Metagenome-assembled genome: binchicken_co208_60
uncultured Chitinophagales bacterium
This sample represents a Third Party Annotation (TPA) Metagenome-assembled genome assembled from the metagenomic runs ERR1352915,ERR4674194 of study ERP014781.
ENA first public
2024-12-11
INSDC center name
CMR
INSDC status
public
Submitter Id
binchicken_co208_60
assembly quality
Many fragments with little to no review of assembly other than reporting of standard assembly statistics
assembly software
metaSPAdes;3.15.4;default
binning parameters
coverage and kmer
binning software
MetaBAT2;2.15;default
broad-scale environmental context
engineered
collection date
not provided
completeness score
93.04
completeness software
CheckM2;1.0.2;default
contamination score
0.87
environmental medium
engineered
geographic location (country and/or sea)
not applicable
geographic location (latitude)
not provided
geographic location (longitude)
not provided
investigation type
metagenome-assembled genome
isolation_source
marine metagenome
local environmental context
marine biome
metagenomic source
marine metagenome
project name
We are addressing a critical and unresolved ecological question: When are community composition and biodiversity important for the provision of a particular ecosystem function and when are they not? We hypothesize that community composition and biodiversity are more important for rare ecosystem functions than for common ecosystem functions. If an ecosystem function is rare, then differences or changes in community composition could have profound effects on the biotransformation rate of that function. In contrast, if an ecosystem function is common, then differences or changes in community composition are unlikely to have an effect on that function.
sample derived from
SAMEA3920718,SAMEA7392479
sample name
binchicken_co208_60
scientific_name
uncultured Chitinophagales bacterium
sequencing method
Illumina HiSeq 2500,Illumina NovaSeq 6000
taxonomic identity marker
multi-marker approach