Effects of obstetric gel on the process and duration of labour in pregnant women: Randomised controlled trial.
The present study investigated maternal and neonatal outcomes in pregnant women who used obstetric lubricant gels during active labour. This prospective randomised controlled study included 180 pregnant women. Women were randomly assigned to two groups during the first-stage of labour. Pregnant women in the obstetric gel group received standard antepartum care plus vaginal application of obstetric gel. Women in the control group received standard antepartum care without obstetric gel. Mean duration of the second stage of labour was significantly shorter in the obstetric gel group than control group (45 ± 34 min vs. 58 ± 31 min, respectively; p = .005). Mean APGAR values at 5 min were significantly higher in the obstetric gel group (9.5 ± 0.6 vs. 9.2 ± 0.7; p = .0014). Among nulliparous women, mean duration of the second stage of labour was significantly shorter in the gel group than control group (53 ± 52 min vs. 83 ± 45 min, respectively; p = .003). Using obstetric gel at the beginning of the first stage decreases the length of the second stage of labour, particularly in nulliparous women, and may be associated with an improved APGAR score at 5 min. Impact statement A limited number of studies in the literature have demonstrated that obstetric gels shorten the second stage of labour and are protective for the pelvic floor. The results of this study show that using obstetric gel shortens the second stage of labour in only nulliparous, but not multiparous women. In addition, a significant improvement in the 5 min APGAR score was seen in the neonates of women who used obstetric gel. The application of obstetric gels during the labour of nulliparous women may be a useful clinical practice and may have a widespread use in the future.
a Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology , Ankara University School of Medicine , Ankara , Turkey.
Mehmet Murat
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4922-5046
MM
Seval
a Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology , Ankara University School of Medicine , Ankara , Turkey.
Tuncay
T
Yüce
a Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology , Ankara University School of Medicine , Ankara , Turkey.
Betül
B
Yakıştıran
a Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology , Ankara University School of Medicine , Ankara , Turkey.
Yavuz Emre
YE
Şükür
a Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology , Ankara University School of Medicine , Ankara , Turkey.
Batuhan
B
Özmen
a Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology , Ankara University School of Medicine , Ankara , Turkey.
Cem
C
Atabekoğlu
a Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology , Ankara University School of Medicine , Ankara , Turkey.
Acar
A
Koç
a Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology , Ankara University School of Medicine , Ankara , Turkey.
Feride
F
Söylemez
D000328:Adult; D002482:Cellulose / Q000031:analogs & derivatives; D004338:Drug Combinations; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007743:Labor, Obstetric / Q000187:drug effects*; D010298:Parity; D010502:Perineum; D011247:Pregnancy; D019946:Propylene Glycol; D011446:Prospective Studies; D014622:Vaginal Creams, Foams, and Jellies; D055815:Young Adult
D004338:Drug Combinations; D014622:Vaginal Creams, Foams, and Jellies; D019946:Propylene Glycol; D002482:Cellulose; C002283:hydroxyethylcellulose
Lubricant gel; friction force; labour; neonatal outcome; perineal laceration