title: Beyond the security paradox: Ten criteria for a socially informed security policy.
abstract: This article investigates the normative and procedural criteria adopted by European citizens to assess the acceptability of surveillance-oriented security technologies. It draws on qualitative data gathered at 12 citizen summits in nine European countries. The analysis identifies 10 criteria, generated by citizens themselves, for a socially informed security policy. These criteria not only reveal the conditions, purposes and operation rules that would make current European security policies and technologies more consistent with citizens' priorities. They also cast light on an interesting paradox: although people feel safe in their daily lives, they believe security could, and should, be improved.
authors.affiliation: Institute of Public Goods and Policies (IPP) - Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CCHS-CSIC), Spain.
authors.forename: Vincenzo
authors.initials: V
authors.lastname: Pavone
authors.affiliation: University of St Andrews, UK.
authors.forename: Kirstie
authors.initials: K
authors.lastname: Ball
authors.affiliation: Universitat Oberta de Catalunya, Spain.
authors.forename: Sara
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Degli Esposti
authors.affiliation: Coventry University, UK.
authors.forename: Sally
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Dibb
authors.affiliation: Universidade da Coruña, Spain.
authors.forename: Elvira
authors.initials: E
authors.lastname: Santiago-Gómez
keywords: acceptability; privacy; public participation; security; technology