GSE109106
Neurogenomic Profiling Reveals Distinct Gene Expression Profiles between Brain Parts that are Consistent in  Ophthalmotilapia Cichlids
The detection of external and internal cues alters gene expression in the brain which in turn may affect neural networks that underly behavioral responses. Previous studies have shown that gene expression profiles differ between major brain regions within individuals and between species with different morphologies, cognitive abilities and/or behaviors. A detailed description of gene expression in all macroanatomical brain regions and in species with similar morphologies and behaviors is however lacking. Here, we dissected the brain of two cichlid species into six macroanatomical regions. Ophthalmotilapia nasuta and O. ventralis have similar morphology and behavior and occasionally hybridise in the wild. We use 3' mRNA sequencing and a stage-wise statistical testing procedure to identify differential gene expression between females that were kept in a social setting with other females. Our results show that gene expression differs substantially between all six brain parts within species: out of 11 577 assessed genes, 8 748 are differentially expressed (DE) in at least one brain part compared to the average expression of the other brain parts. At most 16 % of these DE genes have |log2FC| significantly higher than two. Functional differences between brain parts were consistent between species. The majority (61 – 79 %) of genes that  are DE in a particular brain part were shared between both species. Only 32 genes show significant differences in fold change across brain parts between species. These genes are mainly linked to transport, transmembrane transport, transcription (and its regulation) and signal transduction. Moreover, statistical equivalence testing reveals that within each comparison, on average 89 % of the genes show an equivalent fold change between both species. The pronounced differences in gene expression between brain parts and the conserved patterns between closely related species with similar morphologies and behavior suggest that unravelling the interactions between genes and behavior will benefit from neurogenomic profiling of distinct brain regions. Overall design: 5 females O. nasuta and 5 females O. ventralis; 6 brain parts (cerebellum, olfactory bulbs, telencephalon, diencephalon, brainstem, optic tectum) from each of the ten fish; the five specimens per species were kept in one tank (so we had two tanks).