title: Trust, trolleys and social dilemmas: A replication study.
abstract: The present manuscript addresses how perceived trustworthiness of cooperative partners in a social dilemma context is influenced by the moral judgments those partners make on Trolley-type moral dilemmas; an issue recently investigated by Everett, Pizarro, and Crockett (2016). The present research comprises 2 studies that were conducted independently, simultaneously with, and incognizant of the Everett studies. Whereas the present studies aimed at investigating the same research hypothesis, a different and more elaborate methodology was used, as such providing a conceptual replication opportunity and extension to the Everett et al.
  
  
  
  Overall, the present studies clearly confirmed the main finding of Everett et al., that deontologists are more trusted than consequentialists in social dilemma games. Study 1 replicates Everett et al.'s effect in the context of trust games. Study 2 generalizes the effect to public goods games, thus demonstrating that it is not specific to the type of social dilemma game used in Everett et al. Finally, both studies build on these results by demonstrating that the increased trust in deontologists may sometimes, but not always, be warranted: deontologists displayed increased cooperation rates but only in the public goods game and not in trust games. (PsycINFO Database Record
authors.affiliation: Department of Developmental, Personality, and Social Psychology, Ghent University.
authors.forename: Dries H
authors.identifier: 0000-0001-9994-4615
authors.initials: DH
authors.lastname: Bostyn
authors.affiliation: Department of Developmental, Personality, and Social Psychology, Ghent University.
authors.forename: Arne
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Roets
mesh_terms: D003299:Cooperative Behavior; D005716:Game Theory; D006801:Humans; D007398:Interpersonal Relations; D007600:Judgment; D009014:Morals; D035502:Trust