The Canadian National Dairy Study 2015-Adoption of milking practices in Canadian dairy herds.
Several studies have investigated which management practices have the greatest effect on udder health, but little information is available on how broadly the recommended milking practices are adopted across Canada. The National Dairy Study 2015 was designed to gather dairy cattle health and management data on dairy farms across Canada. The objectives of the present study were to describe the current proportions of adoption of milking practices on Canadian dairy farms, and identify factors associated with their use on farms. A bilingual questionnaire measuring use of various practices, including an udder health-specific section, was developed and sent to all Canadian dairy farms. The questions in the udder health section of the questionnaire were adapted from a bilingual questionnaire previously validated and containing questions regarding general milking hygiene and routine, and on-farm mastitis management. Chi-squared tests were used to investigate simple associations between adoption of practices and various explanatory variables including region, milking system, herd size, and bulk tank somatic cell count. In total, 1,373 dairy producers completed the survey. The regional distribution of the participants was representative of the Canadian dairy farm population, and milk quality was, on average, similar to nonparticipants. Overall, Canadian dairy producers followed the recommendations for milking procedures, but some were more extensively used than others. Fore-stripping, cleaning teats, wiping teats dry, using single-cow towels, and use of postmilking teat disinfectant were widely adopted. Use of gloves and glove hygiene, use of a premilking teat disinfectant, and use of automatic takeoffs were not as extensively implemented. Adoption percentages for several practices, including use of gloves, use of a premilking teat disinfectant, teat drying methods, and use of automatic takeoffs were significantly associated with milking system, herd size, and region. It would be helpful to explore the reasons why producers choose to adopt or ignore recommended milking practices as most are easy to include in the routine and are fairly inexpensive.
Department of Population Medicine, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada, N1G 2W1; Canadian Bovine Mastitis and Milk Quality Research Network, C.P. 5000, St-Hyacinthe, Québec, Canada, J2S 7C6.
E
E
Belage
Canadian Bovine Mastitis and Milk Quality Research Network, C.P. 5000, St-Hyacinthe, Québec, Canada, J2S 7C6; Department of Pathology and Microbiology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Montreal, C.P. 5000, St-Hyacinthe, Québec, Canada, J2S 7C6.
S
S
Dufour
Department of Population Medicine, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada, N1G 2W1.
C
C
Bauman
Department of Population Medicine, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada, N1G 2W1.
A
A
Jones-Bitton
Department of Population Medicine, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada, N1G 2W1; Canadian Bovine Mastitis and Milk Quality Research Network, C.P. 5000, St-Hyacinthe, Québec, Canada, J2S 7C6. Electronic address: dkelton@uoguelph.ca.
D F
DF
Kelton
D000818:Animals; D002170:Canada; D002417:Cattle; D003612:Dairying; D005260:Female; D008321:Mammary Glands, Animal; D008414:Mastitis, Bovine / Q000453:epidemiology*; D008892:Milk
adoption; dairy cattle; milking practices; udder health