Omitted evidence undermines sexual motives explanation for attractiveness bias.
This commentary makes three points: (1) the existing evidence does not consistently favor the proposed sex difference in attractiveness preferences, nor the fitness-related outcomes of attractiveness; (2) the neglected association of perceived attractiveness and trustworthiness allowed the authors to incorrectly attribute many findings solely to attractiveness, and (3) the importance accorded attractiveness in mate preferences is culturally shaped and likely evolutionarily novel.
Department of Psychology,Yale University,New Haven, CT 06520marianne.lafrance@yale.eduhttp://genderlab.yale.edu.
Marianne
M
LaFrance
Department of Psychology,Northwestern University,Evanston, IL 60108.eagly@northwestern.eduhttp://www.psychology.northwestern.edu/people/faculty/core/profiles/alice-eagly.html.
Alice H
AH
Eagly
D015982:Bias; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D058025:Interdisciplinary Studies; D008297:Male; D009042:Motivation; D011593:Psychology, Social; D012725:Sexual Behavior