Effectiveness of Using Incentives to Improve Parolee Admission and Attendance in Community Addiction Treatment.
This study is a randomized effectiveness trial of the use of incentives to improve treatment utilization among parolees in community treatment. In prison, Admission phase parolees were randomized to Admission Incentive (N=31) or Education (N=29). Attendance phase parolees entering community treatment were randomized to Attendance Incentive (N=104) or Education (N=98). There was no main effect for incentives in either study phase. Neither admission to community treatment (Incentive 60%, Education 64%;p=.74), nor intervention completion (Incentive 22%; Education 27%;p=.46) appeared to be impacted. Time-in-treatment was predicted by age, first arrest age, and type of parole status (Cox regression p<.05), but not by treatment group. Providing incentives did not increase the likelihood that parolees enrolled in or stayed in community treatment. In light of this finding, criminal justice practitioners who are considering incentives to increase admission or retention should be aware that they may not produce the desired outcomes.
University of California, Los Angeles.
Michael L
ML
Prendergast
University of California, Los Angeles.
Elizabeth A
EA
Hall
University of California, Los Angeles.
Jason
J
Grossman
University of California, Los Angeles.
Robert
R
Veliz
University of California, Los Angeles.
Liliana
L
Gregorio
University of California, Los Angeles.
Umme S
US
Warda
University of California, Los Angeles.
Kory
K
Van Unen
Johns Hopkins School of Medicine.
Chloe
C
Knight