The role of the IACUC in ensuring research reproducibility.
There is a "village" of people impacting research reproducibility, such as funding panels, the IACUC and its support staff, institutional leaders, investigators, veterinarians, animal facilities, and professional journals. IACUCs can contribute to research reproducibility by ensuring that reviews of animal use requests, program self-assessments and post-approval monitoring programs are sufficiently thorough, the animal model is appropriate for testing the hypothesis, animal care and use is conducted in a manner that is compliant with external and institutional requirements, and extraneous variables are minimized. The persons comprising the village also must have a shared vision that guards against reproducibility problems while simultaneously avoids being viewed as a burden to research. This review analyzes and discusses aspects of the IACUC's "must do" and "can do" activities that impact the ability of a study to be reproduced. We believe that the IACUC, with support from and when working synergistically with other entities in the village, can contribute to minimizing unintended research variables and strengthen research reproducibility.
Department of Animal Medicine and Department of Pathology, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, Massachusetts.
Jerald
J
Silverman
Yale Animal Resources Center and Section of Comparative Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.
James
J
Macy
Departments of Medicine/Nephrology and Cellular &Molecular Physiology, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut.
Patricia A
PA
Preisig
D035661:Animal Care Committees / Q000458:organization & administration*; D000827:Animal Welfare; D000818:Animals; D000830:Animals, Laboratory; D035843:Biomedical Research / Q000458:organization & administration* / Q000592:standards; D004195:Disease Models, Animal; D015203:Reproducibility of Results; D012107:Research Design / Q000592:standards