title: Status of marine turtle rehabilitation in Queensland.
abstract: Rehabilitation of marine turtles in Queensland has multifaceted objectives. It treats individual animals, serves to educate the public, and contributes to conservation. We examined the outcome from rehabilitation, time in rehabilitation, and subsequent recapture and restranding rates of stranded marine turtles between 1996 and 2013 to determine if the benefits associated with this practice are cost-effective as a conservation tool. Of 13,854 marine turtles reported as stranded during this 18-year period, 5,022 of these turtles were stranded alive with the remainder verified as dead or of unknown condition. A total of 2,970 (59%) of these live strandings were transported to a rehabilitation facility. Overall, 1,173/2,970 (39%) turtles were released over 18 years, 101 of which were recaptured: 77 reported as restrandings (20 dead, 13 alive subsequently died, 11 alive subsequently euthanized, 33 alive) and 24 recaptured during normal marine turtle population monitoring or fishing activities. Of the turtles admitted to rehabilitation exhibiting signs of disease, 88% of them died, either unassisted or by euthanasia and 66% of turtles admitted for unknown causes of stranding died either unassisted or by euthanasia. All turtles recorded as having a buoyancy disorder with no other presenting problem or disorder recorded, were released alive. In Queensland, rehabilitation costs approximately $1,000 per animal per year admitted to a center, $2,583 per animal per year released, and $123,750 per animal per year for marine turtles which are presumably successfully returned to the functional population. This practice may not be economically viable in its present configuration, but may be more cost effective as a mobile response unit. Further there is certainly benefit giving individual turtles a chance at survival and educating the public in the perils facing marine turtles. As well, rehabilitation can provide insight into the diseases and environmental stressors causing stranding, arming researchers with information to mitigate negative impacts.
authors.affiliation: Veterinary-Marine Animal Research, Teaching and Investigation (Vet-MARTI) Unit, School of Veterinary Science, University of Queensland, Gatton, Queensland, Australia; Center for Conservation, The Florida Aquarium, Apollo Beach, FL, United States of America.
authors.forename: Jaylene
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Flint
authors.affiliation: Veterinary-Marine Animal Research, Teaching and Investigation (Vet-MARTI) Unit, School of Veterinary Science, University of Queensland, Gatton, Queensland, Australia; School of Forest Resources and Conservation, University of Florida, Apollo Beach, FL, United States of America.
authors.forename: Mark
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Flint
authors.affiliation: Veterinary-Marine Animal Research, Teaching and Investigation (Vet-MARTI) Unit, School of Veterinary Science, University of Queensland, Gatton, Queensland, Australia; Department of Environment and Heritage Protection, Threatened Species Unit, Queensland Government, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
authors.forename: Colin James
authors.initials: CJ
authors.lastname: Limpus
authors.affiliation: Veterinary-Marine Animal Research, Teaching and Investigation (Vet-MARTI) Unit, School of Veterinary Science, University of Queensland , Gatton , Queensland , Australia.
authors.forename: Paul
authors.initials: P
authors.lastname: Mills
keywords: Marine turtle; Queensland; Rehabilitation; Sea turtle; Stranding