021641:Recognition, Psychology / Q000502:physiology*; D012938:Social Perception
keywords: False memory; Informational social influence; Memory routes; Misinformation effect; Normative social influence