title: Why do women choose an unregulated birth worker to birth at home in Australia: a qualitative study.
abstract: In Australia the choice to birth at home is not well supported and only 0.4% of women give birth at home with a registered midwife. Recent changes to regulatory requirements for midwives have become more restrictive and there is no insurance product that covers private midwives for intrapartum care at home. Freebirth (planned birth at home with no registered health professional) with an unregulated birth worker who is not a registered midwife or doctor (e.g. Doula, ex-midwife, lay midwife etc.) appears to have increased in Australia. The aim of this study is to explore the reasons why women choose to give birth at home with an unregulated birth worker (UBW) from the perspective of women and UBWs.
  
  
  
  Nine participants (five women who had UBWs at their birth and four UBWs who had themselves used UBWs in the past for their births) were interviewed in-depth and the data analysed using thematic analysis.
  
  
  
  Four themes were found: 'A traumatising system', 'An inflexible system'; 'Getting the best of both worlds' and 'Treated with love and respect versus the mechanical arm on the car assembly line'. Women interviewed for this study either experienced or were exposed to mainstream care, which they found traumatising. They were not able to access their preferred birth choices, which caused them to perceive the system as inflexible. They interpreted this as having no choice when choice was important to them. The motivation then became to seek alternative options of care that would more appropriately meet their needs, and help avoid repeated trauma through mainstream care.
  
  
  
  Women who engaged UBWs viewed them as providing the best of both worlds - this was birthing at home with a knowledgeable person who was unconstrained by rules or regulations and who respected and supported the woman's philosophical view of birth. Women perceived UBWs as not only the best opportunity to achieve a natural birth but also as providing 'a safety net' in case access to emergency care was required.
authors.affiliation: School of Nursing and Midwifery, Western Sydney University, Locked Bag 1797, Penrith, NSW 2751, Australia. 17380179@student.uws.edu.au.
authors.forename: Elizabeth Christine
authors.initials: EC
authors.lastname: Rigg
authors.affiliation: School of Nursing and Midwifery, Western Sydney University, Locked Bag 1797, Penrith, NSW 2751, Australia.
authors.forename: Virginia
authors.initials: V
authors.lastname: Schmied
authors.affiliation: School of Nursing and Midwifery, Western Sydney University, Locked Bag 1797, Penrith, NSW 2751, Australia.
authors.forename: Kath
authors.initials: K
authors.lastname: Peters
authors.affiliation: School of Nursing and Midwifery, Western Sydney University, Locked Bag 1797, Penrith, NSW 2751, Australia.
authors.forename: Hannah Grace
authors.initials: HG
authors.lastname: Dahlen
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D001291:Attitude of Health Personnel; D001294:Attitude to Health; D001315:Australia; D002755:Choice Behavior; D059037:Doulas / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence / Q000523:psychology*; D005260:Female; D006700:Home Childbirth / Q000523:psychology*; D006801:Humans; D008875:Middle Aged; D008880:Midwifery / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence; D011247:Pregnancy; D036301:Qualitative Research
keywords: Birth worker; Doula; Homebirth; Midwives; Regulation