Taking Stock of the Diversity and Sense of Community Debate.
Over the past couple of years, a debate has played out in the pages of the American Journal of Community Psychology concerning the relationship between two of Community Psychology's core values: promoting diversity and promoting a sense of community. This special section is to continue a discussion about diversity and community, both among the debate's initial contributors (Alex Stivala, Greg Townley, and Zachary Neal), as well as among others whose own work has touched on these issues (Anne Brodsky, Richard Florida, Jean Hill, and Roderick Watts). In this essay, I address some broad questions that have emerged through this discussion. First, because much has been written on the relationship between diversity and community, both in community psychology and in other disciplines, what do we know, or at least think we know? Second, since the constructs of diversity and sense of community are complex and multi-faceted, how can definitions get in the way and how can we avoid talking past one another in this discussion? Finally, looking across the original papers that initiated this discussion, as well as the contributions in this special section, what path(s) forward do we have?
Department of Psychology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA.
Zachary P
ZP
Neal
D018864:Cultural Diversity; D006801:Humans; D012111:Residence Characteristics; D066270:Social Capital; D060756:Social Networking; D012944:Social Support
Agent-Based Model; Cohesion; Diversity; Network; Segregation; Sense of Community; Simulation