title: The Precautionary Principle Has Not Been Shown to Be Incoherent: A Reply to Peterson.
abstract: In this journal, I have objected to Peterson's 2006 claim that the precautionary principle is an incoherent decision rule. I defend my objections to Peterson's recent replies, and I still claim that the precautionary principle has not been shown to be incoherent.
authors.forename: Thomas
authors.initials: T
authors.lastname: Boyer-Kassem
keywords: Decision rule; incoherence; precautionary principle; risk; uncertainty