title: The relationship between least-cost and resistance distance.
abstract: Least-cost modelling and circuit theory are common analogs used in ecology and evolution to model gene flow or animal movement across landscapes. Least-cost modelling estimates the least-cost distance, whereas circuit theory estimates resistance distance. The bias added in choosing one method over the other has not been well documented. We designed an experiment to test whether both methods were linearly related. We also tested the sensitivity of these metrics to variation in Euclidean distance, spatial autocorrelation, the number of pixels representing the landscape, and data aggregation. We found that least-cost and resistance distance were not linearly related unless a transformation was applied. Resistance distance was less sensitive to the number of pixels representing a landscape and was also less sensitive than least-cost distance to the Euclidean distance between nodes. Spatial autocorrelation did not affect either method or the relationship between methods. Resistance distance was more sensitive to aggregation in any form compared to least-cost distance. Therefore, the metric used to infer movement or gene flow and the manipulations applied to the data used to calculate these metrics may govern findings.
authors.affiliation: Environmental & Life Sciences Graduate Program, Trent University, Peterborough, Ontario, Canada.
authors.forename: Robby R
authors.initials: RR
authors.lastname: Marrotte
authors.affiliation: Wildlife Research & Monitoring Section, Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry, Peterborough, Ontario, Canada.
authors.forename: Jeff
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Bowman
mesh_terms: D000465:Algorithms; D000818:Animals; D019295:Computational Biology / Q000379:methods*; D003198:Computer Simulation; D004463:Ecology / Q000379:methods; D017753:Ecosystem; D019143:Evolution, Molecular; D051456:Gene Flow / Q000235:genetics*; D005828:Genetics, Population / Q000379:methods; D008957:Models, Genetic