title: Sensory Substitution and Multimodal Mental Imagery.
abstract: Many philosophers use findings about sensory substitution devices in the grand debate about how we should individuate the senses. The big question is this: Is "vision" assisted by (tactile) sensory substitution really vision? Or is it tactile perception? Or some sui generis novel form of perception? My claim is that sensory substitution assisted "vision" is neither vision nor tactile perception, because it is not perception at all. It is mental imagery: visual mental imagery triggered by tactile sensory stimulation. But it is a special form of mental imagery that is triggered by corresponding sensory stimulation in a different sense modality, which I call "multimodal mental imagery."
authors.affiliation: University of Antwerp, Belgium; Peterhouse, University of Cambridge, UK.
authors.forename: Bence
authors.initials: B
authors.lastname: Nanay
mesh_terms: D006801:Humans; D007092:Imagination / Q000502:physiology*; D055698:Touch Perception / Q000502:physiology*; D014796:Visual Perception / Q000502:physiology*
keywords: imagery; multisensory/cross-modal processing; sensory plasticity/adaptation; sensory substitution