Intubation learning curve: comparison between video and direct laryngoscopy by inexperienced students.
Background:Direct laryngoscopy (DL) is considered the most common method of tracheal intubation. On the other hand, evidence shows the growing role of video laryngoscopy in danger airway administration.Objectives:Due to the importance of a proper training to accomplish an accurate and fast intubation by the student of anesthesia, this research was conducted to assess the effects of DL and video laryngoscopy (Glidescope VL) training on the success rate of tracheal intubation by low-skill students.Materials/Patients and styles:50 undergraduate students of anesthesiology took part in this randomized control educational intervention. Having no considerable experience in intubation, they were selected and divided randomly into two equal groups (n = 25); video-laryngoscopy via GlideScope VL and direct laryngoscopy (DL) via a Macintosh blade were prepared by the same experienced anesthesiologist. All the participants practiced intubation six times on the same mannequin within a routine airway situation. The maximum acceptable time for each intubation was 3 minutes and three times of successful intubation was considered as an appropriate intubation skill. The required time for laryngoscopy and intubation at each stage, the grade of glottis view, the reasons for an unsuccessful intubation and the amount of successful intubations were recorded and compared between groups.Results:There was a clear variation between the 2 teams, in all the steps, based on the required time for laryngoscopy and intubation (p = 0.0001). Data analysis was performed by using repeated measures data which demonstrated that the necessary time for laryngoscopy and intubation during the study was clearly lower in the GlideScope VL team (p = .0001). In first five rounds of training, the glottis view in the DL group was significantly better than in the VL group (p < 0.05).Conclusion:Based on the result of today' study, routine airway intubation by using GlideScope VL is significantly faster than direct laryngoscopy. It seems that further studies are needed to investigate the effect of the educational program on different laryngoscopy and intubation situations.
Anesthesiology Department, Labaffinejad Hospital, Pasdaran, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
H
H
Aghamohammadi
Anesthesiology Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Anesthesiology Department, Modarres Hospital, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
N
N
Massoudi
Anesthesiology Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Anesthesiology Department, Modarres Hospital, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
M
M
Fathi
Anesthesiology Department, Labaffinejad Hospital, Pasdaran, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
A
A
Jaffari
Anesthesiology Department, Labaffinejad Hospital, Pasdaran, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
B
B
Gharaei
Anesthesiology Department, Labaffinejad Hospital, Pasdaran, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
A
A
Moshki
GlideScope; Video Laryngoscopy; intubation; simulation