Gait biomechanics following lower extremity trauma: Amputation vs. reconstruction.
Surgical advances have substantially improved outcomes for individuals sustaining traumatic lower extremity injury. Injuries once requiring lower limb amputation are now routinely managed with limb reconstruction surgery. However, comparisons of functional outcomes between the procedures are inconclusive.



To compare gait biomechanics after lower limb reconstruction and transtibial amputation.



Twenty-four individuals with unilateral lower limb reconstruction wearing a custom ankle-foot orthosis (Intrepid Dynamic Exoskeletal Orthosis), 24 with unilateral, transtibial amputation, and 24 able-bodied control subjects underwent gait analysis at a standardized Froude speed based on leg length. Lower extremity joint angles, moments, and powers, and ground reaction forces were analyzed on the affected limb of patients and right limb of able-bodied individuals. ANOVA with Tukeys post-hoc tests determined differences among groups and post-hoc paired t-tests with Bonferroni-Holm corrections determined differences between limbs.



The ankle, knee, and hip exhibited significant kinematic differences between amputated, reconstructed and able-bodied limbs. The reconstruction group exhibited less ankle power and range of motion while the amputee group exhibited lower knee flexor and extensor moments and power generation.



Gait deficiencies were more pronounced at the ankle following limb reconstruction with orthosis use and at the knee following transtibial amputation with prosthesis use. Although both groups in the cohorts tested can replicate many key aspects of normative gait mechanics, some deficiencies still persist. These results add to the growing body of literature comparing amputation and limb reconstruction and provide information to inform the patient on functional expectations should either procedure be considered.
Center for the Intrepid, Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Brooke Army Medical Center, Ft. Sam Houston, TX 78234, United States; Extremity Trauma and Amputation Center of Excellence, United States. Electronic address: Elizabeth.m.russell34.civ@mail.mil.
Elizabeth
E
Russell Esposito
US Army Institute of Surgical Research, Brooke Army Medical Center, Ft. Sam Houston, TX 78234, United States; Centre for Blast Injury Studies, Imperial College London, United Kingdom. Electronic address: daniel.j.stinner2.mil@mail.mil.
Daniel J
DJ
Stinner
Center for the Intrepid, Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Brooke Army Medical Center, Ft. Sam Houston, TX 78234, United States. Electronic address: john.r.fergason.civ@mail.mil.
John R
JR
Fergason
Center for the Intrepid, Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Brooke Army Medical Center, Ft. Sam Houston, TX 78234, United States; Extremity Trauma and Amputation Center of Excellence, United States. Electronic address: jason.m.wilken.civ@mail.mil.
Jason M
JM
Wilken
D000328:Adult; D000671:Amputation, Surgical; D000843:Ankle Joint / Q000503:physiopathology; D001696:Biomechanical Phenomena / Q000502:physiology*; D005260:Female; D005684:Gait / Q000502:physiology*; D006621:Hip Joint / Q000503:physiopathology; D006801:Humans; D007719:Knee Joint / Q000503:physiopathology; D007869:Leg Injuries / Q000503:physiopathology / Q000601:surgery*; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D009989:Orthotic Devices; D011183:Postoperative Complications / Q000503:physiopathology*; D016059:Range of Motion, Articular / Q000502:physiology; D019651:Plastic Surgery Procedures; D000072797:Walking Speed / Q000502:physiology
IDEO; Limb salvage; Prosthesis; Transtibial; Walking