title: Moving From Static to Dynamic Models of the Onset of Mental Disorder: A Review.
abstract: In recent years, there has been increased focus on subthreshold stages of mental disorders, with attempts to model and predict which individuals will progress to full-threshold disorder. Given this research attention and the clinical significance of the issue, this article analyzes the assumptions of the theoretical models in the field.
  
  
  
  Psychiatric research into predicting the onset of mental disorder has shown an overreliance on one-off sampling of cross-sectional data (ie, a snapshot of clinical state and other risk markers) and may benefit from taking dynamic changes into account in predictive modeling. Cross-disciplinary approaches to complex system structures and changes, such as dynamical systems theory, network theory, instability mechanisms, chaos theory, and catastrophe theory, offer potent models that can be applied to the emergence (or decline) of psychopathology, including psychosis prediction, as well as to transdiagnostic emergence of symptoms.
  
  
  
  Psychiatric research may benefit from approaching psychopathology as a system rather than as a category, identifying dynamics of system change (eg, abrupt vs gradual psychosis onset), and determining the factors to which these systems are most sensitive (eg, interpersonal dynamics and neurochemical change) and the individual variability in system architecture and change. These goals can be advanced by testing hypotheses that emerge from cross-disciplinary models of complex systems. Future studies require repeated longitudinal assessment of relevant variables through either (or a combination of) micro-level (momentary and day-to-day) and macro-level (month and year) assessments. Ecological momentary assessment is a data collection technique appropriate for micro-level assessment. Relevant statistical approaches are joint modeling and time series analysis, including metric-based and model-based methods that draw on the mathematical principles of dynamical systems. This next generation of prediction studies may more accurately model the dynamic nature of psychopathology and system change as well as have treatment implications, such as introducing a means of identifying critical periods of risk for mental state deterioration.
authors.affiliation: Orygen, The National Centre of Excellence in Youth Mental Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia2Centre for Youth Mental Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
authors.forename: Barnaby
authors.initials: B
authors.lastname: Nelson
authors.affiliation: Orygen, The National Centre of Excellence in Youth Mental Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia2Centre for Youth Mental Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
authors.forename: Patrick D
authors.initials: PD
authors.lastname: McGorry
authors.affiliation: Interdisciplinary Center for Psychopathology and Emotion Regulation, Department of Psychiatry, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.
authors.forename: Marieke
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Wichers
authors.affiliation: Interdisciplinary Center for Psychopathology and Emotion Regulation, Department of Psychiatry, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.
authors.forename: Johanna T W
authors.initials: JTW
authors.lastname: Wigman
authors.affiliation: Orygen, The National Centre of Excellence in Youth Mental Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia2Centre for Youth Mental Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
authors.forename: Jessica A
authors.initials: JA
authors.lastname: Hartmann
mesh_terms: D018450:Disease Progression; D006801:Humans; D001523:Mental Disorders / Q000175:diagnosis*; D008962:Models, Theoretical; D062706:Prodromal Symptoms