title: Data, Staff, and Money: Leadership Reflections on the Future of Public Health Informatics.
abstract: Health informatics can play a critical role in supporting local health departments' (LHDs') delivery of certain essential public health services and improving evidence base for decision support. However, LHDs' informatics capacities are below an optimum level. Efforts to build such capacities face ongoing challenges. Moreover, little is known about LHD leaders' desires for the future of public health informatics.
  
  
  
  Conduct a qualitative analysis of LHDs' future informatics plans, perceived barriers to accomplishing those plans, and potential impact of future advances in public health informatics on the work of the public health enterprise.
  
  
  
  This research presents findings from 49 in-depth key informant interviews with public health leaders and informatics professionals from LHDs, representing insights from across the United States. Interviewees were selected on the basis of the size of the population their LHD serves, as well as level of informatics capacity. Interviews were transcribed, verified, and double coded.
  
  
  
  Major barriers to doing more with informatics included staff capacity and training, financial constraints, dependency on state health agency, and small LHD size/lack of regionalization. When asked about the role of leadership in expanding informatics, interviewees said that leaders could make it a priority through (1) learning more about informatics and (2) creating appropriate budgets for integrated information systems. Local health department leaders said that they desired data that were timely and geographically specific. In addition, LHD leaders said that they desired greater access to clinical data, especially around chronic disease indicators.
  
  
  
  Local health department leadership desires to have timely or even real-time data. Local health departments have a great potential to benefit from informatics, particularly electronic health records in advancing their administrative practices and service delivery, but financial and human capital represents the largest barrier. Interoperability of public health systems is highly desirable but hardly achievable in the presence of such barriers.
authors.affiliation: de Beaumont Foundation, Bethesda, Maryland (Dr Leider and Mr Castrucci); and Jiann-Ping Hsu College of Public Health, Georgia Southern University, Statesboro, Georgia (Drs Shah and Williams, and Ms Gupta).
authors.forename: Jonathon P
authors.initials: JP
authors.lastname: Leider
authors.forename: Gulzar H
authors.initials: GH
authors.lastname: Shah
authors.forename: Karmen S
authors.initials: KS
authors.lastname: Williams
authors.forename: Akrati
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Gupta
authors.forename: Brian C
authors.initials: BC
authors.lastname: Castrucci
mesh_terms: D000068598:Data Accuracy; D003625:Data Collection / Q000295:instrumentation; D003695:Delivery of Health Care / Q000458:organization & administration / Q000639:trends; D057286:Electronic Health Records / Q000639:trends; D006801:Humans; D007857:Leadership; D009111:Local Government; D008490:Medical Informatics / Q000592:standards*; D011634:Public Health / Q000191:economics*; D036301:Qualitative Research; D014481:United States; D000078329:Workforce