ena-STUDY-BRGM-26-01-2021-15:36:50:665-328
Side effects of pesticides and metabolites in groundwater: impact on denitrification
The impact of two pesticides (S-metolachlor and propiconazole) and their respective main metabolites (ESA-metolachlor and 1,2,4-triazole) on microbial denitrification in groundwater was studied. For this, denitrification and bacterial diversity were followed during XX days in lab-experiments using a nitrate contaminated groundwater sample  with or without pesticides or metabolites at concentrations of 2 or 10 µg/L. Kinetics of nitrate reduction along with nitrite and N2O production all suggested that S-metolachlor had no or only little impact, whereas its metabolite ESA-metolachlor inhibited denitrification by 65 % at 10 µg/L. Propiconazole and 1,2,4-triazole also inhibited denitrification at both concentrations, but to a lesser extent (29-38 %) than ESA-metolachlor. When inhibition occurred, pesticides affected the reduction of nitrate into nitrite step. However, no significant differences were detected for nitrate reductase narG and napA genes abundance, suggesting an impact of pesticides/metabolites at the protein level rather than on denitrifying bacteria abundance. 16S rRNA gene Illumina sequencing indicated no major modification of bacterial diversity in presence or absence of pesticides/metabolites, except for ESA-metolachlor and propiconazole at 10 µg/L that tended to increase or decrease Shannon and InvSimpson indices, respectively. General growth parameters suggested no impact of pesticides, except for propiconazole at 10 µg/L that partially inhibited acetate uptake and induced a decrease in microbial biomass. In conclusion, pesticides and metabolites can have side effects at environmental concentrations on microbial denitrification in groundwater, and may thus affect ecosystem services based on microbial activities.
The impact of two pesticides (S-metolachlor and propiconazole) and their respective main metabolites (ESA-metolachlor and 1,2,4-triazole) on microbial denitrification in groundwater was studied. For this, denitrification and bacterial diversity were followed during XX days in lab-experiments using a nitrate contaminated groundwater sample  with or without pesticides or metabolites at concentrations of 2 or 10 µg/L. Kinetics of nitrate reduction along with nitrite and N2O production all suggested that S-metolachlor had no or only little impact, whereas its metabolite ESA-metolachlor inhibited denitrification by 65 % at 10 µg/L. Propiconazole and 1,2,4-triazole also inhibited denitrification at both concentrations, but to a lesser extent (29-38 %) than ESA-metolachlor. When inhibition occurred, pesticides affected the reduction of nitrate into nitrite step. However, no significant differences were detected for nitrate reductase narG and napA genes abundance, suggesting an impact of pesticides/metabolites at the protein level rather than on denitrifying bacteria abundance. 16S rRNA gene Illumina sequencing indicated no major modification of bacterial diversity in presence or absence of pesticides/metabolites, except for ESA-metolachlor and propiconazole at 10 µg/L that tended to increase or decrease Shannon and InvSimpson indices, respectively. General growth parameters suggested no impact of pesticides, except for propiconazole at 10 µg/L that partially inhibited acetate uptake and induced a decrease in microbial biomass. In conclusion, pesticides and metabolites can have side effects at environmental concentrations on microbial denitrification in groundwater, and may thus affect ecosystem services based on microbial activities.