title: Food partitioning by lake-dwelling triclads and glossiphoniid leeches: field and laboratory experiments.
abstract: The triclads Polycelis tenuis and Dugesia polychroa and the glossiphoniid leeches Glossiphonia complanata and Helobdella stagnalis are abundant on the stony shores of productive British lakes. All species are food limited and there is considerable overlap in the diets of these triclads and leeches. This paper investigates interactions between the two groups using field and laboratory experiments to try to identify the mechanism of their co-existence. Triclad and leech numbers were manipulated inside experimental enclosures, mathced by controls, erected on the stony shore of an eutrophic English lake. Increasing the numbers of P. tenuis and D. polychroa prior to the reproductive season in spring resulted in a significant decrease in the numbers and body size of G. complanata and H. stagnalis compared with control populations in the summer months, and vice versa. However, increases and decreases were temporary with a readjustment of numbers and body size to control levels in the autumn after reproduction had ceased. It is suggested that increasing the numbers of either group elevated the severity of both intra- and interspecific competition for food. The "condition" of prey may, in part, determine the strength of competition, and this was examined in laboratory experiments in which different densities and ratios of P. tenuis and H. stagnalis were offered either live of recently crushed Asellus aquaticus. In monospecific controls, growth rates of P. tenuis were greater when fed on crushed than live Asellus, but there was no significant difference in the growth of H. stagnalis fed either live or crushed prey. In mixed cultures of predators, P. tenuis and H. stagnalis were the superior competitors when fed on crushed and live Asellus, respectively. However, when competitive pressure was low, at low densities of predators, the presence of H. stagnalis in mixed cultures fed on live prey was beneficial to the growth of P. tenuis. These results are explained in terms of the greater ability of triclads to detect damaged prey, leaking body fluids, due to their sophisticated chemosensory system, and the ability of leeches to capture live prey due to the presence of suckers. It is concluded that co-existence of the two groups in British lakes is assisted by the partitioning of food on a live or damaged basis.
authors.affiliation: Department of Environmental and Evolutionary Biology, University of Liverpool, P.O. Box 147, L69 3BX, Liverpool, UK.
authors.forename: R M H
authors.initials: RM
authors.lastname: Seaby
authors.affiliation: Department of Environmental and Evolutionary Biology, University of Liverpool, P.O. Box 147, L69 3BX, Liverpool, UK.
authors.forename: A J
authors.initials: AJ
authors.lastname: Martin
authors.affiliation: Department of Environmental and Evolutionary Biology, University of Liverpool, P.O. Box 147, L69 3BX, Liverpool, UK.
authors.forename: J O
authors.initials: JO
authors.lastname: Young
keywords: Competition; Food; Lakes; Leeches; Triclads