title: Congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction: Should we continue lacrimal massage till 1 year or perform an office probing at 6 months? A clinical decision analysis approach.
authors.affiliation: Department of Pediatric Oculoplasty Services, Jyotirmay Eye Clinic and Ocular Motility Laboratory, Thane; Department of Pediatric Ophthalmology, Mahatme Eye Hospital, Nagpur, Maharashtra, India.
authors.forename: Mihir
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Kothari
authors.affiliation: Department of Pediatric Oculoplasty Services, Jyotirmay Eye Clinic and Ocular Motility Laboratory, Thane, Maharashtra, India.
authors.forename: Vivek
authors.initials: V
authors.lastname: Rathod
authors.affiliation: Department of Pediatric Oculoplasty Services, Jyotirmay Eye Clinic and Ocular Motility Laboratory, Thane, Maharashtra, India.
authors.forename: Kruti
authors.initials: K
authors.lastname: Shah
authors.affiliation: Department of Pediatric Oculoplasty Services, Jyotirmay Eye Clinic and Ocular Motility Laboratory, Thane, Maharashtra, India.
authors.forename: Khushboo
authors.initials: K
authors.lastname: Shikhangi
authors.affiliation: Department of Pediatric Oculoplasty Services, Jyotirmay Eye Clinic and Ocular Motility Laboratory, Thane, Maharashtra, India.
authors.forename: Renu
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Singhania
mesh_terms: D003608:Dacryocystorhinostomy; D003661:Decision Support Techniques; D006801:Humans; D007223:Infant; D007767:Lacrimal Duct Obstruction / Q000151:congenital; D008405:Massage; D009301:Nasolacrimal Duct; D016896:Treatment Outcome