Oncolytic Reovirus mediates innate-driven SARS-CoV-2 elimination in the absence of cell toxicity
Interplay between type I interferon (IFN) driven innate responses and viral antagonism strongly influences SARS-CoV-2 transmission and the COVID-19 disease course. Hence, variant adaptation includes diminished induction of IFN stimulated genes (ISG) and/or evasion of their effector functions. Exogenous IFN treatment “rewires” innate responses to drive virus elimination, yet therapeutic trials to date have been unremarkable. Resolving this paradox could translate to variant-agnostic innate immunotherapy. By contrast, oncolytic viruses (OV) exhibit profoundly attenuated innate antagonism, resulting in potent IFN responses despite the inherently immunosuppressive nature of tumour microenvironments. Moreover, OV only undergo lytic replication within innate-deficient malignant cells, and not in cells where sufficient innate responses exist. This, combined with previous studies showing that OV suppressed replication of underlying oncogenic viruses in tumours, we explored whether clinical grade oncolytic Orthoreovirus (Reo) superinfection could eliminate SARS-CoV-2 from immune-competent lung epithelial cell lines in the absence of toxicity. Reo exerted profound activation of innate responses, including when SARS-CoV-2 infection was already established, rewiring cells towards an antiviral state emulating that of Reo infection alone. Both intracellular and paracrine mechanisms induced ISG repertoires including multiple known anti-SARS-CoV-2 effectors, as well as others that remain unvalidated. Amongst these, we demonstrate the first direct evidence that MX2 and XAF1 restrict SARS-CoV-2 replication. Thus, with an excellent safety record, self-amplification, and respiratory tract tropism, we propose that Reo superinfection may provide a tractable alternative to recombinant cytokines for innate antiviral immunotherapy.
Interplay between type I interferon (IFN) driven innate responses and viral antagonism strongly influences SARS-CoV-2 transmission and the COVID-19 disease course. Hence, variant adaptation includes diminished induction of IFN stimulated genes (ISG) and/or evasion of their effector functions. Exogenous IFN treatment “rewires” innate responses to drive virus elimination, yet therapeutic trials to date have been unremarkable. Resolving this paradox could translate to variant-agnostic innate immunotherapy. By contrast, oncolytic viruses (OV) exhibit profoundly attenuated innate antagonism, resulting in potent IFN responses despite the inherently immunosuppressive nature of tumour microenvironments. Moreover, OV only undergo lytic replication within innate-deficient malignant cells, and not in cells where sufficient innate responses exist. This, combined with previous studies showing that OV suppressed replication of underlying oncogenic viruses in tumours, we explored whether clinical grade oncolytic Orthoreovirus (Reo) superinfection could eliminate SARS-CoV-2 from immune-competent lung epithelial cell lines in the absence of toxicity. Reo exerted profound activation of innate responses, including when SARS-CoV-2 infection was already established, rewiring cells towards an antiviral state emulating that of Reo infection alone. Both intracellular and paracrine mechanisms induced ISG repertoires including multiple known anti-SARS-CoV-2 effectors, as well as others that remain unvalidated. Amongst these, we demonstrate the first direct evidence that MX2 and XAF1 restrict SARS-CoV-2 replication. Thus, with an excellent safety record, self-amplification, and respiratory tract tropism, we propose that Reo superinfection may provide a tractable alternative to recombinant cytokines for innate antiviral immunotherapy.
European Bioinformatics Institute