High-Grade Partial and Retracted (<2 cm) Proximal Hamstring Ruptures: Nonsurgical Treatment Revisited.
BACKGROUND
High-grade partial proximal hamstring tears and complete tears with retraction less than 2 cm are a subset of proximal hamstring injuries where, historically, treatment has been nonoperative. It is unknown how nonoperative treatment compares with operative treatment.


OBJECTIVE
The clinical and functional outcomes of nonoperative and operative treatment of partial/complete proximal hamstring tears were compared. We hypothesize that operative treatment of these tears leads to better clinical and functional results.


METHODS
Case series; Level of evidence, 4.


METHODS
A retrospective review identified patients with a high-grade partial or complete proximal hamstring rupture with retraction less than 2 cm treated either operatively or nonoperatively from 2007 to 2015. All patients had an initial period of nonoperative treatment. Surgery was offered if patients had continued pain and/or limited function refractory to nonoperative treatment with physical therapy. Outcome measures were each patient's strength perception, ability to return to activity, Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS) score, Short Form-12 (SF-12) physical and mental component outcome scores, distance traversed by a single-leg hop, and Biodex hamstring strength testing.


RESULTS
A total of 25 patients were enrolled in the study. The 15 patients who were treated nonoperatively sustained injuries at a mean age of 55.73 ± 14.83 years and were evaluated 35.47 ± 30.35 months after injury. The 10 patients who elected to have surgery sustained injuries at 50.40 ± 6.31 years of age (P= .23) and were evaluated 30.11 ± 19.43 months after surgery. LEFS scores were significantly greater for the operative group compared with the nonoperative group (77/80 vs 64.3/80;P= .01). SF-12 physical component scores for the operative group were also significantly greater (P= .03). Objectively, operative and nonoperative treatment modalities showed no significant difference in terms of single-leg hop distance compared with each patient's noninjured leg (P= .26) and torque deficit at isokinetic speeds of 60 and 180 deg/s (P= .46 and .70, respectively).


CONCLUSIONS
Patients who undergo operative and nonoperative treatment of high-grade partial and/or complete proximal hamstring tears with <2 cm retraction demonstrate good clinical and functional outcomes. In our series, 40% of patients treated nonoperatively with physical therapy went on to have surgery. For those patients with persistent pain and/or loss of function despite conservative treatment, surgical repair is a viable treatment option that is met with good results.
New England Baptist Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Jonathan R
JR
Piposar
University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, Massachusetts, USA.
Amrit V
AV
Vinod
New England Baptist Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Joshua R
JR
Olsen
Boston Celtics and Prosports Therapy, Waltham, Massachusetts, USA.
Edward
E
Lacerte
New England Baptist Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Suzanne L
SL
Miller
hamstring surgical outcomes; hamstring surgical repair; high-grade partial hamstring tears; proximal hamstring tears