title: Counterpoint.
abstract: Claims about alterations in perception based on manipulations of the energetics hypothesis (and other influences) are often framed as interesting specifically because they affect our perceptual experience. Many control experiments conducted on such perceptual effects suggest, however, that they are the result of attribution effects and other kinds of judgmental biases influencing the reporting process rather than perception itself. Schnall (2017, this issue), appealing to Heider's work on attribution, argues that it is fruitless to try to distinguish between perception and attribution. This makes the energetics hypothesis less interesting.
authors.affiliation: Department of Psychology, Swarthmore College.
authors.forename: Frank H
authors.initials: FH
authors.lastname: Durgin
mesh_terms: D035061:Control Groups; D006801:Humans; D007600:Judgment; D016364:Reading Frames; D012938:Social Perception
keywords: demand characteristics; embodied perception; glucose; space perception