Impact of preoperative diagnosis on patient satisfaction following lumbar spine surgery.
OBJECTIVE Patient satisfaction is a commonly used metric in the current health care environment. While factors that affect patient satisfaction following spine surgery are complex, the authors of this study hypothesized that specific diagnostic groups of patients are more likely to be satisfied after spine surgery and that this is reflected in patient-reported outcome measures. The purpose of this study was to determine if the preoperative diagnosis-disc herniation, stenosis, spondylolisthesis, adjacent segment degeneration, or mechanical disc collapse-would impact patient satisfaction following surgery. METHODS Patients enrolled in the Quality Outcomes Database, formerly known as the National Neurosurgery Quality and Outcomes Database (N2QOD), completed patient-reported outcome measures, including the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) for back pain (NRS-BP) and leg pain (NRS-LP) preoperatively and 1-year postoperatively. Patients were stratified by diagnosis and by their response to the satisfaction question: 1) surgery met my expectations; 2) I did not improve as much as I hoped, but I would undergo the same operation for the same results; 3) surgery helped, but I would not undergo the same operation for the same results; or 4) I am the same or worse as compared with before surgery. RESULTS A greater proportion of patients with primary disc herniation or spondylolisthesis reported that surgery met expectations (66% and 67%, respectively), followed by recurrent disc herniation and stenosis (59% and 60%, respectively). A smaller proportion of patients who underwent surgery for adjacent segment degeneration or mechanical disc collapse had their expectations met (48% and 41%, respectively). The percentage of patients that would undergo the same surgery again, by diagnostic group, was as follows: disc herniation 88%, recurrent disc herniation 79%, spondylolisthesis 86%, stenosis 82%, adjacent segment disease 75%, and mechanical collapse 73%. Regardless of diagnosis, mean improvement and ultimate 1-year postoperative ODI, NRS-BP, and NRS-LP reflected patient satisfaction. CONCLUSIONS Preoperative diagnosis was predictive of patient satisfaction following spine surgery. The mean change in and 1-year ODI, NRS-BP, and NRS-LP reflected patient satisfaction regardless of preoperative diagnosis.
Norton Leatherman Spine Center, Louisville, Kentucky.
Charles H
CH
Crawford
Norton Leatherman Spine Center, Louisville, Kentucky.
Leah Y
LY
Carreon
Department of Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland; and.
Mohamad
M
Bydon
Carolina Neurosurgery & Spine, Charlotte, North Carolina.
Anthony L
AL
Asher
Norton Leatherman Spine Center, Louisville, Kentucky.
Steven D
SD
Glassman
D001416:Back Pain / Q000601:surgery; D016208:Databases, Factual; D004185:Disability Evaluation; D005260:Female; D005500:Follow-Up Studies; D006801:Humans; D008159:Lumbar Vertebrae / Q000601:surgery*; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D010147:Pain Measurement; D000071066:Patient Reported Outcome Measures; D017060:Patient Satisfaction; D011446:Prospective Studies; D012907:Smoking; D013122:Spinal Diseases / Q000175:diagnosis / Q000523:psychology* / Q000601:surgery*; D013997:Time Factors
BMI = body mass index; NRS-BP = Numeric Rating Scale for back pain; NRS-LP = NRS for leg pain; ODI = Oswestry Disability Index; QOD = Quality and Outcomes Database; SCB = substantial clinical benefit; diagnosis; lumbar surgery; patient reported outcomes; patient satisfaction