title: How appropriate are the English language test requirements for non-UK-trained nurses? A qualitative study of spoken communication in UK hospitals.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Non-native speakers of English who hold nursing qualifications from outside the UK are required to provide evidence of English language competence by achieving a minimum overall score of Band 7 on the International English Language Testing System (IELTS) academic test.
  
  
  OBJECTIVE
  To describe the English language required to deal with the daily demands of nursing in the UK. To compare these abilities with the stipulated levels on the language test.
  
  
  METHODS
  A tracking study was conducted with 4 nurses, and focus groups with 11 further nurses. The transcripts of the interviews and focus groups were analysed thematically for recurrent themes. These findings were then compared with the requirements of the IELTS spoken test.
  
  
  METHODS
  The study was conducted outside the participants' working shifts in busy London hospitals.
  
  
  METHODS
  The participants in the tracking study were selected opportunistically;all were trained in non-English speaking countries. Snowball sampling was used for the focus groups, of whom 4 were non-native and 7 native speakers of English.
  
  
  METHODS
  In the tracking study, each of the 4 nurses was interviewed on four occasions, outside the workplace, and as close to the end of a shift as possible. They were asked to recount their spoken interactions during the course of their shift. The participants in the focus groups were asked to describe their typical interactions with patients, family members, doctors, and nursing colleagues. They were prompted to recall specific instances of frequently-occurring communication problems. All interactions were audio-recorded, with the participants' permission,and transcribed.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Nurses are at the centre of communication for patient care. They have to use appropriate registers to communicate with a range of health professionals, patients and their families. They must elicit information, calm and reassure, instruct, check procedures, ask for and give opinions,agree and disagree. Politeness strategies are needed to avoid threats to face. They participate in medical team discussions, and provide information. They have to be able to translate between everyday and medical registers. This requires socio-pragmatic competence, much of which is not tested by IELTS.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  In addition to linguistic knowledge and fluency, nursing requires considerable cultural and pragmatic knowledge and competence. Our findings support arguments for including socio-pragmatic competence in language tests specifically designed for nurses. They also indicate a need for further research to find or design more appropriate assessment, and greater awareness amongst policy makers of the principles of language test design and use.
authors.affiliation: Honorary Research Fellow, Dept of Media Culture and Language, University of Roehampton, Roehampton Lane, London SW15 5SL, United Kingdom. Electronic address: c.sedgwick@roehampton.ac.uk.
authors.forename: Carole
authors.initials: C
authors.lastname: Sedgwick
authors.affiliation: Head of Whitelands College, University of Roehampton, Roehampton Lane, London SW15 4JD, United Kingdom. Electronic address: mark.garner@roehampton.ac.uk.
authors.forename: Mark
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Garner
mesh_terms: D003144:Communication Barriers; D017144:Focus Groups; D005551:Foreign Professional Personnel; D006801:Humans; D007802:Language; D009740:Nursing Staff; D036301:Qualitative Research; D006113:United Kingdom
keywords: English language testing; IELTS; International nurse; Language proficiency; Nurse communication; Policy; Practice standard; Qualitative research