title: Distances on hills look farther than distances on flat ground: Evidence from converging measures.
abstract: Distances on hills are judged as farther than when the same distance is presented on the flat ground. The hypothesized reason for this difference is because perception is influenced by the increased effort required to walk up a hill than to walk the same distance on flat ground. Alternatively, distances presented up a hill might be judged as farther for other, nonperceptual reasons such as bias from demand characteristics. To test whether distances on hills are perceived as farther or are merely judged as farther, we used a variety of measures, including visual matching and blindwalking tasks, and found similar effects across all measures. This convergence is consistent with a perceptual explanation. Second, we mined our data with the goal of making recommendations for future research on this paradigm. Although all of the perceptual measures used showed similar effects, visual matching was the only measure that had good intrasubject reliability. We recommend that future research on this action-specific effect could use any measure unless the research is geared towards individual differences, in which case, only the visual matching measure of perceived distance should be used.
authors.affiliation: Colorado State University, Behavioral Sciences Building, Fort Collins, CO, 80523, USA. Nate.Tenhundfeld@colostate.edu.
authors.forename: Nathan L
authors.initials: NL
authors.lastname: Tenhundfeld
authors.affiliation: Colorado State University, Behavioral Sciences Building, Fort Collins, CO, 80523, USA.
authors.forename: Jessica K
authors.initials: JK
authors.lastname: Witt
mesh_terms: D003290:Convergence, Ocular / Q000502:physiology*; D004215:Distance Perception / Q000502:physiology*; D004777:Environment; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D010775:Photic Stimulation / Q000379:methods*; D015203:Reproducibility of Results; D014796:Visual Perception / Q000502:physiology; D016138:Walking / Q000502:physiology*
keywords: Distance perception; Embodied perception; Perception action; Reliability