title: Public Acceptability of E-Mental Health Treatment Services for Psychological Problems: A Scoping Review.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Over the past decades, the deficient provision of evidence-based interventions for the prevention and treatment of mental health problems has become a global challenge across health care systems. In view of the ongoing diffusion of new media and mobile technologies into everyday life, Web-delivered electronic mental health (e-mental health) treatment services have been suggested to expand the access to professional help. However, the large-scale dissemination and adoption of innovative e-mental health services is progressing slowly. This discrepancy between potential and actual impact in public health makes it essential to explore public acceptability of e-mental health treatment services across health care systems.
  
  
  OBJECTIVE
  This scoping review aimed to identify and evaluate recent empirical evidence for public acceptability, service preferences, and attitudes toward e-mental health treatments. On the basis of both frameworks for technology adoption and previous research, we defined (1) perceived helpfulness and (2) intentions to use e-mental health treatment services as indicators for public acceptability in the respective general population of reviewed studies. This mapping should reduce heterogeneity and help derive implications for systematic reviews and public health strategies.
  
  
  METHODS
  We systematically searched electronic databases (MEDLINE/PubMed, PsycINFO, Psyndex, PsycARTICLES, and Cochrane Library, using reference management software for parallel searches) to identify surveys published in English in peer-reviewed journals between January 2010 and December 2015, focusing on public perceptions about e-mental health treatments outside the context of clinical, psychosocial, or diagnostic interventions. Both indicators were obtained from previous review. Exclusion criteria further involved studies targeting specific groups or programs.
  
  
  RESULTS
  The simultaneous database search identified 76 nonduplicate records. Four articles from Europe and Australia were included in this scoping review. Sample sizes ranged from 217 to 2411 participants of ages 14-95 years. All included studies used cross-sectional designs and self-developed measures for outcomes related to both defined indicators of public acceptability. Three surveys used observational study designs, whereas one study was conducted as an experiment investigating the impact of brief educational information on attitudes. Taken together, the findings of included surveys suggested that e-mental health treatment services were perceived as less helpful than traditional face-to-face interventions. Additionally, intentions to future use e-mental health treatments were overall smaller in comparison to face-to-face services. Professional support was essential for help-seeking intentions in case of psychological distress. Therapist-assisted e-mental health services were preferred over unguided programs. Unexpectedly, assumed associations between familiarity with Web-based self-help for health purposes or "e-awareness" and intentions to use e-mental health services were weak or inconsistent.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Considering the marginal amount and heterogeneity of pilot studies focusing on public acceptability of e-mental health treatments, further research using theory-led approaches and validated measures is required to understand psychological facilitator and barriers for the implementation of innovative services into health care.
authors.affiliation: Institute for Psychology, Department of Health Psychology, University of Hagen, Hagen, Germany.
authors.forename: Jennifer
authors.identifier: http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5755-9225
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Apolinário-Hagen
authors.affiliation: Institute for Psychology, Department of Health Psychology, University of Hagen, Hagen, Germany.
authors.forename: Jessica
authors.identifier: http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0522-8402
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Kemper
authors.affiliation: Institute for Psychology, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
authors.forename: Carolina
authors.identifier: http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9502-2197
authors.initials: C
authors.lastname: Stürmer
keywords: acceptability of healthcare; attitude to computers; cognitive therapy; computer literacy; diffusion of innovation; eHealth; mental health; patient preference; public opinion; review