Invited Commentary: The Tao of Clinical Cohort Analysis-When the Transitions That Can Be Spoken of Are Not the True Transitions.
Patterns in risk-related behaviors identified using clinically deployed surveys may hold value for public health surveillance. However, because such surveys assess subjects only when subjects choose to visit clinics, clinical data are subject to variability in observation patterns that is not present in conventional longitudinal data sets in which research teams contact subjects at regular intervals. In this issue of the Journal, Wilkinson et al. (Am J Epidemiol. 2017;185(8):627-635) describe how they applied a latent transition analysis technique to surveillance data collected during clinic visits. In this commentary I discusses the selection bias that may arise in longitudinal analysis of clinical data due to subject-specific observation patterns, with particular focus on issues that may arise due to classifying successive clinical visits as waves. I suggest that quantitative bias analysis and inverse probability weighting may be useful techniques with which to assess and control bias in future latent transition analyses of clinical data.
Stephen J
SJ
Mooney
D015331:Cohort Studies; D006801:Humans; D011336:Probability
clinical cohort studies; latent transition analysis; selection bias; surveillance