Improving the adaptability of WHO evidence-informed guidelines for nutrition actions: results of a mixed methods evaluation.
Over the past decade, the World Health Organization (WHO) has implemented a standardized, evidence-informed guideline development process to assure technically sound and policy-relevant guidelines. This study is an independent evaluation of the adaptability of the guidelines produced by the Evidence and Programme Guidance unit, at the Department of Nutrition for Health and Development (NHD). The study systematizes the lessons learned by the NHD group at WHO.



We used a mixed methods approach to determine the adaptability of the nutrition guidelines. Adaptability was defined as having two components; methodological quality and implementability of guidelines. Additionally, we gathered recommendations to improve future guideline development in nutrition actions for health and development. Data sources for this evaluation were official documentation and feedback (both qualitative and quantitative) from key stakeholders involved in the development of nutrition guidelines. The qualitative data was collected through a desk review and two waves of semi-structured interviews (n = 12) and was analyzed through axial coding. Guideline adaptability was assessed quantitatively using two standardized instruments completed by key stakeholders. The Appraisal Guideline for Research and Evaluation questionnaire, version II was used to assess guideline quality (n = 6), while implementability was assessed with the electronic version of the GuideLine Implementability Appraisal (n = 7).



The nutrition evidence-informed guideline development process has several strengths, among them are the appropriate management of conflicts of interest of guideline developers and the systematic use of high-quality evidence to inform the recommendations. These features contribute to increase the methodological quality of the guidelines. The key areas for improvement are the limited implementability of the recommendations, the lack of explicit and precise implementation advice in the guidelines and challenges related to collaborative work within interdisciplinary groups.



Overall, our study found that the nutrition evidence-informed guidelines are of good methodological quality but that the implementability requires improvement. The recommendations to improve guideline adaptability address the guideline content, the dynamics shaping interdisciplinary work, and actions for implementation feasibility. As WHO relies heavily on a standardized procedure to develop guidelines, the lessons learned may be applicable to guideline development across the organization and to other groups developing guidelines.
Independent consultant, Bogotá, Colombia. macecilia.dedios@gmail.com.
Maria Cecilia
MC
Dedios
Independent consultant, Washington DC, USA.
Alexo
A
Esperato
Evidence and Program Guidance, Department of Nutrition for Health and Development, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
Luz Maria
LM
De-Regil
Evidence and Program Guidance, Department of Nutrition for Health and Development, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
Juan Pablo
JP
Peña-Rosas
Guideline Review Committee Secretariat, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
Susan L
SL
Norris
D019317:Evidence-Based Medicine / Q000379:methods*; D019983:Guideline Adherence / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D006801:Humans; D018673:Nutrition Policy; D014944:World Health Organization
Adaptability; Guidelines; Implementability; Methodological quality; Mixed methods; Nutrition; WHO