title: Theory of Animal Mind: Human Nature or Experimental Artefact?
abstract: Are animals capable of empathy, problem-solving, or even self-recognition? Much research is dedicated to answering these questions and yet few studies have considered how humans form beliefs about animal minds. Evidence suggests that our mentalising of animals is a natural consequence of Theory of Mind (ToM) capabilities. However, where beliefs regarding animal mind have been investigated, there has been slow progress in establishing the mechanism underpinning how this is achieved. Here, we consider what conclusions can be drawn regarding how people theorise about animal minds and the different conceptual and methodological issues that might limit the accuracy of conclusions currently drawn from this work. We suggest a new empirical framework for better capturing the human theory of animal mind, which in turn has significant political and social implications.
authors.affiliation: Queen Mary University of London, Biological and Experimental Psychology, School of Biological and Chemical Sciences, London, UK. Electronic address: c.spence@qmul.ac.uk.
authors.forename: Caroline E
authors.initials: CE
authors.lastname: Spence
authors.affiliation: Queen Mary University of London, Biological and Experimental Psychology, School of Biological and Chemical Sciences, London, UK. Electronic address: m.osman@qmul.ac.uk.
authors.forename: Magda
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Osman
authors.affiliation: Queen Mary University of London, Biological and Experimental Psychology, School of Biological and Chemical Sciences, London, UK.
authors.forename: Alan G
authors.initials: AG
authors.lastname: McElligott
mesh_terms: D016477:Artifacts; D004645:Empathy; D040821:Human Characteristics; D006801:Humans; D011340:Problem Solving; D056345:Theory of Mind