title: Population-based Assessment of Intraoperative Fluid Administration Practices Across Three Surgical Specialties.
abstract: To assess the variation in hospitals' approaches to intraoperative fluid management and their association with postoperative recovery.
  
  
  
  Despite increasing interest in goal-directed, restricted-volume fluid administration for major surgery, there remains little consensus on optimal strategies, due to the lack of institution-level studies of resuscitation practices.
  
  
  
  Among 64 hospitals in a state-wide surgical collaborative, we profiled fluid administration practices during 8404 intestinal resections, 22,854 hysterectomies, and 1471 abdominopelvic endovascular procedures. We computed intraoperative fluid balance, accounting for patient morphometry, crystalloid, colloid, blood products, urine, blood loss, duration, and approach. We stratified hospitals by average fluid balance quartile, and compared patterns across disciplines and associations with risk-adjusted postoperative length of stay (pLOS).
  
  
  
  There was wide variation in fluid balance between hospitals (P < 0.001, all procedures), but significant within-hospital correlation across operations (Pearson rho: intestinal-hysterectomy = 0.50, intestinal-endovascular = 0.36, hysterectomy-endovascular = 0.54, all P < 0.05). Highest fluid balance hospitals had significantly longer adjusted pLOS than lowest balance hospitals for intestinal resection (6.5 vs 5.7 d, P < 0.001) and hysterectomy (1.9 vs 1.7 d, P < 0.001), but not endovascular (2.1 vs 2.3 d, P = 0.69). Risk-adjusted complication rates were not associated with fluid balance rankings.
  
  
  
  Hospitals' approaches to intraoperative fluid administration vary widely, and their practice patterns are pervasive across disparate procedures. High fluid balance hospitals have 12% to 14% longer risk-adjusted pLOS for visceral abdominal surgery, independent of patient complexity and complications. These findings are consistent with evidence that isovolemic resuscitation in enhanced recovery protocols accelerates recovery of bowel function.
authors.affiliation: *Department of Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI†Department of Anesthesia, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI‡Center for Healthcare Outcomes and Policy, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI§Michigan Surgical Quality Collaborative, Ann Arbor, MI.
authors.forename: Scott E
authors.initials: SE
authors.lastname: Regenbogen
authors.forename: Nirav J
authors.initials: NJ
authors.lastname: Shah
authors.forename: Stacey D
authors.initials: SD
authors.lastname: Collins
authors.forename: Samantha
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Hendren
authors.forename: Michael J
authors.initials: MJ
authors.lastname: Englesbe
authors.forename: Darrell A
authors.initials: DA
authors.lastname: Campbell
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D015331:Cohort Studies; D003107:Colorectal Surgery / Q000009:adverse effects / Q000379:methods*; D057510:Endovascular Procedures / Q000009:adverse effects / Q000379:methods*; D005260:Female; D005440:Fluid Therapy / Q000379:methods*; D005500:Follow-Up Studies; D006801:Humans; D007044:Hysterectomy / Q000009:adverse effects / Q000379:methods*; D007430:Intraoperative Care / Q000379:methods*; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D011787:Quality of Health Care; D012189:Retrospective Studies; D018570:Risk Assessment; D013043:Specialties, Surgical; D016896:Treatment Outcome; D014481:United States; D014882:Water-Electrolyte Balance / Q000502:physiology